Canadians prefer Trump over trudeau


Murphy
Conservative
#601
You did it again. If you look at your post above, in the quote box with Hahahaha!! in it, this is attributed to me. I did not say that. spilledthebeer did.

If you edit your last post, put quotes around what I have posted below,

Quote:

Harper was NOT monkeying with pension payouts to make 60 year old`s equal to 67 year old`s- its just YOUR usual LIE-beral version of the truth!

The bottom line on Isis and Syria and Muslims and immigration generally-once you dig down to the opinions of REAL Cdns-as opposed to the thoughts of special interest groups such as immigration lawyers, poverty pimps/social workers and Lie-beral party swine who want to exploit immigrants in exchange for votes and power and be damned to the welfare of Canada is this::::

HARPER WAS RIGHT!!!! The ordinary Cdn wants to see an end to the suffering in the Middle East, wants to see a happy and prosperous end to the violence......AND ordinary Cdns want to see Muslims STAY in their home countries and not come to Canada!

Cdns are concerned that too many immigrants now come to Canada simply looking for access to OUR money. Special interest groups of various stripes already demand too much of our money for affordable housing, special training, welfare and support for a mob of kids often coming in numbers far in excess of what the parents can reasonably support.

Cdns especially fear that radical Muslims will alter life in Canada with their rabid religious demands. Muslims here in Ontari-owe have already approached the Lie-beral govt in hope of getting their Sharia Law imposed on Muslims in Ontari-owe. As Sharia Law is a harsh backward step for women’s rights, Lie-berals realized they had been handed a political time bomb and refused.....but if enough Muslims immigrate to Ontari-owe then Sharia Law WILL be voted in......and with enough votes Sharia Law will be imposed on ALL Cdn women-not just Muslims!

And Cdn government is currently spending something like 250-350 MILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR to keep full time security eyes on approximately 250 suspected terrorists that our Lie-beral dominated immigration system has let into the country but who are deemed by security experts as too dangerous to be allowed loose unsupervised and yet the Lie-berals scream racist if Harper govt moves to deport any of these dangerous types.

Lie-beral minded hypocrites want to cosy up to potentially dangerous newcomers in exchange for votes and yet it will be Lie-berals who scream loudest and accuse the govt and cops of incompetence if a terror attack occurs here!

So, the Harper Conservative policy of helping to contain Isis by bombing and trying to create safe areas for Middle Eastern inhabitants is the right one and best for Canada. If Muslims are safe and happy in their current homes then they won’t want or NEED to come here and wont be out on the ocean in flimsy boats risking life and limb in desperation!

And they DON’T really want to come here-one has only to look at the experience of Mohammed Shafia who brought his 2 wives, 2 daughters and 1 son to Canada and ended up murdering the first wife and both daughters......Muslim women who get a look at the way Cdn women live often undergo a crisis of faith-they no longer want to strictly follow Muslim Sharia law and want to live with the freedoms enjoyed by Cdn women.....which prompts sometimes violent conflict within the family. Letting Mohammad Shafia into Canada is going to cost us about FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS PER YEAR in jail house expenses to keep Mohammed, his son and surviving wife locked up for the murders they committed! At $125,00.00 EACH per year for jail costs plus about 3 MILLION DOLLARS for the murder trial to lock them away, they are not a bargain! And we cannot afford any more such `deals`!

Nobody wants to see refugees suffer and we CAN help with that....sending winter coats to Syria as the boy with the nice hair has suggested is a fine start, but what they really need is peace and stability and steady jobs in THEIR homelands and defeating groups like Isis and deposing brutal Syrian dictator Assad who likes to lob poison gas at his enemies will help! Very few Cdns want more Muslims to come to Canada as its like mixing oil and water.....and not good for either one! Only NDP and Trudope support the policy of do nothing and let the economy and world messes sort themselves out!




HAHAHAHA!!!!!!! Both bluebyrd and tax slave are exposed as LIARS! Both bill themselves as having NO party affiliation! And then proceed to slag anybody who points out obvious holes in LIE-beral and NDP policy!

 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#602
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

Bluebyrd 35 - For Gawd's sake will you get at least one thing straight. Before going off half-cocked on one of those long rants that make no sense look up what you do not believe & give up proof of why you do not believe the articles written by good sources!

Here is where Harper raised the retirement age to 67. After up having read it and looked up where Trudeau returned the age to 65 , I want an apology and in the email shouting you seem to be so fond of.

Budget reveals plan to raise retirement age to 67 - MoneySense

PS I know of several people who are quite happy with the reversal because they are able to retire two years early than if Harper had been elected.

Harper did the sensible thing, 65 is not sustainable, when people are living to 90 and 100!
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#603
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Harper did the sensible thing, 65 is not sustainable, when people are living to 90 and 100!

Sorry but it certainly is. When the population shrinks and gets older, that is when an influx immigrants is needed. Also, givng the rich a break because wealth trickles down is proven wrong. By boosting the taxes on the middle class it is rapidly devolving into the poor class. The rich should pay their fair share.

It is far worse in the US where they have done that for years. Do only the rich deserve to live well, retire at 65 and have a few safety nets?? You know like decent affordable health care, and a viable pension?
 
MHz
#604
Orwell, 1984 was a very good year.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#605
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

Sorry but it certainly is. When the population shrinks and gets older, that is when an influx immigrants is needed. Also, givng the rich a break because wealth trickles down is proven wrong. By boosting the taxes on the middle class it is rapidly devolving into the poor class. The rich should pay their fair share.

It is far worse in the US where they have done that for years. Do only the rich deserve to live well, retire at 65 and have a few safety nets?? You know like decent affordable health care, and a viable pension?


Sorry, but it ain't! How do you expect 1/3 of the population to support the other 2/3?
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
#606
Remember when they used to tell us that automation would free humans up for more leisure and creative endeavors? Remember the slogan "better living through chemistry"? How we doing so far?
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#607
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

Remember when they used to tell us that automation would free humans up for more leisure and creative endeavors? Remember the slogan "better living through chemistry"? How we doing so far?

Ask your local druggie!
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
+1
#608
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Ask your local druggie!

Anyone who is on pharmaceuticals is a druggie. What happened to automation freeing us up? Do you think the 1% wants to share the profits gained by automation want to feed the "useless feeders"? Why do you think the 1% has been hording 90% of the world's wealth? Does that translate as sharing with the rest of us? When you are nonproductive, you become redundant and therefore, expendable.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#609
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

Anyone who is on pharmaceuticals is a druggie. What happened to automation freeing us up? Do you think the 1% wants to share the profits gained by automation want to feed the "useless feeders"? Why do you think the 1% has been hording 90% of the world's wealth? Does that translate as sharing with the rest of us? When you are nonproductive, you become redundant and therefore, expendable.


That's one of the problems with semantics! Quite often they don't mean anything. I am on half a dozen prescribed drugs, all but one are for preventative measures and have absolutely no affect on my physical or mental performance.
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
#610
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
+1
#611
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Sorry, but it ain't! How do you expect 1/3 of the population to support the other 2/3?

Simply by increasing the working class through immigration. Remember instead of having 20 children and more and dropping that down to 1 or 2 and often none over in just a generation or two and we have a huge older generation. How do you propose to change that? Kill off all the old people??? Because through modern medicine we are living longer, does;t mean we will be in great enough shape to fill the gap with just two years. However, many of the immigrants have two and three children who in 15 to 20 years will also be wage earners, Furthermore, it relieves the world over-population in some parts and fills the losses we have.

Those who are still working up to their retirement years need to consider that with the diminishing tax payers more than just the pensions are at risk. All the social programs most people take for granted will have to be cut.
Last edited by bluebyrd35; Oct 16th, 2017 at 12:24 PM..
 
Hoid
+1
#612
Under NAFTA Cami is moving auto manufacturing from Canada to Mexico because Mexicans work cheap. This is after receiving every tax benefit Ontario and Ottawa could think to give them. This is after the government enables them to lay people off whenever they want by waiving the waiting periods for EI for laid off auto workers.

That's quite a deal for Canada. I can see why we wouldn't want any changes made.
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#613
https://globalnews.ca/news/3805109/c...-monday-night/
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#614
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

Simply by increasing the working class through immigration. Remember instead of having 20 children and more and dropping that down to 1 or 2 and often none over in just a generation or two and we have a huge older generation. How do you propose to change that? Kill off all the old people??? Because through modern medicine we are living longer, does;t mean we will be in great enough shape to fill the gap with just two years. However, many of the immigrants have two and three children who in 15 to 20 years will also be wage earners, Furthermore, it relieves the world over-population in some parts and fills the losses we have.

Those who are still working up to their retirement years need to consider that with the diminishing tax payers more than just the pensions are at risk. All the social programs most people take for granted will have to be cut.


Dream on!
 
EagleSmack
#615
Trump > Trudeau
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#616
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack View Post

Trump > Trudeau


What about it?
 
spilledthebeer
#617
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

Nobody has time to read your hate filled diatribes, Beer.

Oh....you are so wrong! LIE-berals SECRETLY LINE UP to read my stuff- seeking desperately for some opening to attack my logic! Here is an article describing some REAL LIFE nutty professors- and explaining the idiot influence they are having on stupid LIE-berals:

How sad that some civil service Working Family Hogs-and I include Lie-beral loving loonie leftist university professors in this group- have had their own way for so long and so often that they simply assume that what they want must automatically be right and proper-such self absorbed types simply assume that anybody who disputes their position is trying to give offense-without reason!

I present here some comments made by some professor whose arrogance is so great he lacks even basic understanding of democracy. I include some comments of my own in brackets). The `prof` comments on his interpretation of `unjust laws`-the `prof` says:

Rando asked me to provide an example of unjust laws in Canada. Pretty easy. The Indian Act and that's just a start. It's literally the engine of Indigenous genocide.

(How sad the prof ignores history and reality. It was not racist impulse that brought white people to the new world-it was human nature and technology! All species have that drive to mate and reproduce-and each new couple requires land and resources for that. And who would want to live in a 19th century European city with its utter lack of basic sanitation, the heaps of sewage and horse manure and other refuse-fed upon by an army of rats and other vermin. The water so filthy that even kids are drinking beer and gin to KILL the germs. The filthy air reeking of chemicals with NO safety provisions and No zoning bylaws. White people FLED in horror from Europe and were desperate enough to roll over and displace Indians in their pristine wilderness. White technology now enables millions to live where hundreds once roamed. Progress is not pretty but is HAS been good for the majority of our species. We now live longer, healthier and less difficult lives- even natives got benefit that way. You can argue about the environment in another forum!)

(Further, the Indian Act was created in literally another world-before air planes and gasoline engines and before Chinese imports grabbed so much of our business and so many of our jobs. The Indian Act was intended to give natives the chance to live a life as near as possible to what they had lost. They would live like 19th century Metis who took the best of both white and native worlds for their lifestyle-Metis lived in small villages and they farmed because such was necessary to provide enough food in a shrinking world and they went on long summer hunts-living in Tepees and hunting Buffalo and Deer as well-whenever there was opportunity-a lifestyle that was neither white nor native but a hybrid.)

(Natives now foolishly reject all worlds and all options-they wont dig in the dirt and farm as Metis did, cannot hunt as their remote ancestors did since the wildlife is not there in proper numbers any more, cannot trade for furs as the European market has collapsed, and they refuse to enter the white world-only 25 percent of natives living on reserves graduate from high school-at a time when over75 percent of jobs require post secondary training-thus rendering native reserve inhabitants all but unemployable through lack of skill and training! Natives are NOT oppressed, they are simply CLUELESS! With LIE-berals encouraging them to be perpetual victims whining for govt aid!)

(The Indian Act has been rendered obsolete by technology and natives have yet to decide if they want to survive as a people or simply drink themselves into history! And in spite of the tragic history of natives-and most Cdns ARE sympathetic to their plight-the majority of Cdns ALSO think it is a DISGRACE that Band Chief Teresa Spence and her pals would burn through ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS of govt money without producing a single receipt-while their band members live in tents and hovels in the Arctic winter-AND without a single new house being built-as the money was INTENDED FOR! We- the Cdn majority- want common sense and logic-NOT a lot of helpless whining and GROSS waste!)

Second the TPP which allows foreign corporations to sue Canada for violating trade agreements over and above the constitution and if there's a nuclear leak or some shit - and you try to protect nature - guess who's going to jail?

(How sad that the prof does not understand that the basic operation of democracy REQUIRES that the will of the majority be the rule of the land. Prime minister Brian Mulroney threw us into the free trade agreement with U.S. because he was NOT prepared to tell Cdn civil service Hogs: “YOU ARE BROKE-NO MORE GRAVY FOR YOU”! So he sold us to Yankees to cover his problem.)

(BUT-and this is NOT a `gotcha` moment for LIE-berals- WE are now stuck with these trade agreements-I remind the dimwit prof-and Hogs that LIE-beral Jean Chretien CAMPAIGNED with a promise to repeal the trade agreement if elected and he RENEGED on his promise. REALITY is this: the trade deal is not pretty but it IS important. Our MAJOR trading partner-those Yankees- are suffering economically and many of them figure it would be GOOD FOR THEM to shut the border to Cdn trade! Yankee extremists are just looking for an excuse to shut us out and the trade agreement is preventing them-from massacring our economy! It ain’t pretty, but the border is still open to us-and even Chretien saw the truth.)

Third segregation and any subsequent 'colour blind' administration of racist laws, such as the 'public amusements act', which were supposedly applied to all - but used to enforce segregation. I'm not going to get into them - but that's how racism operates in Canada using 'colour/gender/etc. blind' laws which are known to have a deleterious effect on equity.

(This-`public amusement act`is a reference to obscure and long discredited and now either REPEALED entirely or NOT ENFORCED legislation designed to control gambling houses and brothels and carnivals with RIGGED games of chance, etc! And how long has it been since segregation was a part of Cdn landscape? These laws date back to the 19th century and were mainly written by U.S. southern states. However there are Cdn counterparts that date roughly to the 1920`s and 1930`s. Much of this stuff relates to the `prohibition era` and the Great Depression when people were desperate to earn a dime by any means and these laws made it easier to control traveling carnivals and gambling dens and fraudulent `revivalist` religious groups-think of that famous fake and whoremaster from Hollywood-Elmer Gantry! Such laws also were handy for dealing with snake oil salesmen marketing dangerous `miracle` cures for all manner of things.)

A perfect example of that (Prof means Public Amusement Act) in recent memory has been bathhouse raids of the 80s and 2000s (against men and women, respectively) and marijuana raids. Everyone smokes weed, we know the law is obsolete - yet it is still enforced.

(How arrogant of the prof that he sees all history ONLY through HIS lense-Toronto the Good was once seriously hostile to public sexual acts-whether between male/female or male/male or female/female-it was all considered lewd and disgraceful and unsuitable for our good city-the majority view at the time! Again, in democracy the will of the Majority prevails-unless you are a spoiled union Hog like the Prof!)

(In addition, the shutting down of the bath houses was considered to be a blow against the spread of venereal disease. The fear of STD`s was a holdover from that older generation of people just getting accustomed to the idea that penicillin MIGHT CURE std`s. Prior to 1945, catching Syphilis was a death sentence! And catching Gonorrhea was a guarantee of sterility- no kids for you! And of course once we get to the 1980`s we see the rise of Aids-ANOTHER std with a death sentence tied to it! No matter that 45 years later, a massive and costly cocktail of drugs can now greatly extend the life of an Aids sufferer-this std is STILL a major threat! This is why people who have Aids and continue to have unprotected sex with un-informed partners are ARRESTED and charged with assault! We have more medical options than our ancestors and it is MODERN bigotry to judge them by OUR standards!)

(As for smoking weed-the jury is still divided on this-we don’t want our kids to be happy stoners-if they are too young to smoke cigarettes then they are also too young for weed. Further-many people will agree that there is little harm in an adult sitting on as couch on a Saturday evening-with work week done-having a little smoke up but will strongly draw the line at letting kids toke up before heading to school!)

(Most people are disgusted by the sight of a company employee furiously toking up in the parking lot 15 minutes before the start of a work shift! We do not want some happy stoner throwing our costly new air conditioner together any old way. We don’t want a goofy stoner tinkering with the steering components of the school bus our child will be riding in. And we certainly don’t want the brakes on that tractor trailer that is riding our bumper on 401 to have been slapped into place by somebody with a “What? Me worry?” Kind of attitude! This is a BIG REASON why so many Cdns buy cars made in Asia-ones made by attentive/SOBER people who are out performing North American auto workers who apparently think that being drunk or stoned on the job is no concern of their boss!)

(Somebody needs to rub the nose of that arrogant prof in a big bucket of reality. Democracy means following the will of the majority! And sometimes the majority changes its collective mind-as witness DESEGREGATION in U.S. Democracy does not and NEVER DID guarantee that some egghead would ALWAYS get his own way! And just how arrogant ARE some of these egg heads? Consider the old episode of W-5 in which a Manitoba community college prof waged a TEN YEAR WAR against the cop who gave him a ticket for running a stop sign! The prof was in and out of any court that would hear him-WHINING that the instructions on the stop sign were not explicit enough and his ticket should be struck down! And we let these dorks `educate` our kids? AND pay them with so much gravy it takes decades to pay off the debts? Just another reason to refer to the professor as “NUTTY”!)

Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Harper did the sensible thing, 65 is not sustainable, when people are living to 90 and 100!

OH MY!!!! WILDLY FUNNY STUFF!!!! Retiring at 65 is not sustainable says somebody or other?

SO why is that of the Cdns who retire voluntarily before age 65- TWO THIRDS are civil service Hogs?

And why is it that LIE-berals INSIST that you retired `voluntarily` if you accepted a buy out that you figured was a little better than waiting till you got THROWN OUT THE DOOR WITH NOTHING?

IS it retiring at age 65 that we cannot afford? Or is it LIE-beral scaled GRAVY to Hogs that we cannot afford?

I am thinking we should stop churning out that LIE-beral gravy if we want to have some coins in our pockets!

Quote: Originally Posted by Hoid View Post

Under NAFTA Cami is moving auto manufacturing from Canada to Mexico because Mexicans work cheap. This is after receiving every tax benefit Ontario and Ottawa could think to give them. This is after the government enables them to lay people off whenever they want by waiving the waiting periods for EI for laid off auto workers.

That's quite a deal for Canada. I can see why we wouldn't want any changes made.

Here is a FUN question for you: "who will buy those cars and replacement parts that are made by good CANADIAN UNION HOGS- AFTER the price jumps about 400 percent to cover those wonderful Hog salaries and pensions?

It is at this point that LIE-berals and their Hog allies leave the room- muttering about Conservatives who dont understand about good jobs!!!!

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

Sorry but it certainly is. When the population shrinks and gets older, that is when an influx immigrants is needed. Also, givng the rich a break because wealth trickles down is proven wrong. By boosting the taxes on the middle class it is rapidly devolving into the poor class. The rich should pay their fair share.

It is far worse in the US where they have done that for years. Do only the rich deserve to live well, retire at 65 and have a few safety nets?? You know like decent affordable health care, and a viable pension?

Here is a thought- of that sort that LIE-berals NEVER want to think- nor do they wish to publicly discuss it either! The question is this:

"Lets compare two hypothetical immigrants:

Immigrant one is from a third world country that believes implicitly in capitalism and democracy and recognizes that these values are the reason for western succes and this immigrant is delighted to have the opportunity to dig into the Cdn dream- this immigrant will have facility in at least one of our official languages- will have educational qualifications that are recognized by Cdn authorities and will prize living in a country where they can practice their religion without interference or prejudice- this immigrant will send their kids to school with the instruction to DO WELL and study hard so you will have a good life!

Immigrant two is also from a third world country- carries a chip on their shoulder over Imperialism and racism- does not speak either of our official languages- does not have any real education- may have papers claiming training in some discipline but Cdn officials cannot verify that- believes that lack of success in his life is probably the result of "systemic racism"- will send his kid to school with a basket ball and foster the kids dream of being some sort of gangsta ranting about rotten white people- will support and tend to his kids maybe- will practice a religion that requires US to conform to HIS values, morals and beliefs- will use his vote to mess up our trade with Yankees and will poison our relations with traditional allies- will vote for lunatic politicians who think that bribing people to like them is a better way to run a country than going to the bother off producing valid, logical, policy!

So the fun question is this: WHICH IMMIGRANT will be more popular and do better in Canada?

And the SCARY ANSWER is this : LIE-berals do not understand the question!!!!
 
Murphy
Conservative
+2
#618
[youtube]gA3Et3-unNg[/youtube]
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#619
Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post



SO why is that of the Cdns who retire voluntarily before age 65- TWO THIRDS are civil service Hogs?


You may want to get your facts straight before you go running off at the mouth about something you know very little about.
Nobody with the Civil Service gets a full pension that hasn't worked a full 35 years and even those who have worked 35 years have a hard time making ends meet unless they've made some voluntary savings like R.R.S.P.s. Maybe do some research before you go shooting off your trap. Not every Civil Service employee is a doctor, lawyer, nurse or judge.
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
+1
#620
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Dream on!

So I assume that you prefer retirement age to go to 75 or death as it used to be?

Quote: Originally Posted by spilledthebeer View Post

Oh....you are so wrong! LIE-berals SECRETLY LINE UP to read my stuff- seeking desperately for some opening to attack my logic! Here is an article describing some REAL LIFE nutty professors- and explaining the idiot influence they are having on stupid LIE-berals:

How sad that some civil service Working Family Hogs-and I include Lie-beral loving loonie leftist university professors in this group- have had their own way for so long and so often that they simply assume that what they want must automatically be right and proper-such self absorbed types simply assume that anybody who disputes their position is trying to give offense-without reason!

I present here some comments made by some professor whose arrogance is so great he lacks even basic understanding of democracy. I include some comments of my own in brackets). The `prof` comments on his interpretation of `unjust laws`-the `prof` says:

Rando asked me to provide an example of unjust laws in Canada. Pretty easy. The Indian Act and that's just a start. It's literally the engine of Indigenous genocide.

(How sad the prof ignores history and reality. It was not racist impulse that brought white people to the new world-it was human nature and technology! All species have that drive to mate and reproduce-and each new couple requires land and resources for that. And who would want to live in a 19th century European city with its utter lack of basic sanitation, the heaps of sewage and horse manure and other refuse-fed upon by an army of rats and other vermin. The water so filthy that even kids are drinking beer and gin to KILL the germs. The filthy air reeking of chemicals with NO safety provisions and No zoning bylaws. White people FLED in horror from Europe and were desperate enough to roll over and displace Indians in their pristine wilderness. White technology now enables millions to live where hundreds once roamed. Progress is not pretty but is HAS been good for the majority of our species. We now live longer, healthier and less difficult lives- even natives got benefit that way. You can argue about the environment in another forum!)

(Further, the Indian Act was created in literally another world-before air planes and gasoline engines and before Chinese imports grabbed so much of our business and so many of our jobs. The Indian Act was intended to give natives the chance to live a life as near as possible to what they had lost. They would live like 19th century Metis who took the best of both white and native worlds for their lifestyle-Metis lived in small villages and they farmed because such was necessary to provide enough food in a shrinking world and they went on long summer hunts-living in Tepees and hunting Buffalo and Deer as well-whenever there was opportunity-a lifestyle that was neither white nor native but a hybrid.)

(Natives now foolishly reject all worlds and all options-they wont dig in the dirt and farm as Metis did, cannot hunt as their remote ancestors did since the wildlife is not there in proper numbers any more, cannot trade for furs as the European market has collapsed, and they refuse to enter the white world-only 25 percent of natives living on reserves graduate from high school-at a time when over75 percent of jobs require post secondary training-thus rendering native reserve inhabitants all but unemployable through lack of skill and training! Natives are NOT oppressed, they are simply CLUELESS! With LIE-berals encouraging them to be perpetual victims whining for govt aid!)

(The Indian Act has been rendered obsolete by technology and natives have yet to decide if they want to survive as a people or simply drink themselves into history! And in spite of the tragic history of natives-and most Cdns ARE sympathetic to their plight-the majority of Cdns ALSO think it is a DISGRACE that Band Chief Teresa Spence and her pals would burn through ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS of govt money without producing a single receipt-while their band members live in tents and hovels in the Arctic winter-AND without a single new house being built-as the money was INTENDED FOR! We- the Cdn majority- want common sense and logic-NOT a lot of helpless whining and GROSS waste!)

Second the TPP which allows foreign corporations to sue Canada for violating trade agreements over and above the constitution and if there's a nuclear leak or some shit - and you try to protect nature - guess who's going to jail?

(How sad that the prof does not understand that the basic operation of democracy REQUIRES that the will of the majority be the rule of the land. Prime minister Brian Mulroney threw us into the free trade agreement with U.S. because he was NOT prepared to tell Cdn civil service Hogs: “YOU ARE BROKE-NO MORE GRAVY FOR YOU”! So he sold us to Yankees to cover his problem.)

(BUT-and this is NOT a `gotcha` moment for LIE-berals- WE are now stuck with these trade agreements-I remind the dimwit prof-and Hogs that LIE-beral Jean Chretien CAMPAIGNED with a promise to repeal the trade agreement if elected and he RENEGED on his promise. REALITY is this: the trade deal is not pretty but it IS important. Our MAJOR trading partner-those Yankees- are suffering economically and many of them figure it would be GOOD FOR THEM to shut the border to Cdn trade! Yankee extremists are just looking for an excuse to shut us out and the trade agreement is preventing them-from massacring our economy! It ain’t pretty, but the border is still open to us-and even Chretien saw the truth.)

Third segregation and any subsequent 'colour blind' administration of racist laws, such as the 'public amusements act', which were supposedly applied to all - but used to enforce segregation. I'm not going to get into them - but that's how racism operates in Canada using 'colour/gender/etc. blind' laws which are known to have a deleterious effect on equity.

(This-`public amusement act`is a reference to obscure and long discredited and now either REPEALED entirely or NOT ENFORCED legislation designed to control gambling houses and brothels and carnivals with RIGGED games of chance, etc! And how long has it been since segregation was a part of Cdn landscape? These laws date back to the 19th century and were mainly written by U.S. southern states. However there are Cdn counterparts that date roughly to the 1920`s and 1930`s. Much of this stuff relates to the `prohibition era` and the Great Depression when people were desperate to earn a dime by any means and these laws made it easier to control traveling carnivals and gambling dens and fraudulent `revivalist` religious groups-think of that famous fake and whoremaster from Hollywood-Elmer Gantry! Such laws also were handy for dealing with snake oil salesmen marketing dangerous `miracle` cures for all manner of things.)

A perfect example of that (Prof means Public Amusement Act) in recent memory has been bathhouse raids of the 80s and 2000s (against men and women, respectively) and marijuana raids. Everyone smokes weed, we know the law is obsolete - yet it is still enforced.

(How arrogant of the prof that he sees all history ONLY through HIS lense-Toronto the Good was once seriously hostile to public sexual acts-whether between male/female or male/male or female/female-it was all considered lewd and disgraceful and unsuitable for our good city-the majority view at the time! Again, in democracy the will of the Majority prevails-unless you are a spoiled union Hog like the Prof!)

(In addition, the shutting down of the bath houses was considered to be a blow against the spread of venereal disease. The fear of STD`s was a holdover from that older generation of people just getting accustomed to the idea that penicillin MIGHT CURE std`s. Prior to 1945, catching Syphilis was a death sentence! And catching Gonorrhea was a guarantee of sterility- no kids for you! And of course once we get to the 1980`s we see the rise of Aids-ANOTHER std with a death sentence tied to it! No matter that 45 years later, a massive and costly cocktail of drugs can now greatly extend the life of an Aids sufferer-this std is STILL a major threat! This is why people who have Aids and continue to have unprotected sex with un-informed partners are ARRESTED and charged with assault! We have more medical options than our ancestors and it is MODERN bigotry to judge them by OUR standards!)

(As for smoking weed-the jury is still divided on this-we don’t want our kids to be happy stoners-if they are too young to smoke cigarettes then they are also too young for weed. Further-many people will agree that there is little harm in an adult sitting on as couch on a Saturday evening-with work week done-having a little smoke up but will strongly draw the line at letting kids toke up before heading to school!)

(Most people are disgusted by the sight of a company employee furiously toking up in the parking lot 15 minutes before the start of a work shift! We do not want some happy stoner throwing our costly new air conditioner together any old way. We don’t want a goofy stoner tinkering with the steering components of the school bus our child will be riding in. And we certainly don’t want the brakes on that tractor trailer that is riding our bumper on 401 to have been slapped into place by somebody with a “What? Me worry?” Kind of attitude! This is a BIG REASON why so many Cdns buy cars made in Asia-ones made by attentive/SOBER people who are out performing North American auto workers who apparently think that being drunk or stoned on the job is no concern of their boss!)

(Somebody needs to rub the nose of that arrogant prof in a big bucket of reality. Democracy means following the will of the majority! And sometimes the majority changes its collective mind-as witness DESEGREGATION in U.S. Democracy does not and NEVER DID guarantee that some egghead would ALWAYS get his own way! And just how arrogant ARE some of these egg heads? Consider the old episode of W-5 in which a Manitoba community college prof waged a TEN YEAR WAR against the cop who gave him a ticket for running a stop sign! The prof was in and out of any court that would hear him-WHINING that the instructions on the stop sign were not explicit enough and his ticket should be struck down! And we let these dorks `educate` our kids? AND pay them with so much gravy it takes decades to pay off the debts? Just another reason to refer to the professor as “NUTTY”!)



OH MY!!!! WILDLY FUNNY STUFF!!!! Retiring at 65 is not sustainable says somebody or other?

SO why is that of the Cdns who retire voluntarily before age 65- TWO THIRDS are civil service Hogs?

And why is it that LIE-berals INSIST that you retired `voluntarily` if you accepted a buy out that you figured was a little better than waiting till you got THROWN OUT THE DOOR WITH NOTHING?

IS it retiring at age 65 that we cannot afford? Or is it LIE-beral scaled GRAVY to Hogs that we cannot afford?

I am thinking we should stop churning out that LIE-beral gravy if we want to have some coins in our pockets!



Here is a FUN question for you: "who will buy those cars and replacement parts that are made by good CANADIAN UNION HOGS- AFTER the price jumps about 400 percent to cover those wonderful Hog salaries and pensions?

It is at this point that LIE-berals and their Hog allies leave the room- muttering about Conservatives who dont understand about good jobs!!!!

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!



Here is a thought- of that sort that LIE-berals NEVER want to think- nor do they wish to publicly discuss it either! The question is this:

"Lets compare two hypothetical immigrants:

Immigrant one is from a third world country that believes implicitly in capitalism and democracy and recognizes that these values are the reason for western succes and this immigrant is delighted to have the opportunity to dig into the Cdn dream- this immigrant will have facility in at least one of our official languages- will have educational qualifications that are recognized by Cdn authorities and will prize living in a country where they can practice their religion without interference or prejudice- this immigrant will send their kids to school with the instruction to DO WELL and study hard so you will have a good life!

Immigrant two is also from a third world country- carries a chip on their shoulder over Imperialism and racism- does not speak either of our official languages- does not have any real education- may have papers claiming training in some discipline but Cdn officials cannot verify that- believes that lack of success in his life is probably the result of "systemic racism"- will send his kid to school with a basket ball and foster the kids dream of being some sort of gangsta ranting about rotten white people- will support and tend to his kids maybe- will practice a religion that requires US to conform to HIS values, morals and beliefs- will use his vote to mess up our trade with Yankees and will poison our relations with traditional allies- will vote for lunatic politicians who think that bribing people to like them is a better way to run a country than going to the bother off producing valid, logical, policy!

So the fun question is this: WHICH IMMIGRANT will be more popular and do better in Canada?

And the SCARY ANSWER is this : LIE-berals do not understand the question!!!!

Are you a frustrated fiction writer who is unable to sell your fiction? You might try being a bit more concise and form a decent thought before you fingers engage with the keyboard.......I have a sore arm from scrolling past those nonsensical posts.
 
Cliffy
Free Thinker
+1
#621


 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#622
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

So I assume that you prefer retirement age to go to 75 or death as it used to be?


That would be wrong...................I believe a person should be allowed to retire at whatever age he/she wants to.
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#623
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

That would be wrong...................I believe a person should be allowed to retire at whatever age he/she wants to.

Yeah....... as long as a person is rich enough to do so without a full government pension as they have always been able to.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#624
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

Yeah....... as long as a person is rich enough to do so without a full government pension as they have always been able to.


When has anyone ever been able to retire on a full Gov't pension? If you are talking about Superannuation that is something altogether different, where the beneficiary contributes.

Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

Yeah....... as long as a person is rich enough to do so without a full government pension as they have always been able to.


Or has done a minimal amount of planning in advance.
 
bluebyrd35
No Party Affiliation
#625
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

When has anyone ever been able to retire on a full Gov't pension? If you are talking about Superannuation that is something altogether different, where the beneficiary contributes.




Or has done a minimal amount of planning in advance.

RRSP's and TFSA and taking time to learn about investing. Many have done and are doing it. I do not understand why teaching children how to manage money is not a compulsory program in school.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#626
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

RRSP's and TFSA and taking time to learn about investing. Many have done and are doing it. I do not understand why teaching children how to manage money is not a compulsory program in school.


My first thought was you wouldn't get any argument from me, but my second thought is there is probably fewer than 5% of teachers who are qualified to do it. The first prerequisite is to understand the difference between "wants" and "needs". (Annual vacations in Hawaii or Mexico aren't "needs")
 
pgs
Free Thinker
#627
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post



Projecting your deficiencies onto others again Cliffy ?
 
DaSleeper
+1
#628
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

Projecting your deficiencies onto others again Cliffy ?

If you check his source.....he's still a facebook addict.............
 
captain morgan
Bloc Québécois
+1
#629
Quote: Originally Posted by bluebyrd35 View Post

RRSP's and TFSA and taking time to learn about investing. Many have done and are doing it. I do not understand why teaching children how to manage money is not a compulsory program in school.

.. And yet, you are lost without your gvt pension.

Entitled much?

Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

Projecting your deficiencies onto others again Cliffy ?

I think that Cliffy just has an unhealthy fixation with dicks
 
EagleSmack
+1
#630
Quote: Originally Posted by captain morgan View Post


I think that Cliffy just has an unhealthy fixation with dicks

Both him and Flossy do.
 

Similar Threads

28
Trudeau stands up to Trump
by mentalfloss | Jan 14th, 2017
53
56
15
Canadians prefer Obama over own leaders
by I think not | Jun 30th, 2008