Wakefield study connecting measles vaccine to autism was a fraud

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
54
Oshawa
Here's a real shock.....

LONDON—The first study to link a childhood vaccine to autism was based on doctored information about the children involved, according to a new report on the widely discredited research.
The conclusions of the 1998 paper by Andrew Wakefield and colleagues was renounced by 10 of its 13 authors and later retracted by the medical journal Lancet, where it was published. Still, the suggestion the MMR shot was connected to autism spooked parents worldwide and immunization rates for measles, mumps and rubella have never fully recovered.
A new examination found, by comparing the reported diagnoses in the paper to hospital records, that Wakefield and colleagues altered facts about patients in their study.
The analysis, by British journalist Brian Deer, found that despite the claim in Wakefield’s paper that the 12 children studied were normal until they had the MMR shot, five had previously documented developmental problems. Deer also found that all the cases were somehow misrepresented when he compared data from medical records and the children’s parents.
Wakefield could not be reached for comment despite repeated calls and requests to the publisher of his recent book, which claims there is a connection between vaccines and autism that has been ignored by the medical establishment. Wakefield now lives in the U.S. where he enjoys a vocal following including celebrity supporters like Jenny McCarthy.
Deer’s article was paid for by the Sunday Times of London and Britain’s Channel 4 television network. It was published online Thursday in the medical journal, BMJ.
In an accompanying editorial, BMJ editor Fiona Godlee and colleagues called Wakefield’s study “an elaborate fraud.” They said Wakefield’s work in other journals should be examined to see if it should be retracted.
Last May, Wakefield was stripped of his right to practise medicine in Britain. Many other published studies have shown no connection between the MMR vaccination and autism.
But measles has surged since Wakefield’s paper was published and there are sporadic outbreaks in Europe and the U.S. In 2008, measles was deemed endemic in England and Wales.

.....the climate change denial industry should recruit this guy.

Of course this is a smear campaign by big pharma, bankers and Al Gore.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
Well, I wonder what Stretch would have to say about that. Probably your last sentence about covers it. I fearlessly predict this will have no effect on the anti-vaccination movement, it's big enough to be self-perpetuating. The loons will just maintain their junk science web sites and continue to cite each other in support of each other, the gas heads will continue to insist maternal instincts trump science's findings, ignorant celebrities will continue to promote it, corrupt physicians will continue to lend them pseudoscientific credibility, and the scientifically illiterate media will continue to give them credulous coverage. And some children will be seriously damaged by or die of completely and easily preventable diseases.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
Well, I wonder what Stretch would have to say about that. Probably your last sentence about covers it. I fearlessly predict this will have no effect on the anti-vaccination movement, it's big enough to be self-perpetuating. The loons will just maintain their junk science web sites and continue to cite each other in support of each other, the gas heads will continue to insist maternal instincts trump science's findings, ignorant celebrities will continue to promote it, corrupt physicians will continue to lend them pseudoscientific credibility, and the scientifically illiterate media will continue to give them credulous coverage. And some children will be seriously damaged by or die of completely and easily preventable diseases.




well said
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Looks like counter double agent spin by the Illuminati.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Well, I wonder what Stretch would have to say about that. Probably your last sentence about covers it. I fearlessly predict this will have no effect on the anti-vaccination movement, it's big enough to be self-perpetuating. The loons will just maintain their junk science web sites and continue to cite each other in support of each other, the gas heads will continue to insist maternal instincts trump science's findings, ignorant celebrities will continue to promote it, corrupt physicians will continue to lend them pseudoscientific credibility, and the scientifically illiterate media will continue to give them credulous coverage. And some children will be seriously damaged by or die of completely and easily preventable diseases.

Yup. They are circling the wagons now.

The media as usual carries a large portion of the blame. There simply aren't enough journalists out there with sufficient science background to do thorough reporting, and to accurately relay the context. Telling both sides of the story without explaining that for many of the controversies that exist in mainstream science knowledge today, that both sides are not in fact equal in validity.

As an example, Lorne Gunter has an awful piece up on the NP today about this years influenza outbreak in Ontario. The vaccination rate is down this year, following the swine flu pandemic last year, and so now the cases of influenza go up...he quotes one doctor who says that the panic was unneccessary. That is contentious, and this kind of reporting only galvanizes this kind of response we see in Ontario from the public. When scientists relay risks, and the uncertainty is great, it's prudent to take precaution, when so many people could easilly have died. But Gunter goes off on a tirade about the UN and other bureaucrats, he chastizes public health officials without fully characterizing the risks, and pressures with keeping populations safe, and then he goes on to explain that it is no wonder that Canadians have such a low faith in "expert exhortations" as he calls it.

He completely exonerates by omission, the place that the media reaction has had in ensuring this negative public reaction to immunization programs:
When experts last season were accused of crying wolf, they deflected criticism by insisting that even if they were overreacting, it was better to be too cautious than not cautious enough. But that’s simply not true. If the hysteria generated by over-the-top flu warnings last year is causing increased hospitalizations and deaths this year, then last year’s pandemic panic arguably did more harm than good.
It's up to the media to accurately report not only the advice from scientists and health officials, but to also report on the uncertainty. It's the uncertainty about what could happen, not what will happen, that makes the strong case for immunization as a precaution.

I'm not surprised that Lorne is printing more garbage, he is consistently caught misrepresenting matters scientific.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
I was a bit surprised at the amount of out and out fabrication in that autsim study - interesting that some of the kids had autism before vaccination.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
I was a bit surprised at the amount of out and out fabrication in that autsim study - interesting that some of the kids had autism before vaccination.

Someday this may be viewed as a bigger fraud than Piltdown man is.