Is Normal Now A Mental Illness?


jjw1965
#1
Pressbox | September 29 2005

Is your child easily distracted? Or perhaps he talks excessively, or can become impatient?

Most, if not all, parents would perhaps answer yes to these questions, as they are, what many of us believe to be, normal expressions of child behaviour.

Not so, according to Psychiatry. It could be that your child has "Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder", a "disease" of the mind that could require medical treatment.

The American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistics Manual (DSM, version IV), the psychiatrist's handbook, lists a number of behavioural traits, such as these, that it considers abnormal in children. Others include: "often has difficulty awaiting turn", "often does not seem to listen when spoken to directly", and "often has difficulty playing or engaging in leisure activities quietly".

'It's total fraud', says Michael Westen, editor of Psychbusters (groups.msn.com/psychbusters), an online activist group that was set up in 2000 to 'decode Psychiatric propaganda'. 'This is not a disease and these are not "diagnostic criteria." These are subjective judgments aimed at coercing a person to follow rules of "proper conduct" made by others with power. The list could just as easily contain: fails to be white, often does not attend a Christian church, tends to be smaller, younger, and unable to do adult tasks.'

'For a disease to exist there must be a tangible, objective physical abnormality that can be determined by a test,' says neurologist Dr. Fred Baughman. 'Such as, but not limited to, a blood or urine test, X-Ray, brain scan or biopsy. All reputable doctors would agree: No physical abnormality, no disease. In psychiatry, no test or brain scan exists to prove that a 'mental disorder' is a physical disease.'

Baughman, from California, and Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology, is one of an ever-growing number of campaigners fighting to expose the lies within the psychiatric industry. An adult & child neurologist of some 35 years, Dr. Baughman is vocal when coming up against misleading research or downright fraud palmed off as "science". 'They made a list of the most common symptoms of emotional discomfiture of children, those which bother teachers and parents most, and in a stroke that could not be more devoid of science or Hippocratic motive--termed them a "disease". Twenty five years of research, not deserving of the term "research", has failed to validate ADD/ADHD as a disease. Tragically--the "epidemic" having grown from 500 thousand in 1985 to between 5 and 7 million today--this remains the state of the "science" of ADHD.'

Despite there being no scientific basis for ADHD, prescriptions of Methylphenidate - most commonly sold as Ritalin - rose to 359,100 last year, a rise of 344,400 since 1995. Figures from the Prescriptions Pricing Authority reveal that there has been a 180-fold increase in prescriptions since 1991 when only 2,000 were issued in England.

Ritalin, which is pharmacologically similar to Cocaine, is a favoured treatment option for those labelled with ADHD, yet critics claim it is a harmful drug that can cause neurological defects and further behavioural difficulties. Earlier this year, researchers in Texas found a link between Ritalin use and chromosome abnormalities - occurrences associated with increased risks of cancer and other adverse health effects.

'The simple fact is that there is absolutely no reliable test that accurately distinguishes between children that are supposed to have "ADHD" and those that are not', says Dr. John Breeding, author of "The Wildest Colts Make The Best Horses". To counter the claim that ADHD is a valid medical condition that requires medical treatment, Breeding encourages parents to demand conclusive scientific evidence. For there simply isn't any.

Elliot S. Valenstien, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of Psychology and Neuroscience at the University of Michigan also agrees. 'Contrary to what is often claimed, no biochemical, anatomical, or functional signs have been found that reliably distinguish the brains of mental patients.'

'I am constantly amazed by how many patients who come to see me believe or want to believe that their difficulties are biologic and can be relieved by a pill,' says psychiatrist Dr. David Kaiser. 'This is despite the fact that modern psychiatry has yet to convincingly prove the genetic/biologic cause of any single mental illness. However, this does not stop psychiatry from making essentially unproven claims that depression, bipolar illness, anxiety disorders, alcoholism and a host of other disorders are in fact primarily biologic and probably genetic in origin, and that it is only a matter of time until all this is proven. This kind of faith in science and progress is staggering, not to mention naive and perhaps delusional.'

'There are many reasons why a child can become inattentive or hyperactive," says Michael Westen. 'Nutritional deficiencies or a poor diet are often underlying problems. There can be difficulties in the home, vision problems, even a lack of sleep. There can be many others. Yet instead of looking at all these issues, Psychiatry ignores them, inventing a one-size-fits-all "disease" that requires "medication".'

'Disingenuous comparisons between physical and mental illness and medicine are simply part of psychiatry's orchestrated but fraudulent public relations and marketing campaign,' says Dr. Baughman.

Many seem to share these views including the late Dr. Loren Mosher, a noted psychiatrist and clinical professor of Psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego, and former Chief of the Center for Studies of Schizophrenia at the National Institute of Mental Health. Mosher famously resigned from the American Psychiatric Association in 1998 due to Psychiatry's growing "unholy alliance" with the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry.

'Psychiatry has become drug dependent (that is, devoted to pill pushing) at all levels - private practitioners, public system psychiatrists, university faculty and organizationally,' Mosher wrote before attacking the field as being mechanistic, reductionistic, tunnel-visioned and dehumanising.

'Modern psychiatry has forgotten the Hippocratic principle,' Mosher once wrote. 'Above all, do no harm.'
 
mrmom2
#2
Well how do you expect the big drug companies to sell there brain wrecking drugs if you don't have phoney evidence that there needed :P Are ya a little depressed today do you ever feel anxious well we've got a pill for you
 
Twila
#3
Can you provide the link to that story. I'd like to forward it to a friend who is currently having her 2 and a half year old tested for add
 
Canucklehead
#4
"...and though she's not really ill, there's a little yellow pill" Puhlease! If parents, and indeed people in general, took a step back and realised, or accepted, that different people learn differently, are interested in different things and can not possibly be angels all the time not only would they be wiser and happier overall but shrinks would regain their status as quasi-professionals who hang with the likes of chiropractors. Bah! People are so frickin gullible
 
Canucklehead
#5
"...and though she's not really ill, there's a little yellow pill"

Puhlease! If parents, and indeed people in general, took a step back and realised, or accepted, that different people learn differently, are interested in different things and can not possibly be angels all the time not only would they be wiser and happier overall but shrinks would regain their status as quasi-professionals who hang with the likes of chiropractors. Bah! People are so frickin gullible
 
annabattler
#6
Much of the "add" or adhd" disorder theory is being driven by teachers...they find a child easily distractible, "not able to keep on task" and they call in the parents,who rush the child to the doctor...prescription time!!
Of course,as adults,we too seem to look for the 'quick" fix in medication from the medical professionals.
 
Jo Canadian
#7
In the good 'ol days teachers had a solution with the "add & adhd" type students, and it didn't require any drugs at all....A nice thick leather Strap!

Nothing like putting in the fear of god with corporal punishment in front of your peers to make you think twice before slacking off eh? Nowadays we're not allowed to do it, and of course the kids know it. To some degree a few even take advantage of it and are complete jackasses disrupting the classes.

I guess the question is, is you can't beat em, and drugging them isn't a good solution...What would be? The children in question won't change, even if you said pretty please. I'm stumped. I'm glad I'm not a teacher, although I've had my stint in subbing. Where I did it, the ADD kids weren't drugged, they were taken out of the regular classes and put in a special class.

Guess which one I was stuck in! Let's just say the reason why I was subbing was because the Teacher would even fake being sick just to avoid the class!
 
Said1
Free Thinker
#8
I often wonder if those who dropped out of school 25+ years agow would be medicated if the option was available then.Being a high school drop out wasn't such the stigma then as it is now. I certainly knew a lot of hyper kids in school, teachers managed to get through to them, or threw them out of their class. The choice was up to the student. Some quite, some hit the books, but no one was medicated.
 
mrmom2
#9
I was Said But it was self medicated And yes i dropped out tuned in and turned on :P
 

Similar Threads

12
Is it Normal?
by Twila | Jun 16th, 2005