Capitalism will save this world

Angstrom

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
HarperCons said:
from a "different perspective" he means the wrong perspective.
Click to expand...

Things are diffrent when your stupid :lol:

You have to relie on government handouts.

The rest of us have no problems figuring a new innovative burger with bacon to sell to pay the bills

Cliffy said:
You would be the expert on that.
Click to expand...

Of course because, I have the capacity to view a subject from any relative perspective, not only from my own.
 
Last edited:
C

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
Angstrom said:
Things are diffrent when your stupid :lol:

You have to relie on government handouts.

The rest of us have no problems figuring a new innovative burger with bacon to sell to pay the bills



Of course because, I have the capacity to view a subject from any relative perspective, not only from my own.
Click to expand...
Stroking yourself in public is an indictable offense.
 
captain morgan

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
HarperCons

HarperCons

Council Member
Oct 18, 2015
1,865
74
48
captain morgan said:
What BS... Hollande is as socialist as they come.

This is exactly how the socialist/communist ideal manifests itself... It's the penultimate expression of entitlement and the expense of The People
Click to expand...
hollande is not remotely socialist. lol. this is how disconnected you are from what socialism actually is.
 
Corduroy

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
I don't know. I'm pretty sure spending a lot of money on hair is the second last stage before communism.

Dictatorship of the proletariat --> Expensive hair --> Full communism

It's why the Soviet Union failed. Lenin was bald, so he was replaced with Stalin, who had a decent hair line, but not an expensive one. The next step was better hair but then Khrushchev came along, bald as Lenin. Brezhnev tried with his crazy eyebrows, but if you want a workers paradise eyebrows ain't gonna cut it. That's why so many anti-Stalinists were Trotskyists.


The penultimate hair of the people.
 
Angstrom

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Corduroy said:
I don't know. I'm pretty sure spending a lot of money on hair is the second last stage before communism.

Dictatorship of the proletariat --> Expensive hair --> Full communism

It's why the Soviet Union failed. Lenin was bald, so he was replaced with Stalin, who had a decent hair line, but not an expensive one. The next step was better hair but then Khrushchev came along, bald as Lenin. Brezhnev tried with his crazy eyebrows, but if you want a workers paradise eyebrows ain't gonna cut it. That's why so many anti-Stalinists were Trotskyists.


The penultimate hair of the people.
Click to expand...

This is the only car you could buy in Solviet Union for 40 years. While we had 500+ different models to choose from.


Thank you capitalism for innovations like the seat belt
 
HarperCons

HarperCons

Council Member
Oct 18, 2015
1,865
74
48
what good is a bunch of expensive cars only the wealthy can afford

Corduroy said:
I don't know. I'm pretty sure spending a lot of money on hair is the second last stage before communism.

Dictatorship of the proletariat --> Expensive hair --> Full communism

It's why the Soviet Union failed. Lenin was bald, so he was replaced with Stalin, who had a decent hair line, but not an expensive one. The next step was better hair but then Khrushchev came along, bald as Lenin. Brezhnev tried with his crazy eyebrows, but if you want a workers paradise eyebrows ain't gonna cut it. That's why so many anti-Stalinists were Trotskyists.


The penultimate hair of the people.
Click to expand...
For a second there I thought that picture of Trotsky was actually Emma Goldman
 
Angstrom

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Corduroy said:
Who needs seat belts when the free hand of the market will hold you to your seat?
Click to expand...

Free markets innovated the seat belt, So your right bang on targueted :lol: as a safety feature, because diffrent manufacturing was competing to make the safest car. And that's because safety is a feature that is attractive for buyers.

So a safer car would achieve more sells, stimulating innovation to make cars safer

If safety is not importent to you buy a ladda. :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom