Google - The Massive Censor is here -


Goober
#1
Google - The Massive Censor is here - Googlegate Saturday, 16 January 2010 08:19 Lawrence Solomon, Financial Post
http://www.thegwpf.org/new-publications/418-googlegate.html

This week, Google announced an end to its long-standing collaboration with the Chinese Communists — it will no longer censor users inside China. That’s good of it. Maybe Google will now also stop using its search engine to censor the rest of us, in the Western countries.

Search for “Googlegate” on Google and you’ll get a paltry result (my result yesterday was 29,300). Search for “Googlegate” on Bing, Microsoft’s search engine competitor, and the result numbers an eye-popping 72.4 million. If you’re a regular Google user, as opposed to a Bing user, you might not even know that “Googlegate” has been a hot topic for years in the blogosphere — that’s the power that comes of being able to control information.

Despite Google’s motto of “Do No Evil,” it has long been controversial and suspected of evil-doing — and not just in its cooperation with China, or in protecting itself by hiding criticism of itself from unsuspecting Google users. In recent months, most of the evil-doing has focused on the Climategate scandal, the startling emails from the Climate Research Unit in the UK that show climate change scientists to be cooking the books.

For many weeks now, readers have been sending me emails describing how Google has been doing its best to hide information relating to Climategate, which has been the single biggest story on the Internet since the Climategate emails came to light on November 19. By Nov. 26, the term had gone viral and Google returned more results for “climategate” (10.4 million) than for “global warming” (10.1 million). As the Climate Scandal exploded, and increasing numbers of blog sites covered it, the number of web pages with Climategate continued to climb. On Dec. 7, Google’s search engine found 31.6 million hits for people who searched for “Climategate.”

Sometime around then, in early December, Google began to minimize the Climategate scandal by hiding Climategate pages from its users. By Dec. 17, the number of climategate pages that a Google search found dropped by almost 10 million, to 22.2 million. One day later Google dropped its find by another 8 million pages, to 14.1 million. By Dec. 23, Google could find only 7.5 million hits and on Dec. 24 just 6 million. And yesterday, when I checked, Google reported a mere 1.8 million climategate pages.

Bing, in contrast, didn’t make climategate pages disappear. As you’d expect from a search engine that wasn’t manipulating data, search results on Bing climbed steadily until they peaked at around 51 million, where they have remained since.

Starting in late November, Google has been keeping the public in the dark about Climategate in other ways, too. Ordinarily, when people begin keying in their search terms, Google helpfully suggests the balance of their text, through an automatic feature it calls Google Suggests.

At the very beginning of the Climategate scandal, before it became huge, Google Suggests worked as advertised. If someone typed in c-l-i-, Google would have shown them “climategate” on a list of options. Many people, in fact, learned about Climategate this very way, because most major media outlets had not yet picked up on the scandal. As Climategate rose in intensity, the term also rose in prominence on the Google Suggest list — anyone keying in c-l-i would see “climategate” at the top of the list.

But suddenly in late November, for reasons known only to Google, Google often would not suggest “climategate” to those who keyed in c-l-i. Even c-l-i-m-a or c-l-i-m-a-t-e-g-a-t weren’t enough to solicit a suggestion. Bing, in contrast, did not and does not steer users away from climategate — it has consistently suggested “climategate” to those who keyed in c-l-i or even c-l.

For those whom Google can’t steer away from “climategate,” and who key in all 11 letters to learn about the eye-opening emails, Google goes the extra yard in keeping people in the dark — it dishes up a page that trivializes the scientific significance of climategate.

Those who click on Google’s “I’m feeling lucky” after asking for “climategate” find themselves on a Wikipedia page entitled “Climatic Research Unit hacking incident” that downplays the content of the emails and focuses on the “unauthorised release of thousands of emails and other documents obtained through the hacking of a server,” the “illegal taking of data,” the “Law enforcement agencies [that] are investigating the matter as a crime,” and “the death threats that were subsequently made against climate scientists named in the emails.” For those who don’t use Google’s “I’m feeling lucky” feature, Google presents them with this one-sided Wikipedia page as the first item in its search results. Wikipedia actually has a page called “Climategate” that contains damning information about the scientists caught up in the scandal but its own censors won’t let the public see it — anyone who tries to key in “Climategate” on the Wikipedia site will be instantly redirected to the Wikipedia-approved version of climategate, where the scandal is described as nothing more than “a smear campaign.”

Why would Google want to tamp down interest in climategate? Money and power could have something to do with it. Search for Google and its founders and you’ll see that they have made big financial bets on global warming through investments in renewable and other green technologies; that they have a close relationship with Al Gore, that Google CEO Eric Schmidt is close to Barack Obama. But search for Googlegate and you’ll also see that more than money is at stake. The accusations against Google of censorship are wide-spread, involving schemes to elect Barack Obama, attacks on Christianity (key in “Christianity is” and Google will suggest unflattering completions to the phrase), and political correctness (key in “Islam is” and nothing negative is suggested). The bottom line?

Google is as inscrutable as the Chinese, and perhaps no less corrupt. For safe searches, you’re best off with Bing.
 
TenPenny
#2
I dunno,as of this morning, if you type in 'clim', the first suggestion is climategate.

Still nothing for 'islam is', however. That one is interesting.
 
Goober
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPenny View Post

I dunno,as of this morning, if you type in 'clim', the first suggestion is climategate.

Still nothing for 'islam is', however. That one is interesting.

Ten Penny

After the uproar and Google having been caught with their hands in the proverbial cookie jar - the maniulation would have been addressed in some cases - But not all - Big Brother is Google -
 
lone wolf
#4
I find that automatic suggestion thing annoying anyhow. What's wrong with typing a whole word by yourself?
 
TenPenny
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolf View Post

I find that automatic suggestion thing annoying anyhow. What's wrong with typing a whole word by yourself?

It's great for amusement, there are some completely bizarre things that pop up, like why does my parakeet eat my diarreah....who the hell started that?
 
Spade
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPenny View Post

It's great for amusement, there are some completely bizarre things that pop up, like why does my parakeet eat my diarreah....who the hell started that?

Gingrich?
 
lone wolf
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPenny View Post

It's great for amusement, there are some completely bizarre things that pop up, like why does my parakeet eat my diarreah....who the hell started that?

Jim Morrison said it best: People are Strange....
 
Tonington
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by Goober View Post

Ten Penny

After the uproar and Google having been caught with their hands in the proverbial cookie jar - the maniulation would have been addressed in some cases - But not all - Big Brother is Google -

If you don't like Google, you don't have to use their search engine.
 
DurkaDurka
#9
Google works great for me, it's a tool and works awesome for what I need it to do.
 
DaSleeper
#10
I tell you....it's a conspiracy
when yo google conspiracy you get 37 million hits....Bing only 23 millions
 
DurkaDurka
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeper View Post

I tell you....it's a conspiracy
when yo google conspiracy you get 37 million hits....Bing only 23 millions

SHEEET! Where have the other 14 million hits gone? Al Gore probably had them expunged due to him inventing the Internet & Global Warming.
 
Andem
#12
The number of results is usually just an estimate and it changes every day. Sometimes if I just search for "canadiancontent" in quotes, it will return 500,000 pages. Right now it's returning 753,000 and other times it shows 1.5 million.

The algorithms Google uses are constantly evolving and from one second to the other, you may get completely different results based on the datacentre that is serving you results.
 
TenPenny
#13
Autocomplete Me

If you've got time to waste
 

Similar Threads

14
Google Mail
by JonB2004 | Jul 25th, 2006
18
Google Earth
by Zan | Jun 9th, 2006
1
BBC to take on Google and AOL.
by Blackleaf | Jun 1st, 2006