POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD? Debate sparked after AGO renames Emily Carr painting


spaminator
+1
#1  Top Rated Post
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD? Debate sparked after AGO renames Emily Carr painting to be more culturally sensitive
Canadian Press
More from Canadian Press
Published:
May 22, 2018
Updated:
May 22, 2018 10:11 PM EDT
Emily Carr's painting "Church In Yuquot Village" is shown in this undated handout photo. Carr exhibited the 1929 painting as "Indian Church" before it was retitled "Church in Yuquot Village."THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO, Art Gallery of Ontario
TORONTO — The painting depicts a colonial structure in an Indigenous setting, but it’s the name of the work that’s spurred a debate about how the art world should address reconciliation.
The Art Gallery of Ontario has renamed a painting by Canadian artist Emily Carr as part of a broader effort to eliminate culturally insensitive language from titles in its collection, a curator says.
But others in the artistic community contend that displacing a work from its historical context does far more cultural damage than a name.
In the 1929 painting, a pallid white church stands out amid the verdant forest in an Indigenous village on Vancouver Island, with dense foliage encroaching on a thin steeple from above and a scattering of cross-marked graves from below.
Carr exhibited the painting as “Indian Church,” and for nearly nine decades, the name stuck.
But at the Toronto’s Art Gallery of Ontario, the work now hangs under the title “Church at Yuquot Village,” a reference to the Mowachaht/Muchalaht community where the missionary-built church was located.
A panel near the painting notes the name change beside an asterisk, explaining that the artist’s title was in keeping with “the language of her era.” The text goes on to say that the gallery is in the process of amending titles containing terms that are considered “discriminatory” by modern standards.
“People are wondering about this idea of: “If we change this title, does that mean that we’re changing the past?” And my argument is not at all,” said Georgiana Uhlyarik, the gallery’s curator of Canadian art.
“We’re interested in inviting people into this conversation that we’re having in order for us to move forward, so that we learn from the past and that we figure out what is constructive.”
Uhlyarik said the effort to “contextualize” Carr’s painting is of a piece with the gallery’s decision last October to appoint her and Indigenous curator Wanda Nanibush to jointly head the newly rebranded Canadian and Indigenous Art department.
As part of their “nation-to-nation” artistic approach, the co-curators are working to remove “hurtful and painful” terminology from the titles of works on a case-by-case basis, Uhlyarik said, but the Carr painting marks the first time the gallery has revised a name in such a public and “deliberate” way.
“I don’t think that it changes the meaning of the work itself at all. I think the painting of the church is incredibly powerful, and the title is simply what it’s referred to as,” she said. “I wanted to make sure it wasn’t a poetic title in any way, that it was in some ways, much more descriptive.”
After consulting with the residents of Yuquot and Carr scholars, Uhlyarik said she decided to swap the word “Indian” for a geographical descriptor, hoping that the new title would prompt further examination of the history of the church, which she said burnt down and was rebuilt as a community centre due to its significance to the village.
“I think this is how we open up a conversation about colonial history,” she said.
“If there’s a way for us to still have the conversation, and still display the work and remove this immediate insult, then we’re trying to figure out what that way is.”
But for Ligwilda’xw interdisciplinary artist Sonny Assu of Campbell River, B.C., changing the name of the painting does not spark a conversation about colonial history so much as it “revises” it.
“I think (the painting) becomes more hurtful and problematic, because it does erase that history,” Assu said. “It comes off as almost revisionist in a way where it’s repainting that picture of inclusion and of tolerance that just wasn’t there.”
He said he would rather the gallery feature a panel offering Indigenous perspectives on the work.
Jan Ross, curator at Emily Carr House, said renaming a work in contradiction with the artist’s intentions is tantamount to “censorship.”
“That is sacrosanct,” she said. “It robs the artist … I think it behooves us to examine things within the context of their day.”
She said the best way for a curator to affirm their commitment to the principles of reconciliation is to place a work within its appropriate context, not impose one’s curatorial perspective.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD? AGO renames Emily Carr painting | Toronto Sun
 
Hoid
-1
#2
what a painting is called has nothing to do with the art itself.

the name does not provide context other than perhaps for the artist.
 
petros
-1
#3
You're f-cked.
 
Danbones
-1
#4
So when we find out what hoid's real name is ( lol likely It's S'doih ) we will change it.

No whining, no debate,...what's good for the goose....ya know?

PS:
Anyone tris to change the titles of Any of the songs I have released, better be prepared for some stormy freakin weather.

They might experience some changes of their own.


So when are they going to get rid of the "RACIST" term "BRITISH" in "British Columbia"?
Since it does not and never really did belong to them whitie usurpers.

It has been NDN land for a long time.

I am sure the chinese have a nice new name all planned out..."happy lucky paradise money wash"
I have no idea what they will call the white reserves.
Last edited by Danbones; May 23rd, 2018 at 11:44 AM..
 
Yo0
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

You're f-cked.

National Socialism is the left in politics.

Seen to economically viable, Capitalism is undead one-third in list, Communism and Democracy and National Socialism where split-two in the order of National Socialism have only been found in a country all the times such as Germany.

Such as Venezuela, Mexico, Cuba and Russia are not rich as Socialism.
 

Similar Threads

43
More Political Correctness?
by DaSleeper | Nov 5th, 2015
6
Political Correctness
by B00Mer | Apr 8th, 2013
37
Political Correctness?
by kellystone | Dec 5th, 2006