3,000 year old shipwreck found off Devon coast

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,400
1,667
113
One of the world's oldest shipwrecks has been found of England's south western coast.

The trading vessel was carrying an extremely valuable cargo of tin and hundreds of copper ingots from the Continent when it sank off the coast of Devon around the year 900BC.

The find provides new evidence about the extent and sophistication of Britain's links with Europe in the Bronze Age as well as the remarkable seafaring abilities of the people during the period.

In total, 295 artefacts have so far been recovered, weighing a total of more than 84kg.

The cargo recovered includes 259 copper ingots and 27 tin ingots. Also found was a bronze leaf sword, two stone artefacts that could have been sling shots, and three gold wrist torcs – or bracelets.

The wreck was found in a bay near Salcombe, south Devon, by a team of amateur marine archaeologists from the South West Maritime Archaeological Group.

Bronze Age shipwreck found off Devon coast

By Jasper Copping
13 Feb 2010
The Telegraph


In total, 295 artefacts have so far been recovered, weighing a total of more than 84kg

Archaeologists believe the copper and possibly the tin was being imported into Britain

One of the world's oldest shipwrecks has been discovered off the coast of Devon after lying on the seabed for almost 3,000 years.

The trading vessel was carrying an extremely valuable cargo of tin and hundreds of copper ingots from the Continent when it sank.

Experts say the "incredibly exciting" discovery provides new evidence about the extent and sophistication of Britain's links with Europe in the Bronze Age as well as the remarkable seafaring abilities of the people during the period.

Archaeologists have described the vessel, which is thought to date back to around 900BC, as being a "bulk carrier" of its age.

The copper and tin would have been used for making bronze – the primary product of the period which was used in the manufacture of not only weapons, but also tools, jewellery, ornaments and other items.

Archaeologists believe the copper – and possibly the tin – was being imported into Britain and originated in a number of different countries throughout Europe, rather than from a single source, demonstrating the existence of a complex network of trade routes across the Continent.

Academics at the University of Oxford are carrying out further analysis of the cargo in order to establish its exact origins.

However, it is thought the copper would have come from the Iberian peninsular, Alpine Europe, especially modern day Switzerland, and possibly other locations in France, such as the Massif Central, and even as far as Austria.

It is first time tin ingots from this period have ever been found in Britain, a discovery which may support theories that the metal was being mined in the south west at this time.

If the tin was not produced in Britain, it is likely it would have also come from the Iberian peninsular or from eastern Germany.

The wreck has been found in just eight to ten metres (24 to 30 feet) of water in a bay near Salcombe, south Devon, by a team of amateur marine archaeologists from the South West Maritime Archaeological Group.

In total, 295 artefacts have so far been recovered, weighing a total of more than 84kg.

The cargo recovered includes 259 copper ingots and 27 tin ingots. Also found was a bronze leaf sword, two stone artefacts that could have been sling shots, and three gold wrist torcs – or bracelets.

The team have yet to uncover any of the vessel's structure, which is likely to have eroded away.

However, experts believe it would have been up to 40ft long and up to 6ft wide, and have been constructed of planks of timber, or a wooden frame with a hide hull. It would have had a crew of around 15 and been powered by paddles.

Archaeologists believe it would have been able to cross the Channel directly between Devon and France to link into European trade networks, rather than having to travel along the coast to the narrower crossing between modern day Dover and Calais.

Although the vessel's cargo came from as far afield as southern Europe, it is unlikely it would have been carried all the way in the same craft, but in a series of boats, undertaking short coastal journeys.

The wreck site is on part of the seabed called Wash Gully, which is around 300 yards from the shore.

There is evidence of prehistoric field systems and Bronze Age roundhouses on the coast nearby and it is thought the vessel could have sunk while attempting to land, or could have been passing along the coast.

The coastline is notoriously treacherous and there is a reef close by which could have claimed the vessel.

The recovery work took place between February and November last year but the discovery was not announced until this month's International Shipwreck Conference, in Plymouth.

The finds have been reported to both English Heritage and the Receiver of Wreck, which administers all shipwrecks. The artefacts are due to be handed over to the British Museum next week.

They will be independently valued and the museum will pay the team for the items.

Mick Palmer, chairman of the South West Maritime Archaeological Group, said: "For the British Isles, this is extremely important. This was a cargo trading vessel on a big scale.

"There is more down there and we will carry on searching for it. We anticipate a lot more will be found."


The wreck was found off Salcombe, a town on Devon's southernmost tip

Dave Parham, senior lecturer in marine archaeology at Bournemouth University and a member of the team, said: "What we are seeing is trade in action.

"We are not stuck with trying to work out trade based on a few deposits across a broader landscape. We are looking at the stuff actually on the boat being moved.

"Everything that is in the ship sinks with it and is on the seabed somewhere. What you would call this today is a bulk carrier. It was carrying what was for the time a large consignment of raw materials."

Dr Peter Northover, a scientist at the University of Oxford who has been analysing the find, said: "These are the produce of a multitude of countries, scattered right around Europe, up and down the Atlantic coast and inland.

"It came from a combination of places. It is showing the diversity of the trade.

"Metal traders and workers would have traded parcels of metal with each other. The metal would have moved in steps, along networks of contacts exchanging metal as and when they need it."

Dr Stuart Needham, a Bronze Age archaeologist, said: "This is genuinely exciting.

"Everyone knows that man has been walking around on land since time immemorial, but I think people now will be surprised to know how much they were plying the seaways at this time, up and down the Atlantic seaboard and across the Channel.

"There's a complex lattice of interactions across Europe happening throughout this period.

"A lot of stuff may have moved across land, but it is eminently possible at this stage that there were quite sophisticated maritime networks with specialist mariners – people who know how to read the tides and the stars and who are not just casually going out on the sea to do some deep sea fishing.

"If you have got specialist mariners plying the Atlantic seaways, there is every possibility they could be picking up material in different locations and stockpiling it.

"The mainstay of this exchange network might have been a number of vessels undertaking short journeys. It doesn't mean there weren't occasional vessels and people going longer distances."

One other Bronze Age vessel has previously been found near Salcombe, where just 53 artefacts were recovered. Another eight Bronze Age items have also been found at a third nearby spot, indicating another possible wreck.

The only other Bronze Age wrecks found in the UK have been located on land, or on the foreshore, at Dover and North Ferriby, on the Humber.

Ben Roberts, Bronze Age specialist at the British Museum, said: "It is an incredibly exciting find. What we have here is really, really good evidence of trade. We don't get many shipwreck sites.

"It is very rare to get a snapshot of this level of activity. It is very possible there were also animals and people going across the Channel too.

"We hardly ever get to see evidence of this cross Channel trade in action. It is a huge amount of cargo."

telegraph.co.uk
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The scientists are surprised by ancient maritime trade. The tin trade between the middle east and the British is documented elsewhere.

Name
The name tin is an ancient Anglo-Saxon word. Tin in the form of cassiterite was mined in ancient Britain and was a major trade item between Britain and the Greeks and Phoenicians of the Mediterranean region. The chemical symbol for tin, Sn, comes from the Latin word for tin, stannum. Tin was one of only seven chemical elements known in pure form, and named by ancient peoples. The mineral cassiterite is named for the ancient Greek word for tin.
Mineral Information Institute - TIN
 

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,863
487
83
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
The scientists are surprised by ancient maritime trade. The tin trade between the middle east and the British is documented elsewhere.

Name
The name tin is an ancient Anglo-Saxon word. Tin in the form of cassiterite was mined in ancient Britain and was a major trade item between Britain and the Greeks and Phoenicians of the Mediterranean region. The chemical symbol for tin, Sn, comes from the Latin word for tin, stannum. Tin was one of only seven chemical elements known in pure form, and named by ancient peoples. The mineral cassiterite is named for the ancient Greek word for tin.
Mineral Information Institute - TIN
Yes that's why I can't understand why some archaeologist thinks Tin was being Imported.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Yes that's why I can't understand why some archaeologist thinks Tin was being Imported.

Almost the entire science of archeology and history is controlled by Darwinist linear thinking where we are told and held to the belief that there is an unbroken chain of progress, nothing could be further from the truth, the world and mankind has risen and fallen a thousand times to greatness we can still not imagine. We are a barely recovering remnant of great and powerful civilizations that were. Most university graduates in history these days might as well have been punched out with a cookie cutter. We cannot talk of old time engineering that we cannot reproduce today without some protector of orthodoxy and dogma butting in to tell us we are dreamers who believe in magic and old tales.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
Hey, Juan. Someone found that boat you lost when you were a kid. ;)
Or was it yours, Cliffy?
Not mine. I was never into boats. Now find me a 3000 year old motorcycle and you would get my attention.:cool:

I read in an article from National Geographic or the Smithsonian that there were sea faring vessels as far back as 60 thousand years ago. I think some cheesy news paper is just trying to sell advertising space with this amazing "discovery".
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Not mine. I was never into boats. Now find me a 3000 year old motorcycle and you would get my attention.:cool:

I read in an article from National Geographic or the Smithsonian that there were sea faring vessels as far back as 60 thousand years ago. I think some cheesy news paper is just trying to sell advertising space with this amazing "discovery".

I think you're spot on Cliffy, the whole thing is a pile of moldering cheese. It amazed BlackLeaf though, cheese merchant that he is.:lol:
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,128
7,991
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Not mine. I was never into boats. Now find me a 3000 year old motorcycle and you would get my attention.:cool:

I read in an article from National Geographic or the Smithsonian that there were sea faring vessels as far back as 60 thousand years ago. I think some cheesy news paper is just trying to sell advertising space with this amazing "discovery".


Yeah....how did (what we call) the Aboriginies of Australia get there in
the first place? No theories of Land Bridges that I've heard of.....
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,128
7,991
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
From: Indigenous Australians - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The earliest definite human remains found to date are that of Mungo Man
which have been dated at about 40,000 years old, but the time of arrival of
the ancestors of Indigenous Australians is a matter of debate among
researchers, with estimates ranging as high as 125,000 years ago."

Australia is a long walk (assuming no boats) from anywhere.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
The oldest known human remains found in South America were of Polynesian or Aborigine origin. Arrival by sea is the accepted explanation.