It’s not just the moon landings. Everywhere, the PC brigade is rewriting history

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
It's not just in a new film about the moon landing in which the loony liberals are rewriting history...

Arts Cinema Rod Liddle

It’s not just the moon landings. Everywhere, the PC brigade is rewriting history

I remember the moon landing very well. I was nine years old. I can remember too my sense of outrage…

Rod Liddle





Rod Liddle
September 6, 2018
The Spectator

I remember the moon landing very well. I was nine years old. I can remember too my sense of outrage and disillusion. ‘This is a blatant violation of the moon’s dignity and sovereignty,’ I told my parents, as the astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong attempted to secure the US flag to the lunar surface. ‘An act of imperialistic, Zionist barbarism and a statement of intent from the American government that it intends to export its white supremacy throughout the known galaxy. You will note that no people of colour were chosen as astronauts, nor women, nor people with fibromyalgia.’

A day or two later, when I had been let out of my bedroom, I informed them that the whole thing had not actually taken place, but was a sham filmed on a Hollywood lot for the benefit of Nasa, the industrial–military complex and Mossad. ‘Did you see the angles of the shadows cast by the astronauts? Klieg lights, you credulous fools.’ So young, and yet so woke.

Hollywood has just made another film about that moon landing and it seems to have been scripted by someone with a very similar mindset to the one I had then. It could not be otherwise, I suppose, these days. First Man purports to be a biopic of the aforementioned Armstrong, but omits entirely the second most important thing he ever did. There is footage of him landing on the moon, with Aldrin, but the film makers quite deliberately omitted to show the flag being planted on the dusty surface. This was because, according to one of the cretinous stars of the film, Ryan Gosling, the moon landings were not about American triumphalism, but something that was good for the whole of humanity. And so they excised the bit about the flag, including showing the astronauts saluting the flag, because it did not fit in with their political agenda and, being liberals, they think that what actually happened, i.e. history, isn’t important and if it offends them it can be rewritten or simply expunged.

Aside from anything else, this is cheating the moviegoers. My guess is that people who want to watch something about one of the US’s greatest triumphs probably possess a scintilla or two of patriotism. They may be the kind of people who would have enjoyed the film made of Tom Wolfe’s fabulous book The Right Stuff, which covered similar territory (and with a rather better cast, not least Ed Harris and Sam Shepard). Gosling and co clearly want the large audience which would be attracted by such a project, but wish to gloss over the inconvenient politics of the time and the political feelings of the audience.

In truth, the moonshot was quintessentially about American triumphalism and almost nothing else — the good of humanity was not a consideration, except insofar as more successful rocket technology at last put the US ahead of the Soviet Union, behind which repulsive country it had lagged alarmingly, well into the 1960s. It was two fingers to the Russkies and a reminder to the rest of the world that the US was the greatest country on earth. In short, as President Kennedy knew, it was the only thing which could trump Sputnik, Laika and Yuri Gagarin. It won the space race.

And forgive me, because now I’ve just used that word: Trump. That’s also somewhere in the mix, somewhere lurking in the muddled, murky potage these asinine liberals call a world view. It’s bad enough to be patriotic at the best of times, but to do so when that fascist is waving the Stars and Stripes around would be unconscionable. Meanwhile, the actual benefit to ‘humankind’ as a consequence of the moon landings was ephemeral, fleeting and slight. Nonstick frying pans, anyone?

We are in the Tyranny of Now. A time when the liberals in Hollywood or on our university campuses will rewrite or eradicate history according to their own manifestos, and where everything that happened in the past is subject to a Manichaean divide. In a film about slavery, the black people will be uniquely good, the whites uniquely bad, conveniently avoiding the issue that black Africans instigated the slave trade and continued it long after we’d been pricked by our honky consciences. Attempt to suggest that not everything that came from colonialism was uniformly bad, as one Oxford professor did recently, and you will be subjected to a moronic inferno of howled abuse — even though, palpably, nothing is quite so black and white as the liberals see it.

The Tyranny of Now, with its weird non-sequiturs: it is perfectly OK for a man to identify as a woman, but once his breasts have been stapled on don’t — for God’s sake — allow him to wear a kimono, because that would be cultural appropriation. It is cultural appropriation for supermarkets to sell curries, but not cultural appropriation for your local Chinese restaurant to offer pie and chips.

Perhaps we in the West should cavil if the rest of the world embraces democracy, sanitation, an independent judicial system, tolerance, gender equality, decent table manners and an appreciation of fine literature, art and music — cultural appropriation! Fortunately, or otherwise, most of the rest of the world seems to have resisted these temptations so far.

More of these non-sequiturs, drawn from the Tyranny of Now. It is fine — no, more than fine, absolutely marvellous — for the new version of the BBC’s Daily Politics to kick off with six women on the panel and not a solitary man. The reverse would be unthinkable, wouldn’t it? Why is one form of gender imbalance worse than another? Why do we not worry about the scarcity of male speech therapists, but agonise over the lack of women heart surgeons?

Buzz Aldrin responded to the film I mention above by tweeting a photograph of himself saluting the American flag on the moon. ‘Proud to be an American,’ he said. Oh, you dinosaur. Die quickly, be gone.

https://spectator.us/2018/09/moon-landings-pc-brigade-rewriting-history/
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Moronic article. Does the author really think the actor playing Armstrong wrote the script? He apparently knows nothing about how films are made. For the most part actors do as they are told. The article is little more than a conservative rant from a whiny idiot who doesn't like the way the world is progressing.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
Moronic article. Does the author really think the actor playing Armstrong wrote the script? He apparently knows nothing about how films are made. For the most part actors do as they are told. The article is little more than a conservative rant from a whiny idiot who doesn't like the way the world is progressing.

Gosling was asked at the Venice Film Festival whether omitting the scene was deliberate and the actor attempted to sidestep the question by responding that the moon landing “transcended countries and borders.”


Ryan Gosling defended the decision to omit the flag planting scene. (Daniel McFadden/Universal Pictures via AP)

“I think this was widely regarded in the end as a human achievement [and] that's how we chose to view it,” he told reporters.

"I also think Neil was extremely humble, as were many of these astronauts, and time and time again he deferred the focus from himself to the 400,000 people who made the mission possible.”

Gosling said he didn’t think Armstrong “viewed himself as an American hero.”

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...ding-scene-ryan-gosling-defends-decision.html

So he's telling us what he THINKS the missions was about rather than what it was REALLY about. A deliberate rewriting of history.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Gosling was asked at the Venice Film Festival whether omitting the scene was deliberate and the actor attempted to sidestep the question by responding that the moon landing “transcended countries and borders.”


Ryan Gosling defended the decision to omit the flag planting scene. (Daniel McFadden/Universal Pictures via AP)

“I think this was widely regarded in the end as a human achievement [and] that's how we chose to view it,” he told reporters.

"I also think Neil was extremely humble, as were many of these astronauts, and time and time again he deferred the focus from himself to the 400,000 people who made the mission possible.”

Gosling said he didn’t think Armstrong “viewed himself as an American hero.”

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...ding-scene-ryan-gosling-defends-decision.html

So he's telling us what he THINKS the missions was about rather than what it was REALLY about. A deliberate rewriting of history.


I saw him interviewed. That doesn't mean he wrote the script for the film. And who gives a shit anyway? The Yanks are always pounding themselves on the back over past history. Meanwhile they have elected the worst prepared president in history.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Meanwhile they have elected
Good thing YOU aren't the self appointed diktator, eh?

LOL, The murkins paid for their space race and deserve any credit for its success.

One thing about trump - he is STILL doing well because his enemies are total morons who screw up everything they try to cheat at.
;)
(not to mention also they are genocidally dishonest even among themselves)

ALSO, in a perfect communist world, how are we going to play hockey if everyone is on the same team, and when someone gets a goal, EVERYONE gets a point?
:)
That would be totally KOOKOO Skidward!
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Meanwhile they have elected the worst prepared president in history.
The US could go honest and just let Generals and Admirals apply for that position since they call the shots anyway. Trump's office is just the PR outlet for the Pentegram to tell the slaves what is going down. The Pentegram is the enforcer for the World Bank.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
LOL, The murkins paid for their space race and deserve any credit for its success.
NASA is a continuation of the Nazi rocket program. A few rockets to the moon to take pictures and a few loops around planet earth to justify the $5T they have made and 30,000 nuclear weapons on the tip of rockets. What do you think the mandate of Nasa was and still is. The world is still paying a lot of money for vids that are animations rather than the results of scientific experiments.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
I saw him interviewed. That doesn't mean he wrote the script for the film. And who gives a shit anyway? The Yanks are always pounding themselves on the back over past history. Meanwhile they have elected the worst prepared president in history.


So you're comfortable taking credit for the moon landing?
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,981
2,075
113
New Brunswick
So what's wrong with looking to the film as something to celebrate humanity as a whole and not just the US for once? It's not like the world doesn't know the US was on the moon "first" (cause US ego won't let anyone forget it). Focusing on the human side of things is actually a nice change.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,620
7,093
113
Washington DC
So what's wrong with looking to the film as something to celebrate humanity as a whole and not just the US for once? It's not like the world doesn't know the US was on the moon "first" (cause US ego won't let anyone forget it). Focusing on the human side of things is actually a nice change.
Funniest part is the squeal of OUTRAGE is coming from somebody who ain't even American, though he is a member of one of our client states.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Didn't those astronauts violate US flag protocol by leaving it out in the dark without lighting? I hope they attached a solar light to shine on that flag during those long lunar nights. So disrespectful!
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,429
1,668
113
So what's wrong with looking to the film as something to celebrate humanity as a whole and not just the US for once?

Because it's rewriting history. Why not make another film to "celebrate humanity" instead of making a film and rewriting the historical events in it it to make it look like a global triumph rather than an American one?

What's going to be next? A film about the 1966 World Cup, with the historical events in it rewritten so that England's winning of the tournament is actually a global triumph - a triumph for humanity - rather than an English triumph?
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
8,981
2,075
113
New Brunswick
Because it's rewriting history. Why not make another film to "celebrate humanity" instead of making a film and rewriting the historical events in it it to make it look like a global triumph rather than an American one?

What's going to be next? A film about the 1966 World Cup, with the historical events in it rewritten so that England's winning of the tournament is actually a global triumph - a triumph for humanity - rather than an English triumph?

Where in all that's holy is it re-writing history?

So it doesn't show the US flag.

OMG HISTORY IS CHANGED FOREVER!

Except, it's not.

Are you SURE you're from England and not a US citizen who's there in some undercover deal to make England seem stupider than most countries???