AG Bill Barr Appoints U.S. Attorney John Durham Re Origin of Russia Investigation

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
NO TROLL FARM - US JUDGE!!!​

Federal judge has issued a significant rebuke of a core Mueller claim. Mueller claims that the IRA -- a Russian troll farm -- was the 2nd of "two principal interference operations" by Russian gov't. But as judge notes, Mueller's implied link between IRA & Russian gov't was false:

More
This is a major blow not just to Mueller but to the entire "Russian Active Measures" talking point. As the judge acknowledges, the IRA (which, btw, put out juvenile clickbait mostly unrelated to the election) is a private entity & Mueller never establishes a Kremlin connection.

I point out this disconnect in my latest piece: Mueller says the social media operation was the 2nd major component of a "sweeping and systematic" Russian gov't interference campaign -- yet he never actually shows how it's connected to the Russian gov't.

https://t.co/04tKUmNw4Q

This inconsistency, confirmed by a DC judge, raises new Qs about the validity of Mueller's claim of a "sweeping and systematic" Russian gov't interference campaign. If Mueller was disingenuous in falsely trying to link it to Russian gov't, what else was he disingenuous about?

54 replies 963 retweets 1,913 likes
Reply 54 Retweet 963 Like 1.9K
https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1148581532598198273

Poor brain dead cliffy - Not one thought of his own, just faknews echos playing through his head like dog farts in a garbage bag....LOOK NO TROLL FARM!!!!!
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
https://scontent.fyka1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/66186806_2568246976539764_3305879397663244288_n.jpg?_nc_cat=105&_nc_eui2=AeGDCin3Uk_4DJURCylTiNr0aPzSCoxdxj04APSCaKhPY4qCiCf5ZovwFlK1sEzwMqw1y5Qdf3hEqMJCArqnP_XU31rkA2j2h5cDy9g_vDf_7g&_nc_oc=AQkqqmXrEZ2HaBq713dc8Vny9JN3TEKxz4IFaSKRC01cDltQj3wwrY3fEjmIPZQshSQ&_nc_ht=scontent.fyka1-1.fna&oh=437d8b682d8cf555acdd883c232c42f4&oe=5DC65468


?????
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Mueller Admits NO OBSTRUCTION Of Investigation Occurred
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJQzkAORNc4&t=1s


Revealed: Mueller Didn’t Interview Russiagate Originator

OH boy, Mueller gets it right in the face from jim jordan...you won't see this on TV.

Mifsud the guy who started this whole deal with a false statement in the first place, lied to the FBI and was never charged...Muller is saying I can't tell you about that, bla bla bla, and Jordan after mentioning all the people that Mueller charged for making false statements, asks how come he didn't charge Mifsud for lying, and points out IT'S ALL IN THE REPORT ALREADY...DUH!
 
Last edited:

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
S'okay.

There will be an investigation of the Barr-Durham conspiracy after Trump and his merry band of flaming assholes is gone.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,565
7,076
113
Washington DC
Speaking of investigations. . .

Senior Justice Department officials have concluded that former FBI director James B. Comey should not be charged in connection with his handling of memos documenting conversations with President Trump, according to people familiar with the matter.

The determination comes amid ongoing internal reviews focused on federal authorities’ investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and the Trump campaign. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is conducting one of the reviews, is unlikely to produce a final report on that subject for at least a month, but one aspect of his work is largely complete, these people say: Comey’s handling of the memos.

Deciding not to charge the former FBI director, who has become an outspoken critic of President Trump since Trump fired him in May 2017, was “not a close call,” said a person who was not authorized to discuss the investigation and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Speaking of investigations. . .
Senior Justice Department officials have concluded that former FBI director James B. Comey should not be charged in connection with his handling of memos documenting conversations with President Trump, according to people familiar with the matter.
The determination comes amid ongoing internal reviews focused on federal authorities’ investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and the Trump campaign. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is conducting one of the reviews, is unlikely to produce a final report on that subject for at least a month, but one aspect of his work is largely complete, these people say: Comey’s handling of tuhe memos.
Deciding not to charge the former FBI director, who has become an outspoken critic of President Trump since Trump fired him in May 2017, was “not a close call,” said a person who was not authorized to discuss the investigation and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
He swing the election to Trump'rs favour in a mere 24 hours or so.

A grateful Trump remembers?

Nah.

Gratitude would not be part of Trump's repertoire.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,634
6,977
113
B.C.
Speaking of investigations. . .

Senior Justice Department officials have concluded that former FBI director James B. Comey should not be charged in connection with his handling of memos documenting conversations with President Trump, according to people familiar with the matter.

The determination comes amid ongoing internal reviews focused on federal authorities’ investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and the Trump campaign. Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is conducting one of the reviews, is unlikely to produce a final report on that subject for at least a month, but one aspect of his work is largely complete, these people say: Comey’s handling of the memos.

Deciding not to charge the former FBI director, who has become an outspoken critic of President Trump since Trump fired him in May 2017, was “not a close call,” said a person who was not authorized to discuss the investigation and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Whether accurate or not, don’t you just love unnamed sources ? Is that unnamed anonymous source close to the investigation, breaking any laws leaking this information ?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
New text messages reveal MI-5 & FBI colluded in Trump soft coup

The Duran
Published on Aug 3, 2019

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 264.

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss newly surfaced text
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0LwKUC2k9w&t=13s

The exchanges underscore a sensitive issue in the US – namely the role foreign intelligence services played in the FBI’s decision to initiate an investigation into the Trump campaign.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...cast-light-uk-early-role-trump-russia-inquiry
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
TREASON!
GAME CHANGING Transcript Between Papadopoulos and Stephan Halper
Confirmed Dems WORST FEARS​

Cristina Laila from The Gateway Pundit reports, Retired Congressman Trey Gowdy on Sunday called for the transcript of Papadopoulos’s September 2016 meeting with Deep State spy Stephan Halper to be released.

TRANSCRIPTS. EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.

Which should have been given to the fisa court.

OH boy.