Kyle Rittenhouse


B00Mer
+3
#1
 
B00Mer
+2
#2








 
B00Mer
+5
#3  Top Rated Post




 
Cliffy
+1
#4
Still wet dreaming, eh.
 
B00Mer
-1
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by Cliffy View Post

Still wet dreaming, eh.

Not sure what your talking about.. I still get laid 3 times a week.. I haven't had a wet dream since I was 16.

I feel sorry for you man..
 
pgs
+1
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

Not sure what your talking about.. I still get laid 3 times a week.. I haven't had a wet dream since I was 16.

I feel sorry for you man..

Come now , on those long lonely road trips you have never found yourself with a bone a dog couldn’t chew ?
 
B00Mer
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by pgs View Post

Come now , on those long lonely road trips you have never found yourself with a bone a dog couldn’t chew ?

 
petros
+1
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

Lol...a reference to Kyle "Rowdy" Busch but Kurt drives the Monster Enery sponsored car.
Last edited by petros; 3 weeks ago at 11:41 PM..
 
Serryah
+1
#9
Fukin' REALLY Boomer?

Why the HELL do you think this is something to post shit up like that about?
 
Serryah
+1
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post









Does NOT matter. This 17 year old murderer had no right to shoot this guy, nor was he even legally able to have the weapon he had in his possession.

Defending this little POS pretty much shows the kind of person you are.
 
B00Mer
+5 / -1
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by Serryah View Post

Does NOT matter. This 17 year old murderer had no right to shoot this guy, nor was he even legally able to have the weapon he had in his possession.

Defending this little POS pretty much shows the kind of person you are.

Regardless if he was legal to own a firearm in Wisconsin, he is legal in his state... he had every right to shoot and kill both attackers and wound one.

While they were peacefully looting a burning the city down, they attacked Kyle, trying to take his rifle away, and 2 attacked him.. he was in fear for his life.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ilk_4e73XRc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVNPasoS-gs


Quote: Originally Posted by Serryah View Post

Fukin' REALLY Boomer?

Why the HELL do you think this is something to post shit up like that about?

This is a News Topic.. which I have to agree with Kyle and his defense.

This is what peacefully protesting looks like in Kenosha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVsuRQTMFl0
Last edited by B00Mer; 3 weeks ago at 10:18 PM..
 
taxslave
+5 / -1
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by Serryah View Post

Does NOT matter. This 17 year old murderer had no right to shoot this guy, nor was he even legally able to have the weapon he had in his possession.
Defending this little POS pretty much shows the kind of person you are.

You mean the 17 yr old that was helping to protect his community from a bunch of terrorists? That Kyle? Good for him.
 
B00Mer
+5
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

You mean the 17 yr old that was helping to protect his community from a bunch of terrorists? That Kyle? Good for him.

You know how it is Taxslave..

To some people burning down people businesses, throwing rocks at police, beating up people who don't agree with your ideology is all part of a peaceful protest.












 
Serryah
+1
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

You mean the 17 yr old that was helping to protect his community from a bunch of terrorists? That Kyle? Good for him.


Except that

1: Kenosha is not his community, his community is in another state.

2. He had to be DRIVEN to Kenosha to be there.


3. It is illegal for him to have the gun he had - he was under age and thus could not legally carry it.


4. In WI, you are NOT allowed to use lethal force, apparently, to protect property. You ARE allowed to beat the shit out of someone to stop them from stealing, for example, but you cannot use force that will lead to the death of someone. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/sta...tes/939/iii/49


Again, if you think this kid is "Good" for being a murderer, then you're as much of a monster as he is.
 
Serryah
+1
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

You know how it is Taxslave..

To some people burning down people businesses, throwing rocks at police, beating up people who don't agree with your ideology is all part of a peaceful protest.


Actually, people who riot to that point are effin' disgusting and do NOTHING to help the actual cause people have been rightly protesting in the first place.

But you know how it is... some people can't tell the difference between what's lawful and what isn't. Right Boom?
 
B00Mer
+3
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by Serryah View Post

Except that
1: Kenosha is not his community, his community is in another state.
2. He had to be DRIVEN to Kenosha to be there.
3. It is illegal for him to have the gun he had - he was under age and thus could not legally carry it.
4. In WI, you are NOT allowed to use lethal force, apparently, to protect property. You ARE allowed to beat the shit out of someone to stop them from stealing, for example, but you cannot use force that will lead to the death of someone. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/sta...tes/939/iii/49
Again, if you think this kid is "Good" for being a murderer, then you're as much of a monster as he is.

Humm 2nd Amendment.

I bet you he gets off.. because you are allowed to defend yourself in WI it's called the “Castle Doctrine”

BTW, while people were burning the city down, Kyle was running around with a fire extinguisher trying to put out the fires.. that is when he was attacked.

https://youtu.be/8kSZWKg0pOY

That's right the arsonist attacked Kyle with a brick and then tried to take his gun away while putting out a fire..

Excuse me for not giving a fukk about the people he killed.

What is funny, is you seem to be defending 1) victim with a long history of abuse against women, and 2) the other victim who was a pedophile and felon and had a gun (he was not supposed to have) and was trying to shoot Kyle.
 
B00Mer
#17
 
taxslave
+3
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by Serryah View Post

Except that
1: Kenosha is not his community, his community is in another state.
2. He had to be DRIVEN to Kenosha to be there.
3. It is illegal for him to have the gun he had - he was under age and thus could not legally carry it.
4. In WI, you are NOT allowed to use lethal force, apparently, to protect property. You ARE allowed to beat the shit out of someone to stop them from stealing, for example, but you cannot use force that will lead to the death of someone. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/sta...tes/939/iii/49
Again, if you think this kid is "Good" for being a murderer, then you're as much of a monster as he is.

So you have already convicted him of a crime he didn't commit. Without a trial. Or does the trial come after the execution? I'm told it is easier to convict a person that is not permitted to defend himself.
 
B00Mer
+3 / -1
#19
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

So you have already convicted him of a crime he didn't commit. Without a trial. Or does the trial come after the execution? I'm told it is easier to convict a person that is not permitted to defend himself.

She probably has a bad case of "Stockholm syndrome" from watching to much CNN and CBC.

Brainwashed from being a captive of Fake News CBC/CNN
 
petros
+5
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by Serryah View Post

Does NOT matter. This 17 year old murderer had no right to shoot this guy, nor was he even legally able to have the weapon he had in his possession.
Defending this little POS pretty much shows the kind of person you are.

It's called karma.

He did what all the beaten women were to afraid of doing.

Did you see a happy ending for these people in their future. How many more women would have suffered before one did them in anyway?
 
Serryah
+1
#21
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

Humm 2nd Amendment.


Humm - still against WI law for a 17 year old to have that kind of gun, which is, of course, a state right.

Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

I bet you he gets off.. because you are allowed to defend yourself in WI it's called the “Castle Doctrine”


Sadly he will likely get off, but not because of the Castle Doctrine. Likely it'll be because a jury can't convict; I figure either a hung jury or they're look at his age and like you be biased that what he did earlier in the day makes him such a sweet, honest kid and we can't ruin his life... (nevermind the lives he's ruined by his actions to others)

Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

BTW, while people were burning the city down, Kyle was running around with a fire extinguisher trying to put out the fires.. that is when he was attacked.

https://youtu.be/8kSZWKg0pOY

That's right the arsonist attacked Kyle with a brick and then tried to take his gun away while putting out a fire..


Funny, the video doesn't show him being attacked by a brick, and I read a bag was thrown at Kyle. And you know what? Does not effin' matter. He could be the best 17 year old in the whole goddamn world, except he was illegally carrying a weapon he was not allowed to have, across a state line he had no business being to and murdered two people.


I should note that I also don't give a fuk what HIS history is either. I don't care if he's a Trump or Biden supporter, if he's a Militia wanna be, cop wanna be, or a fukin' tree hugger hippie. None of that matters to me. What matters is what he did in the moments before and after he murdered those people.

Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

Excuse me for not giving a fukk about the people he killed.


Who he killed doesn't matter.

Also, we know you're a fukin piece of garbage and don't give a shyte about anything, no need to keep proving it.

Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

What is funny, is you seem to be defending 1) victim with a long history of abuse against women, and 2) the other victim who was a pedophile and felon and had a gun (he was not supposed to have) and was trying to shoot Kyle.


1. I'm not defending a man with a history of abuse against women, I'm saying that it doesn't matter what his history is. In the eyes of the law, no matter how much of a fuking scumbag he was, he had as much right to life as anyone else (seeing as he was not in jail/prison)

2. see above. Though I will admit this second being a felon himself and having a gun does change things slightly. He shouldn't have been there either with a gun. And if guy two was shooting at Kyle after he murdered guy one, does that make him a good guy with a gun considering he just saw someone murdered???

Also, according to the indictments, it was the third victim who was shot and his arm grazed that had the gun, who pointed it at Kyle but wasn't trying to shoot him at all.


Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

So you have already convicted him of a crime he didn't commit. Without a trial. Or does the trial come after the execution? I'm told it is easier to convict a person that is not permitted to defend himself.


I'm saying this kid broke the law in having a gun underage that he used in a potential crime, and while it might be a misdemeanor in WI for him to have it and carry it, what he DID with it should factor into it. As well as he left the scene of a crime. Even if he turned himself in the next day, that also should work against him.

At least he will go to trial to be determined if he does go to jail/prison or not. If it ends up he's not guilty, that's how it works, but based on what I've read about the incident, it's certainly pointing to guilt.

The cops who have killed people like Breanna Taylor haven't seen a goddamn second of jail time for that and she did SFA except for sleep in her own goddamn bed.


Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

She probably has a bad case of "Stockholm syndrome" from watching to much CNN and CBC.

Brainwashed from being a captive of Fake News CBC/CNN

If I watched either of those, you might have something. As it is, I don't. Tryharder though.


Quote: Originally Posted by petros View Post

It's called karma.

He did what all the beaten women were to afraid of doing.

Did you see a happy ending for these people in their future. How many more women would have suffered before one did them in anyway?


For the record, I'm GLAD the abuser azzhole is dead. He should'a been in jail for the rest of his life. Same with the sex offender.

However the law allowed them to be out on the streets and as much as it's a fukin' disgrace, that's how the law works.

WE only know their history because of what Kyle did that night. Kyle himself had no idea who it was he was murdering at the time. Which is WHY it doesn't matter who they were beforehand.

If they had no criminal histories at all, would you be more inclined to be less forgiving to Kyle? Somehow I doubt it.


https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/...rs/5651016002/
 
Walter
+4
#22
Rittenhouse did not kill any innocents.
 
Serryah
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by Walter View Post

Rittenhouse did not kill any innocents.


Neither did Jacob Blake, did he deserved to be shot?
 
Girth
+5
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by Serryah View Post

Neither did Jacob Blake, did he deserved to be shot?

Well Blake did rape his ex-girlfriend, and had a warrant out for his arrest, and showed up on their property unannounced. One the Police were dispatched, he fought with them, was tased, got up, ignored commands, and went for a weapon in the vehicle. The Police were justified in shooting him once or twice, but seven times was excessive.

OTOH, Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero, and a modern day Bernhard Goetz.

There is a little bit of Kyle in all of us. That may explain the overwhelming support.
 
B00Mer
+3 / -1
#25
Yes 7 time in the back is a bit excessive..

I think the officer needs to go back to the range..

Once in the head you have been suffice.
 
Twin_Moose
+3
#26
‘He probably would’ve been killed,’ Trump says of Kenosha shooting suspect

Quote:

U.S. President Donald Trump says Kyle Rittenhouse — a man who has been charged in connection with the shooting deaths of two protesters in Kenosha, Wis., — was "very violently attacked" and "probably would've been killed."

"You saw the same tape I saw, and he was trying to get away from them I guess — it looks like — and he fell and then they very violently attacked him and it was something that we’re looking at right now," Trump said.

"I guess he was in very big trouble, he probably would've been killed."

The president made the comments during a press conference at the White House Monday evening, after a reporter asked whether Rittenhouse should be condemned for his alleged actions.

Trump said the incident is "under investigation," adding that it is an "interesting situation."

Rittenhouse, 17, has been charged with six criminal counts, including first-degree homicide, in connection with a shooting incident in Kenosha earlier this week.

The incident took place as demonstrators protesting the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a 29-year-old Black man, clashed with armed militia members.

Tuesday's shooting left a 26-year-old from Silver Lake, Wis., and a 36-year-old from Kenosha dead, while a 36-year-old from West Allis, Wis., is expected to survive his injuries.

Trump is scheduled to travel to Kenosha on Tuesday.

However, the city's mayor John Antaramian, has requested Trump not visit over concerns it could "agitate things."

Read more: Kyle Rittenhouse charged with murder in shooting deaths of protesters in Kenosha

But speaking to reporters on Monday, Trump said his presence could "also increase enthusiasm," and "love and respect for our country."

He said he has "tremendous support" in Wisconsin.

"I promised them when it all gets taken care of we’ll go," he said.

Trump said he is not planning on meeting with Blake's family while in Kenosha.

“They wanted me to speak but they wanted lawyers involved, and I thought that was inappropriate so I didn’t do that,” he said.”

But, Trump claimed he has spoken with the family’s pastor, who he called a “fine man, a wonderful man.”

“I think we had a great talk,” he said.

Blake was shot seven times by Kenosha police. He survived, however, his father said he is now paralyzed from the waist down.

Good on him to go to Kenosha, he should go to Portland as well
 
Twin_Moose
+3
#27
Trump heads to politically crucial Wisconsin amid violence, racial unrest

Quote:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Despite entreaties to stay away, President Donald Trump heads to Kenosha, Wisconsin on Tuesday to highlight his "law and order" campaign theme in a city upended by protests after the shooting of a Black man by a white police officer.

The Republican president, who is running for re-election against Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, has seen his polling gap with the former vice president narrow amid ongoing protests over racial injustice and resulting violence.

Last week's Republican National Convention portrayed Biden as a leader whose policies would create further chaos in the streets. Biden and fellow Democrats have made clear that the violence is happening under Trump's watch and accuse him of fomenting it with divisive rhetoric.

Trump's trip to Wisconsin, a political battleground state that he won narrowly in 2016, gives him a chance to emphasize his police-friendly pitch in a state he hopes to keep in his column in the Nov. 3 election.

Trump has lauded the National Guard for helping to quell violence in Kenosha and has offered to send federal assistance to other cities such as Portland, Oregon, which has experienced three months of protests. The president has not made a recent visit to Oregon, a state that traditionally supports Democrats in presidential elections.

Biden, who is ahead in national polls but has seen that advantage slip, leads Trump in Wisconsin, according to an average of polls by RealClearPolitics.

On Monday he called for rioters and looters to be prosecuted while slamming Trump for a lack of moral leadership.

Protesters have destroyed businesses in Kenosha, the latest city where demonstrations against racism and excessive use of force by police have led to violence that both political parties have condemned but that Republicans have sought to blame on Democrats.

While in Kenosha Trump intends to survey the damage from the protests and meet with law enforcement officials and business owners, but he is not scheduled to meet with the family of Jacob Blake, who was paralyzed from the waist down after the shooting.

The state's governor and the city's mayor both urged Trump not to come to Kenosha to avoid inflaming tensions and allow its citizens to heal, but the president dismissed that request......More

 
B00Mer
+3 / -1
#28
Trump 2020!!!

I'm guessing he will get a landslide and turn California red in the process..
 
Dixie Cup
+5
#29
Well, maybe the charges will be dropped to weapons charges if the Prosecutor can't prove intent & if he claims self-defense. But i'm not going to jump to conclusions. As it stands now, he's charged with murder and we'll see what happens.
 
Girth
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by B00Mer View Post

Trump 2020!!!
I'm guessing he will get a landslide and turn California red in the process..

With a little help from Louis DeJoy...
 

Similar Threads

16
and so kyle returns
by Kyle | Sep 7th, 2004