Latest Federal Polls


Twin_Moose
Conservative
+1
#691
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

there is no path to a conservative majority other than leading a successful minority.
but their basic beliefs are appalling and no leftie party is going to go along with them.

You should read the article before making a fool of yourself
 
Most helpful post: The members here have rated this post as best reply.
Hoid
#692
I would have to say that their beliefs are as valuable as anyone else's

But i'm not a white nationalist

I don't subscribe to the view that being white makes a person better or more valuable.
 
Twin_Moose
Conservative
+1
#693
^^^^^^^^Like I said^^^^^^^^^^
 
Hoid
#694
I stand by my statements:

1) the conservatives have no path to a majority and cannot form a minority

2) the beliefs of all Canadians are equally valid.
 
Colpy
Conservative
#695
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

I stand by my statements:

1) the conservatives have no path to a majority and cannot form a minority

2) the beliefs of all Canadians are equally valid.


1. You're wrong. There is no easy path to majority, that is true. But it is not at all unusual for election results to differ from polls by 3 or 4 points............and even now the cumulative poll from 338Canana gives the Conservatives an equal chance for majority to Libs and Conservatives. (23.6% chance Lib majority, 22.4% chance Conservative majority)


http://338canada.com/



2. You're wrong. You have every right to believe what you like, but philosophies such as Naziism, communism, or Satanism can hardly be considered "valid". Relativism is idiocy.
 
Hoid
#696
1. neither the Liberals or the conservatives are anywhere near the 170 seats they would need. There would need to be a massive shift in the vote in these last couple of months and I don't see how that could happen .

2. We are talking about Canadian Green and NDP voters.
 
Colpy
Conservative
+1
#697
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

1. neither the Liberals or the conservatives are anywhere near the 170 seats they would need. There would need to be a massive shift in the vote in these last couple of months and I don't see how that could happen .

2. We are talking about Canadian Green and NDP voters.


Better than a 1 out of 5 chance a majority happens. That is not "no road"


Some Green/NDP "values" are not valid to me, although (obviously) I didn't know what you were talking about. My point is "valid" is a completely subjective judgement when one is speaking of political philosophy.
Last edited by Colpy; Jul 22nd, 2019 at 01:19 PM..
 
Tecumsehsbones
#698
Hmm. . . I think I've figured out why Americans have only two parties of any significance and a "winner-take-all" system.

We're too dumb to handle anything more complicated.
 
spilledthebeer
#699
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

The liberals basic beliefs are much more aligned with the NDP and Greens than are the conservatives.

just a basic fact of Canadian politics.






Poor hemer-HOID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!


He DOES NOT wish to discuss the REALITY........................................


that ANY improvement in status .....................................


for either NDPers or Greenies..........................................


will come at LIE-beral EXPENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!


It is an "either or" situation..........................


there cannot be more of all three!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Curious Cdn
No Party Affiliation
#700
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

Hmm. . . I think I've figured out why Americans have only two parties of any significance and a "winner-take-all" system.
We're too dumb to handle anything more complicated.

You're having a great deal of difficulty with two.
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
+1 / -1
#701
 
spilledthebeer
#702
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

I stand by my statements:

1) the conservatives have no path to a majority and cannot form a minority

2) the beliefs of all Canadians are equally valid.






Poor hemer-HOID..........................................


he is angry because the white natty`s think he is TOO DUMB....................................


to be one of them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!


So he has joined the LIE-berals ranks..............................


as his best intellectual fit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Curious Cdn
No Party Affiliation
+1
#703
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

See that RAPE SEED behind him?

He needs a manager.
 
spilledthebeer
#704
Quote: Originally Posted by Curious Cdn View Post

See that RAPE SEED behind him?

He needs a manager.




See the DESPERATE LIE-beral FAKE NEWS.......................


that CDNS now RECOGNIZE FOR WHAT IT IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


If LIE-berals were prevented from LYING about Scheer.......................................


the LIE-beral election campaign WOULD BE AT AN END!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!


Why dont you tell us about that Harper SECRET AGENDA THAT NEVER APPEARED.........................................


except in your fevered FAKE NEWS POLLUTED BRAINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!


Better yet.......................................


explain how our economy can be booming....................


while producing record debt levels.......................


falling standard of living.........................


record numbers of HOMELESS.........................


record numbers of murders.............................


record numbers of drug addicts....................................



and record numbers of native suicides!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


IF these questions are too hard for you......................


then those who say LIE-berals are UNFIT TO GOVERN........


ARE PROVEN RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Walter
+2
#705
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

CWB was a millstone around the neck of Canadian farmers, good riddance to bad rubbish. Those farmers wishing for the return of the CWB should first trade in their 2019 Ford F350 and their new combines.
 
Hoid
#706
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

CWB was a millstone around the neck of Canadian farmers, good riddance to bad rubbish. Those farmers wishing for the return of the CWB should first trade in their 2019 Ford F350 and their new combines.

racist does not like the elites
 
Colpy
Conservative
+3
#707
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

racist does not like the elites


A farmer could not take the product of his labour (that obviously belongs to him) and sell it on the open market.


That is outrageous.


The product of your labour belongs to YOU, not the state.
 
pgs
Free Thinker
+2
#708
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

A farmer could not take the product of his labour (that obviously belongs to him) and sell it on the open market.


That is outrageous.


The product of your labour belongs to YOU, not the state.

You didn’t build that .
 
Hoid
#709
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

A farmer could not take the product of his labour (that obviously belongs to him) and sell it on the open market.


That is outrageous.


The product of your labour belongs to YOU, not the state.

They drive F350s They are bad rubbish.


Do you not even listen to the racist?
 
Colpy
Conservative
+3 / -1
#710
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

They drive F350s They are bad rubbish.


Do you not even listen to the racist?


What??????????????????????
 
Hoid
#711
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

CWB was a millstone around the neck of Canadian farmers, good riddance to bad rubbish. Those farmers wishing for the return of the CWB should first trade in their 2019 Ford F350 and their new combines.

You would well advised to start reading things the racist has to say.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+2
#712
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

They drive F350s They are bad rubbish.


Specifically WHAT is wrong with an F350? I've been driving F250s for over 25 years, but can certainly understand someone's need for the F350 for larger hauling capacity.
 
pgs
Free Thinker
#713
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Specifically WHAT is wrong with an F350? I've been driving F250s for over 25 years, but can certainly understand someone's need for the F350 for larger hauling capacity.

Who needs those big motor homes anyway ?
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#714
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

Who needs those big motor homes anyway ?


Yeah, guzzling up all that fossil fuel! (The snowflakes want to see it gone anyway)
 
Hoid
#715
And you are not a snowflake!
 
Walter
#716
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

What??????????????????????

Hence on ignore.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+2
#717
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

And you are not a snowflake!


To be quite honest I don't have a hell of a lot against fossil fuels. They've paid hundreds of thousands to members of my family either directly or indirectly, besides a hell of a lot of it is used to generate electricity so don't be a hypocrite!
 
spilledthebeer
#718
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

CWB was a millstone around the neck of Canadian farmers, good riddance to bad rubbish. Those farmers wishing for the return of the CWB should first trade in their 2019 Ford F350 and their new combines.






TRUE DAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!


I recall seeing news photos of Cdn farmers...........................................


SNEAKING TRUCK LOADS of grain across the border..................................


to sell for BETTER PRICES to Yankees.................................


so they would not have to deal with the civil service union HOG grain GOOFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



There is NO ENTERPRISE.........................


that cannot be damaged severely..........................


merely by letting union HOGS help you with it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
spilledthebeer
#719
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

racist does not like the elites




and hemerHOID routinely LIES about racists........................................


because he is a LIE-beral BIGOT.............................................


and hemerHOID spews nonsense about elites......................................


BECAUSE HE HAS NEVER MET ONE AND HAS NO IDEA........................................


WHAT SUCH CREATURES MIGHT BE LIKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


poor hemerHOID............................


when he dies.............................................. ...................................


his PENANCE will be to READ all his old idiot posts............................................. .......


and memorize every single one..........................................


and ADMIT he was TOTALLY WRONG about EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
spaminator
+2
#720
Liberals make gains but Tories still lead: Poll
Canadian Press
Published:
July 26, 2019
Updated:
July 26, 2019 5:23 PM EDT
Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (L) and Conservative Party Leader Andrew Scheer.MANDEL NGAN / SEBASTIEN ST-JEAN / AFP / GETTY IMAGES
OTTAWA — A new poll conducted for The Canadian Press seems to show the cloud of the SNC-Lavalin controversy is lifting for the federal Liberals, who now face a closer fight with the Conservatives less than three months to go until the election.
In a survey conducted earlier this month, the polling firm Leger found 36% support among decided voters for the Conservatives, versus 33% for the Liberals.
The firm says support for the Tories has dipped by two percentage points since the last time it conducted a survey in June, while support for the Liberals has gone up by four percentage points.
At 12% support among Leger’s respondents, the Greens were slightly ahead of the New Democrats’ 11%. The Bloc Quebecois was favoured by 4% and Maxime Bernier’s People’s Party of Canada was at 3%.
The latest poll was conducted among 1,536 Canadians who are eligible to vote and were recruited from an online panel maintained for the purpose.
In its report, Leger said it cannot provide a margin of error for an internet panel because the method doesn’t provide a truly random sample. But for comparative purposes, a “probability sample” would have a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5%, 19 times out of 20.
Leger vice-president Christian Bourque said in an interview that the Liberals are just about back to levels of support that they had prior to the SNC-Lavalin controversy, which saw former justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould resign from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet.
In late February, Wilson-Raybould testified before the House of Commons justice committee that there was a “consistent and sustained effort” over the span of approximately four months by many people within the government to interfere in her exercise of prosecutorial discretion in her role as attorney general. They wanted her to arrange a type of plea-bargain for SNC-Lavalin, a giant Quebec-based engineering firm, on charges of corruption related to dealings in Libya.
Wilson-Raybould’s cabinet colleague Jane Philpott also resigned over Trudeau’s handling of the issue and both went on to be expelled from the Liberal caucus.
The sustained controversy was linked to a deteriorating support for the Liberals during the winter that saw Prime Minister Justin Trudeau slide for the first time in this mandate from being the top choice for Canadians in the upcoming election, Bourque said.
“We saw a (national) jump from 36 up to 40% for the Conservatives in late April in sort of the peak of that crisis and the Liberals actually going from the mid-30s down to the mid-20s at that time,” he said.
It was more than a knee-jerk public reaction to a string of bad news because the downward trend for the Liberals lasted for months, he added.
“After six months of the grey cloud … there’s sunlight (for the Liberals) again,” he said. Bourque noted that relatively small changes in national support are driven by more substantial shifts in Quebec and Ontario.
In Quebec, Bourque said the Conservatives were out slightly ahead in Leger’s April polling but the Liberals have returned to a lead that is, if not exactly comfortable, substantial enough that they can shift their thinking back to how many seats they can try to pick up in the province.
As for who respondents viewed as the best prime minister, Scheer led by a hair at 24% while Trudeau sat at 23%. The Greens’ Elizabeth May was at 9%, the New Democrats’ Singh was at 7% and People’s Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier was favoured by 4%.
A regional breakdown of the numbers shows the Conservatives did very well in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta but led by just a point in Atlantic Canada and British Columbia. The Tories and Liberals were tied Ontario and the Liberals led comfortably in Quebec.
Survey participants were also asked whether they felt the Liberals deserve a second mandate and whether the Conservatives have shown they deserve to form government. They were not very enthusiastic about either prospect.
Respondents said that 51% did not think the Liberals deserve another whack at power. Thirty percent said they do and 18% were undecided.
As for the Conservatives, 32% of respondents said they did believe the Tories have demonstrated they should form the next government while 44% said they haven’t and 24% were undecided..
Bourque said one of the most troubling things for the New Democrats is that they are not seeing a regional concentration of support — a bastion where the party can hope to remain strong and retain seats it currently has.
The party is polling fourth in British Columbia behind the Greens, a distant fourth in Alberta, a distant third in Manitoba and Saskatchewan. It’s tied for fourth place with the Greens in Ontario and sits fifth in Quebec, he said.
Since the start of 2019, Singh and May have been close in terms of support, Bourque said, adding the issue now for Singh is how much head space there is for him and his party with an increased focus on the Greens.
“It seems more and more he’s sort of being pushed out in terms of grabbing Canadians’ attention,” he said.
http://torontosun.com/news/national/...osing-gap-poll
 

Similar Threads

2
Latest 2016 presidential election polls
by Icarus27k | Jan 3rd, 2015
219
Canada's Federal Election Polls
by Liberalman | May 1st, 2011
44
Advance Polls (for the Federal Election)
by Ron in Regina | Apr 23rd, 2011
37
Latest Polls
by Jersay | Jan 23rd, 2006