Fed up with Islam Yet???


spaminator
#3631
Tarek Fatah takes the M103 fight to Ottawa
By Anthony Furey, Postmedia Network
First posted: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 05:17 PM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 08:21 PM EDT
Brace yourselves, parliamentarians. Tarek Fatah is coming to town! The popular Toronto-based Sun columnist and media personality is trekking up to Ottawa to testify at the controversial M-103 hearings being held by the heritage committee on Wednesday.
Fatah will be the first major speaker following Liberal MP Iqra Khalid’s Monday appearance that started off the whole process. He’s been a firm critic of the motion that singles out the ill-defined phrase Islamophobia for possible special treatment in its bid to tackle discrimination, writing columns across the Sun chain on the issue.
“I hope to make the MPs realize that if they include the words ‘denouncing Islamophobia’ in their proposals, they will infringe on the inalienable right of Muslim Canadians to critique our religion as has been the rich tradition that has been stifled by Mullahs, Kings and Caliphs by murdering us,” Fatah said Tuesday in advance of the committee hearing.
“Their recommendations must recognize the right of a Muslim to publicly challenge what is rotten in Islamdom and to fight our clergy in the tradition of Martin Luther and Erasmus and before them the 10th century Persian Muslim saint Mansoor Hallaj, beheaded on Islamophobia charges by Mullahs of the time.”
Good luck to any MPs planning to grapple with Fatah in question period after his remarks. The award-winning author doesn’t shy away from controversy.
Earlier this year, a bounty was placed on Fatah’s head for promoting a liberal version of Islam on a popular show he hosted on Indian television. He never backed down.
Fatah’s testimony is set to commence Wednesday at 3:30 p.m. EDT and can be watched live on the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage’s website at Welcome to the House of Commons of Canada.
Tarek Fatah takes the M103 fight to Ottawa | Canada | News | Toronto Sun
 
spaminator
#3632
Anti-PDA politician says couples embracing in public should be jailed in India
THE WASHINGTON POST
First posted: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:13 AM EDT | Updated: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:25 AM EDT
NEW DELHI - A member of India's Parliament from the governing Bharatiya Janata Party has said that couples displaying affection in public should be thrown in jail, because such "vulgar" behavior can lead to rape.
"Be it a motorcycle, car or park, couples can be seen behaving in a vulgar fashion. They hug each other as if the girl will eat the boy or the boy will eat the girl," Sakshi Maharaj told reporters Wednesday, according to the Press Trust of India.
"It will be appropriate to take action and put such couples behind bars before anything wrong occurs," he said.
Maharaj, 61, is a controversial saffron-robed religious leader who holds a parliament seat from the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.
He has previously faced charges of rape and murder, and was expelled from the upper house of Parliament on corruption charges. The seat he now holds is in the lower house.
His remarks come at a time when conservatism is rising in majority Hindu India, where new sanctions on consumption of liquor and cow slaughter - anathema to many Hindus - have been put in place. There has also been increased public debate over law enforcement overreaching its role and straying into "moral policing" - with lovers' hotels raided in Mumbai and states setting up "anti-Romeo squads" allegedly to deter harassment.
Maharaj's statements is just the latest in a series of incendiary comments by Indian politicians about sex, women and rape. In recent years, politicians have suggested that mobile phone use or consumption of meat or Chinese food are to blame for rapes or suggested women in the tourist haven of Goa not wear bikinis on the beach "for their own protection."
Anti-PDA politician says couples embracing in public should be jailed in India |
 
spaminator
#3633
Seven arrested in Egypt for raising rainbow flag at concert
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Monday, September 25, 2017 06:02 PM EDT | Updated: Monday, September 25, 2017 06:07 PM EDT
CAIRO — Egyptian security officials say seven homosexuals have been charged with “inciting immorality” after a concert at which the rainbow flag of the LGBT movement was raised in a rare support of gay rights in conservative Egypt.
The officials say the Monday arrests resulted from Friday’s performance by the Lebanese indy rock band Mashrou’ Leila, whose singer is openly gay.
They say the Supreme State Security Prosecution launched legal proceedings against the seven after authorities discovered they “raised the flag of homosexuals.” The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to brief journalists.
Egyptian law doesn’t explicitly prohibit homosexuality, so prosecutors use alternative charges including “immorality” and “debauchery,” which is normally reserved for prostitution. Homosexuality is a taboo in Egypt among both Muslims and the Christian minority.
Seven arrested in Egypt for raising rainbow flag at concert | World | News | Tor
 
spaminator
#3634
Saudi Arabia announces plan to allow female drivers by Summer 2018
Abdullah Al-Shihri and Aya Batrawy, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 04:03 PM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 05:47 PM EDT
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — Saudi Arabia on Tuesday announced that women will be allowed to drive for the first time in the ultra-conservative kingdom next summer, fulfilling a key demand of women’s rights activists who faced detention for defying the ban.
The kingdom was the only the country in the world to bar women from driving and for years had garnered negative publicity internationally for detaining women who defied the ban.
The move, which has been welcomed by the United States, represents a significant opening for women in Saudi Arabia, where women’s rights have steadily and slowly gained ground over the years. Saudi women remain largely under the whim of male relatives due to guardianship laws.
King Salman and his young son and heir, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, have tested the waters though, allowing women into the country’s main stadium in the capital, Riyadh, for national day celebrations this month. The stadium had previously been reserved for all-male crowds to watch sporting events. The king and his son have also opened the country to more entertainment and fun.
Women’s rights activists since the 1990s have been pushing for the right to drive, saying it represents their larger struggle for equal rights under the law.
Some ultraconservative clerics in Saudi Arabia, who wield power and influence in the judiciary and education sectors, had warned against allowing women to drive. They argued it would corrupt society and lead to sin.
Women in Saudi Arabia have long had to rely on male relatives to get to work, run errands and simply move around. The more affluent have male drivers and more recently, in major cities, women could access ride hailing apps like Uber and Careem.
The state-run Saudi Press Agency and state TV reported the news late Tuesday evening, saying King Salman decreed that both men and women to be issued drivers’ licences.
Women, however, will not be allowed to obtain licences immediately. A committee will be formed to look into how to implement the new order, which is slated to come into effect in June 2018.
The kingdom had held out on allowing women to drive, despite a number of social openings and gains for women, including granting women the right to vote and run in elections for the first time in late 2015.
State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said the U.S. is “happy” with the move, calling it “a great step in the right direction for that country.” She did not comment on whether Saudi Arabia still needs to do more to ensure full rights for its female citizens.
Batrawy reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Associated Press writer Josh Lederman in Washington contributed to this report.
Full text of the Saudi king's royal decree
Your Royal Highness, Minister of Interior:
We take into consideration (or we study) the pros of allowing women to drive and the cons of banning them from driving, while taking into account the necessary legal rules and adhering to them.
We also refer to what the majority of the Council of Senior Scholars agreed on, which is that the original Islamic ruling in regards to women driving is to allow it, and that those who have opposed it have done so based on excuses that are baseless and have no predominance of thought. The scholars see no reason not to allow women to drive as long as there are legal and regulatory guarantees to avoid the pretexts (that those against women driving had in mind), even if they are unlikely to happen.
And because the country - with the help of God - is the guardian of Islamic values, it considers preserving those values one of its priorities, in this matter and in others, and will not hesitate to take any means to ensure the security and safety of its society.
Therefore; adopt the application of the Traffic Regulations and its executive list - which include issuing driving licenses to men and women alike, and forming a high-level committee of ministries (including the Interior Ministry, Finance Ministry, Ministry of Labor and Social Development) to study the necessary steps needed to implement the regulations. The committee must submit its recommendations within 30 days. The implementation - God willing - will be from 10/10/1439 (Islamic date in June 201 and in accordance with rules and regulations, and the completion of the necessary steps.
http://spa.gov.sa/1671323
Saudi Arabia announces plan to allow female drivers by Summer 2018 | World | New
 
Durry
#3635
It's just incredible how stupid Muslims are, and they are so fixated on controlling women in one form or another.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#3636
Quote: Originally Posted by Durry View Post

It's just incredible how stupid Muslims are, and they are so fixated on controlling women in one form or another.

Makes a body wonder why you haven't converted yet.
 
Durry
#3637
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

Makes a body wonder why you haven't converted yet.

I'm not into controlling women.

Mohammed liked to diddle nine yr olds, maybe that's why these scum are so fixated on women.
Such idiots,,,,, and to have a prophet who is a pedophile.,,,,sick sick sick!!
 
Tecumsehsbones
#3638
Quote: Originally Posted by Durry View Post

I'm not into controlling women.

Interesting version of "can't."

Quote:

Mohammed liked to diddle nine yr olds, maybe that's why these scum are so fixated on women.

Newsflash. . . nine-year-olds ain't women.

Quote:

Such idiots,,,,, and to have a prophet who is a pedophile.,,,,sick sick sick!!

As opposed to one who's a beggar and executed (properly and legally) for sedition and blasphemy.
 
Durry
#3639
In BC

A charity that runs a Vancouver-area mosque has been penalized by federal regulators after an audit found its former president and imam spent tens of thousands of dollars on personal purchases including a spa, jewelry, video games and hair dye.

The Canada Revenue Agency audit of the Islamic Society of British Columbia also alleged the charity was “controlled or influenced” by a Qatar organization accused of supporting terrorism, although that did not result in a penalty.


The Islamic Society operates the Masjid Al-Hidayah and Islamic Cultural Centre in Port Coquitlam, B.C., and was formerly headed by Saadeldin Bahr, who is now serving a 3-1/2-year prison sentence for a 2013 sexual assault at the mosque.


CRA documents obtained by Global News allege that during the period covered by the audit — Oct. 1, 2010 to Sept. 30, 2013 — Bahr made purchases with his personal credit cards and reimbursed himself with online bank transfers from the charity accounts.

Using this method, he bought a $5,000 “evolution spa therapy,” the CRA said in a letter detailing the audit results that was sent to Bahr and three other directors in June 2016. Auditors said the shipping address for the spa appeared to be Bahr’s home address.

He also bought dish sets, flowers, groceries, pharmacy items, air travel, restaurant meals, car parts, car washes, gas, dry cleaning, a food processor, PlayStation games, an iPad and an iPhone, the CRA letter said.

Although some expenses for which he was reimbursed seemed legitimate, most “appeared to be for personal use,” the letter said. The CRA said they amounted to an “undue benefit” to a board member totalling $127,000 and accused the Society of failing to devote its resources to charitable activities.

The Eid Foundation

The audit documents released by the CRA further said the Sheikh Eid Bin Muhammad Al-Thani Charity Foundation (Eid Foundation) in oil-rich Qatar had “maintained some level of control or influence over the affairs” of the B.C. charity.

“The organization’s connection to and possible control by the Eid Foundation is particularly concerning given that publicly available information … indicates that the Eid Foundation is alleged to have provided support to terrorism,” the CRA Charities Directorate wrote.

“Our research indicates that the Eid Foundation is a member organization in the Union of Good, a global coalition of Islamic charities operated by Hamas, a listed terrorist entity in Canada,” read the letter.

In May, the CRA said in a “Notice of Penalty” letter that while it had initially proposed a $126,000 penalty for Bahr’s spending, it had decided not to follow through after the Islamic Society said it would remove him from the board and improve its internal controls, financial oversight and record keeping.

Etc

https://globalnews.ca/news/3762864/b...-relationship/
 
spilledthebeer
#3640
Quote: Originally Posted by spaminator View Post

Anti-PDA politician says couples embracing in public should be jailed in India
THE WASHINGTON POST
First posted: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:13 AM EDT | Updated: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:25 AM EDT
NEW DELHI - A member of India's Parliament from the governing Bharatiya Janata Party has said that couples displaying affection in public should be thrown in jail, because such "vulgar" behavior can lead to rape.
"Be it a motorcycle, car or park, couples can be seen behaving in a vulgar fashion. They hug each other as if the girl will eat the boy or the boy will eat the girl," Sakshi Maharaj told reporters Wednesday, according to the Press Trust of India.
"It will be appropriate to take action and put such couples behind bars before anything wrong occurs," he said.
Maharaj, 61, is a controversial saffron-robed religious leader who holds a parliament seat from the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.
He has previously faced charges of rape and murder, and was expelled from the upper house of Parliament on corruption charges. The seat he now holds is in the lower house.
His remarks come at a time when conservatism is rising in majority Hindu India, where new sanctions on consumption of liquor and cow slaughter - anathema to many Hindus - have been put in place. There has also been increased public debate over law enforcement overreaching its role and straying into "moral policing" - with lovers' hotels raided in Mumbai and states setting up "anti-Romeo squads" allegedly to deter harassment.
Maharaj's statements is just the latest in a series of incendiary comments by Indian politicians about sex, women and rape. In recent years, politicians have suggested that mobile phone use or consumption of meat or Chinese food are to blame for rapes or suggested women in the tourist haven of Goa not wear bikinis on the beach "for their own protection."
Anti-PDA politician says couples embracing in public should be jailed in India |

OH GOSH AND GOLLY GEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What will those crazy Indians think of next? The people who wrote the Kama Sutra sex manual want you to do your foreplay AT HOME! In private!

At least the rule applies equally to everybody- and does not discriminate! And considering the number and range of things that poor Indians get up to on the street its clear that such a law is needed! Even in Toronto the Good it is illegal to s++t, p+ss or fornicate on the street!

And in other news, some Muslims on the sub continent have actually altered their divorce laws so it is harder for a Muslim man to dump a wife-of course it is entirely possible that Muslims in smaller cities and villages will smile wisely in the big city and then IGNORE the law when they get back home......but hey- its a start!

But I will not be too excited about Muslims until stuff like this is no longer true of them:::


Here is some very funny-in part because its SO TRUE-stuff I wish I had thought of! Thanks to Jeff Foxworthy!

The "M" word..

Have you ever wondered why it's OK to make jokes about Catholics, Jews, Christians, the Pope, the Irish, the
Italians, the Polish, the Hungarians, the Chinese, the
French (including French Canadians), the elderly, bad
golfers, men/women, blacks/whites, etc, but its insensitive
to make jokes about the Muslims?

Well, it's time to level the playing field and be
politically incorrect, by including our friends, the
Muslims, on this grandiose list.

So Jeff Foxworthy did his part to include the Muslims on his list ...

1. If you grow and refine heroin for a living, but morally
object to the use of liquor, You may be a Muslim.

2. If you own a $3,000 machine gun and a $5,000 rocket
launcher, but can't afford shoes, You may be a Muslim.

3. If you have more wives than teeth, You may be a Muslim.

4. If you wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider
bacon to be unclean, You may be a Muslim.

5. If you think vests come in two styles, Bullet-proof and
suicide, You may be a Muslim.

6. If you can't think of anyone that you haven't
declared jihad against, You may be a Muslim.

7. If you consider television dangerous, but routinely carry
explosives in your clothing, You may be a Muslim.

8. If you were amazed to discover that cell phones have
uses, other than setting off roadside bombs, You may be a Muslim

9. If you have nothing against women and think every man
should own at least four, then you, too, may be a Muslim.

10. If you find this offensive and do not forward it, you
are part of the problem here in America …but if you delete
this, you are most likely a Muslim.

Freedom Is not Free !

INCOMING GUNFIRE ALWAYS HAS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY!
 
spaminator
#3641
Danish minister posts screen grab of Muhammad cartoon
Jan M. Olsen, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 01:31 PM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 01:39 PM EDT
COPENHAGEN — Denmark’s integration minister has caused a stir by publishing a screen grab of a tablet showing a controversial cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad that caused outrage among Muslims around the world in 2006.
After a Danish museum didn’t display the 12 caricatures depicting the Prophet Muhammad in its exhibition on blasphemy, Inger Stoejberg posted a photo of an iPad where the background was a drawing of Muhammad wearing a turban shaped like a bomb with a lit fuse.
Stoejberg wrote Tuesday on Facebook that the cartoons show Denmark is “a free country where opinions are challenged,” adding “we should be proud of the Muhammad cartoons.”
“I have no real comments” about Stoejberg’s Facebook post, Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen said. “But I’m happy to live in a country where you can have artists making bizarre pieces of art.”
Holger K. Nielsen of the opposition Socialist People’s party urged people on Twitter to ignore Stoejberg.
The drawings first appeared in Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten newspaper in September 2005 to test whether cartoonists would apply self-censorship when asked to portray Muhammad. Although no Danish laws had been violated, they sparked protests four months later in pre-dominantly Muslim countries, where Islamic law generally opposes any depiction of the prophet.
Denmark then became the target of Islamist extremists, and police say they have thwarted a series of terror plots against Denmark. In February 2016, a gunman killed two people and wounded five in attacks on a free-speech event and Copenhagen’s main synagogue.
The three-month exhibition, called Image Storm, opens Friday at a small museum in Viborg, 160 miles (260 kilometres) northwest of Copenhagen, and tells how blasphemy has provoked people since the 16th-century Protestant Reformation.
In a statement, the museum said it had “deliberately chosen not to show” the Muhammad drawings, citing potential security challenges.
“We would like to show that the debate about blasphemy and freedom of expression reaches far beyond the Muhammad crisis,” it said.
The exhibition includes a 1987 photograph by American artist Andres Serrano of a small plastic crucifix submerged in a small glass tank allegedly filled with the artist’s urine.
It also shows a tin can by Italian artist Piero Manzoni filled with 30 grams (1.1 ounce) of human excrement and a jar with parts of a horse by Bjoern Noergaard, a Danish artist who caused a scandal in 1970 by slaughtering a horse.
Danish minister posts screen grab of Muhammad cartoon | World | News | Toronto S
 
spilledthebeer
#3642
Quote: Originally Posted by spaminator View Post

Danish minister posts screen grab of Muhammad cartoon
Jan M. Olsen, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 01:31 PM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 01:39 PM EDT
COPENHAGEN — Denmark’s integration minister has caused a stir by publishing a screen grab of a tablet showing a controversial cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad that caused outrage among Muslims around the world in 2006.
After a Danish museum didn’t display the 12 caricatures depicting the Prophet Muhammad in its exhibition on blasphemy, Inger Stoejberg posted a photo of an iPad where the background was a drawing of Muhammad wearing a turban shaped like a bomb with a lit fuse.
Stoejberg wrote Tuesday on Facebook that the cartoons show Denmark is “a free country where opinions are challenged,” adding “we should be proud of the Muhammad cartoons.”
“I have no real comments” about Stoejberg’s Facebook post, Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen said. “But I’m happy to live in a country where you can have artists making bizarre pieces of art.”
Holger K. Nielsen of the opposition Socialist People’s party urged people on Twitter to ignore Stoejberg.
The drawings first appeared in Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten newspaper in September 2005 to test whether cartoonists would apply self-censorship when asked to portray Muhammad. Although no Danish laws had been violated, they sparked protests four months later in pre-dominantly Muslim countries, where Islamic law generally opposes any depiction of the prophet.
Denmark then became the target of Islamist extremists, and police say they have thwarted a series of terror plots against Denmark. In February 2016, a gunman killed two people and wounded five in attacks on a free-speech event and Copenhagen’s main synagogue.
The three-month exhibition, called Image Storm, opens Friday at a small museum in Viborg, 160 miles (260 kilometres) northwest of Copenhagen, and tells how blasphemy has provoked people since the 16th-century Protestant Reformation.
In a statement, the museum said it had “deliberately chosen not to show” the Muhammad drawings, citing potential security challenges.
“We would like to show that the debate about blasphemy and freedom of expression reaches far beyond the Muhammad crisis,” it said.
The exhibition includes a 1987 photograph by American artist Andres Serrano of a small plastic crucifix submerged in a small glass tank allegedly filled with the artist’s urine.
It also shows a tin can by Italian artist Piero Manzoni filled with 30 grams (1.1 ounce) of human excrement and a jar with parts of a horse by Bjoern Noergaard, a Danish artist who caused a scandal in 1970 by slaughtering a horse.
Danish minister posts screen grab of Muhammad cartoon | World | News | Toronto S


OH how VERY ODD???? If a privately owned magazine showed the cartoons then Muslims might go on a rampage and MURDER people- oh- wait- THEY DID! This is NOT SPECULATION! You show a cartoon of Muhamed with a turban with a bomb in and Muslims living in Denmark WILL kill you!

But let some Danish LIE-beral Politician put up the cartoon to demonstrate how `open` their society is and all the Muslims stay SILENT! Because carving up a filthy/ white/infidel woman/LIE-beral on a public street might FRIGHTEN the other LIE-berals and persuade them not to allow more Muslim immigrants! And some people want us to think this is showing a developing TOLERANCE by Muslims? HAHAHAHAHA!!!

Orwell was right-some pigs DO think they are more equal than others! And for the LIE-beral doofus who will e-mail me and complain the true quote is “some animals” rather than “some pigs”-yes-I KNOW-but in Canada we are dealing with LIE-beral Pigs who think they are more equal than the rest of us! How else to explain the LIE-beral standard of public security mandated by Our brainless Boy-Justin Trudope? Sun writer Bonokoski supplies a nice column, with some comments of my own in brackets):

Terrorists have rights, sure, now pass the reefer. By Mark Bonokoski, Postmedia Network.

First posted: Thursday, September 08, 2016 08:02 PM EDT | Updated: Thursday, September 08, 2016 08:11 PM EDT. Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Ralph Goodale. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)

The Liberal government of Justin Trudeau, which went apoplectic over the mere notion that the Stephen Harperites would yank the Canadian citizenship of a dual citizen convicted of terrorism, now wants to further restrict our security agencies in tracking down and neutralizing threats.

It wants the RCMP, CSIS, and all agencies monitoring national security issues and terrorist activities, to play nicey-nice or face the consequences for colouring outside the guidelines.

It wants them to use the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as a love-in template, even against those bound and determined on blowing us to kingdom come. It wants to geld them, and don’t think otherwise.

In announcing yesterday the start of an online consultation process for all Canadians to weigh in on how best to neuter the Tories’ Bill C-51, the Anti-terrorism Act, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale kept stressing the rights and freedoms offered by the Charter should also be applied to the terrorism file.

Who does this protect? Certainly not the average Canadian who, if not for good intelligence and superior police work, could have been killed in various scenarios just as easily as those recently slaughtered by terrorists in Paris and Brussels.

Did our security agencies play by the rules when they took down the Toronto 18? Or, more recently, did they play it by the Charter book when they recently zeroed in on Aaron Driver in small-town Strathroy, Ont., before he managed to get to a major urban centre with a suicide bomb in his knapsack?

Who cares? What matters to the average Canadian, and to hell with the progressives who argue that even terrorists have full-gamut rights, is that no innocents were killed.

Short of any form of torture, our intelligence and security agencies should not be hog-tied by little red Liberal ribbons decorating the notion that terrorists have Charter rights that cannot be bent in order to save Canadian lives.

While it is all well and good to ask Canadians to go online and assist Goodale’s ministry in helping to define security measures, let’s be real about what it really is. It’s nothing more than a public-relations exercise to give the unjaded the impression of inclusive politics, not as a tool to drill down on policy.

(`Bono` is right-LIE-berals have already made up their minds about suitable security and their `invite` to ordinary Cdns is a whitewash! All other western nations decided decades ago that there would be TWO CLASSES of political protestors. The first class are home grown-Cdn citzens born and raised here with a legitimate grievance of some sort. It is this logic that allows Bloc Quebois separatists to swear to destroy Canada and still be allowed to take their seats as MP`s in parliament!)

(The SECOND CLASS of protestors are those who are either citizens of or visitors to the country who are taking directions and instructions from a foreign power/govt or terror group HOSTILE to Canada. SENSIBLE people-thus excluding LIE-berals-all believe that spies and hostile agents operating in Canada ought to be DISCOURAGED at every opportunity! It is this group of trouble makers who have come from far away that get LESS rights than others in Canada. And it is this group-struggling to destroy Canada as we know it that is getting the benefit of LIE-beral stupidity!)

But what can we expect from Our brainless Boy? He learned all he knows-and it ain’t much-from his vile father Pierre-the staunch supporter of bloody handed butcher Joseph Stalin. Pierre also supported Adolf Hitler and referred to the British war against Nazis as `Imperialism`! No wonder Our stupid Boy is so muddled-its congenital!)

(As proof of Pierre`s poisonous influence we have only to look at the dimwit younger brother Sacha Trudeau and his maudlin, misguided `love letter` to that other Commie butcher Castro! Sacha Trudope has also distinguished himself by collaborating with Iranian Mullahs and Muslim film producers making a series of anti western, anti Israeli films for publication in territories where the likes of Hezbollah and Hamas and Al Quaida hold power! The Trudope children are dangerous numbskulls who should stay home and play video games while saner heads administer their trust funds for them! Trudope hatred of what they define as western imperialism is so irrational it ought to disqualify them for any public office!)

Remember, a camel is nothing more than a horse designed by a committee, so be prepared for an unwieldy monstrosity to emerge when the online input of Canadians ends on Dec. 1.

Just don’t expect to feel safer, or be safer, once the Liberals are done with the watered-down version of a piece of Conservative legislation that has thus far never failed us. But, hey, not that it matters, right?

It wasn’t long into Goodale’s press conference on national security yesterday that it got derailed with an off-topic question from the media about a Canadian who was banned for life from entry into the United States for admitting to having smoked marijuana.

From that point on, the terrorism talk went limp. Pass the doobie.

(And of course vague talk suits all Trudopes just fine! Trudopes `D` any embarrassing subject-that is-they deny, delay, delude, dismiss, dissemble, and when they can-they flag and delete!! Trudopes have patience and are willing to whittle away quietly at our rights and freedoms like termites. Father Pierre got his start in politics running for office as an MP-for the NDP-and in the campaign, Our Pet referred to LIE-berals as a pack of Sheep! And yet with 2 years Our Pet was LEADER of the LIE-berals. Our Pet had decided that NDP was too left of centre to be popular with most Cdns-and NDP had decided Our Pet was too left wing for them! So Our Pet HID his true values and became a staunch LIE-beral and HIJACKED the party in exactly the fashion he described to reporter Lubor Zink in 1950!)

markbonokoski
 
MHz
#3643
Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

OH how VERY ODD???? If a privately owned magazine showed the cartoons then Muslims might go on a rampage and MURDER people- oh- wait- THEY DID! This is NOT SPECULATION! You show a cartoon of Muhamed with a turban with a bomb in and Muslims living in Denmark WILL kill you!

But let some Danish LIE-beral Politician put up the cartoon to demonstrate how `open` their society is and all the Muslims stay SILENT! Because carving up a filthy/ white/infidel woman/LIE-beral on a public street might FRIGHTEN the other LIE-berals and persuade them not to allow more Muslim immigrants! And some people want us to think this is showing a developing TOLERANCE by Muslims? HAHAHAHAHA!!!

Charlie Hebo is privately owned, do you know who owns them and where the head office is? (rather than France)

Hint: They do not like to be the object of scorn in any cartoon.
 
TenPenny
#3644
Let me guess, the WWJPC?
 
spilledthebeer
#3645
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPenny View Post

Let me guess, the WWJPC?

Hey- Muslim cloud of confusion--I DO NOT CARE where Charlie |Hbdo is located! I DO CARE that LIE-berals and their radical Islamic |Jihad jerk allies ARE HYPOCRITES sucking upb to each other for mutual benefit! AT OUR EXPENSE!
 
Twin_Moose
#3646
I wonder if this lady is related to buddy that was on here about dirty dogs

Video shows woman forcibly removed from Southwest flight

Quote:

A woman was forcibly removed by police from a Southwest Airlines flight Tuesday after saying she had a life-threatening pet allergy with two dogs on board.*
A fellow passenger, Bill Dumas, recorded the incident, which occurred ahead of a flight from Baltimore to Los Angeles. The woman stated she had a pet allergy but was unable to provide documentation that she could safely fly with the animals on the plane, Southwest said in a statement.
Advertisement

"There was one emotional support animal and one pet onboard the aircraft," the company said. "Our policy states that a customer (without a medical certificate) may be denied boarding if they report a life-threatening allergic reaction and cannot travel safely with an animal onboard."
The video shows police officers grabbing the woman's arms and holding her by the chest as they push her down the aisle of the plane. Southwest said crew members asked the woman to exit the plane several times before asking law enforcement to remove her from the aircraft.
Dumas, who filmed the incident, said he believed officers were following protocol. He said the woman's behavior was "odd" and officers were doing what needed to be done.
Southwest said it was sorry for how the situation was handled.
"We are disheartened by the way this situation unfolded and the customer's removal by local law enforcement officers," the airline said. "We publicly offer our apologies to this Customer for her experience and we will be contacting her directly to address her concerns."

 
spaminator
#3647
U.S. citizen convicted in 2009 suicide attack in Afghanistan
Tom Hays, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Friday, September 29, 2017 08:14 PM EDT | Updated: Friday, September 29, 2017 08:18 PM EDT
NEW YORK — A U.S. citizen who joined al-Qaida was convicted Friday of participating in a failed suicide bombing in 2009 at an American military base in Afghanistan.
A federal jury in New York City reached the verdict in the case against Muhanad Mahmoud Al Farekh, originally of Houston.
Farekh’s case drew extra attention because of reports that American officials had initially debated whether to try to kill him in a drone strike, a step almost never taken against U.S. citizens. President Barack Obama’s administration ultimately decided to try for a capture and civilian prosecution instead.
Farekh was captured in Pakistan and brought to the U.S. in 2015.
“Today, an American al-Qaeda member was brought to justice in a U.S. courtroom,” said Bridget Rohde, the acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, using an alternate spelling for the militant group. She said he faces the possibility of life in prison for “his efforts to murder Americans and his commitment to one of the world’s most infamous terrorist organizations.”
Most of the charges against Farekh stem from an attack at Forward Operating Base Chapman in Khost City, Afghanistan, on Jan. 19, 2009.
The attackers drove two vehicles rigged with explosives. An initial blast injured several Afghans, including a pregnant woman, but a much larger bomb failed to go off, sparing the lives of American soldiers.
The jury heard testimony about how forensic technicians in Afghanistan recovered 18 of Farekh’s fingerprints on packing tape used to bind the detonators on the unexploded bomb.
The defence argued the forensic evidence was too weak to convict Farekh. In his closing argument, defence attorney Sean Maher called testimony by fingerprint experts “junk science.”
Farekh was convicted of conspiring to murder U.S. nationals, conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, conspiracy to bomb a government facility and conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists.
During the trial, the jury also heard testimony from Zarein Ahmedzay, one of three men convicted in a thwarted plot to bomb the New York City subway system. Ahmedzay told jurors he was trained by an al-Qaida operative identified by prosecutors as a co-conspirator of Farekh’s who travelled with him from Canada to Pakistan in 2007.
Deliberations were briefly interrupted when the judge learned the defendant’s father had encountered four jurors in an elevator and complained to them that he’d been denied direct contact with his son.
The judge decided to replace the jurors with three alternates and ordered the deliberations to continue with a panel of 11 instead of the usual 12.
U.S. citizen convicted in 2009 suicide attack in Afghanistan | World | News | To
 
spilledthebeer
#3648
Quote: Originally Posted by Twin_Moose View Post

I wonder if this lady is related to buddy that was on here about dirty dogs

Video shows woman forcibly removed from Southwest flight

Oh my- just another instance of the rather twisted Muslim definition of "freedom"! Too many Muslims and WAY too many LIE-berals are convinced they "oppressed" if they do not get their own way!

And apparently a good many Muslims did not realize- when they came here- just how many dogs they would be sharing the public places with! And obviously "service dogs" are NOT common on typical Muslim streets since Muslims are so hostile to the "dirty brutes" under ANY circumstances!

I have said it before and its worth repeating: "Muslim values are so different from our own that it will be a constant source of friction for a VERY LONG TIME TO COME!

The MSN.CA home page had a news article- an interview with a Muslim family- and Dad is in one room talking to a reporter and his 13 year old daughter is in another room with another reporter- and the tv is on in the background- showing figure skating and the Muslim girl thinks it looks like a grand sport to be in- but no word on what tradition bound Dad thinks about HIS daughter cavorting in front of a crowd in one of those skimpy skate costumes! And you know she will have to ditch the burqa and or head scarf as well if she gets into the sport- just another source of friction!

And a few nights back our CBC news did an article with a 15 year old Muslim girl who told the interviewer that she found it much easier to blend and integrate at school once she ditched the head scarf! Wonder what her parents think of that one? And no, the parents did NOT appear on camera!
 
MHz
#3649
"American officials had initially debated whether to try to kill him in a drone strike, a step almost never taken against U.S. citizens."

Being a US citizen is not being a part of any religion.

Quote: Originally Posted by avro12 View Post

I'm fed up with religion.

God still loves you.
 
spilledthebeer
#3650
Quote: Originally Posted by MHz View Post

"American officials had initially debated whether to try to kill him in a drone strike, a step almost never taken against U.S. citizens."

Being a US citizen is not being a part of any religion.


God still loves you.

Oh, HE does not want to be part of that debate! All will be revealed when we become worm food! Consider:

Here is an article setting the right tone for any discussion of LIE-beral policy related to Omar Khadr or national security. The article mocks Ralph Goodale as a Cdn version of the Iraqi information minister under Saddam Hussein. And the label “Comical Ali” fits our Not so Safety Minister to a `T`! With some comments of my own in brackets):

Ralph Goodale our own 'Comical Ali'

By Lorrie Goldstein, Toronto Sun. First posted: Monday, July 10, 2017 03:18 PM EDT | Updated: Monday, July 10, 2017 03:23 PM EDT

Ralph Goodale Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, and Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, hold a news conference regarding a $10.5-million payment to Omar Khadr on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Friday, July 7, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Fred Chartrand

Khadr payoff a slap in the face to all who serve
PM defends $10.5M payout, apology to convicted terrorist Omar Khadr
Liberals two-faced on Khadr
Debate rages over $10.5M Khadr deal

Listening to Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale blame Stephen Harper for the fact the Liberals just gave an apology and $10.5 million to Omar Khadr reminds me of listening to Baghdad Bob during the Iraq war.

Baghdad Bob (aka “Comical Ali”) was the Iraqi information minister, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, who became globally infamous for his daily summations of the war, which had no basis in reality, and which provoked international ridicule every time he spoke.

Goodale — let’s call him “Roaring Ralph” — with an assist from Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould, approached Baghdad Bob levels of disinformation last week as they executed the Trudeau government’s strategy of blaming Harper for the Khadr mess the Liberals created.

“The Harper government refused to repatriate Mr. Khadr or otherwise resolve the matter. They could have, but they didn’t,” Goodale declared.

Except Goodale omitted that in so doing, Harper was merely continuing the policy of the Jean Chretien/Paul Martin Liberal governments from 2002 until they lost power in 2006.

(And WHY should any Cdn WANT to repatriate a proven terrorist with a clear hatred of western values? Oh Khadr is happy to be home now living on welfare and Cdn charity that has to be more comfortable than living in a mud hut or a cave and our charity certainly has to be better than Gitmo prison. But really- how much of the Islamic jihadist fire is still buried in the Khadr mind? Can we EVER fully trust him and do we even want to try? For most Cdns the answer is a FIRM NO!)

The Liberals made no effort to repatriate Khadr. They merely asked the Americans that he not be sent to Guantanamo, and happily dropped the issue when the Americans said no.

The Liberals just wanted the Khadr story to go away because they were embarrassed Chretien had intervened on behalf of Khadr’s terrorist father, Ahmed Said Khadr, in 1996, when he was being held on suspicion of terrorism in Pakistan.

Following Chretien’s request that Ahmed Khadr be treated fairly, Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto released him, whereupon he returned to Canada and soon after moved his family to Pakistan, where Omar began his terrorist training under the Taliban and the elder Khadr’s confidante, Osama bin Laden.

(Of course papa Khdr got into Canada in the first place after LIE-beral Chretien invited the Italians to release bomb maker Papa Khadr from the JAIL they had him locked up in for blowing people up! Papa Khadr was only too have to come to Canada and sire 3 sons and several daughters that Our idiot Boy Justin says we cannot deport! Why a LIE-beral would want anything to do with these people is a complete mystery- and probably a sign of mental instability!)

Wilson-Raybould said the Khadr settlement showed “rights are not subject to the whims of the government of the day.” Except she omitted “the government of the day,” which the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in 2010 had violated Khadr’s rights, was the Chretien-Martin government.

Why? Because it twice sent interrogators to question Khadr in Guantanamo in 2003 and 2004, and shared the information they obtained with his American captors, knowing they had used sleep deprivation to try and get Khadr to crack.

Someone should remind Goodale and Wilson-Raybould that Khadr was repatriated in 2012, under the Harper government, however reluctantly, while the Chretien/Martin government made no attempt to repatriate him from 2002 to 2006.

(It’s the usual LIE-beral hypocrisy- why let FACTS get in the way of a good story? Especially if the FAKE NEWS makes LIE-berals look better!)

And that the 2010 Supreme Court decision did not require the Trudeau Liberals to reach the settlement with Khadr they announced last week, nor did it require the Harper government to try to repatriate Khadr.

The Trudeau government was free to defend itself against Khadr’s $20-million civil suit for violating his Charter rights, something many Canadians would have preferred, even if it meant a higher court-imposed award than the $10.5 million the Liberals handed him.

(If LIE-berals or their hug a thug judges truly believe that they were legally obligated under our Charter to reward Khadr in this way then either there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with the training of our senior judges or there is some major flaw in our Charter or BOTH! How any Cdn can believe that Khadr is owed anything after voluntarily leaving Canada, fighting with a foreign army in another country- against Cdn allies and then getting captured and imprisoned by foreigners should be seen as a sign of madness in any Cdn friendly to Khadr!)

(If Khadr feels he is owed something then let him seek it from his vile mother who aided his father to indoctrinate him as a child soldier and then let him travel across the world to join an army fighting against Canada! Or let Khadr seek redress from the Taliban that he made bombs for! Or best of all- let him sue the Yankees who shot him and imprisoned him- but I do ask that if Khadr wants to sue the Yankees then PLEASE do us a favour-after all you do owe us something for the $10 million- and alert the camera people at Americas Funniest Home Videos! Watching Khadr explain exactly how the west has mistreated him should be good for HUGE laughs!)

Canadians who believe Khadr was a child soldier forced into terrorism by his father and that he should never have been sent to Guantanamo can legitimately criticize Harper for failing to act with any urgency on his behalf, just as Chretien and Martin failed to do before him.

But the hypocritical Liberals, who only started caring about Khadr’s rights after Harper defeated them in 2006, have zero credibility on this issue. None.

lgoldstein at postmedia
 
spaminator
#3651
Toronto school board recalls, revises controversial Islamic guidebook
By Anthony Furey, Postmedia Network
First posted: Monday, October 02, 2017 02:04 PM EDT | Updated: Monday, October 02, 2017 08:22 PM EDT
The Toronto District School Board is temporarily pulling an Islamic Heritage Month guidebook following complaints from Jewish advocacy group B’nai Brith Canada, the Toronto Sun has learned.
The book, as I described in a recent column, is a robust 170-page document that encourages a great deal of religious intrusion in a classroom setting that’s otherwise supposed to be a non-religious environment.
The recommendations include reciting and explaining the Muslim greeting “As-salamu alaykum” (peace be upon you) alongside the singing of O Canada and inviting children to visit a local mosque. It also includes templates of famous mosques around the world for children to construct during cut and paste exercises.
But it’s the guide’s alarming definition of Islamophobia that has caught the attention of the leading Jewish advocacy group. The school board’s guide defines the term as “fear, prejudice, hatred of dislike directed against Islam or Muslims, or towards Islamic politics or culture.”
“The TDSB definition, if enforced, could lead to punishment for students or teachers who display “dislike” towards the persecution of LGBTQ people in the Islamic Republic of Iran, harsh restrictions on women in Saudi Arabia, and Palestinian terrorism against Israelis, all of which are examples of “Islamic politics,” an earlier press release from B’nai Brith Canada says.
The organization contacted the TDSB Monday morning and by the afternoon the school board had committed to pulling the online guidebook until they revised the definition of Islamophobia, according to B’nai Brith Canada.
“A link to the resource guide was provided to school administrators across the system,” TDSB spokesperson Ryan Bird told the Sun. “A revised version with an edited definition of Islamophobia will be available online shortly.”
It’s unclear if they plan to revise or remove any of the other controversial aspects of the guide.
“There are many students in Toronto schools who have come to Canada fleeing persecution from countries like Iran, Pakistan or Saudi Arabia — and now the TDSB is telling them to stay silent about what they’ve suffered. It’s simply ludicrous,” B’nai Brith Canada CEO Michael Mostyn said in the earlier press release. They’ve since issued another release thanking the board for swift action on the issue.
The House of Commons heritage committee is currently engaged in a study of Islamophobia and other forms of prejudice following the passing of the controversial M-103. The committee has yet to offer an agreed upon definition of the ill-defined term.
However, a former RCMP and CSIS officer did deliver testimony recommending that Canadians whose comments on Islam “go too far” should face some form of prosecution.
The Sun has received e-mails of concern from parents and teachers regarding more than just the Islamophobia definition.
afurey@postmedia.com
TDSB Islamic Heritage Month Resource Guidebook 2017 by cynthia_mcleod213 on Scribd
Toronto public school board guide pushes Muslim greetings during morning announc
http://scribd.com/document/360496525...Guidebook-2017
Toronto school board recalls, revises controversial Islamic guidebook | Furey |
 
spaminator
#3652
Egypt cracks down on suspected homosexuals, arrest 27 after rainbow flag waved at concert
Samy Magdy, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 10:07 AM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 10:55 AM EDT
CAIRO — Egypt has stepped up a crackdown on people suspected of homosexuality, arresting a total of 27 in a little more than a week, security officials said Tuesday.
They said the 27 include a man and a woman picked up by police Monday and all have been charged with “debauchery,” they said.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to brief the media.
On Monday, Amnesty International called for the “immediate” and “unconditional” release of all people arrested since a Sept 22 concert in Cairo in which an LGBT flag was raised, an incident that sparked the ongoing crackdown.
In a statement, Amnesty said at least five of those arrested were subjected to anal examinations to determine whether they were engaged in same-sex sexual relations, a practice it said amounted to torture and was scientifically unsound.
“The authorities must urgently halt this ruthless crackdown and release all those arrested immediately and unconditionally,” said Najia Bounaim, Amnesty’s North Africa campaigns director.
The group that played in the Sept. 22 concert — Lebanese indie rock band Mashrou’ Leila whose lead singer is openly gay — condemned the crackdown in a statement posted on its Facebook page Tuesday. Calling it a witch hunt, it said all those detained must be released and international pressure put on Egyptian authorities to halt the crackdown.
Homosexuality is highly taboo in Egypt among Muslims and Christians alike, but it is not explicitly prohibited by law. In practice, authorities prosecute individuals under such charges as “immorality” and “debauchery.
Egypt cracks down on suspected homosexuals, arrest 27 after rainbow flag waved a
 
MHz
#3653
Invade them, invade them now.
 
spilledthebeer
#3654
Quote: Originally Posted by spaminator View Post

Egypt cracks down on suspected homosexuals, arrest 27 after rainbow flag waved at concert
Samy Magdy, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 10:07 AM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 10:55 AM EDT
CAIRO — Egypt has stepped up a crackdown on people suspected of homosexuality, arresting a total of 27 in a little more than a week, security officials said Tuesday.
They said the 27 include a man and a woman picked up by police Monday and all have been charged with “debauchery,” they said.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to brief the media.
On Monday, Amnesty International called for the “immediate” and “unconditional” release of all people arrested since a Sept 22 concert in Cairo in which an LGBT flag was raised, an incident that sparked the ongoing crackdown.
In a statement, Amnesty said at least five of those arrested were subjected to anal examinations to determine whether they were engaged in same-sex sexual relations, a practice it said amounted to torture and was scientifically unsound.
“The authorities must urgently halt this ruthless crackdown and release all those arrested immediately and unconditionally,” said Najia Bounaim, Amnesty’s North Africa campaigns director.
The group that played in the Sept. 22 concert — Lebanese indie rock band Mashrou’ Leila whose lead singer is openly gay — condemned the crackdown in a statement posted on its Facebook page Tuesday. Calling it a witch hunt, it said all those detained must be released and international pressure put on Egyptian authorities to halt the crackdown.
Homosexuality is highly taboo in Egypt among Muslims and Christians alike, but it is not explicitly prohibited by law. In practice, authorities prosecute individuals under such charges as “immorality” and “debauchery.
Egypt cracks down on suspected homosexuals, arrest 27 after rainbow flag waved a

Some people seem to think it is strange or odd when Muslims slam gays? Its not as if Muslims have been sending mixed messages! An Imam in Calgary recently explained the circumstances under which the Quran authorizes Muslims to kill gays so they will not sin in future! These Muslims are being treated like the saviours of the LIE-beral party by their best new friend Justin- the self professed rabid feminist and staunch defender of Muslim religious rights that seem to include female genital mutilation and the fine old sport of wife beating if she so much as steps out the door into the sunshine with permission of hubby! I guess Our idiot Boy Justin is getting dizzy from all the contradictory positions he is taking? It would explain his muddled thinking?

Here is an article illustrating the kind of messes we will be dealing with on a regular basis if we continue allowing LIE-beral style multi cultural choices to prevail! With some comments of my own in brackets):

Hindus protest Muslim prayers at public school

By QMI Agency. First posted: Monday, July 04, 2011 04:32 PM EDT
School

Related Stories: Dad says Hamilton school board not supporting Christian beliefs
Ontario being selective about religious accommodation

TORONTO - Hindus from across Toronto plan to protest outside a North York middle school until a controversial Friday prayer session for 400 Muslim students is stopped.

The Canadian Hindu Advocacy is one of a number of Toronto-area groups who are opposed to the 30- to 40-minute services that occurred in the cafeteria of Valley Park Middle School on Overlea Blvd. from November to March.

An imam from a local mosque is brought to school to head the service, officials said. During the service male students are made to sit in front of the girls.

“This is alarming and unacceptable,” said Advocacy director Ron Banerjee. “We respect the separation of church and state.”

He said his group will be sending letters of protest to the Toronto District School Board in the next few days and calling for an end of the noon-time services. That will be followed by protests in November, when the services resume, if the prayers are to continue next school year.

“There’s not supposed to be any religious classes taking place in public schools,” Banerjee said. “We will be asking the board to stop the practice.”

He said school officials stopped students from reciting the Lord’s Prayers years ago and his group will picket the Muslim classes if the practice isn’t stopped.

“Our organization has received many complaints from Hindu students and parents in the Valley Park Middle School region,” Banerjee said.

He said his group would like to begin a discussion with TDSB authorities aimed at restoring secular education within the school system.

“We would also like to discuss the serving of halal meat within TDSB schools,” he said. “Our organization is determined to ensure all Hindu students are provided non-halal meat alternatives.”

(Halal meat is produced by following Islamic instructions in which the animal has its throat cut and is allowed to bleed to death. The animal is fully conscious at the time of the throat cutting and will take time to pass out from blood loss. This in sharp contrast to standard Cdn meat preparation in which an animal is electrocuted or clubbed on the head to produce instant death- or at least render the animal unconscious so it will not feel anything further. Clearly, Hindus are disturbed by the Halal method of producing meat.)

(Considering the cost to bring Muslim refugees here and then to train and educate them so they will have a chance to survive on their own in our society, along with the long term and very massive security risks that Muslims present, one has to wonder whether it is a good idea to import such numbers of such difficult people? How sad that Muslims cannot send their kids to school without causing hostility and debate over prayers in school and over their treatment of women. Now it seems that Muslims cannot even eat a meal without stirring controversy because they are throwing out most of our laws on animal welfare in the process?)

Area resident Khalid Sheikh, who claims to be president of Parents For School Not for Political Parties, said local school councils have been “hijacked and controlled” by Muslim groups and political parties.

(LIE-berals DO need to buy those ethnic voters and to hell with what ordinary Cdns think! LIE-berals no longer have ANY support in the Cdn private sector and must depend on special ethnic groups and on civil service Hogs for support- with the LIE-beral hold on Hogs being weakened as LIE-beral promises of more gravy go unfilled!)

“Neutral parents who do not like this political stuff in our schools are neglected,” Sheikh said. “For God’s sake, stop this nonsense in our schools.”

Area trustee Gerri Gershon said “there are many tensions within the community.

“The school should not be focused on these tensions and politics but have a wide representation of young people,” Gershon said.

(And this comment by Gershon is LIE-beral speak for: “shut up and go away since we don’t need or care for the opinions of people who don’t vote for us and we intend to do as we think is necessary for LIE-beral benefit”!)

She said the program began after discussions with parents, community leaders and the school administration.

Malcolm Buchanan, of Civil Rights in Public Education, said he has no problems with the Muslim prayer service as long as it doesn’t take place while classes are in session.

“Schools are for learning and not religious ideology,” said Buchanan. “We have no problems as long as it doesn’t take place during school time or the kids are not forced to take part.”

TDSB officials said on Monday the prayer sessions have been taking place for three years and are designed to help with the safety of students, who do not have to leave school to attend mosque.

The officials said the prayer sessions are working well and they haven’t been approached about making changes.

(Oh of course the prayer session are working nicely- after all the only people who are unhappy are those who don’t like LIE-berals to begin with! So what LIE-beral would acknowledge a complaint from such a person?)
 
spaminator
#3655
Crying Amanda Lindhout testifies about her 460 days of hell
THE CANADIAN PRESS
First posted: Thursday, October 05, 2017 11:44 AM EDT | Updated: Thursday, October 05, 2017 11:59 AM
OTTAWA — An emotional Amanda Lindhout is testifying in the trial of a man accused of kidnapping her in Somalia.
Lindhout sobbed as she approached the witness box to describe her abduction at gunpoint, the beginning of what she calls 460 days of hell.
Lindhout, a freelance journalist from Red Deer, Alta., and Australian photographer Nigel Brennan were seized by masked gunmen near Mogadishu in August 2008. Both were released in November 2009.
Ali Omar Ader, a 40-year-old Somalian national, has pleaded not guilty to a criminal charge of hostage-taking for his alleged role as a negotiator.
He was arrested by the RCMP in Ottawa in June 2015.
It emerged during pre-trial motions last spring that the Mounties had lured Ader to Canada through an elaborate scheme to sign a purported book-publishing deal.
Amanda Lindhout. (Leah Hennel/Postmedia File Photo)

Crying Amanda Lindhout testifies about her 460 days of hell | Ontario | News | T
 
spilledthebeer
#3656
Quote: Originally Posted by spaminator View Post

Crying Amanda Lindhout testifies about her 460 days of hell
THE CANADIAN PRESS
First posted: Thursday, October 05, 2017 11:44 AM EDT | Updated: Thursday, October 05, 2017 11:59 AM
OTTAWA — An emotional Amanda Lindhout is testifying in the trial of a man accused of kidnapping her in Somalia.
Lindhout sobbed as she approached the witness box to describe her abduction at gunpoint, the beginning of what she calls 460 days of hell.
Lindhout, a freelance journalist from Red Deer, Alta., and Australian photographer Nigel Brennan were seized by masked gunmen near Mogadishu in August 2008. Both were released in November 2009.
Ali Omar Ader, a 40-year-old Somalian national, has pleaded not guilty to a criminal charge of hostage-taking for his alleged role as a negotiator.
He was arrested by the RCMP in Ottawa in June 2015.
It emerged during pre-trial motions last spring that the Mounties had lured Ader to Canada through an elaborate scheme to sign a purported book-publishing deal.
Amanda Lindhout. (Leah Hennel/Postmedia File Photo)

Crying Amanda Lindhout testifies about her 460 days of hell | Ontario | News | T

There are two things I don't like about this post- first WHY IN HELL is a young woman heading off into ISIS territory- KNOWING how they feel about women?

SEcondly- while I am delighted that a clown who abused a Cdn citizen- a stupid citizen at that- ended up getting punished- but lets consider some details here:

First- we have some very clever cops on the case- if the dumb broad had chased a story closer to home she would not have got into trouble!

Second- just how much did it cost to get that Muslim dog over here? if all radical Muslims were quarantined like the political disease they are then we would have no trouble with them- no contact equals no trouble!

Third- how much will it cost to keep the Muslim kidnapper in jail in Canada? Its currently 150 grand per year without counting inflation!

Its nice the idiot broad wants to make a name for herself as a journalist but are there not various laws preventing idiots from doing hugely dangerous things- such as dangling attractive young women in front of Isis horn dogs who are known for their habit of forcing infidel women into sexual slavery!

Its one thing to be an accredited journalist embedded with western troops and its quite another to be wandering around on your own like the dizzy broad above!

Oh well, its only money and somebody privately paid the ransom- I THINK! \But we get the legal bills and the jail costs!
 
spaminator
#3657
Iranian chess player Dorsa Derakhshani banned for refusing Islamic headscarf takes game to U.S.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Friday, October 06, 2017 02:40 PM EDT | Updated: Friday, October 06, 2017 02:58 PM EDT
ST. LOUIS — A 19-year-old Iranian woman banned from competing in the name of her country after attending an international competition without an Islamic headscarf has taken her game to St. Louis University.
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that Dorsa Derakhshani is now at a freshman at the Missouri school, which has a new but highly ranked chess team of top international players. The biology major decided to accept a full scholarship to play for the university this spring, in the wake of the controversy.
Issues arose when Derakhshani wore a simple headband during a February competition in Gibraltar. She was competing under the oversight of the Iranian Chess Federation, an affiliation that allowed her to enter several championship-cycle tournaments. Iranian law requires women to wear head scarves in public, but she didn’t think it would be a problem.
“I don’t know why some people have enough free time to worry about what I wear,” Derakhshani said.
She was 18 when she moved to Barcelona, Spain, and recruited by a chess club. She declined to be on Iran’s national team sponsored by the government because she didn’t want to be controlled by the rules of the team, including wearing a head scarf even while outside Iran.
But days after the Gibraltar tournament, the head of the Iranian Chess Federation said Derakhshani and her 14-year-old brother could no longer play in the country or under Iran’s name. He cited Derakhshani’s refusal to wear a head scarf and said her brother had played against an Israeli player. Iran doesn’t recognize Israel and has a policy of not competing against Israeli athletes.
Derakhshani said her brother was paired by a computer and didn’t know the player’s nationality before the match.
“It was just cruel,” she said. “He was just a kid. He didn’t know what to do.”
Her arrival in St. Louis comes as the city becomes a major player in the chess community. The Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St. Louis, founded by Republican millionaire activist Rex Sinquefield, hosts several national competitions.
Derakhshani said she wants to become a grandmaster, the top designation for a chess player.
Iranian chess champion banned for refusing head scarf gets a new start at SLU | Metro | stltoday.com
Iranian chess player Dorsa Derakhshani banned for refusing Islamic headscarf tak
 
spilledthebeer
#3658
Quote: Originally Posted by spaminator View Post

Iranian chess player Dorsa Derakhshani banned for refusing Islamic headscarf takes game to U.S.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Friday, October 06, 2017 02:40 PM EDT | Updated: Friday, October 06, 2017 02:58 PM EDT
ST. LOUIS — A 19-year-old Iranian woman banned from competing in the name of her country after attending an international competition without an Islamic headscarf has taken her game to St. Louis University.
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that Dorsa Derakhshani is now at a freshman at the Missouri school, which has a new but highly ranked chess team of top international players. The biology major decided to accept a full scholarship to play for the university this spring, in the wake of the controversy.
Issues arose when Derakhshani wore a simple headband during a February competition in Gibraltar. She was competing under the oversight of the Iranian Chess Federation, an affiliation that allowed her to enter several championship-cycle tournaments. Iranian law requires women to wear head scarves in public, but she didn’t think it would be a problem.
“I don’t know why some people have enough free time to worry about what I wear,” Derakhshani said.
She was 18 when she moved to Barcelona, Spain, and recruited by a chess club. She declined to be on Iran’s national team sponsored by the government because she didn’t want to be controlled by the rules of the team, including wearing a head scarf even while outside Iran.
But days after the Gibraltar tournament, the head of the Iranian Chess Federation said Derakhshani and her 14-year-old brother could no longer play in the country or under Iran’s name. He cited Derakhshani’s refusal to wear a head scarf and said her brother had played against an Israeli player. Iran doesn’t recognize Israel and has a policy of not competing against Israeli athletes.
Derakhshani said her brother was paired by a computer and didn’t know the player’s nationality before the match.
“It was just cruel,” she said. “He was just a kid. He didn’t know what to do.”
Her arrival in St. Louis comes as the city becomes a major player in the chess community. The Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St. Louis, founded by Republican millionaire activist Rex Sinquefield, hosts several national competitions.
Derakhshani said she wants to become a grandmaster, the top designation for a chess player.
Iranian chess champion banned for refusing head scarf gets a new start at SLU | Metro | stltoday.com
Iranian chess player Dorsa Derakhshani banned for refusing Islamic headscarf tak

Oh well....we all know Muslims are NUTS! But at least this woman sounds intelligent enough to make her own way in life and will n ot be running across our border seeking welfare?

Here is an article illustrating that not all people are as comfortable with Muslim attitudes towards women as our LIE-beral govt. It also illustrates that some govts have recognized that one easy way to limit the number of radicals coming into the country is to LIBERATE women from the more draconian portions of Sharia Law!

Radical Muslims with their rabid anti female attitudes are less likely to immigrate to places where their women will be expected to regularly “expose” themselves in the same disgusting fashion as western “shameless sluts”! And radical Muslim men will certainly NOT wish to end up divorced under western laws when Sharia is so much preferable to such men! This is a simple solution to weed out the most extreme Muslim radicals seeking to come to Canada.

We already have laws in place to ensure proper identification of people when in court or doing business in assorted govt offices and there is NO reason why we should not expect Muslim women to reveal themselves/remove the Burqa when employed by govt or when testifying in court or passing through airport security etc as it is behaviour that is expected of ALL CDNS and thus cannot be discriminatory!

There was also an interesting article in the Toronto news recently about an under age BOY being used as a test subject-the kid was dressed in a Burqa and sent off with money in hand to purchase alcohol at various local LCBO outlets. And NOT ONCE was the under age boy challenged over his age or gender and certainly was NOT asked for ID during shopping trips to multiple LCBO outlets!

And why would an LCBO employee bother asking for Id when anybody or anything could be under the Burqa. ID is useless unless there is an actual face to go with the documents and who wants to get into a dog fight with a Muslim broad who thinks you have insulted her and her religion by demanding that she/he/it proves she is entitled to buy alcohol! It just adds insult to injury that Muslims DON’T DRINK alcohol as Quran prohibits this so what was the Burqa clad figure doing in LCBO anyway?


At a glance- Where burkas are banned:
Full burka and niqab ban in:

France, since 2004. Belgium, since 2011. Chad, since 2015. Cameroon, in five provinces, since 2015. Diffa, Niger, since 2015. Brazzaville, Congo, since 2015
Tessin, Switzerland, since 2016

Burkini ban (This is that ridiculous Muslim “swimsuit” that makes Victorian era female swimsuits seem positively DARING by comparison!)

Around 30 French coastal towns had issued bans, but France's highest court ruled against them on 26th August, meaning that burkini bans are now illegal.

(This is just more LIE-beral style judges forcing their radical opinions onto ordinary citizens with greater common sense! So a French judge has struck a blow for Muslim freedom and Muslim women can again swim in “proper” modesty and so what if the water logged cloth bag they are draped in causes them to drown!)

Partial burka and niqab ban

The Netherlands: women cannot have their faces covered in schools, hospital and on public transport

The Italian town of Novara: women were told to stop wearing a full veil in 2010, but there is no established fines system

Parts of Catalonia, Spain: The country's Supreme Court ruled against a ban in some areas in 2013, however those areas which brought their cases to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) have continued with the ban - supported by an ECHR ruling in their favour in 2014

Turkey: a full ban was abandoned in 2013. Now, women are only barred if they work in the judiciary, military and police

(Turkey is of course a fully Muslim country but it has a century long history of making strong efforts to separate Islamic Law and secular law-even Turkish Muslims are leery of Muslim radicals!)
 
petros
#3659
Fed up with Islam? Naaaah. I'm fed up with sympathizers.
 
spaminator
#3660
Man in shark suit, advertising computer store chain, fined for violating Austria's 'burqa ban' law
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Monday, October 09, 2017 08:06 PM EDT | Updated: Monday, October 09, 2017 08:32 PM EDT
VIENNA — An Austrian law that forbids any kind of full-face covering including Islamic veils has claimed an unusual victim — a man wearing a shark suit.
Police say they issued a citation Monday after the man — part of a street advertising campaign for the McShark computer chain stores — refused several requests to take off his shark head.
In effect this month, most full face coverings are prohibited in public in Austria, including off-slope ski masks, surgical masks outside hospitals and party masks on the street. Popularly known as the “burqa ban,” the law is mostly seen as directed at the clothing worn by some ultra-conservative Muslim women.
Violations carry a possible fine of 150 euros ($221). Only a handful of citations have been issued.
A shark mascot for a British cricket team is seen in a 2013 file photo. A man wearing a shark suit, to advertise the McShark computer store chain, was fined for violating Austria's "burqa ban" on Monday, Oct. 9, 2017. (Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)


Man in shark suit, advertising computer store chain, fined for violating Austria
 

Similar Threads

45
What Is Islam?
by ahmadabdalrhman | Jun 9th, 2018
1
Islam in the UK
by I think not | Jan 17th, 2007