Capitalism will save this world

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
Sooo predictable with your Fakebook memes.....lacking diversity in your life huh?

The pseudo-profound nonsense you get on facebook is just that...............Nonsense!!!
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
Goldman Sachs: Curing Cancer is ‘NOT a Sustainable Business Model’

One of the largest banks in the world, Goldman Sachs, has declared that curing patients of cancer, and other terminal illnesses, is not a “sustainable business model.”
The global investment firm also urged investors to resist financing pioneering “gene therapy” treatments as developing cures is bad for business “in the long-term.”
Goldman Sachs advises investors against funding cures

Goldman Sachs sent the “advice” to their clients and investors in an April 10 report.
Entitled “The Genome Revolution,” the world’s 5th largest bank asks: “Is curing patients a sustainable business model?”
Analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note that long-term treatments garner far more revenue than “one-shot cures,” saying:
“The potential to deliver ‘one-shot cures’ is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy, and gene editing.
“However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies.
“While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow.”

Goldman Sachs: Curing Cancer is 'NOT a Sustainable Business Model'

 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,652
6,989
113
B.C.
Goldman Sachs: Curing Cancer is ‘NOT a Sustainable Business Model’

One of the largest banks in the world, Goldman Sachs, has declared that curing patients of cancer, and other terminal illnesses, is not a “sustainable business model.”
The global investment firm also urged investors to resist financing pioneering “gene therapy” treatments as developing cures is bad for business “in the long-term.”
Goldman Sachs advises investors against funding cures

Goldman Sachs sent the “advice” to their clients and investors in an April 10 report.
Entitled “The Genome Revolution,” the world’s 5th largest bank asks: “Is curing patients a sustainable business model?”
Analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note that long-term treatments garner far more revenue than “one-shot cures,” saying:
“The potential to deliver ‘one-shot cures’ is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy, and gene editing.
“However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies.
“While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow.”

Goldman Sachs: Curing Cancer is 'NOT a Sustainable Business Model'

I would think you don’t own any shares .
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
Goldman Sachs: Curing Cancer is ‘NOT a Sustainable Business Model’

One of the largest banks in the world, Goldman Sachs, has declared that curing patients of cancer, and other terminal illnesses, is not a “sustainable business model.”
The global investment firm also urged investors to resist financing pioneering “gene therapy” treatments as developing cures is bad for business “in the long-term.”
Goldman Sachs advises investors against funding cures

Goldman Sachs sent the “advice” to their clients and investors in an April 10 report.
Entitled “The Genome Revolution,” the world’s 5th largest bank asks: “Is curing patients a sustainable business model?”
Analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note that long-term treatments garner far more revenue than “one-shot cures,” saying:
“The potential to deliver ‘one-shot cures’ is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy, and gene editing.
“However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies.
“While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow.”

Goldman Sachs: Curing Cancer is 'NOT a Sustainable Business Model'

Woked? The epitome of Fake News.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Goldman Sachs: Curing Cancer is ‘NOT a Sustainable Business Model’
One of the largest banks in the world, Goldman Sachs, has declared that curing patients of cancer, and other terminal illnesses, is not a “sustainable business model.”
The global investment firm also urged investors to resist financing pioneering “gene therapy” treatments as developing cures is bad for business “in the long-term.”
Goldman Sachs advises investors against funding cures
Goldman Sachs sent the “advice” to their clients and investors in an April 10 report.
Entitled “The Genome Revolution,” the world’s 5th largest bank asks: “Is curing patients a sustainable business model?”
Analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note that long-term treatments garner far more revenue than “one-shot cures,” saying:
“The potential to deliver ‘one-shot cures’ is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy, and gene editing.
“However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies.
“While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow.”
Goldman Sachs: Curing Cancer is 'NOT a Sustainable Business Model'

I can't believe they just figured out what Big Pharma has known since they accidentally cured polio.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
I live in a house because capitalism won't let me live where and how I would prefer to. Capitalism is a pox on the world.
Where and how would you like to live and how is capitalism preventing you from fulfilling yer dream?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,381
11,440
113
Low Earth Orbit
I live in a house because capitalism won't let me live where and how I would prefer to. Capitalism is a pox on the world.
Capitalism didn't vent your aluminium tipi when cooking ramen leading to black mold?

BTW you look retarded on your little scooter.