Ontario was right to eliminate electric car subsidies

H

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
The notwithstanding can only used for constitutional decisions.

Because the judge determined that the Toronto council thing infringed on people's rights he blocked it, and the notwithstanding clause was used.
 
petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,303
11,389
113
Low Earth Orbit
Is it Constitutional for a Govt to sell a Crown Corporation so it can be taxed and unregulated?

Did Wynne have full approval of the Stakeholders (People of Ontario) to sell Hydro-One?

Was that done in the best interests of the People or was it used as leverage to to get an ideologically driven and pricy tax scam at the Provincial and Federal levels off the ground?

Previous to the sale the Feds received no taxes from the Crown Asset.

Now it does, how convenient is that?
 
Last edited:
pgs

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,636
6,979
113
B.C.
Hoid said:
The notwithstanding can only used for constitutional decisions.

Because the judge determined that the Toronto council thing infringed on people's rights he blocked it, and the notwithstanding clause was used.
Click to expand...
So, what does that have to do with Tesla ?
 
MHz

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
petros said:
Still have to wait 20hr using a trickle charger.

NEXT!
Click to expand...
Throw one of these puppies on and away ya go, charge on the go.
 
H

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
pgs said:
So, what does that have to do with Tesla ?
Click to expand...
it has nothing to do with Tesla - it it why Ford could not use the notwithstanding clause to circumvent the decision in the Tesla case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom