A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics.


socratus
+1
#1  Top Rated Post
A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics.
==
Physics is created on some fundamental basis.
At first the basis was an absolute space and an absolute time.
But after discovering SRT, GRT, QT -* Newtonian basis was changed:
there isn't* absolute space, there isn't* absolute time.
In this situation scientists decided that universe was started
from ''singular point'' (big bang theory).* Most believe in such scenario.
A few don't believe.* Why?
a) Gravity forces are the weakest in nature and cannot
create ''singular point'' in the region as big as the whole Universe.
Gravity forces don't work even in a single galaxy and therefore were
invented unseen - unknown ''dark matter-energy''
(more than 90%-95%* in the universe)
b) Which force created ''big-bang'' is unknown.
c) ''big bang theory'' doesn't explain the principal problem:
''where did masses come from?''
#
Some physicists think: universe can start from vacuum.
Why?
a) About vacuum effect:
a) “ Its effects can be observed in various phenomena
(such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect, the
van der Waals bonds, or the Lamb shift), and it is thought
to have consequences for the behavior of the Universe
on cosmological scales. “
/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy /

b)* Light Created from a Vacuum:
Casimir Effect Observed in Superconducting Circuit
/Science Daily (Nov. 18, 2011) /
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 133050.htm
#
Chalmers scientists create light from vacuum
http://www.chalmers.se/en/news/Pages/Ch ... acuum.aspx
#
Then i can think:
if vacuum can somehow create light and particles
then it is possible that universe started from vacuum.
Is this idea gibberish?
Is this idea illogical ?
By the way,* Paul Dirac* wrote:
” The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,*
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
And* Einstein and Infeld*quote:
“ We have the laws, but we are not aware what the body
of reference system they belong to, and all our physical
construction appears erected on sand ”.
* /* Book “Evolution of Physics”*/
=====
 
socratus
#2
In the era of Newtonian physics the materialism
was deterministic world.
In the era of Quantum physics the materialism
is probability world.
====
 
Curious Cdn
+1
#3
Publish or perish, Socratus

Publish or perish.

Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

In the era of Newtonian physics the materialism
was deterministic world.
In the era of Quantum physics the materialism
is probability world.
====

In the non-Euclidean rendering of it, the probability world is a honey cruller donut.
 
socratus
+1
#4
The fundamental basis in philosophy of science.
Modern philosophy of science says:
a) 27% of matter in the universe is dark-matter
(we have no idea what it is )
b) 68% of energy in the universe is dark-energy
(we have no idea what it is )
c) there are many black-holes
(we have no idea how many they are )
d) ≈ 5% of matter in the universe is normal-matter
( we don't know everything about this normal-matter)
#
That is our so called ''philosophical knowledge''
Welcome to the era of precision ignorance.
======
 
socratus
#5
What does modern Physics say about reality?
Modern physics says about reality,
you have modern technology and strange philosophy.
===
Last edited by socratus; Apr 1st, 2019 at 06:35 AM..
 
socratus
+1
#6
Emptiness and Space
Earth space is almost ''empty''
but it is a big theater stage on which the events take place
Atom's space is almost ''empty''
But it is fulled with electric / nuclear force
Cosmic space is almost ''empty''
but it has enormous matter / stuff
Vacuum space is almost ''empty''
but ''virtual particles'' exist there, which have possibility
to effect ''normal-matter''.
#
Don't ignore ''Emptiness''
Every emptiness has something important.
====
 
socratus
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

Emptiness and Space
Earth space is almost ''empty''
but it is a big theater stage on which the events take place
Atom's space is almost ''empty''
But it is fulled with electric / nuclear force
Cosmic space is almost ''empty''
but it has enormous matter / stuff
Vacuum space is almost ''empty''
but ''virtual particles'' exist there, which have possibility
to effect ''normal-matter''.
#
Don't ignore ''Emptiness''
Every emptiness has something important.
====

Tao Te Ching Chapter 11 (written in 500 BC )

"Thirty spokes surround one nave,
the usefulness of the wheel is always in that empty innermost.
You fashion clay to make a bowl,
the usefulness of the bowl is always in that empty innermost.
You cut out doors and windows to make a house,
their usefulness to a house is always in their empty space.
Therefore profit comes from external form,
but usefulness comes from the empty innermost."
- Translated by Isabella Mears, 1916,
 
Curious Cdn
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

Tao Te Ching Chapter 11 (written in 500 BC )
"Thirty spokes surround one nave,
the usefulness of the wheel is always in that empty innermost.
You fashion clay to make a bowl,
the usefulness of the bowl is always in that empty innermost.
You cut out doors and windows to make a house,
their usefulness to a house is always in their empty space.
Therefore profit comes from external form,
but usefulness comes from the empty innermost."
- Translated by Isabella Mears, 1916,

I can identify with that I design aluminum and plastic extrusions and I'm not at all interested in the extrusion die, but solely in the space within it.
 
darkbeaver
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

The fundamental basis in philosophy of science.
Modern philosophy of science says:
a) 27% of matter in the universe is dark-matter
(we have no idea what it is )
b) 68% of energy in the universe is dark-energy
(we have no idea what it is )
c) there are many black-holes
(we have no idea how many they are )
d) ≈ 5% of matter in the universe is normal-matter
( we don't know everything about this normal-matter)
#
That is our so called ''philosophical knowledge''
Welcome to the era of precision ignorance.
======


Concensus says that fool, not science. If there,s dark matter fool you cannot see it. Normal matter versus imagined matter, which kind do you want get struck in the head with fool?
how did I fuk up my quesytion mark? yOU EXEMPLIFY PRECSION IGNORANCE, IF IT.S THAT DARK HOW DO YOU suppose you can see it?
 
darkbeaver
#10
You describe a dark hole which requires an explaination or definition of your advanced mutation.
 
darkbeaver
#11
There are no fukkin holes in the Universe idiot. Do you have car keys? And what fukkin province gave them to you?
 
socratus
#12
Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======
Attached Images
SPIN 1.jpg (61.5 KB, 0 views )
 
socratus
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======

1 - Dirac's theory has reference frame of vacuum
and therefore (-E=Mc^2)
2 - Einstein's SRT postulate has reference frame
of vacuum and therefore speed is ( c=1)
3 - Theory of Ideal gas has reference frame of vacuum
but theoretical quantum physics ignores this framework.
========
Attached Images
IDEA MISSING.jpg (9.6 KB, 0 views )
 
socratus
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

1 - Dirac's theory has reference frame of vacuum
and therefore (-E=Mc^2)
2 - Einstein's SRT postulate has reference frame
of vacuum and therefore speed is ( c=1)
3 - Theory of Ideal gas has reference frame of vacuum
but theoretical quantum physics ignores this framework.
========

The theory of ideal gas is not an ''abstract theory'' or
only ''useful as a simple approximation''
It is useful as Real theory about situation in the Vacuum.
The quantum particles have their source in the Vacuum.
The real particles appear from Vacuum.
(Casimir effect, Lamb shift, vacuum's fluctuation . . ..etc)
#
To understand itself, Quantum physics must be united
with Thermodynamics of Ideal gas
(this is a missed idea in modern physics)
========
Last edited by socratus; Apr 14th, 2019 at 05:31 AM..
 
socratus
#15
Dark Matter = Quantum Cosmology = Gravity
===
1- Dark matter doesn't emit or absorb light.
2 - Dark matter works only via gravity
3 - Dark matter is extremely cold
4 - Dark matter is extremely weak (the weakest stuff)
5 - Dark matter doesn't carry electric charge
6 - Dark matter is passive / neutral stuff
7 - Dark matter consists of (unknown) elementary particles
8 - Dark matter is much more than ordinary matter
9 - Dark matter must have some interaction with ordinary matter
10 - Dark matter can have non-gravitational interactions
11 - Dark matter must have own sector of existence
===
Ordinary matter interacts through the electromagnetic,
weak and strong forces -- helping the visual matter
of our world to form complex systems
Stars, rocks, oceans, plants and animals owe their
very existence to the unity of the non-gravitational
(EM, weak, strong) forces with ordinary matter.
Familiar picture can be thought of interaction
between antiparticles (antimatter) and dark matter
Antiparticles (as EM forces) 10^36 times stronger
than weak particles of dark matter and therefore
can involve it in a process of ''quantum gravity'',
the earliest state of creation our material World.
#
Scientists search a real / potential candidate for dark matter
=====
Attached Images
Dark matter.jpg (5.3 KB, 0 views )
 
Curious Cdn
#16
Dark matter matters.
 
socratus
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Dark matter matters.

it sounds poetical
 
socratus
#18
Dark Energy = Cosmic Zero Vacuum
===
1 - Dark energy is an essential part of cosmology today
2 - Dark energy is just pure energy
3 - In the early state of universe's evolution Dark energy
was dominated
4 - Dark energy is not relative, it is constant structure / stuff . . .
5 - Dark energy permeates the universe
6 - Dark energy distribution is always smooth
7 - Dark energy does not become more dilute when
the universe expands
8 - Dark energy exists even if no actual particles or other
stuff is around
9 - Dark energy is not carried by particles or matter
10 - The density (cosmological constant) of Dark energy is very low
11 - The density of Dark energy is the same everywhere, remains
the same over time (it can be no denser in one region than another)
12 - Dark energy is very different from dark matter, which
collects into objects and will be denser in some place
than in others
#
My opinion
All these proportions have the Cosmic Zero Vacuum (T=0K)
=======
REFERENCE
Book: Dark matter and the Dinosaurs
by Lisa Randall
=====
 
socratus
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

Dark Energy = Cosmic Zero Vacuum
===
1 - Dark energy is an essential part of cosmology today
2 - Dark energy is just pure energy
3 - In the early state of universe's evolution Dark energy
was dominated
4 - Dark energy is not relative, it is constant structure / stuff . . .
5 - Dark energy permeates the universe
6 - Dark energy distribution is always smooth
7 - Dark energy does not become more dilute when
the universe expands
8 - Dark energy exists even if no actual particles or other
stuff is around
9 - Dark energy is not carried by particles or matter
10 - The density (cosmological constant) of Dark energy is very low
11 - The density of Dark energy is the same everywhere, remains
the same over time (it can be no denser in one region than another)
12 - Dark energy is very different from dark matter, which
collects into objects and will be denser in some place
than in others
#
My opinion
All these proportions have the Cosmic Zero Vacuum (T=0K)
=======
REFERENCE
Book: Dark matter and the Dinosaurs
by Lisa Randall
=====

Another hidden scenario of Zero Vacuum
1 - A black hole has a temperature within a few
millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K
/ Oxford. Dictionary./
2 - A stellar black hole of one solar mass has a Hawking
temperature of about 100 nanokelvins. This is far less
than the 2.7 K temperature of the cosmic microwave background
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
3 - Previous Picture of the Day articles about black holes
suggested that the terminology used to describe
“gravitational point sources” is highly speculative: space/time,
singularities, and infinite densityare abstract concepts,
precluding a realistic investigation into the nature of the Universe.
/ Black hole theory contradicts itself, by Stephen Smith. Oct 12, 2011 /
4.
Book: ''' Stephan Hawking, A life in science,''
/ by Michael White and John Gribbin./
#
''Together with Brandon Carter and Jim Bardeen, Hawking
wrote a paper, published in Communications in Mathematical
Physics , pointing out . . . . . the team commented,
'' In fact the effective temperature of a black hole is
absolute zero . . . . No radiation could be emitted from the hole.''
/ page 156./
But later (!) , . . using concept of entropy and
Heisenberg uncertainty principle and quantum fluctuations (!)
Hawking changed his mind and wrote that black hole can emit
( Hawking radiation )
#
So, in the beginning (according to calculations) the ''black hole''
had absolute zero temperature T=0K but . . . thanks to entropy,
HUP and quantum fluctuations (Hawking radiations) was arisen.
In others words:
''black holes'' are micro- scheme of absolute zero vacuum: T=0K
''black hole'' is only another name of the ''true vacuum'' : T=0K
=========
 
socratus
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by socratus View Post

Another hidden scenario of Zero Vacuum
1 - A black hole has a temperature within a few
millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K
/ Oxford. Dictionary./
2 - A stellar black hole of one solar mass has a Hawking
temperature of about 100 nanokelvins. This is far less
than the 2.7 K temperature of the cosmic microwave background
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
3 - Previous Picture of the Day articles about black holes
suggested that the terminology used to describe
“gravitational point sources” is highly speculative: space/time,
singularities, and infinite densityare abstract concepts,
precluding a realistic investigation into the nature of the Universe.
/ Black hole theory contradicts itself, by Stephen Smith. Oct 12, 2011 /
4.
Book: ''' Stephan Hawking, A life in science,''
/ by Michael White and John Gribbin./
#
''Together with Brandon Carter and Jim Bardeen, Hawking
wrote a paper, published in Communications in Mathematical
Physics , pointing out . . . . . the team commented,
'' In fact the effective temperature of a black hole is
absolute zero . . . . No radiation could be emitted from the hole.''
/ page 156./
But later (!) , . . using concept of entropy and
Heisenberg uncertainty principle and quantum fluctuations (!)
Hawking changed his mind and wrote that black hole can emit
( Hawking radiation )
#
So, in the beginning (according to calculations) the ''black hole''
had absolute zero temperature T=0K but . . . thanks to entropy,
HUP and quantum fluctuations (Hawking radiations) was arisen.
In others words:
''black holes'' are micro- scheme of absolute zero vacuum: T=0K
''black hole'' is only another name of the ''true vacuum'' : T=0K
=========

Dark Energy May Be Vacuum
Date:
January 16, 2007
Source:
University of Copenhagen
https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0116130456.htm
#
https://www.iflscience.com/space/dar...g-dark-matter/
==============
 
darkbeaver
#21
Electricity prevents the darkness. There is nowhere not controlled and contained by the electric force. Dark matter was invented to displace electrical theory, it failed there are no dark matter batteries, matches, bottles. You are in the dark too deep to see any light. We can appreciate a spark while a dark spot escapes our cognition. There is no empty space, it,s full to the brim. None of us can encompass its content. Only the originator can grasp the entirety . Of course I am subject to constant revision as the path unfolds before me, usually minor adjustments during the less than warm comfortable conditions for adjustment; I can change my mind, but the transition depends on the transmission and clutch, friction, my wheels demand powers and dark matter ain,t on the list. Being of material construction I inherently appreciate solid chunks of stuff interacting with my manifested presence.I can,t eat an idea with meatless bones. There is no such thing as dark matter, period. There is the dark though. It isn,t empty however, if you step into the dark for a bit you see, after a bit. The dark is not invisable, is it? Seeing nothing is certainly possible.
Last edited by darkbeaver; May 2nd, 2019 at 10:24 PM..
 
darkbeaver
#22
[QUOTE=socratus;2711677]The fundamental basis in philosophy of science.
Modern philosophy of science says:
a) 27% of matter in the universe is dark-matter
(we have no idea what it is )
b) 68% of energy in the universe is dark-energy
(we have no idea what it is )
c) there are many black-holes
(we have no idea how many they are )
d) ≈ 5% of matter in the universe is normal-matter
( we don't know everything about this normal-matter)
#
That is our so called ''philosophical knowledge''
Welcome to the era of precision ignorance.


We hu,.mans must comprehend the scope of our ignorance, it is bottomless and will remain so. Why, because it,s a very big universe and we a re a very little ripple in the tides of time. Enjoy now cuz tomorrow don,t exist. Tomorrow is a theoretical construckt. A construct of some ther]oretical signifigance, we suppose. And the bills pile up. Our real value is our tax burden..... We have worth based on our debt. That ain,t right and my sword will correct your misintepretation of my value. start the war, the enemy is naked and can be crushed the good old way. The rotten pricks in the counting houses. Baby eating bastards they look human but they are not we will submit them to the test, if they fail, off with thier heads.Your gold will get you nothing when I want bread.
Last edited by darkbeaver; May 2nd, 2019 at 11:22 PM..
 
darkbeaver
#23
precision ignorance., is the engine of the future, baked in a a pie full of virtual fruit for virtual people however the test is in the taste and pseudo meat won,t pass. Only bleeding meat counts. Don,t gimme no trans food, I won,t bite.
 
darkbeaver
#24
Eynstien stole the equation E=MC2 frum some guy who first penned it in 1893 or so.
 
Curious Cdn
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver View Post

Eynstien stole the equation E=MC2 frum some guy who first penned it in 1893 or so.

Was he a Relative?
 
socratus
#26
Strings -- Music of the Spheres / Musica universalis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musica_universalis
===
Pythagoras created the theory ''Harmony of the Spheres''
The spirit of Pythagoras idea went into Kepler's thinking
and in 1619 he published ''Harmonices Mundi''
( harmonies of musical intervals describe the motions of the planets )
#
The connection between music, mathematics, and astronomy
had a profound impact on history.
To continue this profound tradition modern physicists created
musical tools ( similar to known violin or guitar strings)
by name ''String Particles'' ( open and closed) in the hope
to hear the harmony of spheres.
=====
Attached Images
S. P..jpg (3.9 KB, 0 views )
 
socratus
#27
Doctrine of Creation
===
Creation is a process.
This process can be known by math / physical laws.
But before to know how this process is going, it needs
to know something about reference frame in which
this process is going. because to describe fish it needs
water and to describe animals it needs another
reference frame -- land. The reference frame has
great influence on physical process. Specific
reference frame is the common ground of all specific creations.
#
The creation began from simple to complex,
from micro-particles world to microworld.
Then it needs to know: in which reference
frame the micro-particles can exist.
#
Today we know -- micro-particles exist in CERN / LHC .reference frame.
====
=======
 

Similar Threads

0
God is Ultimate Basis of Creation
by dattaswami | Jul 24th, 2011
33
Why Am I Here? - A Fundamental Question
by sanctus | Jan 17th, 2007
1
The Fraudulent Basis of Modern Kulture
by jjw1965 | Sep 27th, 2005