What do you call a person who is too face-saving , he can never take criticisms , he hates being commented and he gets mad whenever people point out his mistakes ?
Give me a common word to call this kind of person please !

I'm studying English and I have a question :
What do you call a person who is too face-saving , he can never take criticisms , he hates being commented and he gets mad whenever people point out his mistakes ?
Give me a common word to call this kind of person please !

I was thinking more along the lines of "nobody can tell me I'm wrong". Just can't think of the word.

charlesbb wondered:
"What do you call a person who is too face-saving , he can never take criticisms , he hates being commented and he gets mad whenever people point out his mistakes ?"
The answer is obvious: BARAK HUSSAIN OBAMA.
Or on a much, much lower level, SirJosephPorter.

charlesbb wondered:
"What do you call a person who is too face-saving , he can never take criticisms , he hates being commented and he gets mad whenever people point out his mistakes ?"
The answer is obvious: BARAK HUSSAIN OBAMA.
Or on a much, much lower level, SirJosephPorter.

Try curmudgeon (usually associated with men past their prime)

CharlesbbSensitive - Overly-sensitive or Insecure (mentioned before).If it a personal insult, he/she could be quite normal and have a valid reaction of anger.

I'm studying English and I have a question :
What do you call a person who is too face-saving , he can never take criticisms , he hates being commented and he gets mad whenever people point out his mistakes ?
Give me a common word to call this kind of person please !

This query has led me to wonder what a good word would be for the "deliverer" of insult.Are they insecure, lacking in empathy for others, lacking in knowledge, or basically rude/crude?

Hi JLM - I often wonder why people choose to lead with a sword - it solves nothing, it disarms another from entering into an interesting discussion and comes off to readers as neanderthal. Yet people engage this type of response all the time - and it doesn't lend itself to discussion which is the purpose of a forum isn't it?