Live Earth is promoting green to save the planet - what planet are they on?


Blackleaf
#1
Live Aid is promoting green to save the planet - what planet are they on?

7th July 2007
Daily Mail

As Madonna bounds on to the huge 90,000 capacity Wembley Stadium stage in London to save the planet, how the assembled Greenies will cheer.

The superstar is today fronting the massive Live Earth event, with nine concerts played over 24 hours across seven continents before an audience of two billion.

The much-hyped bid to save the world is being masterminded by former U.S. vice president Al Gore - who helped focus attention on the environmental movement with his Oscar-winning film, An Inconvenient Truth - and features artists including The Police, Red Hot Chili Peppers, UB40 and Metallica.

No doubt to rapturous applause, Madonna will call for mass global change to reduce carbon emissions and to tackle 'climate crisis'.

Watching the veteran star lap up the adoration, her entourage could, however, be forgiven for exchanging slightly jaded glances - having witnessed her jet in for the concert from New York.

For her 2006 World Tour, she flew by private jet, transporting a team of up to 100 technicians and dancers around the globe. Waiting in the garage at home, she has a Mercedes Maybach, two Range Rovers, an Audi A8 and a Mini Cooper S.


Hypocrisy: Madonna will strut on stage today preaching at her viewers to save the planet - yet she herself produces more than 100 times the average amount of waste produced by each person in Britain in a year



Indeed, Madonna's carbon footprint is dwarfed only by her ego - she has vowed that she will 'speak to the planet' at Wembley. In fact, an apology might be in order - for the superstar's energy consumption is only the tip of the iceberg in this epic vanity-fest.

The Live Earth event is, in the words of one commentator: "a massive, hypocritical fraud".

For while the organisers' commitment to save the planet is genuine, the very process of putting on such a vast event, with more than 150 performers jetting around the world to appear in concerts from Tokyo to Hamburg, is surely an exercise in hypocrisy on a grand scale.

Matt Bellamy, front man of the rock band Muse, has dubbed it 'private jets for climate change'.

A Daily Mail investigation has revealed that far from saving the planet, the extravaganza will generate a huge fuel bill, acres of garbage, thousands of tonnes of carbon emissions, and a mileage total equal to the movement of an army.

The most conservative assessment of the flights being taken by its superstars is that they are flying an extraordinary 222,623.63 miles between them to get to the various concerts - nearly nine times the circumference of the world. The true environmental cost, as they transport their technicians, dancers and support staff, is likely to be far higher.

The total carbon footprint of the event, taking into account the artists' and spectators' travel to the concert, and the energy consumption on the day, is likely to be at least 31,500 tonnes of carbon emissions, according to John Buckley of Carbonfootprint.com, who specialises in such calculations.

Throw in the television audience and it comes to a staggering 74,500 tonnes. In comparison, the average Briton produces ten tonnes in a year.

The concert will also generate some 1,025 tonnes of waste at the concert stadiums - much of which will go directly into landfill sites.

Moreover, the pop stars headlining the concerts are the absolute antithesis of the message they promote - with Madonna leading the pack of the worst individual rock star polluters in the world.

Sepermodel Kate Moss, another profligate polluter through her use of private jets, is producing a T-shirt for the event. Yet, Gore is touting the concerts as 'carbon neutral'. So how can that be?

Let us start with some facts. Worldwide, an audience of around 1,268,500 is expected to attend the concerts - making it one of the largest global events in history.

Dr Andrea Collins, an expert in sustainability from Cardiff University, has researched the impact of such mass gatherings on the environment.

"An event of this size at Wembley - which holds 65,000 at a rock concert, will generate around 59 tonnes of waste," she says. "That is largely composed of the rubbish from food and drink consumption."

She found that a Wembley-sized football match generated an 'ecological footprint' of 3,000 global hectares - an area the size of 4,166 football pitches. This is the amount of bioproductive land required to absorb the C02 emissions produced by such an event.


The concert organisers are preaching carbon neutrality - but isn't that just a guilt-free excuse?



Dr Collins estimates that the global audience for Live Earth will generate some 1,025 tonnes of waste.

An extraordinary one million people are expected at the free concert at Rio de Janeiro's Copacabana beach, featuring Lenny Kravitz, Macy Gray and Pharrell Williams.

Other venues including the Coca-Cola Dome in Johannesburg - where Joss Stone is performing - will cater for audiences of tens of thousands.

Live Earth say that they will recycle much of the waste generated. Fine talk, but in fact some of the concert venues are struggling to keep up with their commitments.

A spokesman for Wembley says they only have the capacity to recycle around a third of waste produced - the rest will go into landfill sites.

Travel forms the vast majority of the 'carbon footprint' talked of by ecological campaigners - contributing up to 90 per cent of the environmental 'cost'.

Collins says: "It is patently absurd to claim that travel of this nature doesn't have an impact. Each person attending the event will have to make a return journey to the venue, be it by air, rail, bus or car. This burns fossil fuel - precisely what we are trying to reduce.

"There is also the environmental cost of these artists flying around the world - that is absolutely huge."

Indeed, an audit of the lifestyles of the A-list performers appearing at Live Earth, reveals that they are among the worst individual polluters in the world, as their world tours and private jets billow thousands of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year. One hour in a Gulfstream jet burns as much fuel as driving a family car for a year.

The Daily Mail has found that five of the top performing acts together have an annual output of almost 2,000 carbon tonnes. Madonna alone has an annual carbon footprint of 1,018 tonnes, according to John Buckley.

Remember, the average Briton produces just ten tonnes.

The veteran pop singer's Confessions tour last year produced 440 tonnes of carbon pollution in just four months, simply in flights between venues. This does not include the trucks required to transport equipment, the power needed to stage each show, or the transport for fans travelling to each concert.

Rock group Genesis re-formed last year and are in the middle of their European tour. The three-man band will fit their Live Earth performance into a tour of at least 47 locations across the world. Their carbon footprint last year totalled 195 tonnes.

James Blunt, another Wembley performer, completed his world tour of the U.S. last year, racking up a carbon footprint of 195 tonnes.

American band Red Hot Chili Peppers have, like Madonna, flown in to Wembley from the U.S.. They have produced 220 tonnes of carbon dioxide with their private jet alone over the last six months.

Meanwhile, the Daily Mail has learnt that Bon Jovi left the UK this week to travel back by private jet to the U.S. to perform at the New York stadium for the American leg of Live Earth.

Music impresario Andrew Lloyd Webber's ex-wife Sarah Brightman is being flown out to sing at the Shanghai concert in China. This is a distance of 5,679.95 miles, producing one tonne of carbon dioxide pollution.

Two other acts have already been criticised for being paid to promote fuel-guzzling cars. John Legend is featured in a Lexus advert, while Sheryl Crow's hit Everyday Is A Winding Road is used to sell Subaru 4WDs.


Plans for concert organiser Al Gore to appear at the event in both Britain and America on the same day were scuppered due to fears of the backlash it would cause



Razorlight frontman Johnny Borrell has been criticised for urging people to drive electric eco-scooters - but buying a 1,000cc Moto Guzzi bike - described as 'a monster-revving beast'.

Such is the level of disquiet felt about Live Earth in New Zealand, that a pressure group called the Climaction Coalition, is urging people to protest against it on July 7. Radiohead, who are pioneers in eco-friendly performing, have refused to appear. Of course, Live Earth is doing its utmost to ensure the event is 'green' in appearance at least - stars will be ferried between the stage and dressing room by energy-efficient Smart Cars and biodiesel fuelled Mercedes.

A proposal for Gore to appear at concerts in Britain and America on the same day - something that Phil Collins, the Genesis drummer and singer, was able to do at the original Live Aid in 1985, courtesy of Concorde - has been dropped because of the anger that the 'gas-guzzling' flight would provoke.

Andrea Robinson, Live Earth's green manager, says her message to celebrities is: "Leave the Learjet at home - fly commercial."

Wembley Stadium will be lit using low energy fluorescent lightbulbs, while the backdrop is composed of recycled tyres and oil drums. The organisers tried to introduce re-usable cups for interval refreshments, but found that - like many green strategies - this was not practical on such a huge scale.

Some bio-produced plastic, made from corn, will be used, and artists' changing rooms will be fitted with energy-saving lightbulbs - all rather a drop in the ocean compared to the pollution generated by fans traveling across the UK to the concert or using the stadium's 2,618 toilets. Plans to ask the British public to turn off their electrical appliances during the Live Earth broadcast were scuppered when the National Grid pointed out that as everyone switched on again, a giant power surge could cripple the country.

Some stadiums are greener than others. The Aussie Stadium in Sydney will run the event on 100 per cent green energy supply. Each Australian Live Earth ticket comes with a free public transport voucher, while all the bathrooms will be waterless with waste being composted into fertiliser.

Conversely, in New York's Giants Stadium, trade unions have blocked Live Earth's attempts to recycle, and the 52,000-seater arena is not situated near public transport. The smallest - and least polluting - concert will be held at the British Antarctic Survey's base in Rothera.

Bizarrely, the concerts are also being 'independently audited' by consultants PricewaterhouseCoopers over the next seven weeks, to assess the level of pollution they will have generated.

It is unclear what benefit this exercise will have, although the Live Earth organisers talk in terms of providing a 'legacy' for future events, showing how recycling and low-impact travel can be encouraged, and carbon-offsetting used. But the fact remains - massive rock concerts are hardly eco-friendly.

So just how does Gore claim that Live Earth will be carbon neutral? He does so by convenient use of 'carbon offsetting' - a trendy new method of absolving yourself of guilt.

Carbon offsetting involves 'neutralising' the emissions you are responsible for by buying 'credits'.

A spokesperson for Live Earth says: "This might involve buying environmentally sound lightbulbs for a Third World school, planting trees, or installing solar panels in a developing country."

A huge industry has sprung up to provide corporations with carbon credits.

However, critics say that the practice is simply a way for consumerist industries and nations to export their responsibility to developing countries. Others say it simply does not work.

Carbon-offsetting is, it turns out, how celebrities square green issues with their extravagant lifestyles and use of private jets.

Jon Bon Jovi has said: "We wrote a cheque, we took care of our footprint and raised awareness, blah blah blah."

When Gore - who himself spent eight years flying on Air Force Two - was asked if he had persuaded Madonna to stop using private jets, he said: 'Well, I appreciate and respect her as an artist and as a person, and there are many artists who are offsetting their role in contributing to the CO2 build-up, and I understand that.' A rather longwinded way of saying 'no'.

Madonna has, however, been given an instruction handbook on climate crisis by Live Earth.

John Rego, the environmental director of Live Earth, says he expects to purchase at least 3,000 tonnes of carbon credits to off-set the event. It is believed the organisers will spend in excess of 1million on carbon offsetting to counter criticism.

Rego explains: "All the events are carbon neutral. We have chosen a reforestation and reagricultural project in Mozambique. It is a credible certifiable carbon-diffused project. We are in the process of purchasing a carbon offset."

Dr Collins says: "Taking a flight and planting a tree does not add up. It does not make it all right. It is having your cake and eating it."

Dr John Barrett, from the Stockholm Environment Institute at the University of York, says: "There is a huge irony in flying halfway across the globe in a private jet, eating up fossil fuel.

"The idea that you can offset the pollution you cause is just ridiculous. What these people at Live Earth have done is defined their boundaries to suit themselves, but there is no sense in which this concert is carbon neutral.

"Planting trees or investing in renewable energy does not reverse the damage of releasing huge quantities of carbon dioxide into the environment.

"It is far better not to pollute in the first place. Carbon offsetting can be a removal of guilt, but it is not an effective one."

Live Earth is encouraging 'citizens of the world' to take small steps: share a car, plant a shrub, turn off a light or hang out washing rather than use a dryer.

But Dr Barrett says: "It would be far better for these celebrities to stay at home. Holding large concerts to highlight environmental concerns and cut carbon emissions just seems ridiculous. What planet do these people live on?"


dailymail.co.uk
 
Kreskin
#2
Quote:

Madonna will strut on stage today preaching at her viewers to save the planet - yet she herself produces more than 100 times the average amount of waste produced by each person in Britain in a year

Has she seen a doctor about it? Or a dietician?
 
no color
#3
Would be good if these celebreties practice what they preach. They're flying around all over the place in their private jets without a care in the world. These same folks have the audacity to scold us cause we want to store a half dozen beers in our fridge or cause we have one too many lights turned on in our homes.

I for one ain't paying no attention to their "Live Earth" event as it speaks hypocracy. Would anyone take dieting advice from Luciano Pavarotti?

 
IdRatherBeSkiing
#4
I find it amazing that anybody takes advice from any rock star on anything.
 
SwitSof
#5
I guess the organisers have another agenda in mind, don't they? I mean, with all of that power used for the concert..., not to mention the garbage that most likely would be flying around the stadium from all of those people attending. Doesn't sound like an attempt to save the earth...
 
Dreadful Nonsense
#6
some of the stuff the rockers are asking/demanding is lame coming from millionaires....I can see them doing this for starving peoiple, farmers, aparthied, but it crosses the line of hypocracy when they ask for the price of gas to skyrocket....Some lame ass aussie last night wants this
His band mate was wearing say no to nuclear energy....Look the demand of energy is so great that all the alternative stuff in the world is only going to help it not erase the need....nuclear energy done safely is the way to go....hell the technology is way better than when we first started out and like we only had a few chenorbils and 3 mile islands incidents...
i think nuclear is the way to go....coal is so...soooo Dickensesque
 
Unforgiven
#7
You know something, these Live Earth idiots are nuts. This stuff never works.

There were a couple of guys standing on the street looking at these people and thinking the same thing back then.

"All in all, Woodstock remains a lasting icon of the cultural movement of the 1960s that looked to change the world through its acceptance of values and beliefs that contradicted the established power structure of the United States."

If someone says let's change the way we do things to something less harmful to us, don't you believe them.
 
typingrandomstuff
#8
Yeah, it's like the foundation of teaching by the "green" organizations. They are so "green". Although the best way is through directly doing something like a celebrity did by buying bulbs and not using coal and oil. Bluesfest also attempted to buy biodegradable cups and reusable. The concert's song is great though. Just hope they do more than giving out messages like Al Gore did.
Last edited by typingrandomstuff; Jul 8th, 2007 at 12:43 PM..
 
SwitSof
#9
I'm not sure how it works but a researcher I met in Japan told me she was studying how to build a plant that is burning garbage that produces energy to be converted into electricity. If that really works, well that is indeed a way to recycle waste and this kind of concert can do that instead.

Another friend got an offer to work in the R&D department of a Japanese car manufacturer to build a car engine that can use biodiesel fuel efficiently, which is again a very good movement of the manufacturer. I suppose it's proven Japanese cars have been fuel-efficient already anyway.

But rather than doing something that would produce a good result or at least avoiding doing something that can be harmful, doing something just to make the situation square is indeed damaging like purchasing carbon credit to offset. Actually this credit has become a business product that it's traded like stocks or shares almost. And if business is in the picture, there is no way environment would be the main drive behind it.

Funny though, I saw on TV here one of the MCs, one of the actors in UK comedy series, The Office, Ricky Gervais said something like,"Well some artists used their private jets, but that's to save the queue", and I must admit I wondered if he was being sarcastic or he really couldn't think of a good excuse!

And Metallica said that they brought their family on carriages, yeah right!
 
Dreadful Nonsense
#10
i think the worse was Cheryl Crow asking everyone to only use one sheet of toilet paper...so please do yerself a favour and don't eat anything she passes to you.....

Look I'm in i'll do my part, but hell don't crush me ...the friggin billionares , millionaires got there by polluting the hell out of our planet......
Hell look at a cd and it's packaging...go to a rock concert and see the carbon footprint all the way to a 65 million dollar tour.....
And !!! and!!! and !!!
Whats with the depressing lyrics these people are giving us hahahahahahaha
some of this stuff is unlistanble depression city.....lol
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by Unforgiven View Post

You know something, these Live Earth idiots are nuts. This stuff never works.

There were a couple of guys standing on the street looking at these people and thinking the same thing back then.

"All in all, Woodstock remains a lasting icon of the cultural movement of the 1960s that looked to change the world through its acceptance of values and beliefs that contradicted the established power structure of the United States."

If someone says let's change the way we do things to something less harmful to us, don't you believe them.

Yep. Woodstock brougt us the generation of hypocrites now poluting the planet and driving the SUVs.
Live 8 a couple of years ago was the same thing. The world has NEVER changed because of a rock concert.
 
Unforgiven
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiing View Post

Yep. Woodstock brougt us the generation of hypocrites now poluting the planet and driving the SUVs.
Live 8 a couple of years ago was the same thing. The world has NEVER changed because of a rock concert.

Also the generation of recyclers and the concept that the planet isn't just a place to dump garbage. That we don't need to have enough nukes to kill everyone 11000 times over. That the VietNam war was wrong. Among other things.

It simply spread the word. Just like this concert is about spreading the word. It's not about a concert that uses electricity, or about the cars and trucks that got everyone and there stuff there.

Just to raise awareness. It's an event, that draws people, is news worthy and is televised. It's not about making money or promoting GM cars because they are better than Toyota. Just buy a ticket, go see a bunch of bands and hang out with people. And in all of this, someone tells you a little bit about what you can do yourself to reduce some of the things that are causing a problem.

http://www.climateprotect.org/splash/

People make money off it like anything that is being promoted. Everything costs and those costs are met or they don't happen. It's not your money, it's not taxes, it's raised for and by these guys to support the NGO who is promoting awareness.

I know I know, a terrible horrible thing in and of itself. Surely if we can just point a few fingers on the Internet at SUV owners it would be solved already, but that's life.
 
GenGap
#13
"I see stupid people everywhere" was the slogan for the concert, then then they found out they were stupid themselves. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
 
s243a
#14
but what are they going to do about manbearpig???????


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manbearpig
http://www.southparkzone.com/episode-vid-1006.htm
 
Dreadful Nonsense
#15
despite all my rage I'm still just a rat in a cage

Smashing Pumpkins
Now i'm happy
 
Dreadful Nonsense
#16
did you catch Roger Waters?
nice to see him doing so well
 

Similar Threads

69
Birth control to save the planet
by Andem | Nov 10th, 2009
1
Planet Earth (Planet Erde)
by Andem | May 16th, 2008
13
Earth Like Planet Discovered
by CTV News | May 19th, 2007