A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics.

A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics.
==
Physics is created on some fundamental basis.
At first the basis was an absolute space and an absolute time.
But after discovering SRT, GRT, QT -* Newtonian basis was changed:
there isn't* absolute space, there isn't* absolute time.
In this situation scientists decided that universe was started
from ''singular point'' (big bang theory).* Most believe in such scenario.
A few don't believe.* Why?
a) Gravity forces are the weakest in nature and cannot
create ''singular point'' in the region as big as the whole Universe.
Gravity forces don't work even in a single galaxy and therefore were
invented unseen - unknown ''dark matter-energy''
(more than 90%-95%* in the universe)
b) Which force created ''big-bang'' is unknown.
c) ''big bang theory'' doesn't explain the principal problem:
''where did masses come from?''
#
Some physicists think: universe can start from vacuum.
Why?
a) About vacuum effect:
a) “ Its effects can be observed in various phenomena
(such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect, the
van der Waals bonds, or the Lamb shift), and it is thought
to have consequences for the behavior of the Universe
on cosmological scales. “
/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy /

b)* Light Created from a Vacuum:
Casimir Effect Observed in Superconducting Circuit
/Science Daily (Nov. 18, 2011) /
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 133050.htm
#
Chalmers scientists create light from vacuum
http://www.chalmers.se/en/news/Pages/Ch ... acuum.aspx
#
Then i can think:
if vacuum can somehow create light and particles
then it is possible that universe started from vacuum.
Is this idea gibberish?
Is this idea illogical ?
By the way,* Paul Dirac* wrote:
” The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,*
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
And* Einstein and Infeld*quote:
“ We have the laws, but we are not aware what the body
of reference system they belong to, and all our physical
construction appears erected on sand ”.
* /* Book “Evolution of Physics”*/
=====

In the era of Newtonian physics the materialism
was deterministic world.
In the era of Quantum physics the materialism
is probability world.
====

The fundamental basis in philosophy of science.
Modern philosophy of science says:
a) 27% of matter in the universe is dark-matter
(we have no idea what it is )
b) 68% of energy in the universe is dark-energy
(we have no idea what it is )
c) there are many black-holes
(we have no idea how many they are )
d) ≈ 5% of matter in the universe is normal-matter
( we don't know everything about this normal-matter)
#
That is our so called ''philosophical knowledge''
Welcome to the era of precision ignorance.
======

What does modern Physics say about reality?
Modern physics says about reality,
you have modern technology and strange philosophy.
===

Emptiness and Space
Earth space is almost ''empty''
but it is a big theater stage on which the events take place
Atom's space is almost ''empty''
But it is fulled with electric / nuclear force
Cosmic space is almost ''empty''
but it has enormous matter / stuff
Vacuum space is almost ''empty''
but ''virtual particles'' exist there, which have possibility
to effect ''normal-matter''.
#
Don't ignore ''Emptiness''
Every emptiness has something important.
====

socratus said:

Emptiness and Space
Earth space is almost ''empty''
but it is a big theater stage on which the events take place
Atom's space is almost ''empty''
But it is fulled with electric / nuclear force
Cosmic space is almost ''empty''
but it has enormous matter / stuff
Vacuum space is almost ''empty''
but ''virtual particles'' exist there, which have possibility
to effect ''normal-matter''.
#
Don't ignore ''Emptiness''
Every emptiness has something important.
====

Click to expand...

Tao Te Ching Chapter 11 (written in 500 BC )

"Thirty spokes surround one nave,
the usefulness of the wheel is always in that empty innermost.
You fashion clay to make a bowl,
the usefulness of the bowl is always in that empty innermost.
You cut out doors and windows to make a house,
their usefulness to a house is always in their empty space.
Therefore profit comes from external form,
but usefulness comes from the empty innermost."
- Translated by Isabella Mears, 1916,

Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======

socratus said:

Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======

Click to expand...

1 - Dirac's theory has reference frame of vacuum
and therefore (-E=Mc^2)
2 - Einstein's SRT postulate has reference frame
of vacuum and therefore speed is ( c=1)
3 - Theory of Ideal gas has reference frame of vacuum
but theoretical quantum physics ignores this framework.
========

socratus said:

1 - Dirac's theory has reference frame of vacuum
and therefore (-E=Mc^2)
2 - Einstein's SRT postulate has reference frame
of vacuum and therefore speed is ( c=1)
3 - Theory of Ideal gas has reference frame of vacuum
but theoretical quantum physics ignores this framework.
========

Click to expand...

The theory of ideal gas is not an ''abstract theory'' or
only ''useful as a simple approximation''
It is useful as Real theory about situation in the Vacuum.
The quantum particles have their source in the Vacuum.
The real particles appear from Vacuum.
(Casimir effect, Lamb shift, vacuum's fluctuation . . ..etc)
#
To understand itself, Quantum physics must be united
with Thermodynamics of Ideal gas
(this is a missed idea in modern physics)
========

Dark Matter = Quantum Cosmology = Gravity
===
1- Dark matter doesn't emit or absorb light.
2 - Dark matter works only via gravity
3 - Dark matter is extremely cold
4 - Dark matter is extremely weak (the weakest stuff)
5 - Dark matter doesn't carry electric charge
6 - Dark matter is passive / neutral stuff
7 - Dark matter consists of (unknown) elementary particles
8 - Dark matter is much more than ordinary matter
9 - Dark matter must have some interaction with ordinary matter
10 - Dark matter can have non-gravitational interactions
11 - Dark matter must have own sector of existence
===
Ordinary matter interacts through the electromagnetic,
weak and strong forces -- helping the visual matter
of our world to form complex systems
Stars, rocks, oceans, plants and animals owe their
very existence to the unity of the non-gravitational
(EM, weak, strong) forces with ordinary matter.
Familiar picture can be thought of interaction
between antiparticles (antimatter) and dark matter
Antiparticles (as EM forces) 10^36 times stronger
than weak particles of dark matter and therefore
can involve it in a process of ''quantum gravity'',
the earliest state of creation our material World.
#
Scientists search a real / potential candidate for dark matter
=====

Curious Cdn said:

Dark matter matters.

Click to expand...

it sounds poetical

Dark Energy = Cosmic Zero Vacuum
===
1 - Dark energy is an essential part of cosmology today
2 - Dark energy is just pure energy
3 - In the early state of universe's evolution Dark energy
was dominated
4 - Dark energy is not relative, it is constant structure / stuff . . .
5 - Dark energy permeates the universe
6 - Dark energy distribution is always smooth
7 - Dark energy does not become more dilute when
the universe expands
8 - Dark energy exists even if no actual particles or other
stuff is around
9 - Dark energy is not carried by particles or matter
10 - The density (cosmological constant) of Dark energy is very low
11 - The density of Dark energy is the same everywhere, remains
the same over time (it can be no denser in one region than another)
12 - Dark energy is very different from dark matter, which
collects into objects and will be denser in some place
than in others
#
My opinion
All these proportions have the Cosmic Zero Vacuum (T=0K)
=======
REFERENCE
Book: Dark matter and the Dinosaurs
by Lisa Randall
=====

socratus said:

Dark Energy = Cosmic Zero Vacuum
===
1 - Dark energy is an essential part of cosmology today
2 - Dark energy is just pure energy
3 - In the early state of universe's evolution Dark energy
was dominated
4 - Dark energy is not relative, it is constant structure / stuff . . .
5 - Dark energy permeates the universe
6 - Dark energy distribution is always smooth
7 - Dark energy does not become more dilute when
the universe expands
8 - Dark energy exists even if no actual particles or other
stuff is around
9 - Dark energy is not carried by particles or matter
10 - The density (cosmological constant) of Dark energy is very low
11 - The density of Dark energy is the same everywhere, remains
the same over time (it can be no denser in one region than another)
12 - Dark energy is very different from dark matter, which
collects into objects and will be denser in some place
than in others
#
My opinion
All these proportions have the Cosmic Zero Vacuum (T=0K)
=======
REFERENCE
Book: Dark matter and the Dinosaurs
by Lisa Randall
=====

Click to expand...

Another hidden scenario of Zero Vacuum
1 - A black hole has a temperature within a few
millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K
/ Oxford. Dictionary./
2 - A stellar black hole of one solar mass has a Hawking
temperature of about 100 nanokelvins. This is far less
than the 2.7 K temperature of the cosmic microwave background
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
3 - Previous Picture of the Day articles about black holes
suggested that the terminology used to describe
“gravitational point sources” is highly speculative: space/time,
singularities, and infinite densityare abstract concepts,
precluding a realistic investigation into the nature of the Universe.
/ Black hole theory contradicts itself, by Stephen Smith. Oct 12, 2011 /
4.
Book: ''' Stephan Hawking, A life in science,''
/ by Michael White and John Gribbin./
#
''Together with Brandon Carter and Jim Bardeen, Hawking
wrote a paper, published in Communications in Mathematical
Physics , pointing out . . . . . the team commented,
'' In fact the effective temperature of a black hole is
absolute zero . . . . No radiation could be emitted from the hole.''
/ page 156./
But later (!) , . . using concept of entropy and
Heisenberg uncertainty principle and quantum fluctuations (!)
Hawking changed his mind and wrote that black hole can emit
( Hawking radiation )
#
So, in the beginning (according to calculations) the ''black hole''
had absolute zero temperature T=0K but . . . thanks to entropy,
HUP and quantum fluctuations (Hawking radiations) was arisen.
In others words:
''black holes'' are micro- scheme of absolute zero vacuum: T=0K
''black hole'' is only another name of the ''true vacuum'' : T=0K
=========

socratus said:

Another hidden scenario of Zero Vacuum
1 - A black hole has a temperature within a few
millionths of a degree above absolute zero: T=0K
/ Oxford. Dictionary./
2 - A stellar black hole of one solar mass has a Hawking
temperature of about 100 nanokelvins. This is far less
than the 2.7 K temperature of the cosmic microwave background
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
3 - Previous Picture of the Day articles about black holes
suggested that the terminology used to describe
“gravitational point sources” is highly speculative: space/time,
singularities, and infinite densityare abstract concepts,
precluding a realistic investigation into the nature of the Universe.
/ Black hole theory contradicts itself, by Stephen Smith. Oct 12, 2011 /
4.
Book: ''' Stephan Hawking, A life in science,''
/ by Michael White and John Gribbin./
#
''Together with Brandon Carter and Jim Bardeen, Hawking
wrote a paper, published in Communications in Mathematical
Physics , pointing out . . . . . the team commented,
'' In fact the effective temperature of a black hole is
absolute zero . . . . No radiation could be emitted from the hole.''
/ page 156./
But later (!) , . . using concept of entropy and
Heisenberg uncertainty principle and quantum fluctuations (!)
Hawking changed his mind and wrote that black hole can emit
( Hawking radiation )
#
So, in the beginning (according to calculations) the ''black hole''
had absolute zero temperature T=0K but . . . thanks to entropy,
HUP and quantum fluctuations (Hawking radiations) was arisen.
In others words:
''black holes'' are micro- scheme of absolute zero vacuum: T=0K
''black hole'' is only another name of the ''true vacuum'' : T=0K
=========

Click to expand...

Dark Energy May Be Vacuum
Date:
January 16, 2007
Source:
University of Copenhagen
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070116130456.htm
#
https://www.iflscience.com/space/dark-energy-may-be-consuming-dark-matter/
==============