Yeah Colpy, this one seems to be aiming the law at a person it wasn't intended for. maknig an example for pedophiles out of someone who truly doesn't seem to be one, seems over the top. It seems like one that needs to be found guilty, yes, but at 20 years? Even 12 years JLM seems excessive.
The kid needs a couple of solid kicks in the **** and an apology tour to every parent of every child in the class. Additional kicks to be applied as needed...
Then it needs to be forgotten.
My God we've gotten off-track.
sexually victimize a child, or just create art that LOOKS like you sexually victimize a child
It plays to the fact that there are whole groups of pedophiles who get off on introducing kids to sex.... leaving porn mags out for them, letting them see them naked, telling them about sex, etc. A video all about kids watching you sit and talk about sex is porn for some people. And when it comes to portraying sexual victimization of children, even in that context, reality doesn't matter as far as the law is concerned. Portraying it is enough.
More evidence at how dumb the western world is and how horribly they treat their citizens.
This is nothing but a joke, a poor joke nothing that I find particularly funny, but nothing distasteful either. However jail for 20 years? LOL @ USA.
Got any kids?
No....but you're an expert.
I have two grown children.......both of whom are sane, independent, intelligent, good caring people.........and they both seem to like me.
One of whom is an excellent father.
Come talk to me when you have grown kids.
And here is the clue in raising them: actions have consequences.
Using peoples children in a widely publicized video without permission and including material that is questionable at best may not be criminal, but it is exceptionally bad behaviour, and needs to be corrected.
You don't need to be an expert on children or have any of your own to know facing 20 years is extremely excessive for a dumb joke. More overreacting from overprotective housewives imo.