There are probably tens of thousands of people working in the free press.
All with their own internal viewpoints and biases.
The solution is not to paint an entire industry with the same brush but to just identify any logical inconsistencies for each piece.
Now, I'm sure there are outlets that have earned their reputation for bias, like the Toronto Star or Rebel Media, but we need to drop the lazy, populist talking points and address problems from the bottom up.
Yelling about #metoo just puts you in that movement's adversarial camp and compromises your ability to address inconsistencies about the movement. A better strategy would be to simply identify where that movement may contradict itself.
For example, those women who show themselves off in front of cars and didn't want to lose their jobs because of objectification. Sure, there was certainly some level of objectification there. But the problem is granular. Proportionality is important. Those women felt that the small sacrifice they may need to make in terms of objectification actually ended up empowering them. So, one could sensibly argue that the greater good outweighed the relatively harmless degree of bad.
