'Armored' Fish Study Helps Strengthen Darwin's Natural Selection Theory

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
45
Newfoundland!
ScienceDaily (Sep. 1, 2008) — Shedding some genetically induced excess baggage may have helped a tiny fish thrive in freshwater and outsize its marine ancestors, according to a UBC study published today in Science Express.


Lateral plate morphs in marine stickleback. Complete morph (top), partial morph (middle), and low morph (bottom). These fish were stained to highlight bones. (Credit: Courtesy of Rowan Barrett, UBC)

Measuring three to 10 centimetres long, stickleback fish originated in the ocean but began populating freshwater lakes and streams following the last ice age. Over the past 20,000 years – a relatively short time span in evolutionary terms – freshwater sticklebacks have lost their bony lateral plates, or “armour,” in these new environments.

“Scientists have identified a mutant form of a gene, or allele, that prohibits the growth of armour,” says UBC Zoology PhD candidate Rowan Barrett. Found in fewer than one per cent of marine sticklebacks, this allele is very common in freshwater populations.

Barrett and co-authors UBC post-doctoral fellow Sean Rogers and Prof. Dolph Schluter set out to investigate whether the armour gene may have helped sticklebacks “invade” freshwater environments. They relocated 200 marine sticklebacks with the rare armour reduction allele to freshwater experimental ponds.

“By documenting the physical traits and genetic makeup of the offspring produced by these marine sticklebacks in freshwater, we were able to track how natural selection operates on this gene,” says Rogers.

“We found a significant increase in the frequency of this allele in their offspring, evidence that natural selection favours reduced armour in freshwater,” says Barrett.

Barrett and Rogers also found that offspring carrying the allele are significantly larger in size. “It leads us to believe that the genetic expression is also tied to increased growth rate,” says Barrett.

“If the fish aren’t expending resources growing bones – which may be significantly more difficult in freshwater due to its lack of ions – they can devote more energy to increasing biomass,” says Barrett. “This in turn allows them to breed earlier and improves over-winter survival rate.”

Celebrating its 150th anniversary this week, Darwin’s first publication of his natural selection theory proposed that challenging environments would lead to a struggle for existence, or “survival of the fittest.” Since then, scientists have advanced the theory by contributing an understanding of how genes affect evolution.

“This study provides further evidence for Darwin’s theory of natural selection by showing that environmental conditions can directly impact genes controlling physical traits that affect the survival of species,” says Barrett.

source
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
The armour plating gene could be co-varying with the osmoregulating gene, which is also dependent on ion concentrations ;)
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Lol, sure thing.

Covariance is the average product of two variables and how well they vary together in a population. So in this case, the genes that control the expressions for armour plating and osmoregulating could be highly covarying, which seems pretty likely to me. It could be that it's actually one gene that influences both traits. That's called pleiotropy. You could think of it this way. Some genes will control trait X. Some genes will control trait Y. Where you find the genetic correlations between X and Y, it's likely pleiotropic genes that affect both traits X and Y.

The osmoregulation is another ion dependent function. Fish in full strength sea water need to balance the concentration of ions inside their body with the concentration outside. They do that by drinking sea water constantly Moving to freshwater is pretty stressful to most marine fish, unless they have the ability to turn off their osmoregulation and go back to the simpler osmosis for ion equilibrating.

Seems pretty likely to me that both functions are being influenced by a single protein in this specific case for the stickleback.