Gun Control is Completely Useless.
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
My brother spent a summer or two and many quarts of blood surveying a new route "up the mountain" for the main line of the CPR when they flooded a portion of the Columbia River. He lived in a portable in a place called Donald Station and returned to the world with one leg longer than the other and new respect for mosquitos the size of pterodactyls.
I'm vaguely familiar with it, Donald Station is 20 miles north of Golden, the terrain is steep and the bugs are bad.
Are you really that dumb? The Glock 20 was designed for law enforcement and security. They are designed to serve and protect.
Well, they served and protected the hell out of Timothy Russell and Malissa Williams.
How do they achieve that "Enforcement and Security"? What aspect of a Glock creates those bi-products?
That was a car chase where the car backfired. The designers of the chevy malibu did not carefully design the car for drivers that wont pull over.
Where are you going with this? You don't believe that a gun is a peace keeping tool for law enforcement? If so, I suggest you move to London, they use billy clubs there.
Austrian engineers are meeting daily, discussing the concept of a new, light weight product made out of polymers.
What characteristics should it have? What should it be capable of doing? Do you think they said
"It needs to serve and protect. We need to make a product to bring Enforcement and Security to the world"
"Hans? Ve're going to make a polymer satellite?"
Nein, nein.
That's not how it works. That's not what it does. The Austrian engineers (contracted for the Austrian Army) likely never even thought of your design criteria ... not likely for a single second, would they have.
Is one of your legs longer than the other?
Do your lungs oxygenate your blood faster than the rest of ours?
No you suddenly sit up straight in your sleep when a 150 car unit train roars through town?
Do you wait for ionospheric radio skip at night to hear cowboy music from Texas?
This is just an example of you trying to move the goal posts again. You have said "designed to kill" and I said "designed to serve and protect".
"kill" "serve" and "protect" are all action words so suck it.
What is the primary design criterion of a pistol?
It's a really simple question with a really simple, truthful answer and "for truth, justice and the American way" is not an answer.
What is the primary design criterion of an automobile? (hint: it is different).
The MOTOR contains and controls the expanding gases thereby protecting the operator.
That is not the reason to design one. That describes a part of the mechanism.
You do not design automobiles to contain expanding gasses.
I think you don't have a big picture view on this. Both inventions stem from the science of fire. Almost everything does. Forged steal knives? yep, fire.
We'll I guess you could make a car that is pulled by a horse. It's definitely been done.