'Solid evidence' for 9th planet in solar system: Scientists

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
35,860
3,042
113
'Solid evidence' for 9th planet in solar system: Scientists
Marcia Dunn, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 12:15 PM EST | Updated: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 05:20 PM EST
This one is 5,000 times bigger than outcast Pluto and billions of miles farther away, say scientists who presented "good evidence" for a long-hypothesized Planet X on Wednesday.
The gas giant is thought to be almost as big as its nearest planetary neighbour Neptune, quite possibly with rings and moons. It's so distant that it would take a mind-blowing 10,000 to 20,000 years to circle the sun.
Planet 9, as the pair of California Institute of Technology researchers calls it, hasn't been spotted yet. They base their prediction on mathematical and computer modeling, and anticipate its discovery via telescope within five years or less.
The two reported their research Wednesday in the Astronomical Journal because they want people to help them look for it.
"We could have stayed quiet and quietly spent the next five years searching the skies ourselves and hoping to find it. But I would rather somebody find it sooner, than me find it later," astronomer Mike Brown told The Associated Press.
"I want to see it. I want to see what it looks like. I want to understand where it is, and I think this will help."
Brown and planetary scientist Konstantin Batygin feel certain about their prediction, which at first seemed unbelievable to even them.
"For the first time in more than 150 years, there's good evidence that the planetary census of the solar system is incomplete," Batygin said, referring to Neptune's discovery as Planet 8.
Once it's detected, Brown insists there will be no Pluto-style planetary debate. Brown ought to know; he's the so-called Pluto killer who helped lead the charge against Pluto's planetary status in 2006. (Once Planet 9, Pluto is now officially considered a dwarf planet.)
"THIS is what we mean when we say the word 'planet,' " Brown said.
Brown and Batygin believe it's big -- 10 times more massive than Earth -- and unlike Pluto, dominates its cosmic neighbourhood. Pluto is a gravitational slave to Neptune, they pointed out.
Another scientist, Alan Stern, said he's withholding judgment on the planet prediction. He is the principal scientist for NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, which buzzed Pluto last summer in the first-ever visit from Planet Earth. He still sees Pluto as a real planet -- not a second-class dwarf.
"This kind of thing comes around every few years. To date, none of those predicts have been borne out by discoveries," Stern said in an email Wednesday. "I'd be very happy if the Brown-Batygin were the exception to the rule, but we'll have to wait and see. Prediction is not discovery."
Brown and Batygin shaped their calculation on the fact that six objects in the icy Kuiper Belt, or Twilight Zone on the far reaches of the solar system, appear to have orbits influenced by only one thing: a real planet. The vast, mysterious Kuiper Belt is home to Pluto as well.
Brown actually discovered one of these six objects more than a decade ago, Sedna, a large minor planet.
"What we have found is a gravitational signature of Planet 9 lurking in the outskirts of the solar system,' Batygin said. The actual discovery, he noted, will be "era-defining."
Added Brown: "We have felt a great disturbance in the force."
Scott Sheppard of the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington said Brown and Batygin's effort takes his own findings to "the next level." Two years ago, he and a colleague suggested a possible giant planet.
"I find this new work very exciting," Sheppard said in an email. "It makes the distant Super-Earth planet in our solar system much more real. I would say the odds just went from 50% to 75% that this distant massive planet is real."
Depending on where this Planet 9 is in its egg-shaped orbit, a space telescope may be needed to confirm its presence, the researchers said. Or good backyard telescopes may spot it, they noted, if the planet is relatively closer to us in its swing around the sun. It's an estimated 20 billion to 100 billion miles away.
The Caltech researchers prefer calling it Planet 9, versus the historical term Planet X. The latter smacks of "aliens and the imminent destruction of the Earth," according to Brown.
Who knows, there could even be a Planet 10 out there well beyond No. 9, but there aren't enough data at this point to guess, Brown said.
The last real planet to be discovered in our solar system was Neptune in 1846. Pluto's discovery came in 1930; humanity got to see the small icy world and its main moon Charon up close for the first time last July thanks to New Horizons.
The spacecraft, unfortunately, is in the opposite direction of Planet 9, according to the researchers, and thus unable to help in its detection.
Brown realizes skepticism will exist until the planet is actually observed. History is packed with mistaken planet-seekers, he said, and so "standing up and saying we're right this time makes us almost look crazy -- except I'm going to stand up and say we're actually right this time."
He couldn't resist this jab on his bplutokiller Twitter account:
"OK, OK, I am now willing to admit: I DO believe that the solar system has nine planets."
'Solid evidence' for 9th planet in solar system: Scientists | World | News | Tor
the 9th planet is orbiting earths second sun. ;)
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
35,860
3,042
113
Planet hunter, Xena lover discovers 'Planet Nine'
Tom Spears, Postmedia Network
First posted: Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:57 PM EST | Updated: Thursday, January 21, 2016 07:36 PM EST
OTTAWA - A scientist who once tried to name a new planet after Xena the Warrior Princess is the same guy who may have found the solar system's "Planet Nine" this week.

Mike Brown is a California Institute of Technology planet hunter.

In 2005, he found a little one far out in the solar system and tried to name it Xena, because he’s a fan of the 1990s TV show, and because planets have names from Greek and Roman myths.

Not so fast, said the International Astronomical Union. As a television heroine, Xena is a fake myth (as opposed to a real myth). They voted instead on Eris, the ancient goddess of discord, which made sense given their infighting.

There had officially been nine planets as of 1930, the year Pluto was discovered.

As telescopes improved, other small, planet-like objects started to show up.

However, astronomers then decided the little planets are a different kind of heavenly body, not real planets. They demoted Pluto, Eris and Ceres to “dwarf planet” in 2006. Bad feeling over Pluto is still simmering.

Now Brown and Caltech colleague Konstantin Batygin have found evidence of a planet 10 times bigger than Earth, orbiting far beyond Pluto in a dark region called the Kuiper Belt.

They call it Planet Nine for now. They haven’t seen it, but they observed the movements of other Kuiper Belt objects and reasoned that something massive is exerting a strong gravitational pull on them. Brown hasn’t mentioned Xena this time. Or Xena’s sidekick, Gabrielle.

He still won a final victory in his Xena battle. He persuaded the International Astronomical Union to name Eris’s moon Dysnomia, after the mythical Greek spirit of lawlessness. Xena was played by actress Lucy Lawless.

tspears@postmedia.com

twitter.com/TomSpears1
Planet hunter, Xena lover discovers 'Planet Nine' | World | News | Toronto Sun
 

selfsame

Time Out
Jul 13, 2015
3,491
0
36
If this planet is so big and so distant ( : 5,000 times bigger than Pluto and billions of miles farther away), then it does not belong to our but to another solar system.

It can't be billions of miles away and the sun have gravity influence on it, so as to draw it to orbit around the sun as a planet of the solar system.
I don't think the sun's electromagnetic field may reach to billions of miles away; this is a weak probability.

The sun's gravity can hold Planet Neptune, which is so huge a planet; but behind it by billions of miles ... this cannot be taken as certain.

This is what I think, and God is the All-Knowing.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,203
8,047
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
If this planet is so big and so distant ( : 5,000 times bigger than Pluto and billions of miles farther away), then it does not belong to our but to another solar system...

If this planet ('bout 10x the size of the Earth?) and is
orbiting (though at a great distance) around our Sun,
then how could it belong to another solar system?
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
The sun's gravity can hold Planet Neptune, which is so huge a planet; but behind it by billions of miles ... this cannot be taken as certain.

This is what I think, and God is the All-Knowing.
Looks like you and your god don't know f uck all about physics and gravity ...

Here have a sammich..
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
If this planet is so big and so distant ( : 5,000 times bigger than Pluto and billions of miles farther away), then it does not belong to our but to another solar system.

It can't be billions of miles away and the sun have gravity influence on it, so as to draw it to orbit around the sun as a planet of the solar system.
I don't think the sun's electromagnetic field may reach to billions of miles away; this is a weak probability.

The sun's gravity can hold Planet Neptune, which is so huge a planet; but behind it by billions of miles ... this cannot be taken as certain.

This is what I think, and God is the All-Knowing.
Perhaps you may want to stick with spamming your book shyt selfslime. That was kind of a stupid thing to post.
 

selfsame

Time Out
Jul 13, 2015
3,491
0
36
If this planet ('bout 10x the size of the Earth?) and is
orbiting (though at a great distance) around our Sun,
then how could it belong to another solar system?

Our sun is not very large in comparison to other suns in the universe; it may be considered small or medium in size: not a large sun.
It has a limited power of gravity: it can draw such planets as our present planets; the most remote is Neptune and it is a very large planet.

The electromagnetic field of the sun and its extension ... this will limit the gravity of the sun which will not be without limit.

The planets orbit the sun in the confines of this electromagnetic field, and therefore, the planets are almost orbiting in the equatorial plane of the sun.



All the planets circle around the sun in the same direction of the rotation of the sun around itself, and all the planets are situated about the equatorial plane of the sun in relation to its rotation and its electromagnetic field which will determine the extent of the planets drawn to the sun.



http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/...the_Revolution_of_the_Planets_Around_the_Sun_
 
Last edited:

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,617
7,093
113
Washington DC
I think we should name the new planet for something sacred to Muslims.

What do you think, selfshame, should we go with "AK-47" or "suicide belt?"
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,617
7,093
113
Washington DC
"We could have stayed quiet and quietly spent the next five years searching the skies ourselves and hoping to find it. But I would rather somebody find it sooner, than me find it later," astronomer Mike Brown told The Associated Press.

Wait a minute. . . I thought Mike Brown was dead.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Our sun is not very large in comparison to other suns in the universe; it may be considered small or medium in size: not a large sun.
It has a limited power of gravity: it can draw such planets as our present planets; the most remote is Neptune and it is a very large planet.

The electromagnetic field of the sun and its extension ... this will limit the gravity of the sun which will not be without limit.

The planets orbit the sun in the confines of this electromagnetic field, and therefore, the planets are almost orbiting in the equatorial plane of the sun.



All the planets circle around the sun in the same direction of the rotation of the sun around itself, and all the planets are situated about the equatorial plane of the sun in relation to its rotation and its electromagnetic field which will determine the extent of the planets drawn to the sun.



The Universe and the Quran 2

Are you sure that those planets are spinning in the right direction, Sesame? What does the Prophet say about that? If you have to fart out of the left side, wipe your @ss with your left hand then old Moe must have decreed that they can only go one way?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,421
1,668
113
The influence of the Sun's gravity is thought to extend to 2 light years away - that's about 12 trillion miles. Pluto is a mere 3.6 billion miles from the Sun (about 40 times further away from the Sun than Earth is). It is entirely possible there is another planet beyond Pluto that is still well within the Sun's gravitational reach.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,617
7,093
113
Washington DC
Do tell us everything you know about gravity, Princess Swallows.

Better yet, tell us everything you know about gravity (and everything else) that's correct. Make a pretty short post.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,421
1,668
113
Do tell us everything you know about gravity, Princess Swallows.

An Englishman discovered it.

It is, by far, the weakest of all the known forces. This is shown by the fact, when you throw a ball into the air, the entire force of Earth is required to pull it back to the ground. And, as we all can see, a simple little bar magnet can overcome the gravity of the entire Earth.