Trickle of Illegal Immigrants into Canada Could Become Deluge in the Spring

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
Swilledthebeer is working for some overlord or other. If it's the Conservatives, they shouldn't pay the next invoice.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Oh Curious Cdn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Is that really what you want to call a powerful rebuttal of the condemnation of LIE-beral LACK of ethical standards?????????????????



You will have to become a whole lot more FAKE and imaginative if you want to rehabilitate the BADLY TARNISHED IMAGE of our idiot Boy Justin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Oh Curious Cdn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Is that really what you want to call a powerful rebuttal of the condemnation of LIE-beral LACK of ethical standards?????????????????



You will have to become a whole lot more FAKE and imaginative if you want to rehabilitate the BADLY TARNISHED IMAGE of our idiot Boy Justin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Hey leave him alone brah!


Do you know how busy he has been imagining that Canadian ships are advanced and leaders in stealth technology? While you rip on him, and while Canadian sailors are puking all over the deck because their ships are unstable in choppy seas... he's busy imagining a real navy. How is he to imagine anything else?


You're asking way too much of him.


Sincerely,


Ivan E. Smackonovich
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Hey leave him alone brah!
Do you know how busy he has been imagining that Canadian ships are advanced and leaders in stealth technology? While you rip on him, and while Canadian sailors are puking all over the deck because their ships are unstable in choppy seas... he's busy imagining a real navy. How is he to imagine anything else?
You're asking way too much of him.
Sincerely,
Ivan E. Smackonovich
That's right ... you're a Russian disruptor. Got you nailed. Even a Yank isn't going to be as big an arsehole as you are.
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
Hey leave him alone brah!


Do you know how busy he has been imagining that Canadian ships are advanced and leaders in stealth technology? While you rip on him, and while Canadian sailors are puking all over the deck because their ships are unstable in choppy seas... he's busy imagining a real navy. How is he to imagine anything else?


You're asking way too much of him.


Sincerely,


Ivan E. Smackonovich


OH GOSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And......display of dismay right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I did not mean to destroy the pleasant day dreams - probably fueled by strong hallucinogens - of our not so Curious Cdn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


He can dream what he wants!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It is a FREE COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


For the time being!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



But Curious must not be allowed to thrust his delusions on the rest of us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And.........in actual fact -if our LIE-beral overlords decided to scrap most of the ship buying and concentrate on building up a powerful air force- I would not be greatly distressed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


As it stands now- ANY NEW MILITARY EQUIPMENT would be a benefit............and we could get state of the art fighters MUCH FASTER than ships!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And in fact ANY GENUINE EFFORT by LIE-berals to improve our national security would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


They could start by rounding up some of the swarms of money launderers operating here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Could make greater efforts to seal the borders against drug and contraband shipments!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Could admit that their decision NOT to deport convicted terrorists is a national disgrace!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Could admit that giving Omar Khadr anything other than a SLAP IN THE HEAD was an insult to the Cdn tax payers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



And it should be regarded as a national disgrace that FBI is doing a better job of standing on guard for Canada then the LIE-beral party!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
OH GOSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And......display of dismay right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I did not mean to destroy the pleasant day dreams - probably fueled by strong hallucinogens - of our not so Curious Cdn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


He can dream what he wants!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It is a FREE COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


For the time being!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



But Curious must not be allowed to thrust his delusions on the rest of us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You'd be paranoid to if you had to deal with Russians. He fought a Naval Battle against them in the 1970s while he was (supposedly) in the Canadian Navy. You should ask him all about it.
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
There are none so blind as those who refuse to see .


Ahhhhhh...........HOW NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The usual LIE-beral BULLSH+T about white people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Slaves are generally AGRICULTURAL WORKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Thus such saves are NOT NEEDED in a country like Canada - with a 4 month growing season!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


it is NOT ECONOMICAL keeping slaves with NOTHING TO DO FOR EIGHT MONTHS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Thus THE FEW SLAVES that came to Canada were HOUSE SERVANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Those FEW SLAVE were the property of FRENCH ARISTOCRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And you will maybe recall what happened to those aristocrats in 1789????????



AFTER THE REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The few house slaves owned by a privileged AND VERY SMALL and wealthy French MINORITY were all taken back out of Canada after the British take over in 1759!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Other house slaves did arrive along with British colonial governors- but that practice was BANNED in 1790`s- meaning NO MORE IMPORTATION OF SLAVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



And serving as a slave in house was a far cry from picking cotton or tobacco!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


In the 1780`s- the British Navy brought 19,000 FORMER SLAVES to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick after the end of the Yankee Revolution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It was that act by the navy - that enabled slaves to ESCAPE THEIR MASTERS - that brought most blacks to Canada!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



And of course the famous Underground railroad brought even more blacks to Canada to ESCAPE SLAVERY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


LIE-berals are playing fast and loose with BOTH NUMBERS AND DATES as they try to smear ordinary white Cdns- the ones who had NO USE for slaves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


HYPOCRITE LIE-berals would prefer NOT TO ADMIT that slavery was common in all parts of the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And LIE-beral propaganda meisters would prefer NOT TO ADMIT that Brits were world leaders in BANNING SLAVERY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
"Drug addled" on Ibuprophen for my sore, 62 year old bones and their many injuries ...


Here is an article illustrating some points that all Socialists- Greens, NDPers, LIE-berals and Red Tories like Curious Cdn DO NOT want yo discuss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


We don't have to surrender to public-sector unions

By NEIL REYNOLDS

Special to The Globe and Mail. Published Monday, Oct. 24, 2011


In the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt declared categorically that he would not give government workers the right to strike. "A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intention on their part to obstruct the operation of government until their demands are satisfied," he said. "Such action, looking forward to the paralysis of government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable." Even in the late 1950s, the big labour unions themselves largely agreed. In 1959, AFL-CIO president George Meany said it would be "impossible" for a union to bargain with a government.

What caused liberal politicians and progressive unionists to change their minds - with such predictable and disturbing consequences? Manhattan Institute scholar Fred Siegel advanced a plausible historical explanation in a Wall Street Journal column earlier this year, and it provides a cautionary tale on either side of the border.

In 1958, New York City mayor Robert F. Wagner Jr., a Democrat, broke new ground when he gave New York's employees the right to bargain collectively and the right to strike. Running for re-election in 1961, he won an extremely close race with public-sector-union support. "His re-election resonated at the Kennedy White House, which had won office by only the narrowest of margins in 1960," Mr. Siegel writes. "Ten weeks after Wagner's victory, Kennedy looked to mobilize public-sector workers as a new source of Democratic Party political support." In 1962, he issued an executive order giving federal workers the right to organize and to strike. With this order, Kennedy turned federal workers, hitherto public servants, into a partisan political force.


Public-sector unions expanded rapidly across the county. "In 1958, there had been but 15 public-employee strikes nationwide, involving a handful of workers," Mr. Siegel says. "By 1968 ... more than 200,000 union members, mostly in local and state government, were involved in 254 strikes." Mob action ensued when the newly unionized workers turned on the Democratic politicians who had empowered them. In 1975, New York sanitation workers went on strike, "allowing garbage to pile up in the streets of a Gotham already in the throes of a fiscal crisis." In the same year, New York police went on strike, with marchers carrying signs that read "Burn City Burn."

In both strikes, New York's political leaders caved - and, in capitulation, learned how to live with public-sector unions: Give them (and keep giving them) more or less what they want.

Canada followed the U.S. example. In 1965, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers waged its famous illegal wildcat strike and stayed off the job for two weeks until Lester Pearson surrendered unconditionally. The prime minister could have fired them all (as Ronald Reagan would memorably do in a similar situation with air traffic controllers in 1981); instead, he enacted the Public Service Staff Relations Act, extending the right to strike to federal employees.

Canadian governments learned the same lesson U.S. governments learned: Give them more or less what they want. Give them big wage increases. Give them work-to-rule. Give them the contract language that multiplies overtime compensation. Most of all, give them gold-plated pension plans. The consequences are stark. When governments negotiate with public-sector unions, they tend to surrender their own authority, tend, indeed, to swap it - turning the unions, however episodically, into governments.

As George Meany said so long ago: Impossible. A Canadian public-sector worker can retire at 55 and collect as much as $1.4-million. This worker can now earn more in retirement than he or she earned (on average) in their careers - a generosity few private-sector workers will ever enjoy. The C.D. Howe Institute, meantime, reports that the federal pension plan is underfunded by $200-billion, most of which must be made good by private-sector workers.

We could tinker with the public-sector pensions (and we should), but we would be wiser to tackle the public-sector unions directly. We could justifiably eliminate them. We could justifiably eliminate the right to strike. Or we could justifiably adopt the American model: Wisconsin's reform law that limits public-sector collective bargaining to wages only (excluding benefits, work rules and pensions) and ends the right to strike. FDR would approve. With hindsight, Lester Pearson might, too.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Trudeau Government Sending Another $15M For Toronto Shelters Crowded With Illegal Immigrants
http://dailycaller.com/2019/01/27/trudeau-government-15-million-toronto-shelters-refugees/
The Trudeau government will be sending another $15 million to Toronto so that the city can find more emergency shelter beds made scarce by the continuing arrivals of illegal immigrants from New York.
The system is being stretched to the limit.
Deluge
Your wee mind has been stretched way beyond it's limit, Ivan.