There's no such thing as 'a free lunch' for Inertia.
=.
Newton wrote:
* For the basic problem of philosophy seems to be to discover
the forces of nature from the phenomena of motions
and then to demonstrate the other phenomena from these forces*
=..
For the movement we must pay energy-money.
There isn't inertia without force / energy.
Your car wouldn't move even one inch without force /energy.
But Newtonian conception of *inertia* says nothing about the forces of inertia.
The idea of forces for * Inertia* was solved by Einstein.
In 1905 Einstein wrote paper:
“ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?”
As he realized the answer was:
“ Yes, the inertia depends on its energy E= Mc^2.”
How can E=Mc^2 be responsible for inertial movement of quantum particle?
Nobody explains the details of such possibility of inertia movement.
Someone wrote:
“An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question
what inertia is, would win a Nobel Prize. “
=..
=.
Newton wrote:
* For the basic problem of philosophy seems to be to discover
the forces of nature from the phenomena of motions
and then to demonstrate the other phenomena from these forces*
=..
For the movement we must pay energy-money.
There isn't inertia without force / energy.
Your car wouldn't move even one inch without force /energy.
But Newtonian conception of *inertia* says nothing about the forces of inertia.
The idea of forces for * Inertia* was solved by Einstein.
In 1905 Einstein wrote paper:
“ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?”
As he realized the answer was:
“ Yes, the inertia depends on its energy E= Mc^2.”
How can E=Mc^2 be responsible for inertial movement of quantum particle?
Nobody explains the details of such possibility of inertia movement.
Someone wrote:
“An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question
what inertia is, would win a Nobel Prize. “
=..