'I'm not giving you a b--- j-- in your office'; CTV's Paul Bliss suspended after form


spaminator
#1
'I'm not giving you a b--- j-- in your office'; CTV's Paul Bliss suspended after former employee posts allegations against unnamed reporter
Canadian Press
More from Canadian Press
Published:
January 26, 2018
Updated:
January 26, 2018 9:33 PM EST
CTV reporter Paul Bliss is seen in a 2009 Facebook photo.
TORONTO — A prominent CTV News reporter has been suspended, hours after a woman made sexual misconduct allegations against him.
Bell Media’s vice president of communications said Paul Bliss, who works at CTV’s bureau in the Ontario legislature, has been suspended and an investigation is underway.
“Allegations have been made against a CTV News reporter,” Scott Henderson said in an email statement provided to The Canadian Press.
“We take this very seriously and as a result have suspended Paul Bliss until an investigation is complete.”
The allegations were made in a blog post by Bridget Brown, who describes herself as a Calgary-based entrepreneur and former CTV employee.
Under a Friday post titled “MeToo in Canadian Broadcasting,” Brown detailed an alleged sexual incident in the spring of 2006 involving an unnamed CTV reporter.
Bridget Brown. (TWITTER)
Brown wrote that when she began working at CTV, she reached out to a reporter she had met at a party a few weeks earlier and asked if he’d like to get coffee with her in the cafeteria and reconnect.
The reporter “suggested instead I come to his office after his shift,” wrote Brown, and she agreed.
Brown said the reporter showed her around “the storied building where he worked,” and ended the tour back in his office.
She alleges that he then started kissing her and “pushing on the top of my head” as a signal that he wanted oral sex.
“I’m not giving you a b— j– in your office,” she says she responded.
Brown claims the reporter also exposed his penis to her.
Brown wrote that she kept silent about the alleged incident for 12 years, and had been struggling in recent months with whether to reveal it.
She said she had been thinking about the #MeToo movement of women coming forward with stories of sexual harassment, and reading about the resignation of Ontario Progressive Conservative leader Patrick Brown.
He stepped down early Thursday morning, hours after CTV reported that two women have come forward with sexual misconduct allegations against him — allegations that haven’t been verified by The Canadian Press.
In a post on Twitter Friday night, Bridget Brown wrote that she decided to come forward now because she had noticed a “dearth in #MeToo stories coming from Canada, specifically from media in Canada.”
When reached by phone, she told The Canadian Press she had no comment on Bliss’s suspension.
Her allegations have not been verified by The Canadian Press, and Bliss did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Bliss’ biography on CTV’s website describes him as a “veteran reporter … and occasional anchor for CTV Toronto.”
It says he has won 13 awards for his reporting, including the Edward R. Murrow International Award for Best News Series.

http://medium.com/@bridget.erin.brow...g-f881c3a50b74
‘I’m not giving you a b— j– in your office’; CTV’s Paul Bliss suspended after former employee posts allegations against unnamed reporter | Toronto Sun
 
tay
+2
#2  Top Rated Post
Bridget Brown is peddling a book. Wonder why this came out now...........?


https://medium.com/@bridget.erin.bro...g-f881c3a50b74
 
spilledthebeer
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by tay View Post

Bridget Brown is peddling a book. Wonder why this came out now...........?


https://medium.com/@bridget.erin.bro...g-f881c3a50b74

Well......gosh.....giving a BJ in the office setting is a tad bit UN-professional? Unless you are getting PAID to be kinky that way?

Women generally like to have a nice meal first and a drink or two.....prefer soft lights and mood music to set the tone of the encounter?

Simply barking out: "do it now" is off- putting for most women!

I think we should be HIGHLY suspicious of all that Hollywood casting couch crap! After all, most women can- if pushed to be honest- admit to knowing one woman who WILL use her looks to get ahead!

PIcture it- some beautiful woman with stars in her eyes- knowing she is head and shoulders beyond all other women in her ability toi attract ALL male attention with a little flirt- and we all know that some women believe an ulgy man looks a little better if he has a big.....wallet!

So there is our hypothetical beautiful woman in the movie moguls office- looking at the "couch" and weighing her options....should she do that little task that the mogul desires? She has done such things before with guys back home- guys who CANNOT put her onto the path of great fame and fortune as a movie star.......some women will say no......and some will say yes......because the task is simple and may even be pleasant- depending on how the mogul handles her- and the payoff will be HUGE!

Why bother breaking your pretty finger nails in the secretarial pool playing grab as with some old boss when you can get the movie mogul to buy you lunch and a pedicure after he is finished with playing grab ass! After all, you WILL want to discuss the successful launch of your new career in detail!

But there seems to be a little fly in the ointment of Tinsel Town.....why are so many women suddenly NOW whining about grabby horny directors and movie moguls? After all such people had a BAD reputation when Shakespeare was trying to persuade movers and shakers to read his little stories!

Shall we ask if having fame and fortune is not always as wonderful as some had expected and now some disappointed women have decided they sold out.......TOO CHEAP?

Some people should recall the joke about the horny old guy who meets a beautiful women at a party and propositions her; "asking-will you sleep with me for a million dollars- as he shows her his bank book". The woman smiles at all those big numbers and coyly mutters something sweet and a little bashful- impressed in spite of herself.

So the old guy then asks: " will you sleep with me for fifty bucks"? And the girl is offended and slaps the guy and asks "what kind of girl do you think I am"?

And the old guy responds with: "we have already established that honey, now we are just haggling over the price"!
 
spaminator
#4
Bell Media axes CTV News reporter Paul Bliss following sexual misconduct allegation
Canadian Press
More from Canadian Press
Published:
March 6, 2018
Updated:
March 6, 2018 6:54 PM EST
CTV News reporter Paul Bliss appears in this 2009 Facebook photo.Paul Bliss / Facebook
TORONTO — A prominent CTV News reporter who was suspended after a woman made sexual misconduct allegations against him is no longer with the company, Bell Media said Tuesday.
A spokesman for the media outlet confirmed the departure of Paul Bliss but refused to provide further details.
“We don’t comment on the specifics of individual employee matters,” Scott Henderson said in an email to The Canadian Press.
‘I’m not giving you a b— j– in your office’; CTV reporter suspended
Bliss did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The allegations against him have not been verified by The Canadian Press.
The veteran reporter, who worked at CTV’s bureau at the Ontario legislature, was suspended in late January hours after the publication of a blog post containing allegations by Bridget Brown, who describes herself as a Calgary-based entrepreneur and former CTV employee.
The logo for Bell Media, owned by BCE Inc., is displayed on a Toronto building in a handout photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO, Bell Media – Darren Goldstein
Brown did not name Bliss in her post, but Henderson, Bell Media’s vice president of communications, said at the time that Bliss had been suspended pending an investigation in light of the allegations.
In a statement, Brown said she empathized with any family “who experiences job loss” but said people are responsible for their bad behaviour, which can have repercussions years later.
Brown also she had no idea what had become of the Bell Media investigation until reporters began calling her Tuesday, and said she had reasons for not naming Bliss in her original blog post.
“I wanted the focus to be on the fact that #MeToo experiences are happening in Canada,” Brown said. “I was not prepared for CTV public relations to publicly name my harasser before even commencing its investigation and name me as the instigating source for the investigation.”
In her original post titled, “MeToo in Canadian Broadcasting,” Brown detailed an alleged sexual incident involving an unnamed CTV reporter in the spring of 2006. She said she had reached out to the reporter she had met at a party a few weeks earlier to ask if he wanted to get coffee with her.
The reporter “suggested instead I come to his office after his shift,” Brown wrote, which she did.
After showing her around, they ended up in his office where, she said, he started kissing her and pushing on the top of her head. She said she told him she wasn’t interested and that he then allegedly performed a sex act in front of her.
Brown wrote that she had kept silent about the alleged incident for 12 years but had finally decided to go public in light of the #MeToo movement of women coming forward with stories of sexual harassment and after reading about the resignation of Ontario’s Progressive Conservative leader amid sexual-misconduct allegations against him.
Brown said she had also endured harassment online since her allegations against Bliss became public.
Bliss’s biography on CTV’s website had described him as a “veteran reporter … and occasional anchor for CTV Toronto.” It said he has won 13 awards for his reporting, including the Edward R. Murrow International Award for Best News Series.
Three women have reached out to her since her blog post to say they allegedly had similar experiences between 2007—2017, Brown said in her statement on Tuesday. She said she would not share what they told her.
“They were understandably concerned about maintaining their privacy if they chose to report what happened,” Brown said.
‘I’m not giving you a b— j– in your office’; CTV’s Paul Bliss suspended after former employee posts allegations against unnamed reporter | Toronto Sun
http://medium.com/@bridget.erin.brow...n-d6a776c1b785
http://medium.com/@bridget.erin.brow...g-f881c3a50b74
Bell Media axes CTV News reporter Paul Bliss following sexual misconduct allegation | Toronto Sun
 
Murphy
#5
 
spaminator
+2
#6
Former CTV News reporter Paul Bliss suing broadcaster and woman who accused him of sexual misconduct
Canadian Press
More from Canadian Press
Published:
April 6, 2018
Updated:
April 6, 2018 6:44 PM EDT
Former CTV News reporter Paul Bliss.Paul Bliss / Twitter
TORONTO — A former CTV News reporter facing sexual misconduct allegations is suing the broadcaster, its parent company and the woman who levelled the accusations against him.
Paul Bliss, whose departure from CTV was announced last month, claims Bridget Brown defamed him with her allegations and CTV further defamed him by broadcasting and publishing stories about his suspension from the network in January.
Reporter Paul Bliss no longer with CTV following sexual misconduct allegation https://t.co/cd27NwdcfC
— CTV News (@CTVNews) March 6, 2018
Bliss’ suit, which also targets four unidentified CTV journalists, seeks $7.5 million in damages.
“The defamatory words have created damaging speculation respecting Mr. Bliss and his ability to interact and work with people and has lowered his reputation in the general public,” his statement of claim said.
CTV refused to comment on the lawsuit, which was filed in a Toronto court this week.
The defamatory words have created damaging speculation respecting Mr. Bliss and his ability to interact and work with people and has lowered his reputation in the general public.
statement of claim
Brown, who describes herself as a Calgary-based entrepreneur and former CTV employee, said her legal team was reviewing Bliss’ suit.
“I find virtually everything in the statement of claim to be false,” she said. “We have some time for our response and have not compiled one yet, nor any potential statements of claim of our own that we may decide to file.”
Brown alleged in a January blog post that “an award-winning CTV reporter and anchor” had, in 2006, showed her to his office, began kissing her, pushed her head down to signal that he wanted oral sex, and exposed himself to her.
https://twitter.com/Bridget_Brown_/s...26194196377600
Brown’s original blog post did not name Bliss, but left “no doubt” that he was the man being described, Bliss said in his statement of claim. Brown also later told CTV that Bliss was the man her post referred to, the claim said.
Bliss denied Brown’s accusations in his statement of claim and said the pair engaged in a consensual encounter.
CTV suspended Bliss, a veteran reporter who worked at its bureau at the Ontario legislature, shortly after Brown’s allegations came to light.
Bliss claimed in his suit that the network broadcast and published “false, malicious, irresponsible” stories about his suspension and subsequent departure from the network — which the suit described as a termination.
Bell Media axes CTV News reporter Paul Bliss following sexual misconduct allegation
‘I’m not giving you a b— j– in your office’; CTV reporter suspended
The statement of claim further says CTV’s coverage should have noted that Brown’s blog says the details of her online post were adapted from a memoir she is writing, which will be published in 2019.
“Brown had an ulterior motive (in making the allegations), being the publication of her intended book,” Bliss said in the claim.
None of the allegations have been proven in court.
Former CTV News reporter Paul Bliss suing broadcaster, accuser | Toronto Sun
 
spilledthebeer
+1
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by spaminator View Post

Former CTV News reporter Paul Bliss suing broadcaster and woman who accused him of sexual misconduct
Canadian Press
More from Canadian Press
Published:
April 6, 2018
Updated:
April 6, 2018 6:44 PM EDT
Former CTV News reporter Paul Bliss.Paul Bliss / Twitter
TORONTO — A former CTV News reporter facing sexual misconduct allegations is suing the broadcaster, its parent company and the woman who levelled the accusations against him.
Paul Bliss, whose departure from CTV was announced last month, claims Bridget Brown defamed him with her allegations and CTV further defamed him by broadcasting and publishing stories about his suspension from the network in January.
Reporter Paul Bliss no longer with CTV following sexual misconduct allegation https://t.co/cd27NwdcfC
— CTV News (@CTVNews) March 6, 2018
Bliss’ suit, which also targets four unidentified CTV journalists, seeks $7.5 million in damages.
“The defamatory words have created damaging speculation respecting Mr. Bliss and his ability to interact and work with people and has lowered his reputation in the general public,” his statement of claim said.
CTV refused to comment on the lawsuit, which was filed in a Toronto court this week.
The defamatory words have created damaging speculation respecting Mr. Bliss and his ability to interact and work with people and has lowered his reputation in the general public.
statement of claim
Brown, who describes herself as a Calgary-based entrepreneur and former CTV employee, said her legal team was reviewing Bliss’ suit.
“I find virtually everything in the statement of claim to be false,” she said. “We have some time for our response and have not compiled one yet, nor any potential statements of claim of our own that we may decide to file.”
Brown alleged in a January blog post that “an award-winning CTV reporter and anchor” had, in 2006, showed her to his office, began kissing her, pushed her head down to signal that he wanted oral sex, and exposed himself to her.
https://twitter.com/Bridget_Brown_/s...26194196377600
Brown’s original blog post did not name Bliss, but left “no doubt” that he was the man being described, Bliss said in his statement of claim. Brown also later told CTV that Bliss was the man her post referred to, the claim said.
Bliss denied Brown’s accusations in his statement of claim and said the pair engaged in a consensual encounter.
CTV suspended Bliss, a veteran reporter who worked at its bureau at the Ontario legislature, shortly after Brown’s allegations came to light.
Bliss claimed in his suit that the network broadcast and published “false, malicious, irresponsible” stories about his suspension and subsequent departure from the network — which the suit described as a termination.
Bell Media axes CTV News reporter Paul Bliss following sexual misconduct allegation
‘I’m not giving you a b— j– in your office’; CTV reporter suspended
The statement of claim further says CTV’s coverage should have noted that Brown’s blog says the details of her online post were adapted from a memoir she is writing, which will be published in 2019.
“Brown had an ulterior motive (in making the allegations), being the publication of her intended book,” Bliss said in the claim.
None of the allegations have been proven in court.
Former CTV News reporter Paul Bliss suing broadcaster, accuser | Toronto Sun

Oh.....He said and she said.....this is another court case that will NEVER be resolved as there is no evidence!

Bliss claims he and the woman had a consensual relationship.....who knows and who cares.....especially since it seems likely the woman is grand standing in order to get sympathy from the public and buyers for her book of "memoirs" !

One has to ask if the woman`s major beef with Bliss is that she DID voluntarily give Bliss some sexual service and then got annoyed because her career did not advance as swiftly as she had expected?

In the old days- a prosecutor did not bother wasting time on cases that lacked credible evidence and this one is a classic! No witnesses, no evidence and no proof- just assertions of a woman being supported and encouraged by LIE-berals for political points!

That would be the same LIE-berals who RELEASED SEVEN ACCUSED KILLERS IN 2017 simply because they could not provide a trial in reasonable time frame!

I suggest the general public is SICK of these LIE-beral antics motivated by vote buying greed!

LIE-berals consider that it is more important to deal with a case where a woman was asked by Bliss to perform a sex act- one she MAY have previously performed for him- she refused an walked out of his office. Then look at the seven accused killers dumped back on the street because LIE-berals are too busy screwing around with people like Bliss and Patrick Brown!

Sexual assault is certainly not a joke- but ignoring killers while catering to radical feminists pushing idiot accusations with no proof is insane!
 
Tecumsehsbones
+1
#8
Some days ya just can't get a hummer at work.
 
spilledthebeer
+1
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by Tecumsehsbones View Post

Some days ya just can't get a hummer at work.

Here is a FUNNY article that will be swiftly buried by LIE-beral friendly news media. With some comments of my own in brackets):

California #MeToo leader accused of groping man

Associated Press. Published: February 8, 2018. Updated: February 8, 2018 10:18 PM EST

Filed Under:

Toronto SUN/ News/ World

By Kathleen Ronayne, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California Democratic Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia, the head of the Legislative Women’s Caucus and a leading figure in the state’s anti-sexual harassment movement, is accused of groping a male staffer from another lawmaker’s office.

(So- as a lot of men have suspected all along- most of the MeToo leaders are grand standers and publicity Hogs more interested in finding a soap box to attract publicity rather than real seekers after honest justice! These hypocrites think it is justice to ruin a man with innuendo. Actual evidence that can be brought into a law court and judged honestly is NOT NEEDED! Such hypocrites!)

Daniel Fierro told The Associated Press on Thursday that Garcia stroked his back, squeezed his buttocks and attempted to touch his crotch in a dugout after a legislative softball game in 2014.

Fierro didn’t report it at the time but in January told his former boss, Democratic Assemblyman Ian Calderon, who reported it to Assembly leaders. The Assembly is now investigating Garcia.

Politico first reported Fierro’s accusation.

Garcia’s spokeswoman Teala Schaff said the assemblywoman learned Jan. 23 a complaint was filed but was given no details and only learned the specifics of the allegations from Politico.

“Every complaint about sexual harassment should be taken seriously and I will participate fully in any investigation that takes place,” the Los Angeles-area lawmaker said in a statement Thursday. “I have zero recollection of engaging in inappropriate behaviour and such behaviour is inconsistent with my values.”

The investigation into Garcia is one of many in statehouses nationwide following a wave of sexual misconduct allegations against men in power since an October expose of movie mogul Harvey Weinstein by the New York Times.

Fierro said he decided to tell Calderon about the incident because of Garcia’s outspokenness in the #MeToo movement, which references the social media campaign used by millions to tell personal experiences with sexual harassment.

“If the person leading the charge on it isn’t credible it just ends up hurting the credibility of these very real stories,” Fierro told the AP.

Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, a Democrat, said in a statement he is directing human resources to reach out to Garcia’s staff to make sure they feel safe.

“I trust that while the investigation proceeds, Assemblymember Garcia will respond appropriately and in a way that fortifies the Legislature’s effort to create a new climate,” he said.

Fierro, who was 25 at the time, said he was interviewed by an outside law firm hired by the Assembly Rules Committee last Friday. Politico also reported that a lobbyist who declined to be named claimed Garcia made crude sexual comments and tried to grab his crotch at a 2017 fundraiser.

(OH! Now we have multiple accusers! And in the latest news we have new allegations of sexual impropriety from 4 other staffers who quit for various reasons. SHE is apparently a criminal! AND HYPOCRITE!)

Garcia was elected in 2012 and has carved out a name as a champion of women’s issues and environmental health for poor communities and chairs the Women’s Caucus.

(Author Christina Hoff-Somers details the hypocrisy of these “champions of women`s issues” in her book “Who Stole Feminism”. Hoff-Sumers details numerous instances of falsified statistics and radically altered interpretations of law and the rules of evidence by feminists in order to create the appearance of a crisis! U of T professor Jordan Peterson is under personal attack for pointing out that the values being taught in various colleges and universities are entirely at odds with main stream public opinion! And a teaching assistant at Laurier University was nearly fired for daring to present a fair and open clip of a debate played on TVO/The Agenda- the rather popular talk show that does a fine job of discussing events in an open and honest fashion! To condemn The Agenda as morally wrong for merely discussing a contentious issue is to condemn western civilization and democracy! Refusing even to allow honest discussion is the hallmark of Fascists- exactly the kind of people now infesting our schools!)

Democratic Sen. Connie Leyva, co-chair of the women’s caucus, said she was “shocked and disturbed” at the allegations and she will ask the group to meet soon to discuss Garcia’s fate as leader.

Garcia’s photo was featured in Time Magazine’s Person of the Year issue on being one of the “Silence Breakers” on sexual harassment.

“I refuse to work with (Assemblyman Raul Bocanegra) and anyone who takes part in harassment or assault,” she tweeted in October after it was reported Bocanegra had been disciplined in 2009 for groping a colleague. Bocanegra later resigned after more women made public accusations.

Garcia was a fierce advocate for legislation signed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Monday giving legislative staff members whistleblower protections for reporting sexual misconduct or other misbehaviour, speaking at a rally on the Capitol steps after its passage. She’s tweeted repeatedly about the importance of sexual consent in recent days.

Fierro and the lobbyist said it appeared Garcia was inebriated at the time of the encounters.

(It occurs to me to ask: ”just how damned ENTITLED do all these horn dog politicians think they are anyway” Apparently these Hogs see nothing wrong with wining and dining on the govt gravy train and then grabbing at any erogenous zone that catches their eye! How PIGGISH are they? And why should we put up with them at all? Replace them all- there are LOTS of other new candidates waiting in the wings! Vote early and vote often-SCREW ALL THE HOGS!)

In a November interview with AP about alcohol-fueled fundraisers and other after-work events that are a part of regular business in Sacramento, Garcia said blaming alcohol isn’t an acceptable excuse for sexually inappropriate behaviour. It’s men who chose to misbehave, not the social events themselves, that create the problems, she said.

(And what about the women who also misbehave? Oh we don’t want to discuss them- it might make women look bad! Women trading on their looks is as old as time!)

“I would say that most of the public realizes that our job is based on relationships, and so we are expected to go out there and socialize,” she said. “I think our public also expects us to hold ourselves to a higher standard.”

The Assembly committee said last week that eight allegations of sexual harassment are pending in the Assembly but did not divulge any names. Debra Gravert, the chief administrative officer, didn’t respond to an email from AP seeking clarifation whether Fierro’s allegation is one of the eight pending. Fierro said he was contacted by Rules several days after telling Calderon about the incident for an initial interview before speaking with outside lawyers for more than an hour last week.

Fierro, of Cerritos, left the Assembly in 2016 and now runs a communications firm. Calderon, his former boss, is now the majority leader. Lerna Shirinian, Calderon’s communications director, said Fierro told her about the incident right after it happened.

“He was in shock, I was in shock — but the culture was very different back then,” Shirinian told Politico.
 
taxslave
#10
SO why hasn't Garcia been suspended from her position yet? Double standards?
 
Tecumsehsbones
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by taxslave View Post

SO why hasn't Garcia been suspended from her position yet? Double standards?

Because you can't suspend elected representatives, moron.
 
Kreskin
#12
Trumps lawyer will cover his settlement. That is, if the Mexicans haven't already paid for it.
 
spilledthebeer
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by Kreskin View Post

Trumps lawyer will cover his settlement. That is, if the Mexicans haven't already paid for it.

Oh....double standard is the rule of the day!


Here is an example of the kind of nonsense being spouted about the Patrick Brown case by LIE-berals and their allies as they seek frantically for some way of salvaging even a small part of Ontari-owe LIE-beral fortune as we head towards that June 2018 election. With some comments of my own in brackets):

By Katherine Ward, Reporter/Videographer, CTV News Barrie at KWardCTV

Published Friday, January 26, 2018 5:13PM EST. Last Updated Friday, January 26, 2018 7:08PM EST

In a world where the wheels of justice often turn slowly, the courtroom of public opinion is much quicker to convict.

Brown’s sister calls sexual misconduct allegations a ‘political hit’. Shock and support: Politicians, residents react to allegations made against Patrick Brown

As soon as the sexual misconduct allegations surfaced against Patrick Brown, his inner team quit. A last minute news conference was held, and Brown condemned the claims, but within hours he stepped down as Progressive Conservative leader.

“We pre-judge people, we hear an allegation, we cast somebody off the planet, and we don't give them a fair shake, says legal expert Ari Goldkind.

(Goldkind is being wildy naive here- sexual allegations are toxic in our current political climate- with long time politician Brown being well aware of the toxic soup he has been dumped into. So- for the good of his party he has left the scene- taking his closest advisers with him to ensure that party policy remains at centre stage rather than allegations about his personal life!)

He says these anonymous allegations will never be brought to a courtroom.

“No police person will ever lay a charge here. They cannot sue him for anything because he's not done anything. He can also not sue them. Why? Because I think they are actually telling the truth of their claim.”

(How nice- HYPOCRITE Goldkind offers up a verdict without ANY witness speaking and without ANY evidence being presented! Goldkind is offering up legal suicide masquerading as a polite defence! Just HOW will Brown defend himself anyway- this IS the key question? His 2 accusers walked into a news media office and offered up ANONYMOUS alleged inside information about Brown- and NOTE THIS- they did NOT speak to police about incidents alleged to have happened over a decade ago! The timing alone makes the matter HUGELY suspect- 5 months before an election that LIE-berals are widely expected to lose- 2 ANONYMOUS women make this damaging allegation against the man who might have become premier!)

(These women did not make their accusation in a legal forum- so NO charge for perjury if they are ever found to be liars. They made their accusation anonymously to news media notorious for hostility to Cdn Conservatives such as Brown- and LIE-beral loving news media DOES like to protect its sources- to ensure a continued flow of juicy allegations from unidentified sources so what will it take for Brown to actually identify his accusers? The 2 women anonymous women are currently protected by the media with no legal way to pry loose the names!)

(And what if Brown does get the names of his accusers? What then? Over ten years ago the Toronto Red Star quoted an Ontari-owe judge who said a typical libel lawsuit of this sort would cost well over $50,000 dollars- and might easily now run over $100 grand, so let us assume Brown does go to court and does win- want to bet his accusers own NOTHING? Brown can win every argument and prove every point and still collect NOTHING in either court costs or damages either! He will be forever tainted by political ghosts with no legal exorcism available!)

(Browns accusers can ANONYMOUSLY lie their heads off with no repercussions. In the event of a court battle, Browns accusers can rally an army of feminazis to donate all manner of support including financial aid for a legal defence while Brown is on his own for fees and costs. If Brown sues he may find his enemies have deeper pockets than he does and will drag this out till he is forced to quit trying to clear his name due to bankruptcy! This is a civil matter and it proceeds ONLY as long as Brown can PAY!)

(If Brown sues for defamation HE is the one who Must prove he has been unfairly injured- and the proof he gives MUST be beyond doubt- his accusers DO NOT have to prove anything- all they need is for Brown to fail to provide an ironclad case for events alleged to have occurred over a decade ago- with NO evidence remaining- and his accusers and their LIE-beral media enablers can walk away LAUGHING! Brown must prove that his word alone is more reliable than that of TWO ACCUSERS who have all the leisure time they need to cooperate in producing a story- that may or not be true! These people will NOT make a repeat of the absurd Ghian Ghomeshi trial- we can be assured that lawyers will study the Ghomeshi trial seeking weaknesses to learn from and shore up and repair in this Brown Case! There is no justice to be had in this legal crap! The ONLY winners will be the lawyers bleeding Brown dry with their fees! )

Goldkind says Brown has to be the first person to fight back, adding that most reasonable, well-informed people would support him.

(Oh really? And that “support” would look like what exactly? Would he get help with his MASSIVE legal fees generated while chasing ghosts that MAY have their home base in LIE-beral headquarters? What support could Brown look for- other than to have people HOPE the truth will come out? There is no evidence of ANYTHING here- no smoking gun- no fingerprints- no evidence of any kind- just he said and she said and that is no evidence at all! Who would spend $50 grand or a $100 grand just to have a judge state the obvious: that there is NO evidence to decide this case! THIS IS WHY the 2 women went to news media rather than to cops! You cannot be charged with perjury by speaking in a media office! You cannot be charged with obstructing police if you do not make a formal legal complaint! But you CAN make damaging accusations in a media office and walk away LAUGHING- secure in the knowledge that nobody will EVER catch you!)

(As some other poster asked earlier: “how much did LIE-berals pay to a pair of sex trade workers to smear Browns reputation just before the election”? We will never know the truth and Brown will never be free of this taint! And if that other cynical poster is right about LIE-berals paying the 2 women then Wynne-bag- the most hated premier in Cdn History will still be defeated in the June election but she will have the satisfaction of dragging Brown down with her!)

(And would LIE-berals stoop to paying 2 women to smear Brown this way? The LIE-beral party that has been repeatedly described as the most corrupt in Cdn history? The LIE-beral Party that wasted a billion dollars on gas plants- and LIED about it and got hauled into court and CONVICTED on that? The LIE-beral Party that bribed a Sudbury MPP and escaped being convicted on that one because of word games and semantics- in that the MPP they bribed was NO LONGER an MPP/candidate- LIE-berals had already fired him and chosen another candidate to run- and the bribe was therefore offered only to a FORMER politician as a sop to the local riding organization to make sure the old candidate had some money till he could find other work- so it WAS BRIBERY in the minds of ordinary Cdns but LIE-berals got away with it on a technicality! And what of the three billion dollar adscam theft by federal LIE-berals under LIE-beral Chretien- if you can steal three billion dollars frmo tax payers then how hard is it to offer up a couple hundred grand to a couple of bimboes to persuade them to go into a media outlet and tell a dirty story about somebody who is powerless to legally defend his name?)

“The growing trend has to, at some point, face backlash. I can think of no better story than the Patrick Brown one,” he says.

“I would say don't spend a dollar on a lawyer, or a PR person. Be the first person that the mob is kicking off the planet, to actually fight back. Don't turtle, be the leader that you've always said you are. Stand up and answer every question.”

(Answer the questions, the legal weasel advises? WHAT QUESTIONS? The only people asking anything are media reporters and the only ONE question being asked is this: “IS it true”? And Brown- humiliated and legally impotent in that he currently has not even the right to know the identity of his attackers- has insisted it is NOT TRUE! Again- there is NO justice to be had in this crap that MAY have been inspired by his LIE-beral enemies- the ones repeatedly described in our news media as the most corrupt govt in Canadian history!)

Some people in the Barrie area are still on Brown’s side.

“We're supposed to be innocent until if, if, and I say if in a big word, if we are found guilty. And it just seems like everyone is thinking guilty. I certainly don't. I stand by you, Patrick Brown,” one person said.

“It all seems like they have jumped on the bandwagon to crucify him, so they better well be right,” another Barrie resident added.

Goldkind says in his opinion, Brown now has a rare opportunity.

(I suggest that Goldkind has displayed the sort of values that make people smile whenever they hear that Shakespeare quote about “first, we kill all the lawyers”!)

Goldkin says: “He's faced with an opportunity. Does he turtle, does he disappear does he become a coward when he really hasn't done anything? Or does he come up and take the heat, answer the questions and rehabilitate and image that two anonymous hidden accusers have destroyed?”

(And the TRUE question is: does he drink from the poisoned legal cup that ambulance chasers such as Goldkin offers him? Will Brown go chasing legal unicorns and rainbows as Goldkin suggests he should? Or will Brown ride into history books as the first major Cdn politician to be destroyed by an unproved allegation?)