CDN Election 2019


spilledthebeer
#841
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Bernier not invited to the leaders debate.

Does not meet the criteria




HemerHOID NOT INVITED to discuss the leaders debate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


HemerHOID does not understand the criteria!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#842
Spilkedthebeer doesn't understand the difference between "the criterion" and the plural "criteria" so early in the morning.

.... must be a closet LIEBERAL who's trying to hoodwink us.
 
spilledthebeer
#843
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Spilkedthebeer doesn't understand the difference between "the criterion" and the plural "criteria" so early in the morning.

.... must be a closet LIEBERAL who's trying to hoodwink us.






HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Apparently Comrade Curious does not understand the CRITERIA EITHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



As the leaders debate can be expected to cover an ARRAY of subjects...............................


AND CRITERIA????????????????????????????????????
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#844
Can't wait for Jagmeet's take on Alberta separatism.

See if it's anything like Punjabi separatism.
 
Hoid
-1
#845
you expect a federal leader to be pro separation?
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#846
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

you expect a federal leader to be pro separation?

Of course not.

It likely will not come up. It is very much a minority view in a minority place.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#847
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Of course not.

It likely will not come up. It is very much a minority view in a minority place.


It's a very moot point anyway, so sense in even worrying about it. Too much ink has already been wasted on this subject.
 
spilledthebeer
#848
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Can't wait for Jagmeet's take on Alberta separatism.

See if it's anything like Punjabi separatism.




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Poor Foolish Comrade Curious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!


The rest of Canada............................................ .....


IS STILL WAITING FOR Jagmeet the Dead Political Meat..................................


to produce a COHERENT COMMENT ....................................


about the Kinder Morgan pipeline!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!


And he has HAD THREE YEARS.....................................


and his opinion is................................................ ........


SILENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!



Dead Meat HAS NOTHING OF SIGNIFICANCE TO SAY...........................


about REAL NATIONAL ISSUES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


DO you really expect him to comment.....................


IN ANY SENSIBLE WAY..............................


on the deranged dreams.....................................


of the Abexit LUNATIC FRINGE??????????????????????


How CONFUSED ARE YOU?????????????????????????

 
spilledthebeer
#849
Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Poor Foolish Comrade Curious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!


The rest of Canada............................................ .....


IS STILL WAITING FOR Jagmeet the Dead Political Meat..................................


to produce a COHERENT COMMENT ....................................


about the Kinder Morgan pipeline!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!


And he has HAD THREE YEARS.....................................


and his opinion is................................................ ........


SILENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!



Dead Meat HAS NOTHING OF SIGNIFICANCE TO SAY...........................


about REAL NATIONAL ISSUES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


DO you really expect him to comment.....................


IN ANY SENSIBLE WAY..............................


on the deranged dreams.....................................


of the Abexit LUNATIC FRINGE??????????????????????


How CONFUSED ARE YOU?????????????????????????








IN OTHER NEWS.............................................. ......


LIE-berals WILL NEVER ALLOW Alberta to secede!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!


If Alberta separates.....................................


then Ottawa LIE-berals LOSE their ability ....................................


to over regulate and STRANGLE..........................................


the Alberta Oil Patch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
+1
#850
Trudeau Defends Using Doug Ford’s Name To Attack Conservatives

Infrastructure money 'not Ralph Goodale's re-election fund:' Moe

Quote:

REGINA — Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is suggesting the federal government is playing favourites with infrastructure funding to give a boost to Liberal-area member of Parliament Ralph Goodale.
The province is in a dispute with Ottawa over how millions in federal infrastructure dollars will flow to projects in different communities.
Moe questions why the federal government is focused on funding for two outdoor swimming pools in Goodale's Regina riding when they're not a priority for the province.
He says there's a long list of other recreational projects Ottawa could consider.
"This is an infrastructure fund that is put forward to ensure that we can move forward on provincial priorities," Moe said Tuesday.
"This is not Ralph Goodale's re-election fund."
Goodale said the pools, one of which serves low-income inner city kids, have been identified as important to Regina.
"The provincial government has said that those kids are a lesser priority than a landfill or a garage dump somewhere else," he said.
Goodale also said of the 25 infrastructure projects the province submitted for federal funding, 21 of them fall in constituencies represented by Moe's Saskatchewan Party.
"So what do you read in that?" he said. "Surely that's not partisan."
The federal government recently announced it had approved funding for 13 of Saskatchewan's infrastructure projects and would be likely to approve more.

 
B00Mer
No Party Affiliation
+3
#851
#BREAKING This is unprecedented. Trudeau was just found guilty of meddling in Canada’s justice system.

This is now the second time Trudeau has been found guilty of violating Canada’s ethics laws ��

#TrudeauMustGo
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
+1
#852
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

Trudeau Defends Using Doug Fordís Name To Attack Conservatives
Infrastructure money 'not Ralph Goodale's re-election fund:' Moe

It's an old tradition before an election. A giant paving machine rolls across every Liberal riding in the country. If you vote Tory, you'll get your roads fixed once a decade. If you vote NDP,you can't see over the rims of the pot holes, anymore.
 
Hoid
+1 / -1
#853
depending on the federal government to pave your streets is somewhat silly
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
+1
#854
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

depending on the federal government to pave your streets is somewhat silly

Tru dat but Provincial governments A) play the partisan game and B) very often do pave their roads using "infrastructure" money from the Feds. We are not privy to the strings attached, there.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#855
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

depending on the federal government to pave your streets is somewhat silly


Happens all the time!
 
spilledthebeer
#856
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

depending on the federal government to pave your streets is somewhat silly




POOR STUPID LIE=berals..................................


trying SO VERY HARD...................................


to distract from TRUDOPE SHAME......................................


AND LIE-beral DISGRACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!


LIE-berals are carefully trying to get us to FORGET.................................


that NINE civil service union HOGS in the Prime Ministers Office..............................


JUST REFUSED TO Talk to the Ethics Commissioner about LAVALIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


So much for ANY PRETENSE of civil service HOG neutrality!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Our idiot Boy Justin currently stands CONVICTED OF TWO Breaches of Ethics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


But LIE-berals are trying FRANTICALLY TO HIDE THE THIRD ONGOING ETHICS BREACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I refer of course to the GROSS CONFLICT OF INTEREST........................................


in which civil service union HOGS get great gobs of gravy in exchange FOR DEFENDING LIE-beral RULE BREAKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And our HOGS get even MORE GRAVY for VOTING in support of LIE-berals at election time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Cdn LIE-berals are engaged in the sort of shameless election scams typically seen in THIRD WORLD PEST HOLE NATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!



And LIE-berals are desperately hoping they can use that SIX MILLION DOLLAR MEDIA SLUSH FUND.............................


that they SET UP TO BUY GOOD PRESS from media "THEY TRUST"...................................


to help cover their CRIMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



 
spilledthebeer
#857
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

depending on the federal government to pave your streets is somewhat silly




Sadly.........................in this one comment......................................


hemerHOID is CORRECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


LIE-berals DO NOT THINK we have any right to paved streets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!


LIE-berals DO NOT approve of us using paved streets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Because all we do on those paved streets...........................................



is create pollution......................................... ..


and cost LIE-berals money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!


LIE-berals view the average Cdn in much the same light as Ebeneezer SCROOGE................................


GROWLING about "surplus population"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Are there no work houses?????????????????


Are there no jails?????????????????????


With the LIE-beral Electoral Reform CRAP.............................................


their attempts to reserve Parliament seats based on gender............................


REGARDLESS of who we prefer to support....................................



the INSISTENCE on hiring ONLY NON whites for govt jobs...................................


the constant shameless insults about "systemic racists"....................................


the Islamophobia madness and attempts to use Human Rights Kangaroo Courts............................................ .....


to silence ANY critic of any LIE-beral policy............................................ .........


the issuing of tens of thousands of voter registration cards........................


not just to people who are DEAD................................


but to illegals who have no right to vote.........................................


along with the "vouching system" that allows TOTALLY UNKNOWN..............................



and unidentified people to VOTE in critical swing ridings...............................


IN SUPPORT OF LIE-berals..................................



where a seat may be won or lost by a mere few votes..................................


with the people being vouched for ..................................................


being chosen at the discretion of civil service union HOGS....................................


who all HATE Conservative govt........................................


and who are engaged in a MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST......................................


by voting LIE-beral in exchange for massive pay raises.........................................


LIE-berals demonstrate THEIR TOTAL DISDAIN for the general Cdn public.................................


and for our political choices!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
#858
ANALYSIS: NB, P.E.I. most recent winners of Trudeau government pre-election spending

Quote:

Politicians in any government at any time will spend their summers doing the barbeque circuit, often with federal cheques in hand to fund any number of local projects.
But this summer, days away from the beginning of what looks to be a very tight federal election contest, the Liberals are pouring it on with spending announcements, with a distinct focus on ridings and regions that are likely to be hotly contested.

Last week, for example, the federal government made 334 funding announcements in New Brunswick alone. The party swept all 10 seats in the province in 2015 but stands to lose as many as half of those seats, according to a seat projection analysis done by Global News.
First, the federal government announced how much just about every municipality in New Brunswick will get from an enhanced federal gas-tax-fund rebate program. That was shortly followed by another press release from Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez bragging about the hundreds of festivals, Acadian Days and Canada Days underwritten in part by federal grants.
To top it off, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau himself showed up with a cheque in Fredericton, where local Liberal MP Matt DeCourcey will be facing a stiff challenge from both the Green Party and the Conservative Party. Trudeau’s cheque was worth $11.4 million and will help Fredericton with flood-mitigation projects.
Add all of those 334 funding announcements up, and they total $133.4 million worth of talking points for Liberal MPs campaigning for re-election in New Brunswick.
ANALYSIS: Liberal ministers find a fondness for visits to battleground ridings
Across the Northumberland Strait in Prince Edward Island, there are but four seats up for grabs, and all but one should be reliably Liberal. The one up for grabs is the seat at the province’s western end, Egmont, which went Conservative in the general elections of 2008 and 2011 before Bobby Morrissey won it back for the Liberals in 2015. It can’t but help, then, that in the flurry of spending announcements last week, there was also a pile of new money announced for municipalities and businesses in Egmont. Morrissey can point to 27 municipalities or projects that just last week received a combined $5 million in fresh federal funding commitments.
Like New Brunswick, P.E.I. communities also learned how much they’re getting in gas-tax-fund rebates, but there were also several grants doled out of the Atlantic Fisheries Fund that went to oyster producers on the island — many, again, in Morrissey’s riding of Egmont.
Overall, the federal government last week announced 88 funding commitments on the Island worth a combined $28.2 million...………….More

 
B00Mer
No Party Affiliation
+2
#859
 
DaSleeper
+2
#860
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post


Ain't nuthin' , We have a couple of isis supporters right here in the forum.................
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#861
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post


Maybe not a bad idea! Drop him off on Ellesmere Island with a box of matches, a pocket knife and a can of Off!
 
Decapoda
+3
#862
“The Liberal Party believes that terrorists should get to keep their Canadian citizenship ... because I do,” Trudeau told a Winnipeg town hall in July. “And I'm willing to take on anyone who disagrees with that. He added: “As soon as you make citizenship for some Canadians conditional on good behaviour, you devalue citizenship for everyone.”

Meanwhile...

In Sunday's statement, Goodale's office said... "There is no legal obligation to facilitate their return," the statement read. "We are not able to comment on specific cases or national security operational matters."


Looks like Trudeau needs to educate Goodale on the new Liberal virtues. Goodale needs to stop "devaluing Canadian citizenship for everyone" with his crazy notions of keeping dangerous ISIS terrorists out of our country.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#863
What's he been convicted of?
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
+2
#864
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

What's he been convicted of?

Being British without a licence.
 
B00Mer
No Party Affiliation
+3
#865
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
#866
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

Being British without a licence.

LOL......well stated..
 
spilledthebeer
+1
#867
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

ANALYSIS: NB, P.E.I. most recent winners of Trudeau government pre-election spending




And did you notice just how MUCH LIE-beral BRIBERY..............................


IS ABSOLUTELY DEPENDENT on the LIE-beral .............................


carbon crap and trade tax SCAM?????????????????????????????????


Just how STUPID do people have to be to get excited.........................


over being bribed with their own money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
#868
The Upcoming Canadian Leaders' Debate Will Be Led By An All Female Panel


Quote:

Today the moderators for the federal election leaders' debate were announced and it's packing a lot of woman power. The all-female panel includes five Canadian journalists who will each lead a specific section of the debate. However, the reaction to the announcement has been all over the place.
The leaders debate takes place in the lead up to the Canadian federal election. All five of the political party leaders who were invited to the official debates, both in English and French, have confirmed their attendance.
The English debate is set for Oct. 7 and will be led by Althia Raj (HuffPost Canada), Susan Delacourt (Toronto Star), Rosemary Barton (CBC News), Dawna Friesen (Global News) and Lisa LaFlamme (CTV News).

Who knew the announcement of moderators for an election debate could stir up so much controversy, though? In fact, after the recent news, the reaction to the list of moderators has been quite mixed.
Some Canadians are absolutely loving the fact that panel this year is made up of all women.

Many tweets to read in the article

In the midst of reaction to who the moderators are, some can't help but call into question the legitimacy of the whole debate entirely. This comes as Maxime Bernier, leader of People's Party of Canada, wasn't invited.
Last week the Leaders’ Debates Commission announced that Bernier's People's Party of Canada had not been cleared to debate because it didn't meet the criteria to participate.

 
pgs
Free Thinker
+1
#869
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

The Upcoming Canadian Leaders' Debate Will Be Led By An All Female Panel

It is 2019 after all.
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
#870
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

It is 2019 after all.

Yep and how much sway $600 Million will give you
 

Similar Threads

3
Predictions 2018-2019
by Yo0 | Jun 10th, 2019
15
Family Day to be changed 2019
by JLM | Feb 10th, 2018
12
Conservative Party in 2019
by Sorrow | Dec 29th, 2017