What's missing from the AGW debate is that it really has NOTHING to do with climate. It is a utopian philosophy searching for a material framework.. and anything will do. When the Warming part of the thesis collapsed then ANYTHING else would do to validate the proposition.. storms, cold weather.. anything selectively chosen no matter how contextualized and localized the event.
It has two major characteristics.
1. It is founded on the deeply anti-human bias of radical environmentalism.. that sees population as the primary evil and impediment of creating an eco-utopia.. with perhaps 1/10 of the current world population, strictly contained into communities with a minimum of effect on the planet.
It is no accident that the element of 'carbon' was chosen (as fractional as it is in the atmosphere) as the chief culprit of environmental damage, as this is the one element that is at centre of human industrial development, generation of energy, production of food, and sustenance of the current population
2. Has to do with Carbon Credits
. Which saw the malicious plague of Global Free Market capitalism cynically take advantage of the disproven AGW hypothesis, one driven by fear and and confusion.. to implement global control of the the world's productive capacity. It is through imposed scarcity.. in famine and de-industrialization.. that huge profits and extortion of sovereign national privilege can be imposed.
It's all a pretty disgusting and contrived construct.. promoted by sickos like Suzuki.. but supported by even more malignant forces looking for profit.
Last edited by coldstream; Nov 28th, 2013 at 02:45 PM..