Trump World -USA-2019


Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#2011
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

They didn't even find Bin Laden there, which was the original objective.

It made no rational sense to invade a country to get one man........(and his band of merry murderers.

It was reactionary riding on the emotional shock of 9 11 Which was not the time to make such a major war decision........
 
Hoid
#2012
It was folly to invade a country that would fight you until the end of time.

For us 10 or twenty years of war is a long time.


For them its nothing.
 
Curious Cdn
No Party Affiliation
+1
#2013
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze View Post

It made no rational sense to invade a country to get one man........(and his band of merry murderers.
It was reactionary riding on the emotional shock of 9 11 Which was not the time to make such a major war decision........

Bush was the wrong man at the wrong place at the wrong time in history. I sincerely doubt that Al Gore would have reacted that way.
Last edited by Curious Cdn; Aug 1st, 2019 at 08:49 PM..
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#2014
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

It was folly to invade a country that would fight you until the end of time.

For us 10 or twenty years of war is a long time.


For them its nothing.

The cultural factor in that situation is huge. Totally different philosophy about "life" "death" martyrdom....and a distinct firm belief system. Wars feed right into that kind of thinking.
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#2015
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Bush was the wrong man at the wrong place at the wrong time in history. I sincerely doubt that Al Gore would have reached that way.

indeed. Gore is too level headed , intelligent to make "emotional" decisions OR to "use" a horrific event for some political advantage.
 
MHz
#2016
Still no clue to who trained them in the first place?? lol


https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/...happened-here/
The Rise of the American Gestapo: Has It Already Happened Here?
Adolf Hitler is alive and well in the United States, and he is fast rising to power.”—Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, on the danger posed by the FBI to our civil liberties
Despite the finger-pointing and outcries of dismay from those who are watching the government discard the rule of law at every turn, the question is not whether Donald Trump is the new Adolf Hitler but whether the American Police State is the new Third Reich.
For those who can view the present and past political landscape without partisan blinders, the warning signs are unmistakable: the Deep State’s love affair with totalitarianism began long ago.
Indeed, the U.S. government so admired the Nazi regime that following the second World War, it secretly recruited Hitler’s employees, adopted his protocols, embraced his mindset about law and order, implemented his tactics in incremental steps, and began to lay the foundations for the rise of the Fourth Reich.
Sounds far-fetched? Read on. It’s all documented.
As historian Robert Gellately recounts, “After five years of Hitler’s dictatorship, the Nazi police had won the FBI’s seal of approval.” The Nazi police state was initially so admired for its efficiency and order by the world powers of the day that J. Edgar Hoover, then-head of the FBI, actually sent one of his right-hand men, Edmund Patrick Coffey, to Berlin in January 1938 at the invitation of Germany’s secret police—the Gestapo.
The FBI was so impressed with the Nazi regime that, according to the New York Times, in the decades after World War II, the FBI, along with other government agencies, aggressively recruited at least a thousand Nazis, including some of Hitler’s highest henchmen.
All told, thousands of Nazi collaborators—including the head of a Nazi concentration camp, among others—were given secret visas and brought to America by way of Project Paperclip. Subsequently, they were hired on as spies and informants, and then camouflaged to ensure that their true identities and ties to Hitler’s holocaust machine would remain unknown. All the while, thousands of Jewish refugees were refused entry visas to the U.S. on the grounds that it could threaten national security.
Adding further insult to injury, American taxpayers have been paying to keep these ex-Nazis on the U.S. government’s payroll ever since. And in true Gestapo fashion, anyone who has dared to blow the whistle on the FBI’s illicit Nazi ties has found himself spied upon, intimidated, harassed and labeled a threat to national security.
As if the government’s covert, taxpayer-funded employment of Nazis after World War II wasn’t bad enough, U.S. government agencies—the FBI, CIA and the military—have fully embraced many of the Nazi’s well-honed policing tactics, and have used them repeatedly against American citizens.
Indeed, with every passing day, the United States government borrows yet another leaf from Nazi Germany’s playbook: Secret police. Secret courts. Secret government agencies. Surveillance. Censorship. Intimidation. Harassment. Torture. Brutality. Widespread corruption. Entrapment. Indoctrination. Indefinite detention.
These are not tactics used by constitutional republics, where the rule of law and the rights of the citizenry reign supreme. Rather, they are the hallmarks of authoritarian regimes, where the only law that counts comes in the form of heavy-handed, unilateral dictates from a supreme ruler who uses a secret police to control the populace.
That danger is now posed by the FBI, whose laundry list of crimes against the American people includes surveillance, disinformation, blackmail, entrapment, intimidation tactics, harassment and indoctrination, governmental overreach, abuse, misconduct, trespassing, enabling criminal activity, and damaging private property, and that’s just based on what we know.
Whether the FBI is planting undercover agents in churches, synagogues and mosques; issuing fake emergency letters to gain access to Americans’ phone records; using intimidation tactics to silence Americans who are critical of the government; recruiting high school students to spy on and report fellow students who show signs of being future terrorists; or persuading impressionable individuals to plot acts of terror and then entrapping them, the overall impression of the nation’s secret police force is that of a well-dressed thug, flexing its muscles and doing the boss’ dirty work of ensuring compliance, keeping tabs on potential dissidents, and punishing those who dare to challenge the status quo.
Whatever minimal restrictions initially kept the FBI’s surveillance activities within the bounds of the law have all but disappeared post-9/11. Since then, the FBI has been transformed into a mammoth federal policing and surveillance agency that largely operates as a power unto itself, beyond the reach of established laws, court rulings and legislative mandates.
Consider the FBI’s far-reaching powers to surveil, detain, interrogate, investigate, prosecute, punish, police and generally act as a law unto themselves—much like their Nazi cousins, the Gestapo—and then try to convince yourself that the United States is still a constitutional republic.
Just like the Gestapo, the FBI has vast resources, vast investigatory powers, and vast discretion to determine who is an enemy of the state .
Today, the FBI employs more than 35,000 individuals and operates more than 56 field offices in major cities across the U.S., as well as 400 resident agencies in smaller towns, and more than 50 international offices. In addition to their “data campus,” which houses more than 96 million sets of fingerprints from across the United States and elsewhere, the FBI has also built a vast repository of “profiles of tens of thousands of Americans and legal residents who are not accused of any crime. What they have done is appear to be acting suspiciously to a town sheriff, a traffic cop or even a neighbor.” The FBI’s burgeoning databases on Americans are not only being added to and used by local police agencies, but are also being made available to employers for real-time background checks.
All of this is made possible by the agency’s nearly unlimited resources (its minimum budget alone in fiscal year 2015 was $8.3 billion), the government’s vast arsenal of technology, the interconnectedness of government intelligence agencies, and information sharing through fusion centers—data collecting intelligence agencies spread throughout the country that constantly monitor communications (including those of American citizens), everything from internet activity and web searches to text messages, phone calls and emails.
Much like the Gestapo spied on mail and phone calls , FBI agents have carte blanche access to the citizenry’s most personal information.
Working through the U.S. Post Office, the FBI has access to every piece of mail that passes through the postal system: more than 160 billion pieces are scanned and recorded annually. Moreover, the agency’s National Security Letters, one of the many illicit powers authorized by the USA Patriot Act, allows the FBI to secretly demand that banks, phone companies, and other businesses provide them with customer information and not disclose those demands to the customer. An internal audit of the agency found that the FBI practice of issuing tens of thousands of NSLs every year for sensitive information such as phone and financial records, often in non-emergency cases, is riddled with widespread constitutional violations.
Much like the Gestapo’s sophisticated surveillance programs, the FBI’s spying capabilities can delve into Americans’ most intimate details (and allow local police to do so, as well).
In addition to technology (which is shared with police agencies) that allows them to listen in on phone calls, read emails and text messages, and monitor web activities, the FBI’s surveillance boasts an invasive collection of spy tools ranging from Stingray devices that can track the location of cell phones to Triggerfish devices which allow agents to eavesdrop on phone calls. In one case, the FBI actually managed to remotely reprogram a “suspect’s” wireless internet card so that it would send “real-time cell-site location data to Verizon, which forwarded the data to the FBI.” Law enforcement agencies are also using social media tracking software to monitor Facebook, Twitter and Instagram posts. Moreover, secret FBI rules also allow agents to spy on journalists without significant judicial oversight.

Much like the Gestapo’s ability to profile based on race and religion, and its assumption of guilt by association , the FBI’s approach to pre-crime allows it to profile Americans based on a broad range of characteristics including race and religion.
The agency’s biometric database has grown to massive proportions, the largest in the world, encompassing everything from fingerprints, palm, face and iris scans to DNA, and is being increasingly shared between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies in an effort to target potential criminals long before they ever commit a crime. This is what’s known as pre-crime. Yet it’s not just your actions that will get you in trouble. In many cases, it’s also who you know—even minimally—and where your sympathies lie that could land you on a government watch list. Moreover, as the Intercept reports, despite anti-profiling prohibitions, the bureau “claims considerable latitude to use race, ethnicity, nationality, and religion in deciding which people and communities to investigate.”
Much like the Gestapo’s power to render anyone an enemy of the state, the FBI has the power to label anyone a domestic terrorist.
As part of the government’s so-called ongoing war on terror, the nation’s de facto secret police force has begun using the terms “anti-government,” “extremist” and “terrorist” interchangeably. Moreover, the government continues to add to its growing list of characteristics that can be used to identify an individual (especially anyone who disagrees with the government) as a potential domestic terrorist. For instance, you might be a domestic terrorist in the eyes of the FBI (and its network of snitches) if you:
  • express libertarian philosophies (statements, bumper stickers)
  • exhibit Second Amendment-oriented views (NRA or gun club membership)
  • read survivalist literature, including apocalyptic fictional books
  • show signs of self-sufficiency (stockpiling food, ammo, hand tools, medical supplies)
  • fear an economic collapse
  • buy gold and barter items
  • subscribe to religious views concerning the book of Revelation
  • voice fears about Big Brother or big government
  • expound about constitutional rights and civil liberties
  • believe in a New World Order conspiracy
Much like the Gestapo infiltrated communities in order to spy on the German citizenry, the FBI routinely infiltrates political and religious groups, as well as businesses.
As Cora Currier writes for the Intercept : “Using loopholes it has kept secret for years, the FBI can in certain circumstances bypass its own rules in order to send undercover agents or informants into political and religious organizations, as well as schools, clubs, and businesses…” The FBI has even been paying Geek Squad technicians at Best Buy to spy on customers’ computers without a warrant.
Just as the Gestapo united and militarized Germany’s police forces into a national police force, America’s police forces have largely been federalized and turned into a national police force.
In addition to government programs that provide the nation’s police forces with military equipment and training, the FBI also operates a National Academy that trains thousands of police chiefs every year and indoctrinates them into an agency mindset that advocates the use of surveillance technology and information sharing between local, state, federal, and international agencies.
Just as the Gestapo’s secret files on political leaders were used to intimidate and coerce, the FBI’s files on anyone suspected of “anti-government” sentiment have been similarly abused.
As countless documents make clear, the FBI has no qualms about using its extensive powers in order to blackmail politicians, spy on celebrities and high-ranking government officials, and intimidate and attempt to discredit dissidents of all stripes. For example, not only did the FBI follow Martin Luther King Jr. and bug his phones and hotel rooms, but agents also sent him anonymous letters urging him to commit suicide and pressured a Massachusetts college into dropping King as its commencement speaker.
Just as the Gestapo carried out entrapment operations, the FBI has become a master in the art of entrapment.
In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks the FBI has not only targeted vulnerable individuals but has also lured or blackmailed them into fake terror plots while actually equipping them with the organization, money, weapons and motivation to carry out the plots—entrapment—and then jailing or deporting them for their so-called terrorist plotting. This is what the FBI characterizes as “forward leaning—preventative—prosecutions.” In addition to creating certain crimes in order to then “solve” them, the FBI also gives certain informants permission to break the law, “including everything from buying and selling illegal drugs to bribing government officials and plotting robberies,” in exchange for their cooperation on other fronts. USA Today estimates that agents have authorized criminals to engage in as many as 15 crimes a day. Some of these informants are getting paid astronomical sums: one particularly unsavory fellow, later arrested for attempting to run over a police officer, was actually paid $85,000 for his help laying the trap for an entrapment scheme.
When and if a true history of the FBI is ever written, it will not only track the rise of the American police state but it will also chart the decline of freedom in America, in much the same way that the empowerment of Germany’s secret police tracked with the rise of the Nazi regime.
How did the Gestapo become the terror of the Third Reich?
It did so by creating a sophisticated surveillance and law enforcement system that relied for its success on the cooperation of the military, the police, the intelligence community, neighborhood watchdogs, government workers for the post office and railroads, ordinary civil servants, and a nation of snitches inclined to report “rumors, deviant behavior, or even just loose talk.”
In other words, ordinary citizens working with government agents helped create the monster that became Nazi Germany. Writing for the New York Times, Barry Ewen paints a particularly chilling portrait of how an entire nation becomes complicit in its own downfall by looking the other way:
In what may be his most provocative statement, [author Eric A.] Johnson says that ‘‘most Germans may not even have realized until very late in the war, if ever, that they were living in a vile dictatorship.’’ This is not to say that they were unaware of the Holocaust; Johnson demonstrates that millions of Germans must have known at least some of the truth. But, he concludes, ‘‘a tacit Faustian bargain was struck between the regime and the citizenry.’’ The government looked the other way when petty crimes were being committed. Ordinary Germans looked the other way when Jews were being rounded up and murdered; they abetted one of the greatest crimes of the 20th century not through active collaboration but through passivity, denial and indifference.
Much like the German people, “we the people” have become passive, polarized, gullible, easily manipulated, and lacking in critical thinking skills. Distracted by entertainment spectacles, politics and screen devices, we too are complicit, silent partners in creating a police state similar to the terror practiced by former regimes.
Had the government tried to ram such a state of affairs down our throats suddenly, it might have had a rebellion on its hands.
Instead, the American people have been given the boiling frog treatment, immersed in water that slowly is heated up—degree by degree—so that they’ve fail to notice that they’re being trapped and cooked and killed.
“We the people” are in hot water now.
The Constitution doesn’t stand a chance against a federalized, globalized standing army of government henchmen protected by legislative, judicial and executive branches that are all on the same side, no matter what political views they subscribe to: suffice it to say, they are not on our side or the side of freedom.
From Clinton to Bush, then Obama and now Trump, it’s as if we’ve been caught in a time loop, forced to re-live the same thing over and over again: the same assaults on our freedoms, the same disregard for the rule of law, the same subservience to the Deep State, and the same corrupt, self-serving government that exists only to amass power, enrich its shareholders and ensure its continued domination.
Can the Fourth Reich happen here?


https://jewishvoiceforpeace.org/deadlyexchangereport/
Deadly Exchange report reveals extent of massive training programs between U.S. law enforcement and Israeli police, military and the Shin Bet

housands of participants in Deadly Exchange programs include ICE agents and past and current police chiefs of Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, LA, Seattle and Washington DC September 12, 2018 – From the acting Deputy Director of ICE to the current Chief of Police in Washington DC, from San Diego to Chicago to Atlanta, since 2002 thousands of American law enforcement officials have trained in Israel with Israeli police, military and the Shin Bet. And thousands more have participated in security conferences and workshops with Israeli military, law enforcement and security officials held in the U.S. But despite their branding as top-tier counter-terrorism experts, Israeli police and security agents regularly violate civil rights, and implement racist and deadly policies.
Released today, Deadly Exchange: The Dangerous Consequences of American Law Enforcement Trainings in Israel, comprehensively documents how these trainings solidify partnerships between the U.S. and Israeli governments to exchange methods of state violence and control, including mass surveillance, racial profiling, and suppression of protest and dissent.
Produced by Researching the American Israeli Alliance (RAIA) in partnership with Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), the report is the result of dozens of FOIAs yielding hundreds of documents, exclusive interviews with American and Israeli personnel, and exhaustive academic and media research in English, Arabic and Hebrew. Accompanying the report, RAIA released the Palestine is Here Database, a search engine mapping Israeli trainings of US law enforcement across American cities and towns.
“American police already have a terrible track record on civil rights and racism – and then they go to Israel and train with Israeli police and security agencies that are documented human rights violators! We should be investing in our communities, not militarizing our police” – Jewish Voice for Peace Deputy Director Stefanie Fox
“The dangers of U.S. law enforcement training in Israel for communities across the United States make clear that U.S. policy on Israel is not just a foreign policy issue, but one of civil rights. This unholy alliance between the U.S. and Israeli governments and American military industries is creating an injustice that we must urgently address” – RAIA Executive Director Eran Efrati
Deadly Exchange: The Dangerous Consequences of American Law Enforcement Trainings in Israel documents how these training programs contradict the heroic efforts of the civil rights movements in the U.S. to counter racist state violence – including counter-terrorism initiatives – in black, brown and poor communities.
CASE STUDY: On a police training exchange in Israel, the Boston Police Commissioner visited Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv, where he learned about Israel’s passenger screening process, including racial and ethnic profiling of passengers. Shortly after, Boston’s Logan airport became the first American airport to pioneer the Israeli inspired Screening Passengers by Observation Techniques (SPOT) program. Years later, SPOT not only came under fire for being ineffective and wasteful, but also for facilitating discriminatory racial profiling at airports around the country.
The report also details the financial incentives and trade-offs between Israeli and American security firms and technologies.
CASE STUDY: Developed by Israeli police and manufactured by the Israeli company Odortec, “Skunk” is a foul-smelling liquid designed to cause nausea and linger for days when sprayed at high pressure onto protesters at demonstrations. Based on its proven effectiveness against Palestinian protests – particularly in West Bank village demonstrations against the Apartheid Wall – the American company Mistral Security began selling Skunk to U.S. police departments, including the St. Louis Metropolitan Police, following the 2014 protests in Ferguson, Missouri.
Deadly Exchange: The Dangerous Consequences of American Law Enforcement Trainings in Israel demonstrates that the U.S. law enforcement agencies’ endorsement of Israel’s use of invasive surveillance, blatant racial profiling, and brutal force as a model for policing puts us all in danger.
 
Hoid
+1
#2017
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Bush was the wrong man at the wrong place at the wrong time in history. I sincerely doubt that Al Gore would have reacted that way.

This is so true. Other than Trump I cannot think of a worse guy to have in office on 911.

As bad as his leadership was on 911 it was even worse in the aftermath.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#2018
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

This is so true. Other than Trump I cannot think of a worse guy to have in office on 911.

As bad as his leadership was on 911 it was even worse in the aftermath.


How so?
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#2019
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

What a complete waste of time that war has turned out to be.


Maybe, maybe not! It's impossible to tell what the situation would be like now had the war not occurred. So Damned Insane might still be alive, along with his two lovely sons.
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
+1
#2020
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Maybe, maybe not! It's impossible to tell what the situation would be like now had the war not occurred. So Damned Insane might still be alive, along with his two lovely sons.

and so would a million innocent people.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#2021
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

and so would a million innocent people.


That's something there's no way to tell for sure, maybe a million more would have died. The insurgents weren't exactly innocent.
 
Hoid
+1 / -1
#2022
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

That's something there's no way to tell for sure, maybe a million more would have died. The insurgents weren't exactly innocent.

we were the insurgents
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
#2023
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

That's something there's no way to tell for sure, maybe a million more would have died. The insurgents weren't exactly innocent.

Not exactly innocent?


Madeleine Albright - The deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children was worth it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bntsfiAXMEE


After leaving the National Security Council, Albright joined the academic faculty of Georgetown University and advised Democratic candidates regarding foreign policy. After Clinton's victory in the 1992 presidential election, she helped assemble his National Security Council. In 1993, Clinton appointed her to the position of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. She held that position until 1997, when she succeeded Warren Christopher as Secretary of State, serving until Clinton left office in 2001.

In 1941, Josef and Anna converted from Judaism to Catholicism in an effort to protect their family from the Nazis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madeleine_Albright

Protection from the nazis?....OK clownpeeple.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#2024
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

we were the insurgents


I suggest you educate yourself instead of being an ignoramus all your life. Read the attached (unless you are totally ignorant)



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_...3%E2%80%932011)
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
#2025
You invade a country, you are the insurgent. What the US called insurgents were people trying to get rid of an invading army. The US did not invade Iraq to kill Saddam. They invaded to steal their oil and disrupt and destabilize the muddled east. Saddam was an asshole but he kept the ME stable and that is against US interests.
 
EagleSmack
+3
#2026
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

You invade a country, you are the insurgent. What the US called insurgents were people trying to get rid of an invading army. The US did not invade Iraq to kill Saddam. They invaded to steal their oil and disrupt and destabilize the muddled east. Saddam was an asshole but he kept the ME stable and that is against US interests.

The 90s called... they want their dumb things to say back.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#2027
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

You invade a country, you are the insurgent. What the US called insurgents were people trying to get rid of an invading army. The US did not invade Iraq to kill Saddam. They invaded to steal their oil and disrupt and destabilize the muddled east. Saddam was an asshole but he kept the ME stable and that is against US interests.


I suppose if murdering 30,000 of his own people annually is stable.
 
spilledthebeer
+1
#2028
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

The waters are rising around President Racist. A majority of House Democrats are now in favor of an impeachment inquiry.

Pelosi is the only thing holding it up.

We have come a long way from 4 progs wanting impeachment.

The realization is setting in that everyone is going to be remembered for where they stood on trying to hold this thug to account.






IMBECILE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!


The Democrats HAVE ALWAYS BEEN IN FAVOUR OF IMPEACHMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



THE LITTLE DETAIL.....................................


that keeps tripping them up................................................ ..


IS COMPLETE LACK OF EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I suggest that LIE-berals consider the public reaction.....................................


to impeachment proceedings that have all the charm and grace and logic............................................. .......


of a SHOW TRIAL at a Soviet Union Stalin era....................................


PURGE of enemies of the STATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Washington IS NOT Stalinist MOSCOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


NOT YET anyway!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!


And given the current DELUSIONAL THINKING of Democrats.....................................


they are going to make themselves................................


LOOK VERY STUPID............................................


after a FAILED IMPEACHMENT TRIAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Democrats are trying to RIP UP AND TRASH the standard RULES OF EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The call for impeachment WITH SO LITTLE EVIDENCE..................................


makes Democrats look like HARD CORE NAZIS ........................................


trying to stage a BEER HALL PUTSCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Just like HITLER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Which probably suits Hitlary Clinton just fine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Consider how SLIMY AND DISHONEST Democrats will look..................................


if they begin impeachment proceedings...................................


and WE KNOW HOW LONG it will take to get a verdict...............................


then consider that Democrats would probably rule Trump could not participate in the 2020 election................................


as he is under that impeachment "political cloud"................


and AFTER somebody else becomes president.................................


Trump IS CLEARED OF WRONG DOING...........................................


and has been DENIED another chance at election.....................................


because of a pack of DIRTY UNPROVEN LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



After such a shameless travesty of justice......................................


WHO would ever trust a Democrat EVER AGAIN?????????????????????????????


The history books would speak FOREVER AFTER.................................


of the Democratic Kangaroo Court....................................


that MORTALLY WOUNDED American Democracy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!



But then................................


LIE-berals see themselves as being SO ENTITLED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


That an HONEST DEFENSE OF TRUTH AND DEMOCRACY.......................................


is beneath their dignity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
+1
#2029
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#2030
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

The waters are rising around President Racist. A majority of House Democrats are now in favor of an impeachment inquiry.

Pelosi is the only thing holding it up.

We have come a long way from 4 progs wanting impeachment.

The realization is setting in that everyone is going to be remembered for where they stood on trying to hold this thug to account.


Oh Hoidie, seems "Spilled the Beer" has you pegged, along with me and several others. I think you have to get back to the drawing board with most of your philosophy. You don't really want to continue nattering nonsense!
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
#2031
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

The waters are rising around President Racist. A majority of House Democrats are now in favor of an impeachment inquiry.
Pelosi is the only thing holding it up.
We have come a long way from 4 progs wanting impeachment.
The realization is setting in that everyone is going to be remembered for where they stood on trying to hold this thug to account.

What are they going to impeach him on? To much time used on tweeting?
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#2032
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

What are they going to impeach him on? To much time used on tweeting?


Ridiculous, isn't it? Meanwhile Trump is just sitting back chortling at the idiots!
 
Hoid
#2033
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

What are they going to impeach him on? To much time used on tweeting?

What aren't they going to impeach him on.

How about being a racist?
 
DaSleeper
+1
#2034
Naaah............ because he's a white Natty?
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
+1
#2035
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

What aren't they going to impeach him on.
How about being a racist?

Proof?
 
Hoid
#2036
Paperboy needs a paper
 
DaSleeper
+3
#2037
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Paperboy needs a paper

Naaah......Because you're a well known bullshitter!
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#2038
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

Naaah......Because you're a well known bullshitter!


With a wild imagination. May have been listening to Ocean Breeze too much and believes her fantasies.
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
+1
#2039
Instead of name calling like little children in the school yard
( while doing the same dumb ass bla bla bla thing at the same time, heh...)

NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party


NBC NEWS PUBLISHED a predictably viral story Friday, claiming that “experts who track websites and social media linked to Russia have seen stirrings of a possible campaign of support for Hawaii Democrat Tulsi Gabbard.”

But the whole story was a sham: The only “expert” cited by NBC in support of its key claim was the firm New Knowledge, which just got caught by the New York Times fabricating Russian troll accounts on behalf of the Democratic Party in the Alabama Senate race to manufacture false accusations that the Kremlin was interfering in that election.
https://theintercept.com/2019/02/03/...ocratic-party/

(NY times link)
Secret Experiment in Alabama Senate Race Imitated Russian Tactics
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/u...es-russia.html

People always refuse to observe their own genocides, they just want to point out other people's
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
#2040
 

Similar Threads

4684
Trump's AMERICA : 2018 (& world reaction )
by Ocean Breeze | Sep 26th, 2019
55
2018 - 2019 World Junior Hockey
by Mowich | Jan 6th, 2019
4
World starts to welcome 2019
by Blackleaf | Jan 1st, 2019