Scientists monitor huge iceberg that broke off from Antarctica

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
35,869
3,042
113
Scientists monitor huge iceberg that broke off from Antarctica
Will Dunham, REUTERS
First posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 12:47 PM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 12:54 PM EDT
WASHINGTON - Scientists are monitoring an iceberg roughly six times the size of Manhattan - one of the largest now in existence - that broke off from an Antarctic glacier and is heading into the open ocean.
NASA glaciologist Kelly Brunt said on Wednesday the iceberg covers about 255 square miles (660 square km) and is up to a third of a mile (500 meters) thick. Known as B31, the iceberg separated from Antarctica's Pine Island Glacier last November, Brunt added.
"It's one that's large enough that it warrants monitoring," Brunt said in a telephone interview, noting that U.S. government organizations including the National Ice Center keep an eye on dozens of icebergs at any given time.
The iceberg's present location is not in an area heavily navigated by ships.
"There's not a lot of shipping traffic down there. We're not particularly concerned about shipping lanes. We know where all the big ones are," she said.
Scientists are especially interested in this iceberg not only because of its size but because it originated in an unexpected location, said Brunt.
"It's like a large sheet cake floating through the Southern Ocean," she added.
The glacial crack that created the iceberg was first detected in 2011, according to Brunt, a scientist with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and Morgan State University in Maryland.
Pine Island Glacier has been closely studied over the past two decades because it has been thinning and draining rapidly and may be an important contributor to sea level rise, scientists say.
They say the iceberg has floated across Pine Island Bay, a basin of the Amundsen Sea, and will likely be swept up soon in the swift currents of the Southern Ocean.
"We are doing some research on local ocean currents to try to explain the motion properly. It has been surprising how there have been periods of almost no motion, interspersed with rapid flow," iceberg researcher Grant Bigg of the University of Sheffield in England said in a statement from NASA Earth Observatory.
"There were a couple of occasions early on when there might have been partial grounding or collisions with the sea floor, as B31 bounced from one side of the bay to the other," Bigg said.
The B-31 Iceberg is seen after separating from a rift in Antarctica's Pine Island Glacier in this NASA Earth Observatory handout image acquired on November 13, 2013. (REUTERS/NASA Earth Observatory/Holli Riebeek/Handout via Reuters)

Scientists monitor huge iceberg that broke off from Antarctica | SCIENCE | World
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Lol Walter.

There was an increase in ice extent in one year but the trend is still downward.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
It was a couple of American scientists that made some comments about it but the IPCC didn't project ice free by 2013.

Here is the IPCC:

"In a more recent study, there is good agreement between Arctic sea-ice trends and those simulated by control and transient integrations from the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) and the Hadley Centre (see Figure 16-6). Although the Hadley Centre climate model underestimates sea-ice extent and thickness, the trends of the two models are similar. Both models predict continued decreases in sea-ice thickness and extent (Vinnikov et al., 1999), so that by 2050, sea-ice extent is reduced to about 80% of area it covered at the mid-20th century."

https://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=605
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,628
7,093
113
Washington DC
It was a couple of American scientists that made some comments about it but the IPCC didn't project ice free by 2013.

Here is the IPCC:

"In a more recent study, there is good agreement between Arctic sea-ice trends and those simulated by control and transient integrations from the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) and the Hadley Centre (see Figure 16-6). Although the Hadley Centre climate model underestimates sea-ice extent and thickness, the trends of the two models are similar. Both models predict continued decreases in sea-ice thickness and extent (Vinnikov et al., 1999), so that by 2050, sea-ice extent is reduced to about 80% of area it covered at the mid-20th century."

https://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=605
Well, if that don't convince the deniers, nothing will!

Operative phrase is "nothing will," in case you missed it.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
Learning. Lots of it for you. Are you afraid to learn?



You'll also find this handy unless you don't want to arm yourself to further your beliefs : Can Gases Dissolve in Water? | Chapter 5: The Water Molecule and Dissolving | Middle School Chemistry

Maybe I should post the entire grade school science experiment teaching aid?




Can Gases Dissolve in Water?

Key Concepts

Gases can dissolve in water.

The dissolving of a gas in water depends on the interaction between the molecules of the gas and the water molecules.

The amount of gas that can be dissolved in water depends on the temperature of the water.
More gas can dissolve in cold water than in hot water.

Summary
Students will observe the dissolved carbon dioxide (CO2) in a bottle of club soda. They will help design an experiment to compare the amount of CO2 that stays in cold club soda compared to warmer club soda.

Objective
Students will be able to explain, on the molecular level, how a gas dissolves in water. They will also be able to explain why the gas comes out of solution faster in warm water than in cold water.
 
Last edited:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,389
11,448
113
Low Earth Orbit
Anyone else want to school the Liberal before I show him to be the fool that he is?

Sure. I will. All he has to do is go back to his recent thread about China's pollution impacting US weather. In that thread he'll find an IPCC graph that shows ice sheets are on a growing trend over the past couple hundred years and are currently right on average.

EDIT


It was in the death kneel thread but here it is

Ice is at the mean average after a big leap in growth from far lower than current over the past.



Grow and retreat is the norm.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
Good try. However, the real shame is MF has misunderstood the 3 letters at the beginning of Antarctica, he/she thinks we are posting about the Arctic.