Mueller report is in..

Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,361
5,766
113
Twin Moose Creek
Where is the indictments sealed or unsealed? Is there enough to proceed into impeachment? Is it more than enough to be blamed on a rookie non politician with a rookie team giving him bad advice? I know it said not enough evidence to indict and to much to exonerate, let's see how congress makes out with it.
 
C

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Twin_Moose said:
Where is the indictments sealed or unsealed? Is there enough to proceed into impeachment? Is it more than enough to be blamed on a rookie non politician with a rookie team giving him bad advice? I know it said not enough evidence to indict and to much to exonerate, let's see how congress makes out with it.
Click to expand...
You mean are there any more iductments beyond the 34 generated by the Meuller probe so far?

http://time.com/5556331/mueller-investigation-indictments-guilty-pleas/

Don't forget that several items were spun off to the state of New York where Trump in not protected from prosecution by the Constitution.
 
Tecumsehsbones

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,567
7,076
113
Washington DC
Twin_Moose said:
Where is the indictments sealed or unsealed? Is there enough to proceed into impeachment? Is it more than enough to be blamed on a rookie non politician with a rookie team giving him bad advice? I know it said not enough evidence to indict and to much to exonerate, let's see how congress makes out with it.
Click to expand...
It's been Justice Department policy, from which Mueller was not permitted to deviate, that the President cannot be indicted, since 1990.

You are an ignoramus, aren't you? Fortunately (for you), it doesn't detract from your conviction that you have the first clue what's going on here.
 
Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,361
5,766
113
Twin Moose Creek
Ocean Breeze

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,362
60
48
It's been Justice Department policy, from which Mueller was not permitted to deviate, that the President cannot be indicted, since 1990.
Click to expand...

Why was this established to begin with??
 
Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,361
5,766
113
Twin Moose Creek
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...avoid-statute-limitations-expiring-ncna956841


So, a decision by the government to indict a sitting president under seal coupled with a failure to do anything about it — to initiate trial proceedings or to litigate the question of whether a sitting president can be charged with a crime — could run into Sixth Amendment headwinds. It is not clear that the government would lose under these circumstances, but it could.
By the way, you might be familiar with some of the Department of Justice lawyers involved in the Doggett case when it was argued in the Supreme Court. The solicitor general on the Doggett brief filed in the Supreme Court was a gentleman by the name of Ken Starr. And the high-ranking assistant attorney general who argued the case the first time in the Supreme Court in 1991 (before it was reargued in 1992) was a gentleman by the name of Bob Mueller
Click to expand...

So they technically need to impeach him first, so is there enough to impeach him T-bones?
 
pgs

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,636
6,979
113
B.C.
Hoid said:
We'll see how much of a ground swell there is for impeachment.

I think ultimately that Barr has done a disservice to his boss on this one. As Warren and OAC and the rest of the progs dig deeper into the report they will no doubt want to go after President Pee Pee Tape.

Warren is already trying to drum up support and I don't think she will have a lot of trouble doing so.
Click to expand...
Do you have a copy of this peepee tape you continue to talk about ?
 
pgs

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,636
6,979
113
B.C.
Ocean Breeze said:

Trump seethes, blames ex-White House counsel after Mueller report relies on notes from White House aides


A day after the special counsel��s report offered a portrayal of President Trump��s protracted campaign to thwart the Russia investigation, Trump directed much of his ire at former White House counsel Donald McGahn, whose ubiquity in the report��s footnotes laid bare his extensive cooperation in chronicling the president��s actions.

Some of the report��s most derogatory scenes were attributed not only to the recollections of McGahn and other witnesses, but also to the contemporaneous notes kept by several senior administration officials �� the kind of paper trail that Trump has long sought to avoid leaving.


the bloke is angry and explosive...... NEVER taking responsibility for anything......... NOT fit for the job. Don't think he is fit for any job....He simply cannot work WITH others. He has to rule them and then discard them if they don't comply to his pathological whims and wishes. his disciples seem to like that. They certainly overlook his pathological lying.as if it is the "new normal"
Click to expand...
Drain the swamp .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom