U.S., Russia sign historic nuclear treaty

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
54
Oshawa
This hasn't been discussed do I thouhgt I'd start a thread and see where it goes.

PRAGUE-Reaching anew for peace, President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Thursday signed a treaty to shrink their nations’ nuclear arsenals, the biggest such pact between the former Cold War foes in a generation.
Tenaciously negotiated by even the leaders themselves, the treaty commits their nations to slash the number of strategic nuclear warheads by one-third and more than halve the number of missiles, submarines and bombers carrying them.
In a lavish chamber within the Czech capital’s presidential castle complex, the two presidents put their names to history. The treaty must be now be ratified by Russia’s parliament and by the U.S. Senate, where the White House lobbying effort is under way.
“Today is an important milestone for nuclear security and nonproliferation, and for U.S.-Russia relations,” Obama said. Medvedev hailed the signing as a historic event that would launch a new chapter of co-operation between the countries.
The new treaty will shrink the limit of nuclear warheads to 1,550 per country over seven years. That still allows for mutual destruction several times over. But it is intended to send a strong signal that Russia and the U.S. — which between them own more than 90 per cent of the world’s nuclear weapons — are serious about disarmament.
“The result we have obtained is good,” Medvedev said.
Inside the hall, the anticipated moment came as the two presidents picked up their pens, glanced at each other and grinned as they signed several documents, with aides transferring the papers back and forth so all would have both signatures. When it was done, the leaders seemed momentarily at a loss, with Medvedev flashing a smile and a shrug before they stood to shake hands.
Obama said the treaty sets a foundation for further cuts in nuclear arms.
And he pledged more conversation with Medvedev about missile defence, which remains a sticky issue between the countries as the U.S. moves ahead with plans it calls no threat to Russia. Obama said the missile defence system envisioned is not aimed at changing the “strategic balance” with Russia but rather as a way to counter launches from other countries.
Medvedev said he was optimistic about reaching a compromise on the matter.

Source


....a little something for Fox fawners as well.

Ciao off to Montreal to see the wrist slitter on Saturday night.:lol:

Go Habs?
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,609
99
48
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
As I see it, it's like having a hundred $50 bills in your pocket because you're a millionaire, you grab the pennies in your other pocket that sum up to about 23 cents total, and toss them away.

You're still filthy rich.

In relation, reducing your stock piles of nuclear weapons and patting yourself on the back for it is all for show when you still have enough nuclear weapons to pretty well wipe out the entire human population, and still fully capable of building more if needed.

This doesn't make any difference in the long run, it doesn't give any positive message and those still wanting to build nuclear weapons still want to build them.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
In relation, reducing your stock piles of nuclear weapons and patting yourself on the back for it is all for show when you still have enough nuclear weapons to pretty well wipe out the entire human population, and still fully capable of building more if needed.
It's been going on since they discovered how to make atoms go boom and decided to make a show of peace and reason. It's a facade, I agree.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
As I see it, it's like having a hundred $50 bills in your pocket because you're a millionaire, you grab the pennies in your other pocket that sum up to about 23 cents total, and toss them away.

You're still filthy rich.

In relation, reducing your stock piles of nuclear weapons and patting yourself on the back for it is all for show when you still have enough nuclear weapons to pretty well wipe out the entire human population, and still fully capable of building more if needed.

This doesn't make any difference in the long run, it doesn't give any positive message and those still wanting to build nuclear weapons still want to build them.

Exactly. It will be like cleaning out the garage and dumping the old nukes taking up space.

Nothing big at all.