There’s a Special Place in Hell for Those Who Subpoena Internet Comments


Locutus
#1
I have a new op-ed out in the Los Angeles Times explaining and declaiming the recent unpleasantness Reason.com and our commenters experienced at the hands of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Here's how it begins:
If you have dipped a toe into the fetid swamps of online political debate, chances are you have encountered — maybe even authored — acerbic one-liners like, "There is a special place in hell for that so-and-so _______!" (fill in the blank with your least-favorite public official's name).

Despite its literary origins in Dante's "Inferno," the special-place-in-hell formulation is admittedly juvenile and disproportionate, which is probably why Teddy Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy liked to use versions of it so much. (Here's JFK's: "The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a time of moral crisis preserve their neutrality.")

Online, it's everywhere. No. 3 on Buzzfeed's 2014 list of "55 Things That Deserve a Special Place in Hell" is John Travolta's wig. Reddit's 2014 string asking, "Which people have a 'special place in hell' waiting for them?" had, as of Wednesday, 7,857 suggestions. The meme is more common than Nigerian email scams, and considerably less dangerous.

Unless, that is, you think like the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York
Some of the conclusion:
Gag orders are un-American and should be applied only as a last resort, not as a boilerplate action rubber-stamped by a judge. Grand juries, which were originally designed as checks on government power, have devolved into investigative instruments for harassing commenters and websites that have committed no crimes.

There’s a Special Place in Hell for Those Who Subpoena Internet Comments - Hit & Run : Reason.com

Please read the whole thing here.


 
BaalsTears
+1
#2
The subpoena issued by Obama's attorneys to Reason magazine for the names and IP addresses of its online forum members and the gag order are inherently immoral because they "chill" free speech. What has happened to Reason could just as easily happen to other online forums. Canadian Content has sufficient contacts with the United States to be exposed to similar chilling Big Govt. contact.
 
DaSleeper
+2
#3  Top Rated Post
Progressives such as Obama can't stand dissent or even disagreement, even though both are needed in a truly liberal society.......
 
CDNBear
+1
#4
Where are the Usual Suspects that rail against this?

Oh ya, it was a progressive.

My bad.

Carry on.