Gun Control is Completely Useless.


spilledthebeer
#12331
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

I'll give you the short version: you know dick about Maryland politics, and the square root of dick about whatever influence the NRA may have in the state.




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The Maryland dickhead cones to a Cdn web site to lecture Cdns about Cdn law!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


While at the same time the Maryland dickhead is claiming to have special exalted knowledge that others do not have...............................



about the staggering Yankee gun fight that has been going on since the first Yankees arrived!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


With NO END IN SIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!


Do you not see how TWISTED, insulting and muddled your thoughts are here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You have ENCOURAGED ME of all people............................................


to defend Hemer-hoid against you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It`s a GREAT LIFE..........................................


if you dont weaken!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
JamesBondo
+1
#12332
Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

How is a background check taking guns from law abiding citizens?

You remind me of the case where a reporter/journalist was met with awkward silence when she asked 'How do we stop a terrorist from getting firearms if we don't have background checks?'
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#12333
So. . . bought the Ruger. Getting rid of the Kel-Tec.
 
Colpy
Conservative
+1
#12334
Bill Blair: Greatest AR-15 Salesman in Canadian History


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 23, 2019


Today, a quality source with direct knowledge re-confirmed the Liberal government will attempt to ban the AR-15 rifle by Order in Council, bypassing parliamentary accountability. Apparently, Justin Trudeau will announce the ban at the “Women Deliver Conference” between June 3-6 in Vancouver.


It has been widely speculated New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern will attend the conference to hear Justin Trudeau announce the AR-15 ban. However, her office, so far, has responded to our attendance confirmation requests with stony radio silence.


On Sunday, May 19, Minister Blair all but told CTV’s Evan Solomon the Liberal government would ban the AR-15 by Order in Council.


“I think there is no measure that I think we can rule out,” Blair said.


Trudeau, via Bill Blair, will now ban the world’s most popular sporting rifle so it can virtue-signal Canada is “doing something” about crime guns.


When news first surfaced, the Liberal government immediately denied any kind of gun ban was in the works. It appears Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government is, once again, lying through their teeth.


Let’s be clear. The only thing the Liberal government will accomplish with this blatant virtue signalling is to mobilize target shooters across Canada to work their butts off to defeat the Liberal Party in the upcoming federal election.


In the extreme short term, this impending Order in Council turns Minister William Blair into Canada’s AR-15 Salesman of the Year.


But time is running out fast.


You have until June 2nd to buy your very own AR-15 before the Liberal government makes it impossible for ordinary Canadians to own a beautiful .22 calibre, 5-shot, semi-automatic target rifle of their very own.


Yes, the AR-15 is classified as a Restricted firearm.


Yes, the AR-15 may only be fired at a government-approved shooting range.


Yes, you may have less than 10 days to purchase the world’s most popular sport shooting rifle. Do it now!



From the Canadian Shooting Sports Association.
 
taxslave
Free Thinker
+2
#12335
A 5 shot semi auto 22 targt rifle being restricted clearly shows how out to lunch the anti gun nuts are It trudOWE was at all serious about gun crime he would make it illegal for criminals to own automatic hand guns of any calibre.
 
Hoid
#12336
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Yes, the AR-15 may only be fired at a government-approved shooting range.
Yes, you may have less than 10 days to purchase the world’s most popular sport shooting rifle. Do it now!



From the Canadian Shooting Sports Association.



Is that Canada's little NRA, in the employ the gun industry?
 
spilledthebeer
#12337
Quote: Originally Posted by JamesBondo View Post

You remind me of the case where a reporter/journalist was met with awkward silence when she asked 'How do we stop a terrorist from getting firearms if we don't have background checks?'




OH STUPID HYPOCRITE BONDO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!


If you are SO FOND of background checks and assorted security measures..........................................


then WHY HAVE YOU SAID NOTHING about LIE-beral willingness to hand out firearm certificates to MUSLIMS................................


who have been getting their licenses IN SPITE OF REFUSING TO SUPPLY PHOTO ID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


All that is required is that a VIRTUALLY ANONYMOUS Muslim supply a letter from an Imam testifying that it is against their religion to expose their face and they can get their guns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



How do we know who is buying the guns if all we have is some paper ID..........................................


from REFUGEES who came to us from camps run by TERROR GROUP HAMAS??????????????????????????????


WHO REALLY KNOWS if the can be trusted??????????????????????


The Danforth shooter was a LUNATIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And his brother was a DRUG DEALER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The Muslim who attacked Cdns in Edmonton a few years back was clearly a LUNATIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The Muslim who walked into a Cdn Forces recruiting centre in Toronto was a LUNATIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Sammy Yatim the lunatic who got on a TTC streetcar and the exposed his genitals while scaring passengers off the car with his LARGE KNIFE............................................. .........


was clearly a LUNATIC........................................... ......


who ended up getting SHOT by a cop after refusing orders to put down the knife!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


We do not have permission from LIE-beral judges to know if Yatim was a Muslim as LIE-berals are TOTALLY FOCUSED on the shooting of Yatim!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


but WE DO KNOW that Aramian Yatim was born in Aleppo, Syria and immigrated to Toronto!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


How is it that so very many Muslims have mental health issues..........................................


and yet LIE-berals are comfortable ISSUING fire arm permits without the BOTHER of providing any real ID?????????????????????
 
Colpy
Conservative
+1
#12338
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

Don't worry about Hoid/Waldo, all bluster and no substance...
Even his favorite invective of white natty is a farce....
look up the word "natty" on Google


It ain't no insult ......


Hilarious he is still using this, as I informed him of the meaning the first time he called me this......months ago.


What an idiot!




nat·ty

/ˈnadē/

adjectiveinformal

adjective: natty; comparative adjective: nattier; superlative adjective: nattiest

(of a person or an article of clothing) smart and fashionable.
"a natty blue blazer and designer jeans"
synonyms:smart, stylish, fashionable, dapper, debonair, dashing, jaunty, rakish, spruce, well turned out, well dressed, chic, modish, elegant, trim
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#12339
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Hilarious he is still using this, as I informed him of the meaning the first time he called me this......months ago.


What an idiot!




nat·ty

/ˈnadē/

adjectiveinformal

adjective: natty; comparative adjective: nattier; superlative adjective: nattiest

(of a person or an article of clothing) smart and fashionable.
"a natty blue blazer and designer jeans"
synonyms:smart, stylish, fashionable, dapper, debonair, dashing, jaunty, rakish, spruce, well turned out, well dressed, chic, modish, elegant, trim


No use even acknowledging a person of such limited mental capacity!
 
spilledthebeer
#12340
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Hilarious he is still using this, as I informed him of the meaning the first time he called me this......months ago.


What an idiot!




nat·ty

/ˈnadē/

adjectiveinformal

adjective: natty; comparative adjective: nattier; superlative adjective: nattiest

(of a person or an article of clothing) smart and fashionable.
"a natty blue blazer and designer jeans"
synonyms:smart, stylish, fashionable, dapper, debonair, dashing, jaunty, rakish, spruce, well turned out, well dressed, chic, modish, elegant, trim




OH Colpy............................if Hemer-hoid were a scholar......................................


or if he were sensible and logical........................................... ...........


he would NOT be a LIE-beral!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!


And he would NOT be trying to deliberately insult us with his twisted and semi made up insults!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


He sneers "white natty" because it is quicker for the lazy LIE-beral propaganda meister to type than "white nationalist"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Like all LIE-berals, the words he uses have whatever meaning he wants, as the situation warrants!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


After all - LIE-berals have re-defined the word "racist" to simply refer to somebody who is hostile to the DISTORTED LIE-beral version of truth and LOGIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And they have created the word "Islamophobe" simply to insult people who think radical Islam is both barbaric and two faced!!!!!!!!!!!


After all the devout Muslim sees ONLY the pain of HIS PEOPLE and ignores the suffering of all others!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And LIE-berals approve of this twisted Muslim value system!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
taxslave
Free Thinker
+1
#12341
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

A 5 shot semi auto 22 targt rifle being restricted clearly shows how out to lunch the anti gun nuts are It trudOWE was at all serious about gun crime he would make it illegal for criminals to own automatic hand guns of any calibre.

Oh silly me. It already is illegal for criminals to own handguns of any kind and has been for decades. How about enforcing the laws that are already on the books instead of writing a bunch of new feel good ones that criminals will just ignore?
 
pgs
Free Thinker
+1
#12342
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

Oh silly me. It already is illegal for criminals to own handguns of any kind and has been for decades. How about enforcing the laws that are already on the books instead of writing a bunch of new feel good ones that criminals will just ignore?

We elect people to represent our best interests in parliament and they go there to make laws .
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#12343
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

We elect people to represent our best interests in parliament and they go there to make laws .

Thank you, Mr. Rogers.
 
spilledthebeer
+1
#12344
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

Oh silly me. It already is illegal for criminals to own handguns of any kind and has been for decades. How about enforcing the laws that are already on the books instead of writing a bunch of new feel good ones that criminals will just ignore?




Oh yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


HOW FOOLISH to expect LIE-berals to enforce Cdn laws!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Do you know what it COSTS to put a thug in jail these days?????????????????????????????????


LIE-berals REFUSE to spend THEIR GRAVY on such FRILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Colpy
Conservative
#12345
Venezuelans regret gun ban, 'a declaration of war against an unarmed popul

By Hollie McKay | Fox News


In this April 13, 2010 file photo, members of the National Revolutionary Militia hold up their weapons and a painting of Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez at an event marking the 9th anniversary of Chavez's return to power after a failed 2002 coup, in Caracas, Venezuela. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos, File)



CUCUTA, Venezuela/Colombia border – As Venezuela continues to crumble under the socialist dictatorship of President Nicolas Maduro, some are expressing words of warning – and resentment – against a six-year-old gun control bill that stripped citizens of their weapons.


“Guns would have served as a vital pillar to remaining a free people, or at least able to put up a fight,” Javier Vanegas, 28, a Venezuelan teacher of English now exiled in Ecuador, told Fox News. “The government security forces, at the beginning of this debacle, knew they had no real opposition to their force. Once things were this bad, it was a clear declaration of war against an unarmed population.”


Under the direction of then-President Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan National Assembly in 2012 enacted the “Control of Arms, Munitions and Disarmament Law,” with the explicit aim to “disarm all citizens.” The law took effect in 2013, with only minimal pushback from some pro-democracy opposition figures, banned the legal commercial sale of guns and munitions to all - except government entities.


Chavez initially ran a months-long amnesty program encouraging Venezuelans to trade their arms for electrical goods. That year, there were only 37 recorded voluntary gun surrenders, while the majority of seizures - more than 12,500 – were by force.


In 2014, with Nicolás Maduro at the helm following Chavez’s death but carrying through his socialist “Chavista” policies, the government invested more than $47 million enforcing the gun ban – which has since included grandiose displays of public weapons demolitions in the town square.


A former gun store owner inside Venezuela – who told Fox News he has now been relegated to only selling fishing supplies since the ban – said he can’t sell any type of weaponry - even a slingshot - and underscored that even BB ammunition and airsoft guns are only issued to police and military officers.


The punishment for illicit carrying or selling a weapon now is 20 years behind bars.

CARACAS, VENEZUELA - MARCH 04: A sticker on a car window honors former Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez near the military barracks where Chavez is entombed on March 4, 2014 in Caracas, Venezuela. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images) (2014 Getty Images)


Prior to the 2012 reform, there were only around eight gun stores in the entire country. And the process of obtaining a legal permit to own and carry was plagued by long wait lines, high costs and bribery “to make the process swifter” at the one department allowed to issue licenses, which operated under the umbrella of the Ministry of Defense.


“Venezuelans didn’t care enough about it. The idea of having the means to protect your home was seen as only needed out in the fields. People never would have believed they needed to defend themselves against the government,” Vanegas explained. “Venezuelans evolved to always hope that our government would be non-tyrannical, non-violator of human rights, and would always have a good enough control of criminality.”


He said it didn’t take long for such a wide-eyed public perception to fall apart. “If guns had been a stronger part of our culture, if there had been a sense of duty for one to protect their individual rights, and as a show of force against a government power – and had legal carry been a common thing – it would have made a huge difference,” he lamented.


Since April 2017, almost 200 pro-democracy protesters in Venezuela – armed mostly with stones – were shot dead by government forces in brutal retaliation to their call to end the oppressive socialist regime. The once oil-wealthy nation has continued its downward spiral into financial ruin, extreme violence, and mass human rights violations. An estimated three million Venezuelans have been forced to flee since 2015.


“Venezuela shows the deadly peril when citizens are deprived of the means of resisting the depredations of a criminal government,” said David Kopel, a policy analyst, and research director at the Independence Institute and adjunct professor of Advanced Constitutional Law at Denver University. “The Venezuelan rulers – like their Cuban masters – apparently viewed citizen possession of arms as a potential danger to a permanent communist monopoly of power.”

More than three million Venzuelans have fled into neighboring Colombia since the crisis of 2015.


Although the bill was sold to the population as a hardline effort to improve security, and sharply reduce crime, many now point to Venezuela as a case study for how gun prohibition can actually produce the opposite effect.

The violent crime rate, already high, soared. Almost 28,000 people were murdered in 2015 – with the homicide rate becoming the world’s highest. Compare that, according to GunPolicy.org – an international firearms prevention and policy research initiative – to just under 10,000 in 2012, and 6,500 thousand in 2001, the year before Chavez came to power.


The total number of gun deaths in 2013 was estimated to 14,622, having steadily risen from 10,913 in 2002. While comprehensive data now goes unrecorded by the government, in September this year, Amnesty International declared Venezuela had a murder rate “worse than some war zones” – 89 people per 100,000 people - and three times that of its volatile neighbor Brazil.


Much of the crime has been attributed by analysts to government-backed gangs – referred to in Spanish as “collectivos” – who were deliberately put in place by the government.


“They were set up by the government to act as proxies and exert community control. They're the guys on the motorcycles in the poor neighborhoods, who killed any protesters,” said Vanessa Neumann, the Venezuelan-American president and founder of Asymmetrica, a Washington, D.C.-based political risk research and consulting firm. “The gun reform policy of the government was about social control. As the citizenry got more desperate and hungry and angry with the political situation, they did not want them to be able to defend themselves. It was not about security; it was about a monopoly on violence and social control.”


So while Venezuelan citizens were stripped of their legal recourse to bear arms, the “collectivos” – established by Chavez when came to power – were legally locked and loaded. Deemed crucial to the survival of the socialist dictatorship, the “collectivos” function to brutally subjugate opposition groups, while saving some face as they aren’t officially government forces, critics contend.


Eduardo Espinel, 35, who serves as a representative for the rapidly growing Venezuelan population in the Colombian border town of Cucuta – having fled his ailing nation two years ago under the threat of being kidnapped by local gangsters – said the law had proliferated the violence by allowing the collectivos to freely and legally shoot and kill.


“Everyone else but the common citizen. This law asks for the disarming of the common people, but everyone else can carry,” Espinel said. “The kind of law might make sense in a normal country, but in Venezuela, it makes no sense. People are faced with crime and have no easy means to defend themselves.”

Eduardo Espinel, 35, who serves as a representative for the rapidly growing Venezuelan population in the Colombian border town of Cucuta, said a gun bam law had actually proliferated the violence in Venezuela. (Fox News/Hollie McKay)


And Maribel Arias, 35, who was once a law and political science student at the University of Los Andes in her home state of Mérida but fled to the Colombian border with her family two years ago – living mostly on the streets as she and her husband take turns finding odd jobs such as selling water and attending bathrooms and while sharing the parenting duties of tending to their four children – bemoaned that they simply cannot rely on the nation’s law enforcement.


“The people of Venezuela should have rights for gun carrying because there is just too much crime and people should have the right to defend themselves because the justice system is not working,” Arias asserted. “If you call the police, the police come only if they want. If they capture the criminal maybe they will take away whatever they stole, but they normally go free again. It’s a vicious cycle.”

Maribel Arias, 35, who fled to the Colombian border with her family two years ago – living mostly on the streets as she and her husband take turns finding odd jobs while sharing the parenting duties for their four children – said Venezuelans cannot rely on the nation’s law enforcement.


Many contend the gun ban has in some ways hurt police and law enforcement, who have themselves become a more fervent target of street gangs. There was a 14 percent increase in police murders in 2016. And more than 80 percent of assailants subsequently stole the officer’s gun, according to Insight Crime.


Some experts contend many of the weapons and ammunition used by gangsters were once in the hands of government forces, and obtained either through theft or purchase from corrupt individuals.


And adding to the complication, the ranks of the police force are beleaguered by crime and corruption. “Crimes are committed by police, a lot of the criminals are police themselves,” said Saul Moros, 59, from the Venezuelan city of Valencia.


Luis Farias, 48, from Margarita, said that gun violence was indeed bad when guns were freely available for purchase. But it became much worse after the gun ban was passed. “Now the criminal mother is unleashed,” Farias said. “Trying to ban guns didn’t take guns off the streets. Nobody cares about the law; the criminals don’t care about the law.”

“Crimes are committed by police, a lot of the criminals are police themselves,” Saul Moros, 59, from the Venezuelan city of Valencia. (left) Luis Farias, 48, said gun violence was bad when guns were freely available – but became much worse after the so-called prohibition. (Fox News/Hollie McKay)


A black market in weapons is also thriving. There are an estimated six million unregistered firearms circulating in Venezuela, but they remain far from reach for the average, non-criminal Venezuelan.


“The black market of weapons is very active, mostly used by violent criminals,” said Johan Obdola, a former counter-narcotics chief in Venezuela and now president of Latin America-focused, Canada-based global intelligence and security firm IOSI. “Venezuelans simply looking to protect themselves from the regime are totally vulnerable.”


Prices vary daily. But an AR-15 rifle goes for around $500, sources said, while handguns sell for about $250. Those prices are far beyond the reach of the average Venezuelan.


“Most guns can be bought illegally in a sort of pyramid structure. A big irregular group or criminal organization has the best access to weapons directly from the government, and they sometimes even get access to basically new unused weaponry," explained Vanegas. "The longer down the pyramid you are, you must get your weapon from the nearest big irregular group that overpowers you within your territory. This is not an option for any moral person, due to the fact that you need to deal with criminals in order to get an illegal gun. And for many obvious reasons, people will not even consider this.”


The Venezuelan government denies it is in a deeply deteriorating crisis, caused by its own policies. Rather, it blames the United States and opposition leaders for waging an “economic war.”

Feb. 22, 2014: A group of masked men run for cover after riot police launched tear gas in Caracas, Venezuela. (AP)


According to Omar Adolfo Zares Sanchez, 48, a lawyer, politician, and former mayor of Campo Elías municipality in the Venezuelan state of Mérida, it is now all but too late to make guns legally accessible to the average person.


“Without a doubt, if there had been a balance of armed defense we could have stood up and stopped the oppression at the beginning,” he contended. “But there is too much anarchy on the streets now. Making guns easier for anybody to buy now would start a civil war.”


Other Venezuelans argue that while violence has indeed rapidly increased in the years since the gun ban, it might have been that much worse as the economy collapsed, and the country deteriorated. “The problem from the beginning and still now is that there are too many people in Venezuela who are lawless. Crime is a way of living,” said Emberly Quiroz, 25, mother of three. “Access to weapons won’t solve the problem.”






https://www.foxnews.com/world/venezu...nded-ourselves
 
B00Mer
No Party Affiliation
+1
#12346
 
Colpy
Conservative
#12347
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post


Sorry Boomer, but the USA is currently in 90th place for murder rates..........at 5.35 per 100,000, significantly lower than the world rate of 6.2 per 100,000.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._homicide_rate


This kinda wrecks your point, although I do understand it, and you're not wrong.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#12348
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Sorry Boomer, but the USA is currently in 90th place for murder rates..........at 5.35 per 100,000, significantly lower than the world rate of 6.2 per 100,000.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._homicide_rate
This kinda wrecks your point, although I do understand it, and you're not wrong.

So. . . you're saying he's wrong, but he's not wrong?

Yeah, that makes sense.
 
Colpy
Conservative
+1
#12349
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

So. . . you're saying he's wrong, but he's not wrong?

Yeah, that makes sense.


Allow me to explain.....his stat on US murder rates is incorrect.


His contention that rates crash when you exclude inner cities (with strict gun control) is correct.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#12350
Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy View Post

Allow me to explain.....his stat on US murder rates is incorrect.
His contention that rates crash when you exclude inner cities (with strict gun control) is correct.

And as you regularly point out, the gun control is basically transparent. I just wonder why you're joining Boomster in his racist political fantasy.
 
spilledthebeer
#12351
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

And as you regularly point out, the gun control is basically transparent. I just wonder why you're joining Boomster in his racist political fantasy.




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Tecumsehbonesforbrains CANNOT understand a nuanced argument with people like Colpy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !


And yet he CLAIMS to be a lawyer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!


So now we KNOW why Bonesforbrains spends so much time on this site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Because he has NO Paying clients willing to trust him with their troubles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!


So he comes here to PRACTICE HIS LIES and pick silly fights!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!
 
Tecumsehsbones
#12352
No, I come here, quite specifically, for Colpy. He and I mostly agree, and when we don't, it's an "iron sharpens iron" thing, refining and improving our thinking and argumentation on the subject.

The rest of y'all, and you in particular, are worthless.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#12353
Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

Tecumsehbonesforbrains CANNOT understand a nuanced argument

I think you may be onto something there. The final sentence in his response provides a basic clue about his attitude - of course he'll accuse me of inventing facts as is his wont.
 
Tecumsehsbones
#12354
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

I think you may be onto something there. The final sentence in his response provides a basic clue about his attitude - of course he'll accuse me of inventing facts as is his wont.

Your wit is as frail and impotent as your fists, old man.
 
DaSleeper
+2
#12355
Argumentum ad nauseam is what this whole thread has become.....
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#12356
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

Your wit is as frail and impotent as your fists, old man.


You have a perfect right to an opinion like everyone else...………………..but remember that is ALL it is! If you really think you are qualitied to judge wit.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#12357
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

Your wit is as frail and impotent as your fists, old man.


"Better to fight with the pen than the sword"!
 
Tecumsehsbones
#12358
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

"Better to fight with the pen than the sword"!

Yes, we've heard your coward's mantra many times.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#12359
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

Yes, we've heard your coward's mantra many times.


I think if anyone is a coward on here, it's probably you! You're the only one I can think of on here who resorts to playing the "age and decrepitude card" when you are going down in a debate. Maybe before you go barging in on another country's forum, you might want to study the old maxim...…….."when in Rome do as the Romans do".
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#12360
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

"Better to fight with the pen than the sword"!

Why, you're a Liberal!