Horwath promises provincial pharmacare if elected in 2018

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Ontario’s NDP is pledging to create a provincial pharmacare plan, appealing to the grassroots about a year out from the start of next year’s election campaign.

Leader Andrea Horwath announced the policy Saturday in a speech to about 1,000 delegates at the party’s convention.

“Seeing a doctor just doesn’t mean much if you need a prescription, but you can’t afford to fill it,” she said.

“Just like Tommy Douglas started in one province and built Medicare step-by-step, we’re going to start building universal pharmacare right here in Ontario,” Horwath said, prompting a standing ovation.

“I believe leadership is about telling people what your vision is and what it is you plan on doing,” Horwath said later in a not-so-veiled shot at Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown.

Brown has come under fire for backing away from an earlier pledge to release his plan on hydro “soon,” and has been hesitant to make many grand policy pronouncements before his party’s convention this fall.

Horwath largely took aim at the Liberal government, saying Premier Kathleen Wynne denied there was a hydro crisis until it became a political crisis for her party.

Her speech was heavy on other NDP staples: public assets, a $15 minimum wage, worker protections, child care and transit funding.

An NDP government would work with First Nations to improve education and ensure clean drinking water, proper health care and safe housing — and would then send the bill to the federal government, Horwath said.

The NDP has also proposed to buy back shares of Hydro One — the government has sold 30 per cent and intends to sell up to 60 per cent.

The party said it would buy back shares back at a cost of between $3.3 billion and $4.1 billion, financed through the province’s share of its profit from Hydro One within eight years — assuming 70 per cent of the approximately $700 million in revenue it has previously generated for the province.

The Liberals have said returning Hydro One to full public ownership wouldn’t take a penny off people’s bills.

The New Democrat hydro plan also proposes to end mandatory time-of-use pricing, reduce the delivery charge for rural customers and renegotiate power contracts.

‘Just like Tommy Douglas’: Andrea Horwath promises provincial pharmacare if elected in 2018 | National Post
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
You mean like OHIP is....?

Yes, except that the OHIP premium will go up to cover the new expenditure. I'd go for it (I'm almost 61 and will use it a lot) if Ontario's books were in better shape but this province is already wrung out, quite enough.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
“I believe leadership is about telling people what your vision is and what it is you plan on doing,” Horwath said later in a not-so-veiled shot at Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown.

Brown has come under fire for backing away from an earlier pledge to release his plan on hydro “soon,” and has been hesitant to make many grand policy pronouncements before his party’s convention this fall.
If leadership is telling people what your vision is and what you plan on doing, then everyone qualifies as a leader. Brown is a putz, and I'm a card carrying Conservative. The Liberals have proven to be incompetent. The NDP under Rae buried us in debt. Who's left?
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Duelling drug plans set stage for pharmacare election in Ontario

The two drug programs differ in some key aspects, but they share a crucial political effect: putting the Progressive Conservatives and their leader Patrick Brown on the spot.

Voters are likely to compare the NDP and Liberal plans to see how they measure up, and for now will just have to wonder what the PCs will propose.

"I would have a drug access plan that is fair," Brown told reporters during a news conference Thursday, but offered no specifics. "Of course everyone wants greater drug coverage. The question I would ask is, I want to make sure those precious taxpayer dollars are going to the people that really need it."

The NDP's drug plan, which it unveiled on Saturday, would cover people of all ages, but would only include 125 different types of prescription medication.

The Liberal drug plan, laid out in Thursday's budget, would only cover people age 24 and under, yet would cover some 4,400 medications — every prescription drug covered by the existing Ontario Drug Benefit Plan for seniors and people with lower incomes.

The Liberals are defending their decision to make the drug plan open to everyone in the age group, regardless of family income. During Thursday's news conference, a reporter asked "Why should a millionaire's child have their drugs covered by taxpayers?"

"You want to income test, and we're not doing that when it comes to our children," Sousa replied. "Universal health care applies to everybody equally."

Duelling drug plans set stage for pharmacare election in Ontario - Toronto - CBC News







Ontario budget 2017: Free prescription drugs for anyone under 25, a first of its kind, Liberals say - Toronto - CBC News
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Experts can argue whether the Liberal pharmacare plan is better or worse than that pitched by Andrea Horwath’s Ontario New Democrats. The NDP proposes a scheme that would cover everyone under 65 but only for 125 commonly prescribed drugs.

But the Liberals have the advantage of being in power right now. If they follow through on their promise, their truncated pharmacare plan will come into effect next January.

I suspect they will follow through because this idea is likely to be popular. And once a popular pharmacare scheme is in place, it will be politically difficult for any government to kill it.

Fiscally, the Liberal drug plan has the advantage of being cheap — largely because younger people tend to be in good health. Officials say it will cost roughly $465 million a year, a relatively small amount for a government that spends more than $140 billion annually.

Politically, the drug scheme is a classic pre-election Liberal feint to the left. After years of foundering and with an election due in 2018, Wynne has rediscovered the virtue of activist government.

Health care spending, in particular, is being boosted. The government kept the lid screwed tight. It is loosening it.

If re-elected, the Liberals may return to their tight-fisted ways. They have done so before. Their surprise decision to authorize the sale of Hydro One demonstrates that the Wynne Liberals are infinitely flexible.

But they will find it politically difficult to reverse themselves on pharmacare. It is the missing piece of medicare. Voters understand that.

Voters also understand that employee health benefit plans are in decline. Employers find them too expensive. Precarious workers rarely, if ever, qualify for them.

For these reasons, any move toward universal publicly funded pharmacare is welcome and probably irreversible. Progressive Conservative leader Patrick Brown told reporters Thursday that he would prefer a scheme that is means-tested. But Ontario already has a drug benefit program for the poor.

What is useful about this scheme is precisely what Brown doesn’t like about it: It is a step on the road to universal pharmacare.

Sousa told reporters that he hopes Ontario’s move will persuade Ottawa and other provinces to act. Perhaps it will.

But if that doesn’t happen, this budget at least commits Ontario to something. It makes no sense to exclude out-of-hospital drug therapy from public health insurance. It never has.

There is much in this budget that is unsatisfactory. Welfare rates adjusted for inflation remain flat. The problems faced by seniors trying to get long-term care are not really addressed. As NDP leader Horwath noted, even the pharmacare proposals have a haphazard air about them.

But at least the government has promised something positive. I don’t know whether this will be enough to give the Liberals a victory in the next election. I don’t know whether the Liberals deserve a victory in the next election.

However, if they manage to get this thing going in January, they do deserve, at the very least, a round of one-handed applause.

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/com...pplause-for-youth-pharmacare-plan-walkom.html
 

Groot

Time Out
Apr 28, 2017
107
0
16
The Libs steal ideas because they have none of their own.

Anyone who votes Liberal in the next provincial election needs an EEG.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
10,607
5,250
113
Olympus Mons
Sousa told reporters that he hopes Ontario’s move will persuade Ottawa and other provinces to act. Perhaps it will.
Oh great, more Libtard policies based on a hope and a prayer. F*cking Liberals avoid evidence-based policy like it's the plague or something.