NASA sending a robot to the moon to examine bizarre discovery

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
35,860
3,042
113
NASA sending a robot to the moon to examine bizarre discovery
Irene Klotz, Reuters
First posted: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 05:53 PM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 06:03 PM EDT
CAPE CANAVERAL - More than 40 years after the last Apollo astronauts left the moon, NASA is preparing to launch a small robotic spacecraft to investigate one of their most bizarre discoveries.
Crews reported seeing an odd glow on the lunar horizon just before sunrise. The phenomenon, which prompted a notebook sketch by Apollo 17 Commander Eugene Cernan, was unexpected because the airless moon lacked atmosphere for reflecting sunlight.
Scientists began to suspect that dust from the lunar surface was being electrically charged and somehow lofted off the ground, a theory that will be tested by the U.S. space agency's upcoming Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Experiment.
The spacecraft, known as LADEE, is scheduled to be launched at 11:27 p.m. EDT on Friday (0327 GMT Saturday) from NASA's Wallops Flight Facility on Wallops Island, Virginia.
"Terrestrial dust is like talcum powder. On the moon, it's very rough. It's kind of evil. It follows electric field lines, it works its way in equipment. ... It's a very difficult environment to deal with," said LADEE project manager Butler Hine of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California.
In addition to studying fly-away lunar dust, LADEE will probe the tenuous envelope of gases that surrounds the moon, a veneer so thin it stretches the meaning of the word "atmosphere."
Instead, scientists refer to these environments as exospheres and hope that understanding the moon's gaseous shell will shed light on similar pockets around Mercury, asteroids and other airless bodies.
"LADEE is part of a much broader scientific exploration of the solar system," said John Grunsfeld, NASA's associate administrator for science.
The $280 million mission also includes an experimental laser optical communications system that NASA hopes to incorporate into future planetary probes, including a Mars rover scheduled for launch in 2020.
The prototype is based on technology used in terrestrial fiber-optic communications systems, such as Verizon's FiOS. NASA says the system should be at least six times faster than conventional radio communications. Also, its transmitters and receivers weigh half as much as similar radio communications equipment and use 25 percent less power.
"On the Earth, we've been using laser communication and fiber optics to power our Internet and everything else for the last couple of decades," Grunsfeld said. "NASA has really been wanting to make that same technological leap and put it into space. This is our chance to do that."
LADEE's optical communications system, which includes three ground stations in addition to LADEE, will be tested before the probe drops into a low lunar orbit to begin its science mission about 60 days after launch.
Just getting to the moon will take LADEE 30 days - 10 times longer than the Apollo missions due to the probe's relatively low-powered Minotaur 5 launcher.
The rocket is comprised of three refurbished intercontinental ballistic missile motors and two commercially provided boosters. The Minotaur 5 configuration will be flying for the first time with LADEE.
The use of decommissioned missile components drove the decision to fly from NASA's Wallops Island facility, one of only a few launch sites permitted to fly refurbished ICBMs under U.S.-Russian arms control agreements.
NASA sending a robot to the moon to examine bizarre discovery | Weird | News | Toronto Sun
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,418
1,668
113
The Apollo astronauts saw many mysterious things on the Moon, including artificial-looking structures such as transparent domes.

Neil Armstrong saw something so extraordinary on the Moon that it changed his life forever and eventually led to the abandonment of the manned lunar programmes.

He refused to talk in public about what he saw, but sources have revealed that he saw humongous craft of unknown origin on the surface watching him and Buzz descending from the lander.

HAM radio operators receiving the VHF signals directly picked up the following message which was screened by NASA from the public.


Mission Control:What's there ? Mission Control calling Apollo 11.

Apollo 11:These babies are huge, sir ... enormous....Oh, God, you wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other space craft out there... lined up on the far side of the crater edge... they're on the moon watching us.

During the transmission of the Moon landing of Armstrong and Aldrin, two minutes of silence occurred in which the image and sound were interrupted. NASA insisted that this problem was the result of one of the television cameras which had overheated, thus interfering with the reception.

This unexpected problem surprised even the most qualified of viewers who were unable to explain how in such a costly project, one of the most essential elements could break down... Some time after the historic Moon landing, Christopher Craft, director of the base in Houston, made some surprising comments when he left NASA.

Author Sam Pepper (otherwise unidentified and he has since vanished) gave this version of "the top secret tape transcript" from "a leak close to the top", as follows:


Moon:Those are giant things. No, no, no - this is not an optical illusion. No one is going to believe this !
Houston:What ... what ... what ? What the h--- is happening ? What's wrong with you ?
Moon:They're here under the surface.
Houston:What's there ? (muffled noise) Emission interrupted; interference control calling 'Apollo 11'
Moon:We saw some visitors. They were here for a while, observing the instruments
Houston:Repeat your last information !
Moon:I say that there were other spaceships. They're lined up in the other side of the crater !Houston:Repeat, repeat !
Moon:Let us sound this orbita ... in 625 to 5 ... Automatic relay connected ... My hands are shaking so badly I can't do anything. Film it ? G--, if these d--ned cameras have picked up anything - what then ?
Houston:Have you picked up anything ?
Moon:I didn't have any film at hand. Three shots of the saucers or whatever they were that were ruining the film
Houston:Control, control here. Are you on your way ? What is the uproar with the UFOs over ?
Moon:They've landed here. There they are and they're watching us
Houston:The mirrors, the mirrors - have you set them up ?
Moon:Yes, they're in the right place. But whoever made those spaceships surely can come tomorrow and remove them. Over and out.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiIoBpIDogw&feature=player_detailpage

Go here to read Armstrong and Buzz talking about the mysterous objects theys aw on the Moon: Astronauts Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins & Buzz Aldrin talk about UFOs
 
Last edited:

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,615
7,093
113
Washington DC
We should pair each wackaloon who is convinced that the Apollo landings found (fill in your delusion here) with a wackaloon who insists that the landings were faked in the Arizona desert.

It would be the ultimate geek-fight.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,418
1,668
113
We should pair each wackaloon who is convinced that the Apollo landings found (fill in your delusion here) with a wackaloon who insists that the landings were faked in the Arizona desert.

It would be the ultimate geek-fight.

The Apollo astronauts saw a lot of mysterious things on the Moon. They even said so themselves.

The fact is, the Americans were only the first HUMANS on the Moon. But there were definitely other beings there long before you.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,615
7,093
113
Washington DC
It wouldn't surprise me.

And we would have done it using our own technology, not that taught to you by Nazis.
Almost makes you wonder. . . why haven't you? Being all superior and stuff.

Woulda been kinda funny. You coulda had a 200-rocket pileup on the Moon. Or had your spacecraft shooting each other down.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,418
1,668
113
Almost makes you wonder. . . why haven't you?

How do you know we haven't and that the authorities have kept it all secret? That would explain the artificial structures that astronauts saw on the Moon, such as transparent domes. Either that or it's aliens, which is also likely.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,615
7,093
113
Washington DC
How do you know we haven't and that the authorities have kept it all secret? That would explain the artificial structures that astronauts saw on the Moon, such as transparent domes. Either that or it's aliens, which is also likely.
Little thing called radar. Y'all actually did invent it, unlike most of the stuff you claim. Arthur C. Clarke was instrumental in its development.

As to the rest, you go ahead on and blither as much as you please. Kinda funny.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,418
1,668
113
I like the way you think.

It's funny.

Well, it's true.

Radar could have been invented in 1811 for all you know, but its invention could have been kept a secret by the country who invented it because they don't want people to know they were using it at the time.

It's like photography. I reckon it's only a matter of time before somebody stumbles across a photograph of the Trojan War (which actually occurred in England; if you don't believe me, Google it) or the execution of King Charles I outside Banqueting House in January 1649, and then we'll have to rewrite the history of photography.

Explains your belief in a Big Daddy In The Sky, that's for certain sure

Shock horror. Christian believes in God. Why don't you contact Reuters? It might knock the huge pile up in Kent off Sky News.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,615
7,093
113
Washington DC
Well, it's true.

Radar could have been invented in 1811 for all you know, but its invention could have been kept a secret by the country who invented it because they don't want people to know they were using it at the time.

It's like photography. I reckon it's only a matter of time before somebody stumbles across a photograph of the Trojan War (which actually occurred in England; if you don't believe me, Google it) or the execution of King Charles I outside Banqueting House in January 1649, and then we'll have to rewrite the history of photography.
It's the quality of your logic. Make a ridiculous statement, unsupported by a scintilla of evidence, then smugly claim no-one can disprove you.



Shock horror. Christian believes in God. Why don't you contact Reuters? It might knock the huge pile up in Kent off Sky News.
No shock. No horror. Just amusement. The English probably lead the world in believing perfect rubbish.