Quote: Originally Posted by Jinentonix
Discuss what, the fact that you're rambling and stupid?
If you like we can start there. Can that include my fading hopes that you are a member of the collective that stay collected in the presence of a somebody that is at a lesser station in life, (so I should be listening and not talking). Your thread, let's how it goes, honest above punctuation in my world as well as facts before fiction. If I am stupid that can be fixed by doing some reading, if you are the stupid one it cannot be fixed as the collective taught you everything you believe in.
I don't have a list of forbidden subjects, you and the rest of the collective do apparently so lets see what the opening page is all about, the term 'Songbird' is up for grabs.
First of all, you'll find precious few Canadians who have a problem with immigration in general. What they have a problem with is Trudeau's reckless approach to it.
You mean by taking in penniless refugees instead of members of some Royals of Europe or from somebody in the fortune 500. How many have even applied let alone been turned away. I'm pretty sure the heads at NATO are the ones deciding who goes where rather than JT is there like be was bidding at an auction and the White Helmets would be like the prize of the night. The resettlement we see from there started as soon as Russia entered the war on the side of Syria. From then on getting their proxy army spirited away became the hidden hand part of the sudden concern for a few million people that would be facing treason charges if they stayed. The EU hates Muslims as much as you do. There are a few that come from the actual refugee camps they ran to as soon as the war started
Maybe go learn about economics in a welfare state before you start your winy bullshit.
Would a country such as Canad being run like a large Company Town be a good example for how we operate as a Nation. The hole is getting deeper everyday.
In 2014, this number stood at CAD$1.4 trillion across federal and provincial governments. With the total GDP somewhere around CAD$1.8 trillion, Canada's overall debt/GDP ratio is around 77%. "Gross debt" is the national debt plus intragovernmental debt obligations or debt held by trust funds. Types of securities sold by the government include treasury bills, notes, bonds, Real Return Bonds, Canada Savings Bonds, and provincial government securities. The annual government "deficit" is the difference between government receipts and spending.
Even better just so you know we are not the only ship that is sinking, welcome to the world where Admiralty Law is the rule of the land.
or maritime law
is a body of law
that governs nautical issues and private maritime disputes. Admiralty law consists of both domestic law on maritime activities, and private international law
governing the relationships between private parties operating or using ocean-going ships. While each legal jurisdiction usually has its own legislation governing maritime matters, the international nature of the topic and the need for uniformity has, since 1900, led to considerable international maritime law developments, including numerous multilateral treaties.
Matters dealt by admiralty law include marine commerce, marine navigation
, maritime pollution
, seafarers’ rights
, and the carriage
by sea of both passengers and goods
. Admiralty law also covers land-based commercial activities that are maritime in character, such as marine insurance. Some lawyers prefer to reserve the term “admiralty law” for “wet law” (e.g. salvage, collisions, ship arrest, towage, liens, & limitation), and use “maritime law” only for “dry law” (e.g. carriage of goods & people, marine insurance
, and the MLC
Admiralty law may be distinguished from the Law of the Sea
, which is a body of public international law
dealing with navigational rights, mineral rights
, jurisdiction over coastal waters, and the maritime relationships between nations. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
has been adopted by 167 countries
and the European Union
, and disputes are resolved at the ITLOS
tribunal in Hamburg.
A company town
is a place where practically all stores and housing are owned by the one company that is also the main employer. Company towns are often planned with a suite of amenities such as stores, churches, schools, markets and recreation facilities. They are usually bigger than a model village
("model" in the sense of an ideal to be emulated).
The best examples of company towns have had high ideals; but many have been regarded as controlling or exploitative. Others developed more or less in unplanned fashion, such as Summit Hill, Pennsylvania
, United States, one of the oldest, which began as a LC&N Co.
mining camp and mine site nine miles (14.5 km) from the nearest outside road
) (same page) Occupation 101 is as graphic and up to date as it gets for coverage of that topic.
No, that is not the way things should be run. The Blacks in South Africa should have been educated so they could take over rather than being kept so uneducated they could not no matter how much bigger they were in numbers. I would make sure 15% of the population owned no more than 15% of anything in the country, farming and industry, Due to the slackness done in the past the transition may take 50 years as basic services have even been held back in all of Africa rather than just the South. World Banl Clients rather than religious connection to today's extremist Israel.
Secondly, it's f*cking hilarious listening to you go on about immigrants like we should have open borders while you piss and moan about the existence of Israel.
Immigrants are people who want to move from one peaceful country to another peaceful nation. Refugees are running for their lives and a flood will end and they can return and start over. A war operates on a different set of parameters. When you have to hide your proxy army because they lost the war against Syria you will kill a lot of innocent people to do that as they would make bad witnesses foe war crimes investigations.
Third, Canada is not the US. We don't act like the material riches of other countries belong to us. Canada doesn't engage in hegemony.
We are part of NATO, we follow orders and we are too small to issue any. We contribute little to the war effort, we will reap even less, NATO would have gained about $50T and all for the World Banks once the natives were killed off, . . . like always
Fourth: As for your precious muslim garbage, as immigrants the govt has no right to tell them where they can live in Canada. If you have a problem with them not living in the far north, go bitch at them, it's their choice not to. And who gives a flying f*ck about Mid-east muslims anyway. It's kind'a telling how you don't mention any refugee or other immigrant groups, just muslims. They got a a WHOLE bunch of muslim majority countries they can move to.
What countries areen't under US sanctions or already as controlled as Lebanon is where the leader runs to the KSA rather than help the people who voted him in. Those people. The KSA is run the way the World Bank wants all the Arab nations in the area run, the people have expressed a desire that not take place. Welcome to how your side negotiates.
But here's the one telling thing about some of them. A 16 yr old Afghan girl has more balls than the rest of the Mid-east refugees combined. She was working with the Canadians in A-stan. The Taliban even captured her 10 yr old brother and tortured him in an attempt to get him to rat out his sister. That brave kid didn't break. When it was time for the Canadians to leave, they invited the girl to come back with them where she'd be safe from the Taliban. Her response? "No thanks. I can't help change my country from within if I'm not in it."
You sure you want to us that example because here is how the Taliban got their start?
How Jimmy Carter and I Started the Mujahideen
by Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows”], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
Brzezinski: It isn’t quite that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn’t believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don’t regret anything today?
Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic [integrisme], having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
Brzezinski: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
Whenever I think about her and what she said I invariably remember all those "brave" bitch boys from Africa and the Mid-east streaming into Europe.
It has been the Jewish World Bank involved in Africa for the last century, if it is a hell hole that is the way they want it. Maybe this is a knife in the back to some EU nations that have been getting uppity. Just kidding, England in 1815 were the last one who tried that.
Can you even listen to music that probably has a Muslim in it?