How Liberals really feel about black people


Locutus
+2 / -1
#1
how ignint can these progs get anyway? Lol!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odB1wWPqSlE
 
MHz
#2
Hate came in when the price of buying one went up instead of down.
 
mentalfloss
#3
The first part is about the likelihood of minorities having the required identification sufficient for voting.


This is then superimposed with the second part which asks those in one category minority group if they have any form of identification for any validation situation.


It's extremely misleading and I'm not surprised you would post something so blatantly deceptive.
 
lone wolf
Free Thinker
+1
#4
Yeah.... That street corner is really getting crowded
 
EagleSmack
+2
#5
Must MUST See!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogwNYf1HemM

The liberals were completely condescending to African Americans, saying they were uneducated, unlikely to have access to the internet and would not know how to use it.
 
Johnnny
No Party Affiliation
+3
#6
Requiring a person to present ID in order for that person to vote is a logical thing. The supreme court of America upholds it and even in Canada we have it. Black people have IDs just like they have social security numbers because you know they contribute to society.

The voter ID thing being racist against blacks is stupid. You cant go to the bar without ID and everyone of every ethnic group goes to those so you would be stupid yo think that blacks dont have IDs.
 
mentalfloss
#7
10% of citizens lack voter ID.

Most of those are minorities or impoverished.

Requiring them to provide same amounts to voter suppression.

The people who want to suppress the vote are Trump supporters.
 
Johnnny
No Party Affiliation
+2
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalfloss View Post

10% of citizens lack voter ID.

Most of those are minorities or impoverished.

Requiring them to provide same amounts to voter suppression.

The people who want to suppress the vote are Trump supporters.

So wanting integrity for a system such as voting makes you a trump supporter. Ok.....?

Voter ID laws were in place in some form for when Obama was elected twice and it wasnt an over blown problem then. But since Trump won its all of a sudden a problem? Like voter ID laws didnt stop minorities voting for Obama but it has now?
 
EagleSmack
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalfloss View Post

10% of citizens lack voter ID.

Most of those are minorities or impoverished.

Requiring them to provide same amounts to voter suppression.

The people who want to suppress the vote are Trump supporters.

Hey that is what the racists in the youtube clip said as well!

Quote: Originally Posted by Johnnny View Post

So wanting integrity for a system such as voting makes you a trump supporter. Ok.....?

Voter ID laws were in place in some form for when Obama was elected twice and it wasnt an over blown problem then. But since Trump won its all of a sudden a problem? Like voter ID laws didnt stop minorities voting for Obama but it has now?

The Democrats do not like Voter ID Laws because it is harder to commit voter fraud.
 
Kreskin
#10
 
Danbones
Free Thinker
#11
no ID no welfare check
 
mentalfloss
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by Danbones View Post

no ID no welfare check

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_number
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
+1
#13
Loco has become the new Wally in that he hates libs and makes all kinds of loony accusations against him. Perhaps he should change his name.
 
MHz
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalfloss View Post

The first part is about the likelihood of minorities having the required identification sufficient for voting.
.

How about you have to supply real time answers before you get to push any buttons. A box to check on the new IRS file will let you log onto your tax place and once in you get to vote once. Did the landlords ever burn down a cabin full of 'rebellious slaves', and even if they weren't, the others are now unlikely to revolt now, or gather in groups of more than 10.

Quote: Originally Posted by Kreskin View Post

Really?? How about now?
 
Ludlow
No Party Affiliation
#15
Yes all liberal minded people think the same.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+2
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by Locutus View Post

how ignint can these progs get anyway? Lol!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odB1wWPqSlE


Ignorant f**king thread for sure!

Quote: Originally Posted by Ludlow View Post

Yes all liberal minded people think the same.


What is the telling feature of a Liberal person? Oh, perhaps they have an "L" tattooed on their forehead!
 
Ludlow
No Party Affiliation
+2
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by JLM View Post

Ignorant f**king thread for sure!




What is the telling feature of a Liberal person? Oh, perhaps they have an "L" tattooed on their forehead!

Seems like most narrow minded people want to encapsulate eveyone. It's stupid.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+1
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by gopher View Post

Loco has become the new Wally in that he hates libs and makes all kinds of loony accusations against him. Perhaps he should change his name.


Nah, an idiot by any other name is still an idiot!

Quote: Originally Posted by Ludlow View Post

Seems like most narrow minded people want to encapsulate eveyone. It's stupid.


Yep, they just have the one brush and one can of tar!

Quote: Originally Posted by gopher View Post

Loco has become the new Wally in that he hates libs and makes all kinds of loony accusations against him. Perhaps he should change his name.


Nah, Wally is a genius by comparison!
 
MHz
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalfloss View Post

The first part is about the likelihood of minorities having the required identification sufficient for voting.


This is then superimposed with the second part which asks those in one category minority group if they have any form of identification for any validation situation.


It's extremely misleading and I'm not surprised you would post something so blatantly deceptive.

Deceptive, like pro sports is actually about sports. Most people know that without the 'outlet' that sports provides the 'wrong side of the tracks syndrome' would take over.
A truthful look at the past data where pollution was high will show that it came along with an increased number of 'fight rather than flight' incidents for 'no apparent reasons' while the lack of a certain gas was enough for the brain to register a few warning signs like 'short term memory loss', then the body starts to shut down, etc., then the body dies. Prevention seems to be 'air with an abundance of O2. In theory if the expanding earth theory is true and 200MYA the land and sea covered 5/8 of the size it is today, That 'decrease in altitude would change the spin factor so gravity and air pressure would be changed. A higher gravity would mean 'people' are bigger and stronger as long as they had enough food. Lots of green plants around would mean no pollution and a higher than 'normal' 02 count so the brain might be able to use more than we do day with a lower air pressure and more pollution.
The altitude sickness chart starts at a certain altitude but health and injuries would cause that figure to be altered somewhat. The thing that would not change would be the symptoms and the treatments. One such recommendation is oxygen but no recommendation on the extra amount or how long it should be taken so the max is up to the user. Too much will cause a dry throat and coughing will begin. Backing up is the only way to stop it which is similar to altitude sickness. You descent to a lower level and then climb at a slower rate with frequent stops to allow your body to change without any ill effects.
Those affects are well listed and none of them are good.
A similar cause will get the very same effect, the only thing that changes is the degree of that change. A little too fast all the way to a lot too fast and no people will experience the same changes. In one person it will be a greater change and in another it will be a major change in the other direction. At some point they put you on a stretcher to move you because your brain has shrunk and moving only bruises it and that never repairs itself.
The repairs for memory losses is the original path gets broken and a time delay happens if you 'do nothing' until that thought returns. Once you do that it is a matter of practice makes perfect in that, and nothing else changes, the time delay will get shorter and shorter over a year or so. Slow, but a permanent one where the treatment has an ending and the lapses do not return on their own? (or I'll be more than a little pissed off)
 
Bar Sinister
No Party Affiliation
+1
#20
Really - this video is your evidence that progressive thinkers are racist? I didn't note a single person identify themselves as left or right wing so what is you supposition based on? This is simply the usual right wing rubbish.
 
MHz
#21
Gypsy eyes she has. You've been smitten haven't you??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StC5lwA2snM

Can you spot the troll's face???

haha lolol

Straight down from the fat part of the arrow
looking left, nose is the first object in the lighter color, below that is a cow's mouth and the rock outcrop is the chin
The eyes and green hair are above the nose.
 
EagleSmack
+1
#22
Wow... the saltiness is erupting.

Liberal racist HATE being shown for what they are.
 
gopher
No Party Affiliation
+1
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmack View Post

Wow... the saltiness is erupting.

Liberal racist HATE being shown for what they are.




so says the king of hyperbole
 
EagleSmack
#24
Bumpity Bump!
 
damngrumpy
No Party Affiliation
+1
#25
I am not a conservative nor a liberal for that matter but I would assume being in poverty
and having ID would be two different things. Id is not just for voting, its for getting access to services
everything from banking, social assistance to getting on a plane.
In Canada for a federal election one gets a voter card in the mail if one registers to vote.
Just because people are poor doesn't make them stupid either
 
davesmom
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by mentalfloss View Post

10% of citizens lack voter ID.

Most of those are minorities or impoverished.

Requiring them to provide same amounts to voter suppression.

The people who want to suppress the vote are Trump supporters.


How can people of voting age not have any form of ID? Don't they have a social insurance number, driver's licence, a birth certificate?
Don't people have their names on a 'voter's list'? If they aren't registered to vote it is their own fault. If they are registered their name should be crossed off the list when they pick up a ballet.
Being a minority or impoverished can't be an excuse in itself for not having any ID.
 
Curious Cdn
Conservative
#27
I have to agree that you should became to identify that you are you when you vote. If you can't, why not? What's up with you? How do we know that you haven't voted ten times, today?
 
darkbeaver
Republican
#28
I hate black people. They're smart, beautiful, creative, talented, prolific reproducers. The white reign nears oblivion.
 
EagleSmack
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by davesmom View Post

How can people of voting age not have any form of ID? Don't they have a social insurance number, driver's licence, a birth certificate?
Don't people have their names on a 'voter's list'? If they aren't registered to vote it is their own fault. If they are registered their name should be crossed off the list when they pick up a ballet.
Being a minority or impoverished can't be an excuse in itself for not having any ID.

They do have ID's. The Democrats do not want a Voter ID Law because it makes it harder to commit voter fraud.

And these white liberal snowflakes are mindlessly repeating what they have been taught by Liberal Democrats.
 
Cannuck
No Party Affiliation
#30
This certainly turned into a Trumpite sniffly sniffity thread.