No religion involved. The question to deniers is: IS it POSSIBLE?? (without resorting to "anything is possible") '-)
If one side of the debate are labelled "deniers," what are the other side of the debate labelled as?
No religion involved. The question to deniers is: IS it POSSIBLE?? (without resorting to "anything is possible") '-)
Of course climate is changing. Always has, most probably always will. But to think that taking money from a carbon negative country like Canada and sending it to some third world country and expecting it to change things is closer to retarded than naieve. Unless, like Gore and SUzuki you profit from the scam. One volcano puts more poisons in the air that our whole country does in a year. There are also other factors at play such as the shifting poles and changes in the magnetic field.No religion involved. The question to deniers is: IS it POSSIBLE?? (without resorting to "anything is possible") '-)
Truthers. or True Believers.If one side of the debate are labelled "deniers," what are the other side of the debate labelled as?
It is not a zero sum situation.Truthers. or True Believers.
Please explain how you ans I putting money into general revenue will do anything to abate climate change?Hmm. A lot of climate change deniers.......
Seems that INFORMATION is not enough to make people at least consider the possibility...........so little wonder the newest info is presented more emphatically.
Not that it will make a difference.......to the "my mind is made up......don't confuse me with facts"..group.
Scientific evidence is there........ and the increasingly aggressive weather patters are a symptom of it
so.......perhaps the deniers could provide SCIENTIFIC DATA that climate change is not happening. IE present evidence that opposes the evidence that validates climate change. The humanoid has a certain propensity to play Russian roulette with their own lives. (eg: all the hurricane warnings in the world don't convince folks t o leave............(evacuate).......so they gamble with their lives and their pets and kids. ) But that is their choice.......Leaving others .... professionals to try and locate them when disaster strikes.
You know where to move your fields when the crops start failing where they are at the moment. It doesn't take much of a push to get people to move to where the fields produce 2 crops/yr rather than 1.Please explain how you ans I putting money into general revenue will do anything to abate climate change?
If one side of the debate are labelled "deniers," what are the other side of the debate labelled as?
Think of climate like tides. It is always changing. The problem is we have a bunch of people with the attention span of a gnat in charge and they expect that everything happens in their time frame. Even the news can only be fed to them in 40 character bites or they loose interest.It is not a zero sum situation.
Following the evidence. Yes...Climate change is an ongoing possess. So perhaps the terminology should be re evaluated. for what is perceived as going on now. .
Please explain how you ans I putting money into general revenue will do anything to abate climate change?
Evidence points to the sun and geomagnetics.It is not a zero sum situation.
Following the evidence. Yes...Climate change is an ongoing possess. So perhaps the terminology should be re evaluated. for what is perceived as going on now. .
Crops have failed. They are under snow.You know where to move your fields when the crops start failing where they are at the moment. It doesn't take much of a push to get people to move to where the fields produce 2 crops/yr rather than 1.
Currently science is running in circles for some reason. More money or keep us stupid are the only reasons to do it at all.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/10...al-warming-data-finds-it-riddled-with-errors/
Just ahead of a new report from the IPCC, dubbed SR#15 about to be released today, we have this bombshell- a detailed audit shows the surface temperature data is unfit for purpose. The first ever audit of the world’s most important temperature data set (HadCRUT4) has found it to be so riddled with errors and “freakishly improbable data” that it is effectively useless.
From the IPCC:
Global Warming of 1.5 °C, an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
Nobody here is saying it isn't happening. What's up for debate is just how much is human caused. There are so many mechanisms at work when it comes to the environment and climate that to claim climate change is human caused is kind'a disingenuous.so.......perhaps the deniers could provide SCIENTIFIC DATA that climate change is not happening.
https://www.producer.com/2018/07/crop-insurance-prices-out-of-line-with-markets/Are you really this clueless or ?
Get an estimate how much the volcano in Hawaii let into the air compared to human activity if you want to see how much of a sham it is.Nobody here is saying it isn't happening. What's up for debate is just how much is human caused. There are so many mechanisms at work when it comes to the environment and climate that to claim climate change is human caused is kind'a disingenuous.