2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics


I think not
#1
Venue cost of Vancouver 2010 Games up to $580M

CTV.ca News Staff

The cost of building venues for the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics has jumped to $580 million, pushing the cost of the Games up by 23 per cent.

Vancouver Olympic Organizing Committee CEO John Furlong said the $110-million increase is a product of the city's thriving building industry.

"There have been very significant increases in venue construction costs in B.C. since our initial capital budget was set," Furlong said at a news conference on Friday.

The booming construction market has caused a shortage of skilled workers and pushed construction costs up by an average of nine per cent in 2004, Furlong said.

From the total capital budget of $620 million, the Olympic organizing committee had originally earmarked $470 million for construction.

But Furlong said the construction estimates were calculated in 2002 dollars as required by the International Olympic Committee, with no adjustment for inflation or expected cost increases allowed.

The original project costs did not include major upgrading of a highway from Vancouver to the Whistler ski resort and a mass transit line between the Pacific Coast city's airport and downtown area. Both projects are now underway.

The Olympic committee is dealing with a situation that is also affecting builders and developers in the Vancouver area, according to one industry professional.

"They're looking for the skilled workers and they're going to be impacted by global demands on construction materials like every other project," Keith Sashaw of the Vancouver Construction Association told CTV Vancouver.

Shortfall

To cover the shortfall, Furlong said VANOC has formally requested an extra $55 million each from the federal and B.C. provincial governments.

Both governments have already pledged $310 million each toward the Games.

Any debt from the Games is supposed to be paid for by the B.C. provincial government.

Furlong said he believes the Games can be completed within a $139-million contingency fund created to cover potential cost over-runs.

Furlong said the new construction figure was finalized after the committee was able to find ways of cutting costs elsewhere.

"Understanding the heated construction environment we are operating in, our team spent the past two years rigorously examining every potential savings and efficiency," he told reporters.

"We've identified $85 million in venue cost efficiencies so far."

Warning

Furlong has repeatedly warned that the original budget for venues wasn't enough to meet rising construction and material costs.

"All along, our goal has been to find a way to deliver the magnificent venues we promised the world while trying to find savings and economies in every single project," he added.

Furlong said a study showed that the capital budget for the Olympics would have risen by 41 per cent, or $195 million, if savings weren't found on venues.

"I can tell you that we have been successful in keeping the cost increase in our venue construction program well below the 41 per cent increase projected in our consultant's report."

Furlong pledged organizers will do everything in their power to avoid further cost increases.

"We know conditions could change and so we're looking at every project and continuing to look for refinements, reductions in scope if we can do that and we're prepared to make the tough decisions to make the project work," Furlong told CTV Newsnet.

Furlong also said the organizing committee wanted to delay releasing the revised budget projection until after the Jan 23. federal election.

Link
 
Kreskin
#2
If the games are organized properly and show off Vancouver, the spinoffs will exceed any amount of cost overruns.

The Barcelona games were burdened with cost overruns but the city went from being a 2nd rate European metropolis to a modern, thriving European city. It was 16th on list of of visitor destinations prior to the Olympics. Now it is 3rd, only behind London and Paris. I have heard figures that those extra tourism dollars are 5+ times the costs of putting on their entire Olympic games, overruns and all.

Look what the World's Fair did for Vancouver. We already know what happens when the world sees the most beautiful city on Earth.

I say bring it on at any cost.
 
Olympicfan
#3
Here's the official link of Vancouver 2010. www.vancouver2010.com

Have a nice day!
 
Johnny Utah
#4
Why wasn't it held at Calgary again? Calgary still has the facilities from the 88 games that are still seen as in top condition.
 
Hank C
#5
I know, we already have everything here. Plus we dont have all the silly hippies getting in the way of highway expansion and other projects
 
#juan
#6
The Olympics in Montreal

were said to be one of the best Olympics. The Calgary Olympics were said to be the best in several decades. The B.E. Games in Vancouver, where Banister ran the first four minute mile were were lauded as the best of those games. Expo 86 was the best worlds fair for some time and one of the only ones to make money.

I think Vancouver will do well and make us proud. I'm looking forward to it.
 
Hank C
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by #juan

The Olympics in Montreal

were said to be one of the best Olympics. The Calgary Olympics were said to be the best in several decades. The B.E. Games in Vancouver, where Banister ran the first four minute mile were were lauded as the best of those games. Expo 86 was the best worlds fair for some time and one of the only ones to make money.

I think Vancouver will do well and make us proud. I'm looking forward to it.

I agree Vancouver will be great.......although I would of preferred Toronto get the 2012 summer games.
 

Similar Threads

161
The 2010 Charade (Winter Olympics)
by JLM | Feb 28th, 2010
29
2010 Winter Olympics Worst Ever?
by Bar Sinister | Feb 23rd, 2010
20
Our Canadian-American 2010 Winter Olympics
by Liberalman | Feb 15th, 2010
12