The Evils of Socialism


Tecumsehsbones
#31
Quote: Originally Posted by gopher View Post

Yes, these do constitutes different aspects of socialism. Blame the following for believing in all that:

Jefferson believed in free education

Washington believed in roads and bridges

Thomas Paine believed in old age pension/social security

Alexander Hamilton believed in federal government building up the infrastructure.
Significantly, not one of these socialists believed in a standing army while they believed in separation of church and state.

Damn commies!
 
petros
+1
#32
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

Hospitals.
Public education.
Police.
Fire and emergency medical services.
Health care.
Food and drug safety.
Consumer product safety.
Old age pensions.
Roads and bridges.
Sewers.
And, depending on your definition. . .
Laws.

All investments in Human Capital that is used by Govt to borrow money on your potential.


If your business relies on a truck do you not do everything you can to keep that truck earning?
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
#33
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack;

They also owned slaves... thanks to Socialism I suppose.



Nope. Thanks to Christianity.
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
#34
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones;

Damn commies!

One of the greatest ironies in American history in that many delusionals of the far right believe socialists influenced modern American politics, particularly of the Democratic party when in reality it was our Founding Fathers who influenced socialists.
No surprise that history reveals this reality:

cartoonist Robert Minor was a communist
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
+1
#35
The bankers have been funding communism since it was invented because it is the easiest way to get control of a nation's assets.

it has effe all to do with politics.

Jacob Schiff was openly supportive of the Russian Revolution and in a letter published in the New York Times on 17 March, he ‘thanked the Almighty that a great and good people had been freed from their autocratic Czarist shackles’. [3] Two days later he voiced his opinion that Russia would, before long, rank financially amongst the most favoured nations in the money markets of the world. [4] Interestingly, that same issue of the New York Times reported that there had been a rise in Russian exchange transactions in London 24 hours preceding the revolution. Ah, the Rothschilds, as ever, a day ahead of the rest of the world. It was explained away as mere coincidence.
https://firstworldwarhiddenhistory.w...t-benefactors/

Why did Jacob H. Schiff decide to financially sponsor the Russian Revolutions of 1917?
(Ummm...see link above.)

Schiff encouraged and financed armed revolt against the Czar. He provided financial support for Jewish self-defence groups in Russia, including Bolshevik and other socialist revolutionaries. He was set on fomenting revolution in Russia. The America author, G. Edward Griffin, pondered the question of Schiff’s involvement and unequivocally stated that Schiff ‘was one of the principle backers of the Bolshevik revolution and personally financed Trotsky’s trip from New York to Russia’. [8] Years later, Jacob Schiff’s grandson admitted that his grandfather had given about $20 million for the triumph of communism in Russia. [9]...

...Professor Spence agreed that Schiff ‘had a track record of financing revolutionaries’, and was ‘pro-German’. [10] This latter observation somewhat lets his thesis down. The German born Schiff was not pro-German. He and his German born Warburg partners in Kuhn, Loeb bank on Wall Street, and his good friend (and their brother) Max Warburg in Germany, together with their close Rothschild links in France and London, were not operating a nationalist agenda, whether it be German, British or American, but an internationalist agenda. And that agenda was the domination of the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. [11]

(PRO HINT: the US LOST WW 1 and 2, AND the cold war... duh! They just SAID you won!)

...They were globalists, first and last, seeking control of the entire world. It is why the question of their support for political Zionism, and how that fitted into their agenda, is of critical importance when considering both the Bolshevik Revolution and the Balfour Declaration. The time-scale within which the Anglo-American global-elites power-base moved from London to New York, and the ever growing influence of political Zionism

(Say, where the hell is das with a tin foil hat meme?)

http://www.schiffnaturepreserve.org/...chiffEssay.pdf
Last edited by Danbones; 5 days ago at 05:51 AM..
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
#36
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

Damn commies!

In communism the state owns all the slaves and resources, (like uranium one) in common...

It's why there is communion.
Last edited by Danbones; 5 days ago at 05:41 AM..
 
EagleSmack
+1
#37
Quote: Originally Posted by gopher View Post

Nope. Thanks to Christianity.


Well that was a Grade A FAIL.
 
MHz
#38
Up here 'D' is the fail line, unless you have a pencil and then everybody is smarter than anybody else. Now there is an education system that would be hard to beat.
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
#39
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack View Post

Well that was a Grade A FAIL.


Phooey. Read a few books on American history and learn that it was the truth.
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
+1 / -1
#40
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack;

They also owned slaves... thanks to Socialism I suppose.


Major League




In case you didn't know it, Republican hero Marx was born one full generation later.
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
#41
Lol, I like Trumps line to Ortrz: "People would rather walk their dogs than eat them!"
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
#42
 
MHz
#43
Better to just go ahead and reflect when it is in your rear view mirror. Sometime being 'from someplace' is a lot better than 'staying'.
 

Similar Threads

245
Socialism works
by whitedog | Sep 11th, 2016
10
419
Socialism Is the Only Way
by darkbeaver | Jan 31st, 2008