I guess my sentiments are little different from the mainstream. When it comes to guys f*****g around with little children, I think any accomplishments are automatically negated. How can the harm of destroying a child be compensated?
It was never demonstrated that he did any such thing. The first case was settled out of court (for about $3 million I think) and the details didn't become public as far as I know. The whole thing struck me as greedy parents trying to exploit a situation for financial gain. In the second he was acquitted. What you're saying is actionable; it's libel.
YOU'RE WRONG- he's considered a celebrity, but regardless, it doesn't take rocket science to figure out he was guilty, may be proving it is tough, but knowing it isn't.
When is bedtime at the Jackson house? When the big hand touches the little hand.