Officials in London Have Completely Lost Their Marbles


Canucklehead
#31
NJ,

I reread the original post on the thread and I really think we are looking at this as two entirely different venues. I see this as more of a museum type locale whereas it appears you are taking it to mean open-air exhibition (like a county fair).

If it's in the open as you suggest, then some sort of cordoning off would be appropriate in certain areas of the exhibits since I think we all know that they will have an assortment of toys and educational displays about aberrant behaviours. That much I will grant you.

If your problem is simply the fact that this place exists then I will stutter from my last post and suggest you harp on the Vegas Casinos and New York Sex Museum before condemning another country for making a choice that is of a completely internal social nature and really, noone's god-damned business but their own.
 
peapod
#32
on dat nibblet I am off for dat turkey dinner...have a good one canucklehead
 
Nascar_James
#33
Quote: Originally Posted by Canucklehead

NJ,

I reread the original post on the thread and I really think we are looking at this as two entirely different venues. I see this as more of a museum type locale whereas it appears you are taking it to mean open-air exhibition (like a county fair).

If it's in the open as you suggest, then some sort of cordoning off would be appropriate in certain areas of the exhibits since I think we all know that they will have an assortment of toys and educational displays about aberrant behaviours. That much I will grant you.

If your problem is simply the fact that this place exists then I will stutter from my last post and suggest you harp on the Vegas Casinos and New York Sex Museum before condemning another country for making a choice that is of a completely internal social nature and really, noone's god-damned business but their own.

I'm in full agreement, Canucklehead. Finally someone with common sense. Sure, if the park winds up as a conventional museum instead of an open-air type exhibition, then I have no arguments.
 
Canucklehead
#34
EGADS! NJ said I had common sense... I better go find the devil a parka and ice skates
 
Nascar_James
#35
Quote: Originally Posted by Canucklehead

EGADS! NJ said I had common sense... I better go find the devil a parka and ice skates


 
Reverend Blair
#36
So you'd be happy if they started offing pervert preists, Nascar? The Catholic church sure wouldn't. Old Pope Benny has spent a lot of his career protecting them after all.

This really has nothing to do with kids though. The article doesn't mention kids one way or the other and it doesn't discuss the design or the required age for admission.

What has you freaking out is that it's about sex. Not just sex, either, but people liking sex. People having sex. People having sex in more than one position and for reasons having nothing to do with procreation. You're freaked about it James.

You have been brainwashed into believing that sex is dirty and wrong and immoral and now you found out that people are doing it and you can't stop them and you're pissed off.

By the way, You should watch this
 
Nascar_James
#37
Quote: Originally Posted by Reverend Blair

So you'd be happy if they started offing pervert preists, Nascar? The Catholic church sure wouldn't. Old Pope Benny has spent a lot of his career protecting them after all.

This really has nothing to do with kids though. The article doesn't mention kids one way or the other and it doesn't discuss the design or the required age for admission.

What has you freaking out is that it's about sex. Not just sex, either, but people liking sex. People having sex. People having sex in more than one position and for reasons having nothing to do with procreation. You're freaked about it James.

You have been brainwashed into believing that sex is dirty and wrong and immoral and now you found out that people are doing it and you can't stop them and you're pissed off.

By the way, You should watch this

Rev, you have it all wrong. You said this has nothing to do with kids. I disagree. It has everything to do with kids. If kids are exposed to this, then they are involuntarily affected.

The point I was trying to get across is that any type of sexual activity involving children to any extent is unacceptable. That includes child porn or exposing children to sexual related activities. If they either turn the park into a closed museum or put up a high enough wall to prevent children from being exposed to this nonsense, then I would not object. The truth of the matter is if they really do build this ... er park I am sure they will address these issues.
 
Nascar_James
#38
Quote: Originally Posted by #juan

Nascar_James wrote:

Quote:

Oklahoma is also referred to as the "Sooner" State. The name comes from the University of Oklahoma athletic teams.

I know it's your country, but you may as well get it right:

Oklahoma
In 1889, the Indian Territory was opened to settlers. Thousands of people lined up on the border and, when the signal was given, they raced into the territory to claim their land. Some people went in early to claim their land. They became known as Sooners.
Hence, Oklahoma's nickname today is “The Sooner State”.

You are correct Juan in that the original name "sooner" derrived from the original settlers jumping the gun and claiming land before the allowed time. However, back them Oklahoma was not a state. So the expression "the Sooner State" would not apply.

Oklahoma was admitted to the Union on 16 November, 1907, as the 46th state of the United States of America.

The following year, in 1908 the Oklahoma Sooners footbal team was formed. The university actually derived their name from a pep club called “The Sooner Rooters.” Prior to Oklahoma becoming a state, the team was referred to as either the Boomers or the Rough riders.

Here's an interesting site with the history of the "Oklahoma Sooners" ...

History of the Oklahoma Sooners
 
Nascar_James
#39
Quote: Originally Posted by Reverend Blair

By the way, You should watch this

Nice try Rev. I checked out your link before clicking on it (by simply replying to your post) and judging by what I saw on the name, I want no part of it.
 
unclepercy
#40
Quote: Originally Posted by Nascar_James

Quote: Originally Posted by Reverend Blair

By the way, You should watch this

Nice try Rev. I checked out your link before clicking on it (by simply replying to your post) and judging by what I saw on the name, I want no part of it.

Just place your cursor over the link, and that will make you scroll
away as fast as you can. ICK.

Uncle
 
Reverend Blair
#41
It's a good song. You two should listen to it. The video is g-rated too...no nudity or violence. Or are you terrified by the word "penis"?

By the way, James, I have nothing wrong. It is not up to you to decide at what age and in what way people in Britain teach their children about sex. There is no mention of children in the article. Your hysterical screaming about kiddie porn has absolutely nothing to do with the article.

You are using children as an excuse to further your anti-sex religious agenda.
 

Similar Threads

17588
Gun Control is Completely Useless.
by Colpy | 20 hours ago
4
And now for something Completely Different
by Jo Canadian | Sep 2nd, 2005