The decline and fall of Europe (except, maybe, UK)


Blackleaf
#1
The Decline and Fall of Europe

Talk to top-level scientists and educators about the future of scientific research and they will rarely even mention Europe.

By Fareed Zakaria

Newsweek

Feb. 20, 2006 issue - Cartoons and riots made the headlines in Europe last week, but a far less fiery event, the publication of an academic study, might shed greater light on the future of the Continent. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, headquartered in Paris, released a report, Going for Growth, that details economic prospects in the industrial world. It is 160 pages long and written in bland, cautious, scholarly prose. But the conclusion is clear—Europe is in deep trouble. These days we all talk about the rise of Asia and the challenge to America, but it might well turn out that the most consequential trend of the next decade will be the economic decline of Europe.

It's often noted that the European Union has a combined gross domestic product that is approximately the same as that of the United States. But the EU has 170 million more people. Its per capita GDP is 25 percent lower than that of the U.S. and, most important, that gap has been widening for 15 years. If present trends continue, the chief economist at the OECD argues, in 20 years the average U.S. citizen will be twice as rich as the average Frenchman or German. (Britain is an exception on most of these measures, lying somewhere between Continental Europe and the U.S.)

People have argued that Europeans simply value leisure more and, as a result, are poorer but have a better quality of life. That's fine if you're taking a 10 percent pay cut and choosing to have longer lunches and vacations. But if you're only half as well off as the U.S., that will translate into poorer health care and education, diminished access to all kinds of goods and services, and a lower quality of life. Two Swedish researchers, Frederik Bergstrom and Robert Gidehag, note in a monograph published last year that "40 percent of Swedish households would rank as low-income households in the U.S." In many European countries, the percentage would be even greater.

In March 2000, the EU's heads of state agreed to make the EU "the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-driven economy by 2010." Today this looks like a joke. The OECD report goes through the status of reforms country by country, and all the major continental economies get a B-minus. Whenever some politician makes tiny, halting efforts at reform, strikes and protests paralyze the country. In recent months, reformers like Nicolas Sarkozy in France, Jose Manuel Barroso in Brussels and Angela Merkel in Germany have been backtracking on their proposals and instead mouthing pious rhetoric about the need to "manage" globalization. EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson's efforts to liberalize trade have been consistently undercut. As a result of the EU's unwillingness to reduce its massive farm subsidies, the Doha trade-expansion round is dead.

Talk to top-level scientists and educators about the future of scientific research, and they will rarely even mention Europe. There are areas in which it is world-class, but they are fewer than they once were. In the biomedical sciences, for example, Europe is not on the map, and it might well be surpassed by much poorer Asian countries. The CEO of a large pharmaceutical company told me that in 10 years, the three most important countries for his industry would be the United States, China and India.

And I haven't even gotten to the demographics. In 25 years, the number of working-age Europeans will decline by 7 percent, while those over 65 will increase by 50 percent. One solution: let older people work. But Europe's employment rate for people over 60 is low: 7 percent in France and 12 percent in Germany (compared with 27 percent in the U.S.). Modest efforts to allow people to retire later have been met with the usual avalanche of protests. And while economists and the European Commission keep proposing that Europe take in more immigrants to expand its labor force, it won't. The cartoon controversy has powerfully highlighted the difficulties Europe is having with its existing immigrants.

What does all this add up to? Less European influence in the world. Europe's position in institutions like the World Bank and the IMF relates to its share of world GDP. Its dwindling defense spending weakens its ability to be a military partner of the U.S., or to project military power abroad even for peacekeeping purposes. Its cramped, increasingly protectionist outlook will further sap its vitality.

The decline of Europe means a world with a greater diffusion of power and a lessened ability to create international norms and rules of the road. It also means that America's superpower status will linger. Think of the dollar. For years people have argued that it is due for a massive drop as countries around the world diversify their savings. But as people looked at the alternatives, they decided that the chief rivals, the euro and the yen, represented economies that were structurally weak. So they have reluctantly stuck with the dollar. It's a similar dynamic in other arenas. You can't beat something with nothing.

www.msnbc.msn.com . . .
 
Blackleaf
#2
However, UK, France and Germany have caught up to the US in recent years on GDP per capita. Let's see how we have caught up with them in recent years -


GDP Per capita ($) - 1820

UK - 1400
US - 1287
France - 1218
Germany - 1112



1973
US - 16,607
Germany - 13,152
France - 12,940
UK - 12,000



2004

US - 39,452
UK - 35,421
France - 33,015
Germany - 32,929


Size of GDP per capita compared with US (US = 100)

1820
UK - 109
US - 100
France - 95
Germany - 86

1973
US - 100
Germany - 79
France - 78
UK - 72

2004
US - 100
UK - 90
France - 84
Germany - 83

So recently, we have been catching up to America's GDP per capita.

However, Germany now has the OECD's slowest GDP per capita growth, France has the third-slowest, whereas the UK's GDP per capita growth exceeds that of the US. Our GDP per capita is already 90% that of the US, and if current trends continue, the British will be richer again than the America, like we were in the 19th Century.

However, the Americans WILL probably end up being twice as rich as the French and Germans by 2020, as America's GDP per capita growth is, again, faster than France and Germany's.
 
the caracal kid
#3
What is needed is a change (globally) in what is considered "wealth". This "old way" of wealth measurement needs to end for it is unrealistic and unsustainable.
 
FiveParadox
Liberal
#4
I wish we had a society where there was no money.

Think something along the lines of Star Trek , lol.

Nonetheless, on the topic at hand, what would you think is accounting for this surge in the United Kingdom GDP, in relation to that of the United States? And what would be causing the GDPs of France and Germany to "sputter," so to speak?
 

Similar Threads

6
Conservative ideology is in decline
by Avro | Aug 31st, 2008
41
Britain in decline
by cortez | Apr 8th, 2006
7
The Decline And Fall Of Europe
by I think not | Feb 20th, 2006
2
Giant in decline
by moghrabi | Jan 26th, 2005
2
Four more years of decline
by moghrabi | Dec 13th, 2004