Quote: Originally Posted by petros
Go read NASA's take on "my pet theory" in the other thread ya low life unemployed climate drywaller alarmist.
As NASA says about your pet theory:
"The mechanism for that regional cooling could have been a drop in the sun’s EUV output; this is, however, speculative."
realy no need to take it on. The reserachers themselves are aware of the speculative nature of their inquiries.
Although it's certainly true that the impact of sun on climate is a topic where there is much to be learned, even if it can be shown that the sun is predominately to blame for recent warming, you would still have to demonstrate why CO2 is not acting as predicted. If it turns out that CO2 is not warming the earth, that's throwing out a couple of hundred years of spectral physics.