“[Quantum mechanics] describes nature as absurd from the point of view
of common sense. And yet it fully agrees with experiment.
So I hope you can accept nature as She is - absurd.”
/ Richard P. Feynman /
Why '' . . . you can accept nature as She is - absurd.” / Richard P. Feynman /
Because Einstein and Infeld wrote in the book “Evolution of Physics” :
“ We have the laws, but we are not aware what the body
of reference system they belong to, and all our physical
construction appears erected on sand ”.
What can be reference frame for new ideas?
FROM THE AUGUST 2008 ISSUE
Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything
Could the vacuum contain dark energy, gravity particles, and frictionless gears?
By Tim Folger.* Friday, July 18, 2008
'' When the next revolution rocks physics,chances are it will be
about nothing—the vacuum, that endless infinite void.''
'' Some physicists like to think that M theory will form the basis of what
they call a theory of everything, a set of laws that will completely
describe the universe in all its strangeness, where dark energy, quantum theory,
extra dimensions, and magazine readers will all fit into one tidy package.
But in the end, the key to cosmic truth may well come from another window
on reality, the looming void. A good theory of nothing just might be the
theory of everything physicists have sought for so long.''
Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything | DiscoverMagazine.com
Paul Dirac wrote:
'‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? ‘'
/ Paul Dirac /
If we want to* understand the logical reality of Nature we need to solve
'‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum'' . . . /Dirac/