16 US Marines were arrested,'human smuggling to drug-related offenses'


MHz
#1
Can you say pretty female children were the ones let in?? I knew you couldn't.

https://sputniknews.com/us/201907251...ated-offenses/
A total of 16 US Marines were arrested Thursday for the "alleged involvement in various illegal activities ranging from human smuggling to drug-related offenses."

The Marines were assigned to the 1st Marine Division and were apprehended at a battalion formation in California's Camp Pendleton, a statement from the service reveals. An additional eight Marines were also questioned over their alleged involvement in "drug offenses unrelated to [Thursday's] arrests."
The arrests were carried out with assistance from the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS).
The latest development comes weeks after two US Marines were arrested on July 3 for reportedly attempting to smuggle three undocumented Mexican immigrants into the US through California. According to US District Court documents obtained by the Marine Corps Times from the Southern District of California, Lance Corporals David Javier Salazar-Quintero and Byron Darnell Law II of the 1st Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, at Camp Pendleton, were the latest service members accused of carrying out the crime "for financial gain."
A source with knowledge of the matter told Task & Purpose that the Thursday arrests were the result of information pulled by NCIS from phones belonging to Salazar-Quintero and Law. Maj. Kendra Motz, a spokesperson for the 1st Marine Division, stressed to the outlet that "any Marines found to be in connection with these alleged activities will be questioned and handled accordingly with respect to due process."
 
MHz
#2
https://sputniknews.com/latam/201907...ons-venezuela/
WASHINGTON (Sputnik) - The US State Department is looking to appoint a senior adviser to coordinate humanitarian aid distribution services and interventions in Venezuela, the Federal Business Opportunities agency revealed in a notification.

Earlier this year, the United States sparked violent clashes when it attempted to force supplies, ostensibly meant for humanitarian assistance, through Venezuela's borders without the government’s permission. International humanitarian groups slammed Washington for "politicizing" aid while Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro said the deliveries were part of a US plot to overthrow his government.
"The United States Government, represented by the US Agency for International Development Office of US Foreign Disaster Assistance, is seeking applications from qualified US citizens to provide personal services as a Senior Humanitarian Advisor for Venezuela under a United States Personal Services Contract," the agency said in a solicitation posted this week.
According to the job requirements, the new adviser would lead efforts to assess humanitarian assistance needs, target beneficiary groups and locations, and "recommend the types of interventions" required.
On June 17, Venezuela received its second batch of Red Cross humanitarian aid, which exceeded 20 tonnes. The delivery was in line with the agreement between Maduro and opposition leader Juan Guaido to allow humanitarian aid into the country that was brokered by the Red Cross back in March.
In February, the International Center of the Red Cross (ICRC) in Columbia said it would not help distribute the US goods because it does not consider the assistance to be legitimate humanitarian aid. The UN Secretary-General’s office urged Washington not to deliver aid without the consent of Venezuelan government authorities and to halt politicizing assistance.
While the United States has expressed concerns over the humanitarian situation in Venezuela, a study released in May - co-authored by leading economist Jeffrey Sachs - concluded that Trump administration sanctions have killed some 40,000 Venezuelans since 2017.
The Trump administration intensified efforts to topple Maduro’s government earlier this year by backing opposition leader Juan Guaido’s failed coup and imposing sanctions US officials said were designed to exacerbate the country’s already acute economic crisis.
 
MHz
#3
https://www.equalitynow.org/united_s...ing?locale=es\
United States: Address Role Of U.S. Military In Fueling Global Sex Trafficking

Important: This Archived Action Campaign Has Been Completed Or Discontinued, And The Information Contained In It May Not Be Current. Please See Take Action For Current And Ongoing Campaigns.

view as pdf
In the 1980s, the U.S. Subic Bay Naval Base in the Philippines was the largest U.S. military base outside of the U.S. with an estimated 500 million USD generated by the brothels surrounding it. Local traffickers and brothel owners engaged in the business of buying and selling women and girls to meet the demands of the servicemen stationed there. Alma, who had dreams of becoming an accountant, was one of the women sold in the local sex industry. After three years, she was able to escape this life and subsequently co-founded Buklod ng Kababaihan, a group that helps other exploited women. Though the U.S. bases in the Philippines officially closed in the 1990s, the problem persists today as U.S. sex tourists travel there to take advantage of the commercial sex industry entrenched by the once-large U.S. military presence. Thousands of U.S. servicemen are still deployed in the Philippines where they continue to seek out local women in prostitution despite laws against it. Alma and Buklod continue to fight the exploitation of the estimated 300,000 to 400,000 women and up to 100,000 children in the Philippines commercial sex industry.
It is widely acknowledged that where there is a large military presence, there will be a significant and concurrent growth of the commercial sex industry and trafficking of women and girls into the industry. As former U.S. anti-trafficking Ambassador John Miller stated in 2004, “human trafficking, especially for women and girls forced into prostitution, has followed demand where a multitude of U.S. and foreign aid workers, humanitarian workers, civilian contractors, and yes, U.S. uniformed personnel, operate.” For example, in 2012 The Korea Times reported that women are trafficked to and exploited in brothels around U.S. military bases in South Korea “despite the military’s ‘zero tolerance policy.’” According to one estimate, more than one million Korean women have been used in prostitution by U.S. troops since 1945.
Nearly ten years ago, after noting this rampant trafficking and exploitation around U.S. bases in South Korea and other countries, Equality Now and our Korean partners began advocating for the U.S. government to institute a zero tolerance policy on sex trafficking and the demand for commercial sex that fuels it.
The U.S. government has recognized that the buying and selling of sex is often intrinsically linked to sex trafficking. Sex trafficking is a criminal industry that operates on the market principles of supply and demand. The demand is created by men who pay for commercial sex, ensuring that sex trafficking continues to exist. Traffickers, pimps and facilitators profit from this demand by supplying the millions of women and girls who are exploited on a daily basis around the world. In response to this recognized link, in 2005 the U.S. government amended the Manual for Courts-Martial to specifically enumerate “patronizing a prostitute” as a violation of Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. While this provision has been in place for eight years, as of 2012 there have only been 31 cases brought for “patronizing a prostitute” or “pandering” and only 19 individuals have been convicted.
The U.S. government is bound by international and national anti-trafficking laws and policies to reduce the demand for commercial sex. The UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, requires state parties, including the United States, to “discourage the demand that fosters all forms of exploitation of persons, especially women and children, that leads to trafficking.” Lack of enforcement of the military provision banning the purchase of sex undermines the U.S. government’s commitment to combating sex trafficking, and perpetuates the abuse of women and girls around the world.


https://taskandpurpose.com/military-...icking-problem
The Military Needs To Stop Being A Part Of The Human Trafficking Problem


Shawn VanDiver

January 30, 2015 at 05:00 AM
news

Sailors man the rails of the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS McCampbell (DDG 85) as the ship arrives in Saipan for a port visit.
Photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Chris Cavagnaro
It’s time to talk about an uncomfortable truth. I, like many of you, traveled the world while I served in the military. And I, like many of you, saw my brothers in arms participating in human trafficking.
One instance stands out to me. In the Navy, when you’re visiting a port, someone in command leadership must brief sailors on the ins and outs of the port, including restricted areas. Without fail, these briefs contain a message about how sailors and Marines are not to participate in human trafficking of any kind, including prostitution or other sex industry practices.
There we were, off the coast of Saipan, receiving our port brief from the command master chief. He made a big show of decrying human trafficking, reminding the crew of our annual training. Yet several hours later, he was spotted by many sailors walking around town with multiple local women on his arm --- and it was no secret that he had paid for their services.
This is the problem. The Pentagon seemingly recognizes that military indulgence in human trafficking is an issue, but when we get down to the unit level, commanders and their surrogates just don’t care. During my 12 years in the Navy, it was very clear that many of the sailors aboard ship created a demand for the services rendered through human trafficking. What was also clear was that no one would be charged or prosecuted for these crimes. My first ship even saw a captain who routinely paid for sexual “work” overseas.
What message does this behavior, our behavior, send? To the crew, it says that laws are more akin to suggestions. To civilians, it says that the military does not care to combat human trafficking. To women, it says they are nothing but goods to be bought and sold, treated like sub-humans; it’s no wonder we have such a culture problem in the military with regard to serving with women.
January is Human Trafficking Awareness Month. The Junior League of San Diego organization recently hosted a rally to raise awareness, and at one point, a brave young woman took the stage to tell her story. She told the crowd about answering a modeling ad and being promptly raped when she came in for her “interview.” She later learned that her rape was videotaped and distributed as pornography. She courageously walked us through her struggles, which have culminated in a piece of art meant to shed light on the young men and women affected by this issue.
There are myriad heartbreaking stories like the one described above. As survivors tell them, people become increasingly, and more visibly, uncomfortable. But being uncomfortable to hear such horrific tales is an essential response; we must turn that discomfort into action. Human trafficking affects not just undocumented immigrants and the poorest among us. Victims are our sons and daughters. Our nieces and nephews. Our brothers and sisters. And, yes, our mothers and fathers.
The lack of meaningful enforcement within the military is a slap in the face to the American people. We are charged with protecting all Americans. When we create demand for humans to be forced into modern-day slavery, we are doing quite the opposite. To be clear, I am not saying that the Department of Defense encourages this behavior. I would, however, argue that the issue is not taken seriously enough, especially at the unit level. When sailors and Marines engage in this behavior on deployments, they all too often bring it home and contribute to the domestic sex trafficking economy.
Everyone agrees that human trafficking is terrible, so what can we do about it? Let’s make 2015 the year that the DoD comes off the map as a consumer of human trafficking. Service members must be cognizant that paying for humans is deplorable and illegal. Leadership needs to set the example. As a culture, we must agree to hold ourselves to a high standard of conduct, and those who don’t should be punished.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2632319...o_tab_contents


https://unboundnow.org/breaking-the-...x-trafficking/
Breaking the link between the military and sex trafficking




Oct 30, 2015


If you live in the United States, chances are very good that you live within five hours of a military base. In fact, every single one of the current U.S. UnBound chapters is less than an hour and a half from a major military base. How often do we consider the military and base towns when we discuss anti-trafficking efforts?
One thing to consider is that military operations have been inextricably linked with the exploitation of women for most of human history. In the book of Joshua, Rahab the prostitute provides critical information (that she may have gained from her liaisons with powerful men) to the Israelite spies, which saves her life and the lives of her relatives. Women often traveled with the Roman forces, even as Christian emperors gained power in the early 12th century and decrees were made that these women would be punished if caught in the act.
The modern-day U.S. military base in South Korea has often been described as a massive international hub of sex trafficking that emerged primarily in response to the large population of male soldiers. Just in the last year, an Army Sergeant First Class stationed at Fort Hood was convicted of organizing a prostitution ring through manipulating female soldiers that he outranked and that he knew were having financial issues.
The U.S. military has a policy of ‘zero tolerance’ towards sex trafficking, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice lists severe punishments for prostitution, soliciting a prostitute and enticing others to prostitution. Unfortunately, these policies often go unenforced due to an indifference or justification of sexual exploitation.
What can we do to change the atmosphere around the military and sex trafficking?
  1. Know that sexual exploitation in the military is in large part due to hyper-masculinized tendencies and widespread objectification of women. Finding ways to address these underlying causes, without taking away from the necessary character of the military, is critical to preventing sex trafficking.
  2. Power dynamics play a major role in hierarchical institutions like the military. Anti-trafficking advocates can make it a priority to build strong, trusting relationships with victim advocates and other significant units on base to rely on when it appears that victims are being subjected to forced silence.
  3. Obviously, most military members do not in any way participate in sexual exploitation, and are as repulsed by its occurrence as their local communities. We can encourage and provide the means for allies within base communities to make their voices heard through community prevention and awareness measures.
Those who choose to serve in our military are some of our nation’s best and brightest, and deserve our respect for their courage and, too often, for the sacrifice of their lives. As a nation and as supportive communities, we can demonstrate our respect through choosing to hold those who serve to the highest standards. The military has the capacity to stop violence not only outside our borders, but also within, through rising to the challenge of finally breaking the link between the armed forces and sex trafficking. As communities, we can provide support, education and advocacy to ensure that our base towns can be places of honor and freedom.
 

Similar Threads

0
US, Canada break up human smuggling ring
by I think not | Feb 14th, 2006
0
3
Feds Shut Down Drug-Smuggling Tunnel
by bulldog | Jul 22nd, 2005