Time to take CLIMATE CHANGE SERIOUSLY


Dixie Cup
+3
#61
The whole Climate debate has been totally corrupted. It has been bogus from the start and was started by a Maurice Strong who, unfortunately, is/was a Canadian. He started it on a completely false basis as a distribution of wealth, wanting to lower the earth's population and insisted the only way to control things was to have a world government.


Despite the change of terminology, (aka global warming/climate change) none of this has to do with climate change nor was it ever intended. It was simply a method of scaring and manipulating the general population. Gore and his ilk picked up where he left off because they saw the advantage of controlling the population and lining their pockets.


Do not kid yourself. This has NOTHING to do with climate and EVERYTHING do to with total control of the population and we are all being led by the nose.


While they insist that the most recent hurricanes are due to global warming, they are lying through their teeth. There were even more serious hurricanes in the 1700's but they won't tell you that because it doesn't fit with their agenda.


We truly need to watch these bad actors (Soros, Rockefeller et al) because they have nothing but contempt for us and are greedy, corrupt individuals who want it all at our expense.
 
Cliffy
#62
 
Cliffy
#63


















As I have said before, the climate change debate is a smoke screen to cover up the real problem and that is depicted above.
 
MHz
#64
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

His peers would be other scientists that are capable of independent rational thought instead of parroting what they are told. This would appear to be true in all branches of science.

The 'flat earth theory' centuries ago had the 'accredited scientists' slowing down the truth about how things work. That same patter can be show to have been the case in the solution to how the Pacific Northwest Scab-lands were created. We he proposed it the backlash from the 'scientists' ruined his career and it was reluctance that had the reverse that within his lifetime.
Scientists and all other academics parrot what they lean in school. The very worst are the Jewish and Christian religion as the last update they experienced is measured in 1,000's of years.


You have some links to back up your version?? I would tell you to tackle the 'expanding earth theory' or 'any megalith site on the planet' that show science is clueless about what is going on in front of their very face.
 
petros
+1
#65
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post







As I have said before, the climate change debate is a smoke screen to cover up the real problem and that is depicted above.

Name 10 ways oceans play a direct role in your life.
 
coldstream
+2
#66
Anthropogenic Global Warming is now, and will always be, a political and ideological agenda without an iota of authentic scientific merit. It has simply now become an article of faith from which any dissent is deemed heresy in academia and the liberal media.

Carbon is a trace element in the atmosphere, of which human activity contributes a fractional amount. Carbon through natural processes is in constant circulation between landmass, oceans and atmosphere. The climate is, however, in constant cyclical flux, and has been throughout geological history.

So don't worry. The sky isn't falling. Humans are not destroying the planet. And the globe is not in a death descent into a man made oven. It's just a nasty group of enviro psychopaths that are spreading these myths.
 
petros
+1
#67
Why has O2 remained stable?
 
MHz
#68
Who said it has? More green plants more O2 so that should have changes as ice-ages came and went
 
Twin_Moose
+2
#69
Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

Name 10 ways oceans play a direct role in your life.

I'm trying to figure out what those pictures have to do with Climate change, yes pollution is bad, especially raw sewage in Pic. 1
 
petros
+1
#70
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

Who said it has? More green plants more O2 so that should have changes as ice-ages came and went

It has. It's fact. Feel free to research.

We are still in an ice age. Our present interglacial epoch of the current ice age has seen CO2 rise and and fall along with solar output but O2 has remained at 24%.
Last edited by petros; 1 day ago at 03:43 PM..
 
petros
+3
#71
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

I'm trying to figure out what those pictures have to do with Climate change, yes pollution is bad, especially raw sewage in Pic. 1

Picture 1 is debris from the Japanese tsunami. I have a nice Hello Kitty doormat the Mrs picked up off the beach in Hawaii near Hilo.

The tires are an artificial reef.

The nets are more than likely illegal but people who are hungry don't give a flying f-ck what is legal and what isn't.
 
Twin_Moose
#72
Still looks like raw sewage to me
 
petros
+2
#73
Where are the photos of Injuns selling their 10 salmon outside a beer store?
 
petros
+1
#74
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

Still looks like raw sewage to me

It's the Pacific garbage patch.
 
Bar Sinister
#75
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

Guess there is no hope for you then.




That reply is so weak it swings you strongly toward the stupidity side.
 
coldstream
+1
#76
The only threat to the planet is the potentially catastrophic 'solutions' to a nonexistent problem in AGW. It would be imposed on the human 'pestilence' on Earth to reduce it to a more manageable number.. perhaps half a billion; all eco-utopian fanatics of course.
 
Twin_Moose
+3
#77
Maybe they should volunteer to save the planet, instead of protesting for others to save the planet.
 
MHz
#78
Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

Where are the photos of Injuns selling their 10 salmon outside a beer store?

Never happened, it was behind the store or it would be the buyer going to court rather than the seller.
The Rez should have their own brand of beer, one with a coco leaf from South America in it and see how popular that is with 'the Whites'.

Line up behind me Pilgrims.
 
petros
+2
#79
Quote: Originally Posted by coldstream View Post

The only threat to the planet is the potentially catastrophic 'solutions' to a nonexistent problem in AGW. It would be imposed on the human 'pestilence' on Earth to reduce it to a more manageable number.. perhaps half a billion; all eco-utopian fanatics of course.

but but but the poor will have solar power in their corrugated tin shacks.

Enough for 3 LED lights, a fan and USB plugs to recharge phones and maybe a laptop.

They will still be just as poor.
 
Ron in Regina
-1
#80
Quote: Originally Posted by coldstream View Post

Anthropogenic Global Warming is now, and will always be, a political and ideological agenda without an iota of authentic scientific merit. It has simply now become an article of faith from which any dissent is deemed heresy in academia and the liberal media.

Carbon is a trace element in the atmosphere, of which human activity contributes a fractional amount. Carbon through natural processes is in constant circulation between landmass, oceans and atmosphere. The climate is, however, in constant cyclical flux, and has been throughout geological history.

So don't worry. The sky isn't falling. Humans are not destroying the planet. And the globe is not in a death descent into a man made oven. It's just a nasty group of enviro psychopaths that are spreading these myths.


Are you familiar with "Patrick Moore?" He was one of the founders of Green Peace. How about "Randall Carlson?" Both are interesting people and some of your statements are very close to what they also state?