
Oh yeah,steve was such a hero when he knocked 2% off the gst,something I don't think made a bit of difference since the "middle men'sucked it up by jacking the price of everything up that 2%. NOW that steve and his lackys have got us,what about sixty billion in the hole we;'er going to see higher taxes and more cuts ,but just to stuff that affect the average,low/mid income earner.

We got the GST cut, then hubby and I decided we could push it a little further and drop our rate of consumerism down.
We grow a lot more of our own food, don't drive unless it is carpooling or unless we need to, almost dropped off the grid, and so on. Gov't gets quite a bit less from us than it used to. A lot of it was wasted anyway so now we can put it to good use.

That's the spirit Anna- I kind of like the old Barter System, it's good in that besides saving you money it makes it tougher for the Gov't. to get their nose into your business. ( I can grow Swiss Chard really good if you wanna grow spuds)

We got the GST cut, then hubby and I decided we could push it a little further and drop our rate of consumerism down.
We grow a lot more of our own food, don't drive unless it is carpooling or unless we need to, almost dropped off the grid, and so on. Gov't gets quite a bit less from us than it used to. A lot of it was wasted anyway so now we can put it to good use.

That is why income tax cut is much fairer than GST cut. In addition to the fact that GST disproportionately favours the rich, GST depends upon the old trickle down economics. The idea is that reward the businesses (or the rich) by cutting GST and they will pass on the savings to the customer. But they are under no obligation to do so; no doubt some of them simply jack up the prices to compensate for it.
And yes, Conservatives have got us the biggest deficit we have ever had, they even topped the second biggest deficit we ever had (not surprisingly, also incurred by a conservative, Mulroney).

I think a resouce tax kind of does that. You want the government to build more roads? No problem; buy more gas and you'll pay more taxes for the government to build more roads. You think the government builds too many roads? no problem; reduce your gas consumption and the government will have less money to build roads with. It would just go hand in hand quite nicely. Besides, the more you drive, the more roads we need and vice versa. If taxes relate to consumption, they won't need to be raised and dropped all the time since they'd naturally flow with the market.

This might sound silly, but I spent all night one day to solve this problem. My solution was to raise tax to %75 and have a stimulus package that refunds %25 of the total pot in the government tresurey as a monthly payback stimulus check. What happens is that your first monthly stimulus refund could be as high as $200,000.
It is a rapid money generating sceme that splits the tresurery's pot 50-50 with the people per month.
I got the idea from the U.S. Stimulus Package. They tried the same approach as my theory just backwards taxing $1 for every welfare reciepient in the states, who all got $300 in a stimulus payment. If you divide it up they all made $25 a month on $1 a year tax using this method.