Say more. Speak less. Try not to ramble. Stay focused. You're doing none of that.
Effective communication demands clear, concise writing. It's a skill that you need to develop.
Oh Murphy, you are a nearly mindless `bot` spewing the same limited and tired
non logic at arguments that are detailed, logical and apparently more intellectually rigorous than you are capable of understanding! Here is an older article that makes some observations you wont like and cannot rebutte in any effectual way!
Anybody who thinks the recent `elbowgate` display of temper by our pea brained prime minister is the worst of his behaviour ought to think again. Our Boy with nice hair-for brains has displayed an OMINOUS disrespect for the democratic process-his actions do NOT bode well for the future. I present here a repeat of an Edmonton Sun newspaper column by Lorne Gunter as I think Gunter is spot on with his condemnation!
Anybody who thinks we have seen the worst of our brainless Boy has only to wait a few years. The debts will be piling up, the gravy available to civil service Working Family Hogs will be far less than they expected, our economy will not be improving because as Bob Rae proved-you cannot BORROW prosperity!
In a couple more years, it will become apparent to all LIE-berals that the bold plan by Our Boy to save our economy is nothing more than a rehash of the idiot plan devised by former Ontari-owe premier Bob Rae to simply BORROW all the money he needed to make us rich. If Our Boy sticks to his guns and defies common sense and logic we may even see a repeat of Rae Days! Anyone for Trudope Tuesdays? Once all the economic shit hits the fan our brainless Boy will show us a REALLY FOUL temper!
But as Margaret Thatcher pointed out: “the trouble with socialists is that they eventually run out of other peoples money”! What’s really UGLY about `elbowgate` is how willing some of our loonie/leftist LIE-beral loving media whores are to excuse Boy behaviour! It would all be less disturbing if Our Boy was not trying to dismantle our democracy and set it up to give Him preferential treatment! The little twerp is trying to LIMIT the ability of opposition parties to publicly discuss and comment on jackass LIE-beral legislation that has the capacity to cripple our democracy. And Gunter makes some pretty good points-as presented below-along with some comments of my own in brackets:
Grits think they're above democracy
Commons dust-up sign of Liberal arrogance
By Lorne Gunter , Edmonton Sun
First posted: Friday, May 20, 2016 08:39 AM EDT | Updated: Friday, May 20, 2016 03:25 PM EDT
Trudeau tries to undo fuddle-duddle damage
What do Trudeau's roughhouse tactics mean?
Trudeau behaved like a spoiled brat
'Let go of me — now,' allegedly manhandled Tory MP Brown told Trudeau
'I expect better behaviour of myself'; Trudeau apologizes again for Commons scuffle
#Elbowgate: Social media goes wild over House of Commons altercation
'Get the f--- out of the way'; Trudeau sorry after elbowing NDP MP in Commons
On Wednesday night in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau became indignant because opposition MPs weren’t giving his Liberals what they wanted.
During a contentious debate on a Liberal motion to grant the government much greater control over parliamentary debate, a group of New Democrat MPs were milling about in the centre aisle, chatting.
(I say: In other words NDP were discussing LIE-beral plans to dismantle long standing parliamentary rules that LIE-erals find inconvenient! LIE-berals want POWER, NOT DEMOCRACY!)
They were also blocking the way of Conservative Whip Gord Brown who had to make it to the front of the chamber before a vote on the Liberals’ power grab could be called.
Trudeau shot up out of his seat and pushed his way through the throng of NDP MPs, telling them to “get the f--- out of my way.”
He then grabbed Brown by the arm and frogmarched him, against his will, back through the gaggle of socialists and toward Speaker Geoff Regan.
Quebec NDP MP Ruth Ellen Brosseau claims that in the scuffle the PM also elbowed her in the chest.
Of course, Trudeau isn’t the first member of his family to use the F-word in the House of Commons. Daddy Pierre did the same back in 1971, when, during another chaotic debate, he told a group of opposition MPs to “f--- off.”
(Yeah, Our Pet was sitting in Parliament listening to a gaggle of opposition speakers cataloguing the sins of his party and his respect for democracy was such that he muttered “**** OFF” in the middle of the speech!)
On that occasion, Pierre Trudeau famously insisted all he had said was “fuddle duddle.”
At least Justin had the decency to apologize for his actions.
Pierre never even owned up to his bad behaviour.
But in several important ways it doesn’t matter that the current Trudeau has admitted to being disappointed in himself and has said “sorry.”
Who in heaven’s name does he imagine he is that he felt justified in manhandling other MPs in the first place?
It’s a sign of Liberal arrogance that they feel entitled to get what they want — right now! It’s also a sign of Trudeau’s personal poor judgment that he thought (even temporarily) it was OK to grab and shove other Members of Parliament.
To put Trudeau’s actions into perspective, imagine what would happen to you if you tried the same thing with co-workers.
Imagine shoving through a group of colleagues blocking your path to the copier or watercooler and telling them to get the “f” out of your way.
Or imagine getting impatient with a colleague who wasn’t getting back to his or her desk fast enough, grabbing them and leading them forcefully to their place.
Now imagine the outcry if former Tory PM Stephen Harper had engaged in the same behaviour as Trudeau.
Liberals, who today are slavishly excusing Trudeau’s assaults on Brown and Brosseau as “minor,” would have been furiously tweeting about what a bully and dictator Harper was.
Editorialists would have been insisting it was proof Harper was unfit for office.
And academics would have lined up to sign open letters decrying Harper’s disrespect for the institution of Parliament and for his constitutional role.
Even before this incident, if the Tories had been attempting to alter debate rules in the way the Libs are, the media would have been full of indignation and accusations that Harper was an anti-democratic tyrant.
The Liberals have temporarily withdrawn their bill, but you can be sure they will reintroduce it soon.
It contains rule changes that would limit the opposition’s ability to speak against government bills and would give the Liberals exclusive power to end debate when it suits them.
Couple Trudeau’s physical tactics and the Liberal’s debate rules with the fact they want to change the fundamental nature of Canadian elections without putting the changes to the people in a referendum and you have the picture of a government that believes it’s above democracy.